Individual-level behavioral responses of immature green turtles to snorkeler disturbance
Despite many positive benefits of ecotourism, increased human encounters with wildlife may have detrimental effects on wild animals. As charismatic megafauna, nesting and foraging sea turtles are increasingly the focus of ecotourism activities. The purpose of our study was to quantify the behavioral responses of immature green turtles (Chelonia mydas) to disturbance by snorkelers, and to investigate whether turtles have individual-level responses to snorkeler disturbance. Using a standardized disturbance stimulus in the field, we recorded turtle behaviors pre- and post-disturbance by snorkelers. Ninety percent of turtles disturbed by snorkeler (n = 192) initiated their flights at distances of ≤3 m. Using principal component analysis, we identified two distinct turtle personality types, ‘bold’ and ‘timid’, based upon 145 encounters of 19 individually identified turtles and five disturbance response variables. There was significant intra-individual repeatability in behavioral responses to disturbance, but bolder turtles had more behavioral plasticity and less consistent responses than more timid individuals. Bolder individuals with reduced evasion responses might be at a higher risk of shark predation, while more timid turtles might have greater energetic consequences due to non-lethal predator effects and repeated snorkeler disturbance. Over the longer term, a turtle population with a mix of bold and timid individuals may promote more resilient populations. We recommend that snorkelers maintain >3 m distance from immature green turtles when snorkeling, and that ecotourism activities be temporally and spatially stratified. Further, turtle watching guidelines need to be communicated to both tour operators and independent snorkelers to reduce the disturbance of turtles.
KeywordsEcotourism Flight initiation distance Principal component analysis Personality Repeatability
We like to thank Dr. Craig Lilyestrom and Carlos Diez (Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico), Ricardo Colón-Merced and Ana Roman (Culebra National Wildlife Refuge, US Fish and Wildlife Service), and Todd Plaia (Culebra Divers) for logistical support. We thank Diego Morell Parea (Culebra Adventures) for his support and additional data collection. Further, we would like to thank Chris Haak and Sarah Becker for field assistance. We would also like to thank Dr. Curtice Griffin for writing assistance and Dr. Kevin McGarigal, Blake Massey, and Dr. Chi-Yun Kuo for assistance with statistical analyses. Finally, we would like to thank the Associate Editor, Dr. Aaron Wirsing, and all of the anonymous reviewers for their time and insightful comments on the manuscript.
Author contribution statement
LPG and AJD conceived the study. LPG, JWB, TOG, SJC, ADMW, and AJD designed the methodology. LPG, JWB, and TOG conducted the fieldwork. LPG analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors provided editorial advice and assisted with revisions.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists. Funding source had no involvement in study design collection, and analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. LG was partially supported by the University of Massachusetts Intercampus Marine Science Graduate Program and the Allen Family Foundation. JB is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Berkeley Marine Conservation Fellowship from the American Fisheries Society. TG was partially supported by the University of Massachusetts Environmental Conservation Department. AD was partially supported by UPR Sea Grant.
- Ashley C, Roe D (1998) Enhancing community involvement in wildlife tourism: issues and challenges. Wildlife and Development Series: No. 11, International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Balazs GH, Forsyth RG, Kam AKH (1987) Preliminary assessment of habitat utilization by Hawaiian green turtles in their resident foraging pastures. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFC-71, pp 1–107Google Scholar
- Bejder L (2005) Linking short and long-term effects of nature-based tourism on cetaceans. PhD dissertation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB, Chaloupka MY (2000) Green turtle somatic growth model: evidence for density dependence. Ecol Appl 10:269–282Google Scholar
- Bolten A (2003) Variation in sea turtle life history patterns: neritic versus oceanic developmental stages. In: Lutz PL, Musick J, Wyneken J (eds) The Biology of Sea Turtles II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 243–257Google Scholar
- Constantine R, Bejder L (2008) Managing the whale-and dolphin-watching industry: time for a paradigm shift. In: Higham J, Lück M (eds) Marine wildlife and tourism management: insights from the natural and social sciences. CABI, Oxford, pp 321–333Google Scholar
- Development Core Team, R (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Fennell DA (2015) Ecotourism, 4th edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gabrielsen GW, Smith EN (1995) Physiological responses of wildlife to disturbance. In: Knight RL, Gutzwiller KJ (eds) Wildlife and Recreationists. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 95–107Google Scholar
- Green R, Higginbottom K (2001) The negative effects of wildlife tourism on wildlife. Wildlife Tourism Research Report Series: No. 5, Status Assessment of Wildlife Tourism in Australia Series, CRC for Sustainable Tourism, Gold CoastGoogle Scholar
- Hayes CT, Baumbach DS, Juma D, Dunbar SG (2016) Impacts of recreational diving on hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) behavior in a marine protected area. J Sustain Tour 25:1–17Google Scholar
- Heppell S, Snover M, Crowder L (2003) Sea turtle population ecology. In: Lutz PL, Musick J, Wyneken J (eds) The biology of sea turtles II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 275–306Google Scholar
- Higginbottom K, Northrope C, Green R (2001) Positive effects of wildlife tourism on wildlife. Wildlife Tourism Research Report Series: No. 5, Status Assessment of Wildlife Tourism in Australia series, CRC for Sustainable Tourism, Gold CoastGoogle Scholar
- Jacobson SK, Lopez AF (1994) Biological impacts of ecotourism: tourists and nesting turtles in Tortuguero National Park, Costa Rica. Wildl Soc Bull 22:414–419Google Scholar
- Knight RL, Cole DN (1995) Wildlife responses to recreationists. In: Knight RL, Gutzwiller KJ (eds) Wildlife and recreationists. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 51–69Google Scholar
- Kostas P (2015) In-water behavior of the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) under the presence of humans (Homosapiens) in a major Mediterranean nesting site. In: Kaska Y, Sonmez B, Türkecan O, Sezgin Ҫ (eds) Book of abstracts of the 35th annual symposium on sea turtle biology and conservation. MARCAT Press, Denizli, p 250Google Scholar
- Lusseau D, Bejder L (2007) The long-term consequences of short-term responses to disturbance experiences from whalewatching impact assessment. Int J Comp Psychol 20:228–236Google Scholar
- Meadows D (2004) Behavior of green sea turtles in the presence and absence of recreational snorkelers. Mar Turtle Newsl 103:1–4Google Scholar
- Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 122–147Google Scholar
- Seminoff JA, Allen CD, Balazs GH, Dutton PH, Eguchi T, Haas HL, Hargrove SA, Jensen MP, Klemm DL, Lauritsen AM, MacPherson SL, Opay P, Possardt EE, Pultz SL, Seney EE, Van Houtan KS, Waples RS (2015) Status review of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) under the Endangered Species Act. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-539, pp 1–571Google Scholar
- Slater K (2014) CEA/Operating Wallacea immature green sea turtle monitoring report 2014. http://opwall.com/wp-content/uploads/2014-Turtle-Monitoring-Report.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2016
- Sokal R, Rohlf F (1981) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- The International Ecotourism Society (2006) TIES global ecotourism fact sheet. https://ibgeography-lancaster.wikispaces.com/file/view/TIES+GLOBAL+ECOTOURISM+FACT+SHEET.PDF. Accessed 04 Apr 2016