Diverse foraging opportunities drive the functional response of local and landscape-scale bear predation on Pacific salmon
- 424 Downloads
The relationship between prey abundance and predation is often examined in single habitat units or populations, but predators may occupy landscapes with diverse habitats and foraging opportunities. The vulnerability of prey within populations may depend on habitat features that hinder predation, and increased density of conspecifics in both the immediate vicinity and the broader landscape. We evaluated the relative effects of physical habitat, local, and neighborhood prey density on predation by brown bears on sockeye salmon in a suite of 27 streams using hierarchical Bayesian functional response models. Stream depth and width were inversely related to the maximum proportion of salmon killed, but not the asymptotic limit on total number killed. Interannual variation in predation was density dependent; the number of salmon killed increased with fish density in each stream towards an asymptote. Seven streams in two geographical groups with ≥23 years of data in common were then analyzed for neighborhood density effects. In most (12 of 18) cases predation in a stream was reduced by increasing salmon abundance in neighboring streams. The uncertainty in the estimates for these neighborhood effects may have resulted from interactions between salmon abundance and habitat that influenced foraging by bears, and from bear behavior (e.g., competitive exclusion) and abundance. Taken together, the results indicated that predator–prey interactions depend on density at multiple spatial scales, and on habitat features of the surrounding landscape. Explicit consideration of this context dependency should lead to improved understanding of the ecological impacts of predation across ecosystems and taxa.
KeywordsPredation Functional response Density Habitat Bears Salmon Hierarchical Bayes Ursus Oncorhynchus
We gratefully acknowledge the late Donald Rogers, who initiated bear predation work in the Wood River system and played the key role in maintaining the long-term research program on sockeye salmon in Bristol Bay. We also thank the many entities that have provided financial support for the program over the years, including the seafood industry, National Science Foundation’s BioComplexity and Coupled Natural and Human Systems programs, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Field work has been conducted by very many people but we especially thank Daniel Schindler and co-workers for the surveys of tributaries of Lake Nerka and other upper lakes in the Wood River system, and Jackie Carter and Chris Boatright for Lake Aleknagik tributaries, database management, and overall program assistance. Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the paper.
Author contribution statement
TPQ has been leading this study and collecting the data for over two decades. CJC assisted in data collection and did the Bayesian modeling. AJW assisted in data collection and conceptualization of the study. All authors contributed substantially to manuscript preparation.
- Hunsicker ME, Ciannelli L, Bailey KM, Buckel JA, White JW, Link JS, Essington TE, Gaichas S, Anderson TW, Brodeur RD, Chan K, Chen K, Englund G, Frank KT, Freitas V, Hixon MA, Hurst T, Johnson DW, Kitchell JF, Reese D, Rose GA, Sjodin H, Sydeman WJ, van der Veer HW, Vollset K, Zador S (2011) Functional responses and scaling in predator–prey interactions of marine fishes: contemporary issues and emerging concepts. Ecol Lett 14:1288–1299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marriott RA (1964) Stream catalog of the Wood River lake system, Bristol Bay, Alaska. Special Scientific Report, Fisheries 494, US Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:2–131Google Scholar
- Plummer M (2013) JAGS Version 3.4.0 user manualGoogle Scholar
- Quinn TP (2005) The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Quinn TP, Buck GB (2000) Scavenging by brown bears, Ursus arctos, and glaucous-winged gulls, Larus glaucescens, on adult sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can Field Nat 114:217–223Google Scholar
- R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Su Y, Yajima M (2015) R2jags: using R to Run ‘JAGS’. R package version 0.5-7Google Scholar
- Willson MF, Gende SM, Bisson PA (2004) Anadromous fishes as ecological links between ocean, fresh water, and land. In: Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR (eds) Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 284–300Google Scholar