Plant-soil feedbacks: a comparative study on the relative importance of soil feedbacks in the greenhouse versus the field
Interactions between plants and soil microorganisms influence individual plant performance and thus plant-community composition. Most studies on such plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) have been performed under controlled greenhouse conditions, whereas no study has directly compared PSFs under greenhouse and natural field conditions. We grew three grass species that differ in local abundance in grassland communities simultaneously in the greenhouse and field on field-collected soils either previously conditioned by these species or by the general grassland community. As soils in grasslands are typically conditioned by mixes of species through the patchy and heterogeneous plant species’ distributions, we additionally compared the effects of species-specific versus non-specific species conditioning on PSFs in natural and greenhouse conditions. In almost all comparisons PSFs differed between the greenhouse and field. In the greenhouse, plant growth in species-specific and non-specific soils resulted in similar effects with neutral PSFs for the most abundant species and positive PSFs for the less abundant species. In contrast, in the field all grass species tested performed best in non-specific plots, whereas species-specific PSFs were neutral for the most abundant and varied for the less abundant species. This indicates a general beneficial effect of plant diversity on PSFs in the field. Controlled greenhouse conditions might provide valuable insights on the nominal effects of soils on plants. However, the PSFs observed in greenhouse conditions may not be the determining drivers in natural plant communities where their effects may be overwhelmed by the diversity of abiotic and biotic above- and belowground interactions in the field.
KeywordsGrassland Plant performance Experimental environment Community assembly Plant diversity
We thank Ewald Weber for helpful comments on the manuscript, Frank Warschau for help in the field, Gabriele Gehrmann for help with the soil analyses and the Botanical Garden Potsdam for their cooperation.
Author contribution statement
J. H. designed the study. J. H., M. S. and A. S. performed the experiments. J. H., J. W., and J. J. analyzed the data. J. H., J. W. and J. J. wrote the first draft of the manuscript; all authors contributed substantially to the revisions.
- Bezemer TM, Lawson CS, Hedlund K, Edwards AR, Brook AJ, Igual JM, Mortimer SR, van der Putten WH (2006) Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant-soil feedback responses in two grasslands. J Ecol 94:893–904. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01158.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (2002) BIOLFLOR–eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 38Google Scholar
- Kulmatiski A, Kardol P (2008) Getting plant-soil feedbacks out of the greenhouse: experimental and conceptual approaches. In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Murata J (eds) Progress in botany 69. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 449–472. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72954-9_18
- Morris WF, Hufbauer RA, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Borowitz VA, Gilbert GS, Maron JL, Mitchell CE, Parker IM, Power AG, Torchin ME, Vàzquez DP (2007) Direct and interactive effects of enemies and mutualists on plant performance: a meta-analysis. Ecology 88:1021–1029. doi: 10.1890/06-0442 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939:1–19. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Soliveres S, Maestre FT, Ulbrich W, Manning P, Boch S, Bowker MA, Prati D, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Quero JL, Schöning I, Gallardo A, Weisser W, Müller J, Socher SA, García-Gómez M, Ochoa V, Schulze ED, Fischer M, Allen E (2015) Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. Ecol Lett 18:790–798. doi: 10.1111/ele.12456 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, Bever JD, Bezemer TM, Casper BB, Fukami T, Kardol P, Klironomos JN, Kulmatiski A, Schweitzer JA, Suding KN, van de Voorde TFJ, Wardle DA (2013) Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. J Ecol 101:265–276. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar