, Volume 181, Issue 3, pp 635–644 | Cite as

Snow cover and late fall movement influence wood frog survival during an unusually cold winter

  • Jason H. O’ConnorEmail author
  • Tracy A. G. Rittenhouse
Highlighted Student Research


Understanding how organisms will respond to altered winter conditions is hampered by a paucity of information on the winter ecology for many species. Amphibians are sensitive to environmental temperature and moisture conditions and may be vulnerable to changes in winter climate. We used a combination of radio telemetry and field enclosures to monitor survival of the freeze-tolerant wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) during the unusually cold winter of 2013–2014. We experimentally manipulated snow cover to determine the effect of snow removal on winter survival. In addition, we placed a group of untracked frogs at locations used by tracked frogs prior to long-distance late fall movement to investigate whether late fall movement entailed survival consequences. Winter survival was highest (75.3 %) among frogs at post-movement locations that received natural snow cover. The odds of surviving the winter for frogs in the snow removal treatment was only 21.6 % that of frogs in the natural snow treatment. Likewise, paired frogs placed at pre-fall movement locations had only 35.1 % the odds of surviving as tracked frogs at post-fall movement locations. A comparison of a priori models that included microhabitat conditions measured at wood frog overwintering locations revealed that the minimum temperature experienced and the depth of the frog in the substrate explained additional variation in winter survival. Our results suggest that acute exposure to lethal temperature conditions is the most likely cause of mortality during this study, rather than energy exhaustion or desiccation. They also demonstrate the importance of snow cover to the winter survival of wood frogs.


Amphibian Overwintering ecology Survival Soil temperature Snow cover 



All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Assistance with field work was provided by MJ Evans, JM Hessenauer, KM O’Connor, A Stupik, R Hyland, H Morway, and S Banker. F Thompson, I Ortega and M Urban commented on draft manuscripts. This project also benefited from discussion during Rittenhouse-Vokoun lab group meetings. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful suggestions for improving the manuscript. The research was conducted under University of Connecticut animal care protocol #A13-044.

Author contribution statement

JHO and TAGR conceived and designed experiment. JHO conducted fieldwork. JHO and TAGR analyzed the data. JHO wrote the manuscript and TAGR provided editorial advice.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3450_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)


  1. Anholt BR, Hotz H, Guex G, Semlitsch RD (2003) Overwinter survival of Rana lessonae and its hemiclonal associate Rana esculenta. Ecology 84:391–397. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0391:OSORLA]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin RF, Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG (2006) Conservation planning for amphibian species with complex habitat requirements: a case study using movements and habitat selection of the wood frog Rana sylvatica. J Herpetol 40:442–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes BM (1989) Freeze avoidance in a mammal: body temperatures below 0 °C in an arctic hibernator. Science 244:1593–1595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benard MF (2014) Warmer winters reduce frog fecundity and shift breeding phenology, which consequently alters larval development and metamorphic timing. Global Change Biol. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12720 Google Scholar
  5. Bokhorst S, Phoenix GK, Bjerke JW, Callaghan TV, Huyer-Brugman F, Berg MP (2012) Extreme winter warming events more negatively impact small rather than large soil fauna: shift in community composition explained by traits not taxa. Glob Change Biol 18:1152–1162. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02565.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costanzo J, Lee R (2005) Cryoprotection by urea in a terrestrially hibernating frog. J Exp Biol 208:4079–4089. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01859 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Costanzo JP, Lee RE (2013) Avoidance and tolerance of freezing in ectothermic vertebrates. J Exp Biol 216:1961–1967CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Costanzo JP, Lee RE Jr, Wright MF (1991) Effect of cooling rate on the survival of frozen wood frogs, Rana sylvatica. J Comp Physiol B 161:225–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Costanzo JP, do Amaral MCF, Rosendale AJ, Lee RE (2013) Hibernation physiology, freezing adaptation and extreme freeze tolerance in a northern population of the wood frog. J Exp Biol 216:3461–3473. doi: 10.1242/jeb.089342 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costanzo JP, Reynolds AM, do Amaral MCF, Rosendale AJ, Lee RE Jr (2015) Cryoprotectants and extreme freeze tolerance in a subarctic population of the wood frog. PLoS One 10:e0117234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng X, Nielsen LL, Simpson MJ (2007) Responses of soil organic matter and microorganisms to freeze–thaw cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2027–2037. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths RA, Sewell D, McCrea RS (2010) Dynamics of a declining amphibian metapopulation: survival, dispersal and the impact of climate. Biol Conserv 143:485–491. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harper EB, Semlitsch RD (2007) Density dependence in the terrestrial life history stage of two anurans. Oecologia 153:879–889CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayhoe K, Wake C, Huntington T, Luo L, Schwartz M, Sheffield J, Wood E, Anderson B, Bradbury J, DeGaetano A, Troy T, Wolfe D (2007) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US northeast. Clim Dyn 28:381–407. doi: 10.1007/s00382-006-0187-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heemeyer JL, Lannoo MJ (2012) Breeding migrations in crawfish frogs (Lithobates areolatus): long-distance movements, burrow philopatry, and mortality in a near-threatened species. Copeia 2012:440–450. doi: 10.1643/CE-11-107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James SM, Little EE, Semlitsch RD (2004) Effects of multiple routes of cadmium exposure on the hibernation success of the american toad (bufo americanus). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 46:518–527. doi: 10.1007/s00244-003-3005-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C, Jentsch A (2010) Effects of soil freeze–thaw cycles differ between experimental plant communities. Basic Appl Ecol 11:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2009.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larson DJ, Middle L, Vu H, Zhang W, Serianni AS, Duman J, Barnes BM (2014) Wood frog adaptations to overwintering in alaska: new limits to freezing tolerance. J Exp Biol 217:2193–2200. doi: 10.1242/jeb.101931 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Layne JR, Costanzo JP, Lee RE (1998) Freeze duration influences postfreeze survival in the frog Rana sylvatica. J Exp Zool 280:197–201. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19980201)280:2<197:AID-JEZ11>3.0.CO;2-JGoogle Scholar
  20. Licht LE (1991) Habitat selection of Rana pipiens and Rana sylvatica during exposure to warm and cold temperatures. Am Midl Nat 125:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCaffery RM, Maxell BA (2010) Decreased winter severity increases viability of a montane frog population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8644–8649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912945107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Connor JH (2014) Manipulation of larval and winter habitat reveals potential effects of urbanization and climate change on wood frogs in Connecticut. MSc thesis. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Connecticut, StorrsGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterman WE, Semlitsch RD (2013) Fine-scale habitat associations of a terrestrial salamander: the role of environmental gradients and implications for population dynamics. PLoS One 8:e62184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Pope KL, Matthews KR (2002) Influence of anuran prey on the condition and distribution of Rana muscosa in the Sierra Nevada. Herpetologica 58:354–363. doi:10.1655/0018-0831(2002)058[0354:IOAPOT]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  25. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at:
  26. Reading CJ (2007) Linking global warming to amphibian declines through its effect on female body condition and survivorship. Oecologia 151:125–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Regosin JV, Windmiller BS, Reed JM (2003) Terrestrial habitat use and winter densities of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). J Herpetol 37:390–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD (2009) Behavioral response of migrating wood frogs to experimental timber harvest surrounding wetlands. Can J Zool 87:618–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rittenhouse TAG, Harper EB, Rehard LR, Semlitsch RD (2008) The role of microhabitats in the desiccation and survival of anurans in recently harvested oak–hickory forest. Copeia 2008:807–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD, Thompson FR III (2009) Survival costs associated with wood frog breeding migrations: effects of timber harvest and drought. Ecology 90:1620–1630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rustad L, Campbell J, Dukes JS, Huntington T, Lambert KF, Mohan J, Rodenhouse N (2011) Changing climate, changing forests: the impacts of climate change on forests of the northeastern United States and Eastern Canada. General Technical Report NRS-99. Northern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Newtown SquareGoogle Scholar
  32. Scherer RD, Muths E, Lambert BA (2008) Effects of weather on survival in populations of boreal toads in Colorado. J Herpetol 42:508–517. doi: 10.1670/07-257.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmid WD (1982) Survival of frogs in low temperature. Science 215:697–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt B, Schaub M, Steinfartz S (2007) Apparent survival of the salamander Salamandra salamandra is low because of high migratory activity. Front Zool 4:19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Shaffer TL (2004a) A unified approach to analyzing nest success. Auk 121:526–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shaffer TL (2004b) Logistic-exposure analyses of nest survival. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown. Available at:
  37. Sinclair BJ, Stinziano JR, Williams CM, MacMillan HA, Marshall KE, Storey KB (2013) Real-time measurement of metabolic rate during freezing and thawing of the wood frog, Rana sylvatica: implications for overwinter energy use. J Exp Biol 216:292–302. doi: 10.1242/jeb.076331 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Storey K, Storey J (1984) Biochemical adaption for freezing tolerance in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. J Comp Physiol B 155:29–36. doi: 10.1007/BF00688788 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Storey KB, Storey JM (1988) Freeze tolerance in animals. Physiol Rev 68:27–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tattersall GJ, Ultsch GR (2008) Physiological ecology of aquatic overwintering in ranid frogs. Biol Rev 83:119–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00035.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Templer P, Schiller A, Fuller N, Socci A, Campbell J, Drake J, Kunz T (2012) Impact of a reduced winter snowpack on litter arthropod abundance and diversity in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Biol Fertil Soils 48:413–424. doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0636-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason H. O’Connor
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tracy A. G. Rittenhouse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and the EnvironmentUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Fish and Wildlife Research InstituteFlorida Fish and Wildlife Conservation CommissionHoltUSA

Personalised recommendations