, Volume 180, Issue 4, pp 1223–1234 | Cite as

Seed predation and climate impacts on reproductive variation in temperate forests of the southeastern USA

Global change ecology – original research


Climatic effects on tree recruitment will be determined by the interactive effects of fecundity and seed predation. Evaluating how insect and vertebrate seed predators mediate tree reproductive responses to climate depends on long-term studies of seed production, development, and predation. In this study, our objectives were to (1) assess the effects of interannual climate variation on seed abortion rates, (2) assess the impact of seed density on predation rates, and (3) examine the degree to which density-dependent seed predation would amplify or dampen interannual variation in fecundity associated with seed abortion. We used a 19-year study of seed abortion and pre-dispersal predation rates by insects and vertebrates (birds and rodents) for five temperate tree species across forest plots from the North Carolina Piedmont to the Southern Appalachian Mountains in the southeastern USA. We found that rates of seed abortion and predation increased reproductive variation for oaks (Quercus species). Probability of seed abortion was greatest during years with cool, dry springs. Responses of seed predation on Quercus species to current year’s seed density varied by species, but exhibited positive density-dependence to previous year’s seed density consistent with numerical responses of seed predators. Seed abortion and predation rates for two drupe species responded little to variation in climate or seed density, respectively. Given that predation increased interannual variation in seed availability and the negative density-dependence to previous year’s seed density, our results indicate that consistent numerical responses of oak seed predators may amplify interannual variation due to climate-mediated processes like seed abortion.


Masting Reproductive ecology Seed abortion Seed predation Trees 



We would like to thank Norman Christensen, Fred Hain, Matthew Kwit, Megan Mobley, Ram Oren, Carl Salk, Anne Stein, Denis Valle, Kai Zhu, Ines Ibanez, and three anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. The research was supported by NSF Grants BSR-9444146, DEB 9453498, DEB-9632854, DEB-9981392, IDEA-0308498, DEB 0425465, SEII 0430693 and DDDAS 0540347, as well as the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. The experiments comply with the current laws of the United States of America in which the experiments were performed.

Author contribution statement

DMB and JSC conceived of and designed the study. JSC provided the long-term seed archives and DMB performed measurements. DMB designed and implemented the statistical modeling. DMB and JSC wrote the manuscript.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3537_MOESM1_ESM.docx (494 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 493 kb)
442_2015_3537_MOESM2_ESM.txt (11 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (TXT 10 kb)


  1. Allen RB, Mason NWH, Richardson SJ, Platt KH (2011) Synchronicity, periodicity and bimodality in inter-annual tree seed production along an elevation gradient. Oikos 121:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beal JA, Haliburton W, Knight FB (1952) Forest insects of the southeast: with special reference to species occurring in the Piedmont Plateau of North Carolina. Duke University School of Forestry Bulletin 14Google Scholar
  3. Buonaccorsi JP, Elkinton J, Koenig W et al (2003) Measuring mast seeding behavior: relationships among population variation, individual variation and synchrony. J Theor Biol 224:107–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook, Washington, No. 654, pp 675Google Scholar
  5. Cecich RA, Sullivan NH (1999) Influence of weather at time of pollination on acorn production of Quercus alba and Quercus velutina. Can J For Res 29:1817–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark JS, Macklin E, Wood L (1998) Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecol Monogr 68:213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark JS, Beckage B, Camill P et al (1999) Interpreting recruitment limitation in forests. Am J Bot 86:1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark JS, Bell D, Chu C et al (2010) High-dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence. Ecol Appl 80:569–608Google Scholar
  9. Clark JS, Bell DM, Hersh MH, Nichols L (2011) Climate change vulnerability of forest biodiversity: climate and competition tracking of demographic rates. Glob Change Biol 17:1834–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark JS, Bell DM, Kwit M et al (2012) Individual-scale inference to anticipate climate-change vulnerability of biodiversity. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:236–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crone EE, McIntire EJB, Brodie J (2011) What defines mast seeding? Spatio-temporal patterns of cone production by whitebark pine. J Ecol 99:438–444Google Scholar
  12. Espelta JM, Cortés P, Molowny-Horas R et al (2008) Masting mediated by summer drought reduces acorn predation in Mediterranean oak forests. Ecology 89:805–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Espelta JM, Bonal R, Sánchez-Humanes B (2009) Pre-dispersal acorn predation in mixed oak forests: interspecific differences are driven by the interplay among seed phenology, seed size and predator size. J Ecol 97:1416–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gelfand AE, Ghosh SK (1998) Model choice: a minimum posterior predictive loss approach. Biometrika 85:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Govindan BN, Kéry M, Swihart RK (2011) Host selection and responses to forest fragmentation in acorn weevils: inferences from dynamic occupancy models. Oikos 121:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrera CM, Jordano P, Guitián J, Traveset A (1998) Annual variability in seed production by woody plants and the masting concept: reassessment of principles and relationship to pollination and seed dispersal. Am Nat 152:576–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Houle G (1999) Mast seeding in Abies balsamea, Acer saccharum and Betula alleghaniensis in an old growth, cold temperate forest of north-eastern North America. J Ecol 87:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howe HF (1989) Scatter-and clump-dispersal and seedling demography: hypothesis and implications. Oecologia 79:417–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hughes J, Vogler AP (2004) Ecomorphological adaptation of acorn weevils to their oviposition site. Evolution 58:1971–1983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ichie T, Igarashi S, Yoshida S et al (2013) Are stored carbohydrates necessary for seed production in temperate deciduous trees? J Ecol 101:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Janzen DH (1971) Seed predation by animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:475–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jordano P, García C, Godoy JA, García-Castaño JL (2007) Differential contribution of frugivores to complex seed dispersal patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3278–3282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly D (1994) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol Evol 9:465–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly D, Hart DE, Allen RB (2001) Evaluating the wind pollination benefits of mast seeding. Ecology 82:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelly D, Geldenhuis A, James A et al (2013) Of mast and mean: differential-temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change. Ecol Lett 16:90–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Keyantash J, Dracup JA (2002) The quantification of drought: an evaluation of drought indices. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1167–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knops JMH, Koenig WD, Carmen WJ (2007) Negative correlation does not imply a tradeoff between growth and reproduction in California oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16982–16985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Koenig W, Knops J (2000) Patterns of annual seed production by northern hemisphere trees: a global perspective. Am Nat 155:59–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Koenig WD, Knops JMH (2014) Environmental correlates of acorn production by four species of Minnesota oaks. Popul Ecol 56:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koenig WD, Knops J, Carmen WJ et al (1996) Acorn production by oaks in central coastal California: influence of weather at three levels. Can J For Res 26:1677–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koenig WD, Kelly D, Sork VL et al (2003) Dissecting components of population-level variation in seed production and the evolution of masting behavior. Oikos 102:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koenig WD, Knops JMH, Carmen WJ, Pearse IS (2015) What drives masting? The phenological synchrony hypothesis. Ecology 96:184–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lombardo JA, McCarthy BC (2008) Silvicultural treatment effects on oak seed production and predation by acorn weevils in southeastern Ohio. For Ecol Manage 255:2566–2576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lombardo JA, McCarthy BC (2009) Seed germination and seedling vigor of weevil-damaged acorns of red oak. Can J For Res 39:1600–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maeto K, Ozaki K (2003) Prolonged diapause of specialist seed-feeders makes predator satiation unstable in masting of Quercus crispula. Oecologia 137:392–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Marquis DA, Eckert PL, Roach BA (1976) Acorn weevils, rodents, and deer all contribute to oak-regeneration difficulties in Pennsylvania. Research Paper NE-365, USDA Forest Service Northern Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. McShea WJ (2000) The influence of acorn crops on annual variation in rodent and bird populations. Ecology 81:228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mearns LO, Giorgi F, McDaniel L, Shields C (2003) Climate scenarios for the southeastern US based on GCM and regional model simulations. Clim Change 60:7–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miyazaki Y (2013) Dynamics of internal carbon resources during masting behavior in trees. Ecol Res 28:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morin X, Augspurger C, Chuine I (2007) Process-based modeling of species“distributions: what limits temperate tree species” range boundaries? Ecology 88:2280–2291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mund M, Kutsch WL, Wirth C et al (2010) The influence of climate and fructification on the inter-annual variability of stem growth and net primary productivity in an old-growth, mixed beech forest. Tree Physiol 30:689–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ostfeld RS, Keesing F (2000) Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:232–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostfeld RS, Jones CG, Wolff JO (1996) Of mice and mast. BioScience 46:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ostfeld RS, Canham CD, Oggenfuss K et al (2006) Climate, deer, rodents, and acorns as determinants of variation in lyme-disease risk. PLoS Biol 4:e145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearse IS, Koenig WD, Knops JMH (2013) Cues versus proximate drivers: testing the mechanism behind masting behavior. Oikos 123:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pearse IS, Koenig WD, Funk KA, Pesendorfer MB (2015) Pollen limitation and flower abortion in a wind-pollinated, masting tree. Ecology 96:587–593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pérez-Ramos IM, Urbieta IR, Marañón T et al (2008) Seed removal in two coexisting oak species: ecological consequences of seed size, plant cover and seed-drop timing. Oikos 117:1386–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pérez-Ramos IM, Ourcival JM, Limousin JM, Rambal S (2010) Mast seeding under increasing drought: results from a long-term data set and from a rainfall exclusion experiment. Ecology 91:3057–3068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Reid JL, Katsuki KN, Holl KD (2012) Do birds bias measurements of seed rain? J Trop Ecol 28:421–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sallabanks R, Courtney SP (1992) Frugivory, seed predation, and insect-vertebrate interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 37:377–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Samuels IA, Levey DJ (2005) Effects of gut passage on seed germination: do experiments answer the questions they ask? Funct Ecol 19:365–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Satake A, Bjørnstad ON (2004) Spatial dynamics of specialist seed predators on synchronized and intermittent seed production of host plants. Am Nat 163:591–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Satake A, Bjørnstad ON (2007) A resource budget model to explain intraspecific variation in mast reproductive dynamics. Ecol Res 23:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schauber EM, Kelly D, Turchin P et al (2002) Synchronous and asynchronous masting by 18 New Zealand plant species: the role of temperature cues and implications for climate change. Ecology 83:1214–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schnurr JL, Ostfeld RS, Canham CD (2002) Direct and indirect effects of masting on rodent populations and tree seed survival. Oikos 96:402–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sherry RA, Zhou X, Gu S et al (2007) Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:198–202CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Shibata M, Tanaka H, Nakashizuka T (1998) Causes and consequences of mast seed production of four co-occurring Carpinus species in Japan. Ecology 79:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shibata M, Tanaka H, Iida S et al (2002) Synchronized annual seed production by 16 principal tree species in a temperate deciduous forest, Japan. Ecology 83:1727–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Silvertown JW (1980) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding in trees. Biol J Linn Soc 14:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sork VL, Bramble J, Sexton O (1993) Ecology of mast-fruiting in three species of North American deciduous oaks. Ecology 74:528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Traveset A (1998) Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores’ guts on germination: a review. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 1:151–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vander Wall SB, Kuhn KM, Beck MJ (2005) Seed removal, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology 86:801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams CE (1989) Checklist of North American nut-infesting insects and host plants. J Entomol Sci 24:550–562Google Scholar
  64. Yi XF, Yang YQ, Zhang ZB (2010) Intra- and inter-specific effects of mast seeding on seed fates of two sympatric Corylus species. Vegetatio 212:785–793Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (Outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pacific Northwest Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Nicholas School of the EnvironmentDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations