, Volume 178, Issue 3, pp 855–866 | Cite as

Does extreme environmental severity promote plant facilitation? An experimental field test in a subtropical coastal dune

  • Camila T. Castanho
  • Alexandre A. Oliveira
  • Paulo Inácio K. L. Prado
Community ecology - Original research


The stress gradient hypothesis (SGH) postulates how the balance between plant competition and facilitation shifts along environmental gradients. Early formulations of the SGH predicted that facilitation should increase monotonically with stress. However, a recent theoretical refinement of the SGH postulates stronger facilitation under moderate stress, followed by a decreasing role of facilitation in the most severe environments. We conducted field experiments along the most severe part of a coastal dune gradient in southeast Brazil to test the effect of stress on the intensity and importance of the net interactions between two tree species. First, we compared the performance of distinct life stages of Ternstroemia brasiliensis in the presence and absence of Guapira opposita adults along a beach-to-inland gradient, a gradient of environmental severity. To test the effect of one stress factor in particular, we also manipulated water availability, a limiting resource due to the sandy soils. At the most severe part of the coastal gradient (i.e. closest to the seashore), both intensity and importance of the interaction between G. opposita and T. brasiliensis were negatively related to stress, with a pattern consistent across distinct life stages of the target species. However, the sign of the net interaction depended on the life stage of the target species. Our results provide empirical evidence that the role of facilitation tends to wane, leading to neutral or even negative net interactions between species as stress reaches its maximum, as predicted by the recent refinements of the SGH.


Competition Ontogenetic shift Plant interactions Restinga Stress gradient hypothesis 



We would like to thank Fabiano Neves, Selmo Bernardo and Edison Nascimento for their assistance in the field, and Glauco Machado, Gislene Ganade and Leonardo L. Wedekin for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also acknowledge the financial support provided by PETROBRAS, the PhD scholarship provided by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and a post-doctoral fellowship provided by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; process no 2012/09794-7) to C.T.C., as well as the grant provided by CNPq to P.I.K.L.P. The experiments performed comply with the current Brazilian laws (permission SMA 000.541/2008).

Supplementary material

442_2015_3285_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (255 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 254 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (6.9 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 7054 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (96 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 95 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (107 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 107 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (70 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 70 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (85 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (PDF 85 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (75 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (PDF 74 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (83 kb)
Supplementary material 8 (PDF 83 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM9_ESM.pdf (84 kb)
Supplementary material 9 (PDF 84 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM10_ESM.pdf (80 kb)
Supplementary material 10 (PDF 79 kb)
442_2015_3285_MOESM11_ESM.pdf (217 kb)
Supplementary material 11 (PDF 217 kb)


  1. Armas C, Pugnaire FI (2009) Ontogenetic shifts in interactions of two dominant shrub species in a semi-arid coastal sand dune system. J Veg Sci 20:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armas C, Rodrígues-Echeverría S, Pugnaire FI (2011) A field test of the stress-gradient hypothesis along an aridity gradient. J Veg Sci 22:818–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-40.
  4. Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooker RW, Callaghan TV (1998) The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationships to environmental gradients: a model. Oikos 81:196–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooker R, Kikvidze Z, Pugnaire FI, Callaway RM, Choler P, Lortie CJ, Michalet R (2005) The importance of importance. Oikos 109:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway R, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F, Armas C, Coll L, Corcket E, Delzon S, Forey E, Kikvidge Z, Olofsson J, Pugnaire F, Quiroz CL, Saccone P, Schiffers K, Seifan M, Touzard B, Michalet R (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Callaway RM (2007) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  10. Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997) Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:1958–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Paolini L, Pugnaire FI, Newingham B, Aschehoug ET, Armas C, Kikodze D, Cook BJ (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carboni M, Santoro R, Acosta A (2011) Dealing with scarce data to understand how environmental gradients propagule pressure shape fine-scale alien distribution patterns on coastal dunes. J Veg Sci 22:751–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castanho CT, Prado PI (2014) Benefit of shading by nurse plant does not change along a stress gradient in a coastal dune. PLoS One 9(8):e105082PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castanho CT, Oliveira AA, Prado PIK (2012) The importance of plant life form on spatial associations along a subtropical coastal dune gradient. J Veg Sci 23:952–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooch E, White G (2011) Program MARK: a gentle introduction, 11th edn.
  16. Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A (2010) Beta regression in R. J Stat Softw 34:1–24Google Scholar
  17. Cushman JH, Waller JC, Hoak DR (2010) Shrubs as ecosystem engineers in a coastal dune: influences on plant populations, communities and ecosystems. J Veg Sci 21:821–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Bello F, Dolezal J, Dvorsky M, Chlumská Z, Reháková K, Klimesová J, Klimes L (2011) Cushions of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) do not facilitate other plants under extreme altitude and dry conditions in the north-west Himalayas. Ann Bot 108:567–573PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forey E, Touzard B, Michalet R (2010) Does disturbance drive the collapse of biotic interactions at the severe end of a diversity-biomass gradient? Plant Ecol 206:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franks SJ (2003a) Competitive and facilitative interactions within and between two species of coastal dune perennials. Can J Bot 81:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franks SJ (2003b) Facilitation in multiple life-history stages: evidence for nucleated succession in coastal dunes. Plant Ecol 168:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaucherand S, Liancourt P, Lavorel S (2006) Importance and intensity of competition along a fertility gradient and across species. J Veg Sci 17:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gómez-Aparicio L (2009) The role of plant interactions in the restoration of degraded ecosystems: a meta-analysis across life-forms and ecosystems. J Ecol 97:1202–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. He Q, Bertness MD, Altieri AH (2013) Global shifts towards positive species interactions with increasing environmental stress. Ecol Lett 16:695–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herranz JM, Ferrandis P, Copete MA, Duro EM, Zalacaín A (2006) Effect of allelopathic compounds produced by Cistus ladanifer on germination of 20 Mediterranean taxa. Plant Ecol 184:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmgren M, Scheffer M (2010) Strong facilitation in mild environments: the stress gradient hypothesis revisited. J Ecol 98:1269–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S (2008) Parametric regression models. In: Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time-to-time event data. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 244–285Google Scholar
  28. Hulme PE (1997) Post-dispersal seed predation and the establishment of vertebrate dispersed plants in Mediterranean scrublands. Oecologia 111:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kawai T, Tokeshi M (2007) Testing the facilitation-competition paradigm under the stress-gradient hypothesis: decoupling multiple stress factors. Proc R Soc B 274:2503–2508PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kikvidze Z, Suzuki M, Brooker R (2011) Importance versus intensity of ecological effects: why context matters. Trends Ecol Evol 26:383–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koyama A, Tsuyuzaki S (2013) Facilitation by tussock-forming species on seedling establishment collapses in an extreme drought year in a post-mined Sphagnum peatland. J Veg Sci 24:473–483Google Scholar
  32. Lacerda LD, Araujo DSD, Maciel NC (1993) Dry coastal ecosystems of the tropical Brazilian coast. In: Van der Maarel E (ed) Dry coastal ecosystems: Africa, America, Asia and Oceania. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 477–493Google Scholar
  33. Lane C, Wright SJ, Roncal J, Maschinski J (2008) Characterizing environmental gradients and their influence on vegetation zonation in a subtropical coastal sand dune system. J Coastal Res 24:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Gross EM, Straile D (2012) Release from competition and protection determine the outcome of plant interactions along a grazing gradient. Oikos 121:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Forey E, Touzard B, Michalet R (2013) Disentangling the effects of water and nutrients for studying the outcome of plant interactions in sand dune ecosystems. J Veg Sci 24:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. le Roux PC, McGeoch MA (2010) Interaction intensity and importance along two stress gradients: adding shape to the stress-gradient hypothesis. Oecologia 162:733–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maalouf J, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Marchand L, Touzard B, Michalet R (2012) The interplay of stress and mowing disturbance for the intensity and importance of plant interactions in dry calcareous grasslands. Ann Bot 110:821–828PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maestre FT, Callaway R, Valladares F, Lortie CJ (2009) Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J Ecol 97:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malkinson D, Tielborger K (2010) What does the stress-gradient hypothesis predict? Resolving the discrepancies. Oikos 119:1546–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martínez ML (2003) Facilitation of seedling establishment by an endemic shrub in tropical coastal sand dunes. Plant Ecol 168:333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maun MA (1994) Adaptations enhancing survival and establishment of seedlings on coastal dune systems. Vegetatio 111:59–70Google Scholar
  42. Michalet R, Brooker RW, Cavieres LA, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Pugnaire F, Valiente-Banuet IA, Callaway RM (2006) Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? Ecol Lett 9:767–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Michalet R, Schöb C, Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Callaway RM (2014a) Partitioning net interactions among plants along altitudinal gradients to study community responses to climate change. Funct Ecol 28:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Michalet R, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Maalouf J, Lortie CJ (2014b) Two alternatives to the stress-gradient hypothesis at the edge of life: the collapse of facilitation and the switch from facilitation to competition. J Veg Sci 25:609–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miriti MN (2006) Ontogenetic shift from facilitation to competition in a desert shrub. J Ecol 94:973–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mod HK, le Roux PC, Luoto M (2014) Outcomes of biotic interactions are dependent on multiple environmental variables. J Veg Sci 25:1024–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pires LA, Cardoso VJM, Joly CA, Rodrigues RR (2009) Germinação de Ternstroemia brasiliensis Cambess. (Pentaphylacaceae) de floresta de restinga. Acta Bota Bras 23:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
  49. Rudgers JA, Maron JL (2003) Facilitation between coastal dune shrubs: a non-nitrogen fixing shrub facilitates establishment of a nitrogen-fixer. Oikos 102:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schupp EW (1995) Seed-seedling conflicts, habitat choice, and patterns of plant recruitment. Am J Bot 82:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seifan M, Seifan T, Ariza C, Tielborger K (2010) Facilitating an importance index. J Ecol 98:356–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shumway SW (2000) Facilitative effects of a sand dune shrub on species growing beneath the shrub canopy. Oecologia 124:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smit C, Gusberti M, Muller-Scharer H (2006) Safe for saplings; safe for seeds? For Ecol Manage 237:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Therneau T (2011) Survival: survival analysis, including penalised likelihood. R package version 2.36-9.
  55. Welden CW, Slauson WL (1986) The intensity of competition versus its importance: an overlooked distinction and some implications. Q Rev Biol 61:23–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson JB, Sykes MT (1999) Is zonation on coastal sand dunes determined primarily by sand burial or salt spray? A test in New Zealand dunes. Ecol Lett 2:233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camila T. Castanho
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandre A. Oliveira
    • 1
  • Paulo Inácio K. L. Prado
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Program in EcologyUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Federal de São PauloDiademaBrazil

Personalised recommendations