, Volume 180, Issue 1, pp 161–167 | Cite as

Down-regulation of plant defence in a resident spider mite species and its effect upon con- and heterospecifics

  • Diogo P. GodinhoEmail author
  • Arne Janssen
  • Teresa Dias
  • Cristina Cruz
  • Sara MagalhãesEmail author
Plant-microbe-animal interactions - Original research


Herbivorous spider mites occurring on tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cope with plant defences in various manners: the invasive Tetranychus evansi reduces defences below constitutive levels, whereas several strains of T. urticae induce such defences and others suppress them. In the Mediterranean region, these two species co-occur on tomato plants with T. ludeni, another closely related spider mite species. Unravelling how this third mite species affects plant defences is thus fundamental to understanding the outcome of herbivore interactions in this system. To test the effect of T. ludeni on tomato plant defences, we measured (1) the activity of proteinase inhibitors, indicating the induction of plant defences, in those plants, and (2) mite performance on plants previously infested with each mite species. We show that the performance of T. evansi and T. ludeni on plants previously infested with T. ludeni or T. evansi was better than on clean plants, indicating that these two mite species down-regulate plant defences. We also show that plants attacked by these mite species had lower activity of proteinase inhibitors than clean plants, whereas herbivory by T. urticae increased the activity of these proteins and resulted in reduced spider mite performance. This study thus shows that the property of down-regulation of plant defences below constitutive levels also occurs in T. ludeni.


Tetranychus ludeni Spider mites Plant defences Proteinase inhibitors Plant–herbivore interactions 



We thank Felipe Lemos for sending mite strains from Amsterdam, Flore Zélé for all the improvements of the greenhouse facilities, and genetic identification of spider mites, Inês Santos for taking care of plants and mite populations and the whole mite squad (FZ, IS, Leonor Rodrigues, Ana Rita Ponce, Gonçalo Matos and Salomé Clemente) for stimulating discussions. DG thanks Cristina Branquinho for logistic support. This work was funded by an FCT-ANR project (FCT-ANR//BIA-EVF/0013/2012) to SM and Isabelle Olivieri. TM acknowledges a ​Post Doc grant SFRH/BPD/85419/2012.

Author contribution statement

DG, SM and AJ conceived and designed the experiments. DG performed the experiments, with help from TD and CC in the proteinase activity analysis. DG and SM analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, with considerable contributions from AJ.


  1. Abramovitch RB, Anderson JC, Martin GB (2006) Bacterial elicitation and evasion of plant innate immunity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:601–611PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA (2000) Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 89:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal AA (2007) Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends Ecol Evol 22:103–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alba JM, Glas JJ, Schimmel BCJ, Kant M (2011) Avoidance and suppression of plant defenses by herbivores and pathogens. J Plant Interact 6:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alba JM, Schimmel BCJ, Glas JJ et al (2015) Spider mites suppress tomato defenses downstream of jasmonate and salicylate independently of hormonal crosstalk. New Phytol 205:828–840PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali JC, Agrawal AA (2012) Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 17:293–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ament K, Kant MR, Sabelis MW et al (2004) Jasmonic acid is a key regulator of spider mite-induced volatile terpenoid and methyl salicylate emission in tomato. Plant Physiol 135:25–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin IT, Preston CA (1999) The eco-physiological complexity of plant responses to insect herbivores. Planta 208:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes.
  10. Belliure B, Janssen A, Maris PC et al (2005) Herbivore arthropods benefit from vectoring plant viruses. Ecol Lett 8:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belliure B, Sabelis MW, Janssen A (2010) Vector and virus induce plant responses that benefit a non-vector herbivore. Basic Appl Ecol 11:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boubou A, Migeon A, Roderick GK et al (2012) Test of colonisation scenarios reveals complex invasion history of the red tomato spider mite Tetranychus evansi. PLoS ONE 7:e35601PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broadway R, Duffey S (1986) Plant proteinase inhibitors: mechanism of action and effect on the growth and digestive physiology of larval Heliothis zea and Spodoptera exigua. J Insect Physiol 32:827–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burgyán J, Havelda Z (2011) Viral suppressors of RNA silencing. Trends Plant Sci 16:265–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Moraes GJ, McMurtry JA (1985) Comparison of Tetranychus evansi and T. urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) as prey for eight species of Phytoseiid mites. Entomophaga 30:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Oliveira EF, Pallini A, Janssen A (2015) Herbivores with similar feeding modes interact through the induction of different plant responses. Oecologia. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3344-0 Google Scholar
  18. Denno RF, McClure MS, Ott JR (1995) Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition reexamined and resurrected. Annu Rev Entomol 40:297–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dermauw W, Wybouw N, Rombauts S et al (2013) A link between host plant adaptation and pesticide resistance in the polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dicke M (1994) Local and systemic production of volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids: their role in plant carnivore mutualism. J Plant Physiol 143:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferragut F, Garzón-Luque E, Pekas A (2013) The invasive spider mite Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) alters community composition and host-plant use of native relatives. Exp Appl Acarol 60:321–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glas J, Alba JM, Simoni S et al (2014) Defense suppression benefits herbivores that have a monopoly on their feeding site but can backfire within natural communities. BMC Biol 12:98PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glazebrook J (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Rev Phytopathol 43:205–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gotoh T, Moriya D, Nachman G (2015) Development and reproduction of five Tetranychus species (Acari: Tetranychidae): Do they all have the potential to become major pests? Exp Appl Acarol 66:453–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Green TR, Ryan CA (1972) Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science 175:776–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haegeman A, Mantelin S, Jones JT, Gheysen G (2012) Functional roles of effectors of plant-parasitic nematodes. Gene 492:19–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeppson LR, Keifer HH, Baker EW (1975) Mites injurious to economic plants. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  30. Kakade ML, Rachis JJ, McGhee JE, Puski G (1974) Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: a collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chem 51:376–382Google Scholar
  31. Kant MR, Baldwin IT (2007) The ecogenetics and ecogenomics of plant-herbivore interactions: rapid progress on a slippery road. Curr Opin Genet Devel 17:519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kant MR, Ament K, Sabelis MW et al (2004) Differential timing of spider mite-induced direct and indirect defenses in tomato plants. Plant Physiol 135:483–495PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kant MR, Sabelis MW, Haring MA, Schuurink RC (2008) Intraspecific variation in a generalist herbivore accounts for differential induction and impact of host plant defences. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kant MR, Jonckheere W, Knegt B et al (2015) Mechanisms and ecological consequences of plant defence induction and suppression in herbivore communities. Ann Bot 115:1015–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karban R, Agrawal AA (2002) Herbivore offense. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:641–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. Interspecific interactions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Karban R, Carey JR (1984) Induced resistance of cotton seedlings to mites. Science 225:53–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karban R, Myers JH (1989) Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2001) Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291:2141–2144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:299–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koornneef A, Pieterse CM (2008) Cross talk in defense signaling. Plant Physiol 146:839–844PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lawrence SD, Novak NG, Ju CJT, Cooke JE (2008) Potato, Solanum tuberosum, defense against Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say): microarray gene expression profiling of potato by Colorado potato beetle regurgitant treatment of wounded leaves. J Chem Ecol 34:1013–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li C, Williams MM, Loh YT et al (2002) Resistance of cultivated tomato to cell content-feeding herbivores is regulated by the octadecanoid-signaling pathway. Plant Physiol 130:494–503PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Matsuda T, Fukumoto C, Hinomoto N, Gotoh T (2013) DNA-based identification of spider mites: molecular evidence for cryptic species of the genus Tetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Econ Entomol 106:463–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Migeon A, Nouguier E, Dorkeld F (2011) Spider mites web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae. Trends in Acarology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Musser RO, Hum-Musser SM, Eichenseer H et al (2002) Herbivory: caterpillar saliva beats plant defences: a new weapon emerges in the evolutionary arms race between plants and herbivores. Nature 416:599–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ozawa R, Arimura GI, Takabayashi J et al (2000) Involvement of jasmonate-and salicylate-related signaling pathways for the production of specific herbivore-induced volatiles in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 41:391–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pallini A, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (1997) Odour-mediated responses of phytophagous mites to conspecific and heterospecific competitors. Oecologia 110:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Poelman EH, Dicke M (2014) Plant-mediated interactions among insects within a community ecological perspective. In: Voelckel C, Jander G (eds) Annual plant reviews 47: Insect plant interactions. Wiley, New York, pp 309–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poelman EH, Broekgaarden C, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2008) Early season herbivore differentially affects plant defence responses to subsequently colonizing herbivores and their abundance in the field. Mol Ecol 17:3352–3365Google Scholar
  51. Reddy GVP (2001) Comparative effectiveness of an integrated pest management system and other control tactics for managing spider mite Tetranychus ludeni (Acari: Tetranychidae) on eggplant. Exp Appl Acarol 25:985–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reddy GVP (2002) Plant volatiles mediate orientation and plant preference by the predator Chrysoperlacarnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biol Control 25:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reddy GVP, Baskaran P (2006) Damage potential of Tetranychus ludeni Zacher (Acari: Tetranychidae) on four varieties of eggplant, Solanum melongena L. Int J Trop Insect Sci 26:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rostás M, Hilker M (2002) Feeding damage by larvae of the mustard leaf beetle deters conspecific females from oviposition and feeding. Entmol Exp Appl 103:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sarmento RA, Lemos F, Bleeker PM et al (2011a) A herbivore that manipulates plant defence. Ecol Lett 14:229–236PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sarmento RA, Lemos F, Dias CR et al (2011b) A herbivorous mite down-regulates plant defence and produces web to exclude competitors. PLoS ONE 6(1–7):e23757PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sauge MH, Mus F, Lacroze JP et al (2006) Genotypic variation in induced resistance and induced susceptibility in the peach–Myzus persicae aphid system. Oikos 113:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Silva RS, Ribeiro FR, Queiroz OS et al (2015) Trypsin protease inhibitor activity is not a good proxy for defence against Oligonychus ilicis (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Coffea canephora (Gentianales: Rubiaceae). Int J Acarol 41:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thaler JS, Humphrey PT, Whiteman NK (2012) Evolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci 17:260–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walling LL (2000) The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul 19:195–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Whitlock MC (1996) The red queen beats the jack-of-all-trades: the limitations on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and niche breadth. Am Nat 148:S65–S77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wink M (2003) Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry 64:3–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wybouw N, Zhurov V, Martel C et al (2015) Adaptation of a polyphagous herbivore to a novel host plant extensively shapes the transcriptome of herbivore and host. Mol Ecol. doi: 10.1111/mec.13330 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Zangerl AR, Bazzaz FA (1992) Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 363–391Google Scholar
  65. Zhao Y, Thilmony R, Bender CL et al (2003) Virulence systems of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato promote bacterial speck disease in tomato by targeting the jasmonate signaling pathway. Plant J 36:485–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhu-Salzman K, Bi JL, Liu TX (2005) Molecular strategies of plant defense and insect counter-defense. Insect Sci 12:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.cE3c, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations