, Volume 178, Issue 1, pp 129–140 | Cite as

Behavioural consistency and life history of Rana dalmatina tadpoles

  • Tamás János UrszánEmail author
  • János Török
  • Attila Hettyey
  • László Zsolt Garamszegi
  • Gábor Herczeg
Special Topic: Individual-level niche specialization


The focus of evolutionary behavioural ecologists has recently turned towards understanding the causes and consequences of behavioural consistency, manifesting either as animal personality (consistency in a single behaviour) or behavioural syndrome (consistency across more behaviours). Behavioural type (mean individual behaviour) has been linked to life-history strategies, leading to the emergence of the integrated pace-of-life syndrome (POLS) theory. Using Rana dalmatina tadpoles as models, we tested if behavioural consistency and POLS could be detected during the early ontogenesis of this amphibian. We targeted two ontogenetic stages and measured activity, exploration and risk-taking in a common garden experiment, assessing both individual behavioural type and intra-individual behavioural variation. We observed that activity was consistent in all tadpoles, exploration only became consistent with advancing age and risk-taking only became consistent in tadpoles that had been tested, and thus disturbed, earlier. Only previously tested tadpoles showed trends indicative of behavioural syndromes. We found an activity—age at metamorphosis POLS in the previously untested tadpoles irrespective of age. Relative growth rate correlated positively with the intra-individual variation of activity of the previously untested older tadpoles. In previously tested older tadpoles, intra-individual variation of exploration correlated negatively and intra-individual variation of risk-taking correlated positively with relative growth rate. We provide evidence for behavioural consistency and POLS in predator- and conspecific-naive tadpoles. Intra-individual behavioural variation was also correlated to life history, suggesting its relevance for the POLS theory. The strong effect of moderate disturbance related to standard behavioural testing on later behaviour draws attention to the pitfalls embedded in repeated testing.


Animal personality Intra-individual behavioural variation Behavioural syndrome Pace-of-life syndrome Temperament 



We are highly indebted to Tibor Kovács, Gergely Nagy and Orsolya Molnár for their help during the fieldwork and the laboratory experiment. Our research was funded by the Hungarian State PhD Scholarship to (TJU), the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (K-105517) and the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (to GH), the FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (PCIG13-GA-2013-631722) and the “Lendület” programme of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA, LP2012-24/2012; to AH), and the Spanish government within the framework of the ‘‘Plan Nacional” program (ref. no. CGL2012- 38262 and CGL2012-40026-C02-01; to LZG). Our experiment was done under the permit of Middle-Danube Valley Inspectorate for Environmental Protection, Nature Conservation and Water Management (ref. no. 8464-2/2011) and followed the guidelines of the Hungarian Act of Animal Care and Experimentation (1998, XXVIII, Sect. 243/1998), which conforms to the regulation of animal experiments by the European Union.

Supplementary material

442_2014_3207_MOESM1_ESM.doc (109 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 109 kb)


  1. Adriaenssens B, Johnsson JI (2013) Natural selection, plasticity and the emergence of a behavioural syndrome in the wild. Ecol Lett 16:47–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson MÅ, Höglund E (2012) Linking personality to larval energy reserves in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). PLoS One 7(11):e49247CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1985) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 16th edn. APHA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker WA (1985) Manual of quantitative genetics. Academic Enterprises, Washington State University, PullmanGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell AM (2007) Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proc R Soc B 274:755–761CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell AM, Sih A (2007) Exposure to predation generates personality in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecol Lett 10:828–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  9. Biro PA, Abrahams MV, Post JR, Parkinson EA (2006) Behavioural trade-offs between growth and mortality explain evolution of submaximal growth rates. J Anim Ecol 75:1165–1171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler MW, Toomey MB, McGraw KJ, Rowe M (2012) Ontogenetic immune challenges shape adult personality in mallard ducks. Proc R Soc B 279:326–333CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Careau V, Garland T Jr (2012) Performance, personality, and energetics: correlation, causation, and mechanism. Physiol Biochem Zool 85:543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Careau V, Thomas D, Pelletier F, Turki L, Landry F, Garant D, Réale D (2011) Genetic correlation between resting metabolic rate and exploratory behaviour in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Evol Biol 24:2153–2163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Carter AJ, Feeney WE, Marshall HH, Cowlishaw G, Heinsohn R (2013) Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? Biol Rev 88:465–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Coppens CM, de Boer SF, Koolhaas JM (2010) Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: towards underlying mechanisms. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:4021–4028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. David M, Auclair Y, Giraldeau LA, Cezilly F (2012) Personality and body condition have additive effects on motivation to feed in Zebra Finches Taeniopygia guttata. Ibis 154:372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Reale D, Wright J (2010) Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 25:81–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dingemanse NJ, Dochtermann NA (2013) Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. J Anim Ecol 82:39–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dingemanse NJ, Van der Plas F, Wright J, Réale D, Schrama M, Roff DA, Van der Zee E, Barber I (2009) Individual experience and evolutionary history of predation affects expression of heritable variation in fish personality and morphology. Proc R Soc B 276:1285–1293CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dochtermann NA, Dingemanse NJ (2013) Behavioural syndromes as evolutionary constraints. Behav Ecol 24:806–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70:967–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Galliard JF, Paquet M, Cisel M, Montes-Poloni L (2013) Personality and the pace-of-life syndrome: variation and selection on exploration, metabolism and locomotor performances. Funct Ecol 27:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garamszegi LZ, Herczeg G (2012) Behavioural syndromes, syndrome deviation and the within-and between-individual components of phenotypic correlations: when reality does not meet statistics. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1651–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garamszegi LZ, Markó G, Herczeg G (2012) A meta-analysis of correlated behaviours with implications for behavioural syndromes: mean effect size, publication bias, phylogenetic effects and the role of mediator variables. Evol Ecol 26:1213–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garamszegi LZ, Markó G, Herczeg G (2013) A meta-analysis of correlated behaviors with implications for behavioral syndromes: relationships between particular behavioral traits. Behav Ecol 24:1068–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. García LV (2004) Escaping the Bonferroni iron claw in ecological studies. Oikos 105:657–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gienapp P, Teplitsky C, Alho JS, Mills JA, Merilä J (2008) Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol Ecol 17:167–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190Google Scholar
  29. Groothuis TGG, Trillmich F (2011) Unfolding personalities: the importance of studying ontogeny. Dev Psychobiol 53:641–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Grafen A, Hails R (2002) Modern statistics for the life sciences. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Hegyi G, Garamszegi LZ (2011) Using information theory as a substitute for stepwise regression in ecology and behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herczeg G, Garamszegi LZ (2012) Individual deviation from behavioural correlations: a simple approach to study the evolution of behavioural syndromes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herczeg G, Gonda A, Merilä J (2009) Predation mediated population divergence in complex behaviour of nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius). J Evol Biol 22(544):552Google Scholar
  34. Jandt JM, Bengston S, Pinter-Wollman N, Pruitt JN, Raine NE, Dornhaus A, Sih A (2014) Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels. Biol Rev 89:48–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaplan RH (1998) Maternal effect, developmental plasticity, and life history evolution: an amphibian model. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 244–260Google Scholar
  36. Kortet R, Hedrick AV, Vainikka A (2010) Parasitism, predation and the evolution of animal personalities. Ecol Lett 13(12):1449–1458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuparinen A, Merilä J (2007) Detecting and managing fisheries-induced evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 22:652–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Laugen AT, Laurila A, Merilä J (2002) Maternal and genetic contributions to geographical variation in Rana temporaria larval life-history traits. Biol J Linn Soc 76:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85:935–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Niemelä PT, Vainikka A, Hedrick AV, Kortet R (2012a) Integrating behaviour with life history: boldness of the field cricket, Gryllus integer, during ontogeny. Funct Ecol 26:450–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Niemelä PT, Vainikka A, Forsman JT, Loukola OJ, Kortet R (2012b) How does variation in the environment and individual cognition explain the existence of consistent behavioral differences? Ecol Evol 3:457–464CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Merilä J (2009) Genetic constraints on adaptation? Science 325:1212–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Murtaugh PA (2009) Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data. Ecol Lett 12:1061–1068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82:291–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Réale D, Garant D, Humphries MM, Bergeron P, Careau V, Montiglio PO (2010) Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 365:4051–4063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Riechert SE, Hedrick AV (1993) A test for correlations among fitness-linked behavioural traits in the spider Agelenopsis aperta (Araneae, Agelenidae). Anim Behav 46:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rigterink A, Houpt K, Cho M, Eze O, Xu R, Horii T, Hatada I (2014) Genetics of canine behavior: a review. World J Med Genet 4:46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodel HG, Monclus R (2011) Long-term consequences of early development on personality traits: a study in European rabbits. Behav Ecol 22:1123–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruiz-Gomez MDL, Kittilsen S, Höglund E, Huntingford FA, Sørensen C, Pottinger TG, Bakken M, Winberg S, Korzan WJ, Øverli Ø (2008) Behavioral plasticity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with divergent coping styles: when doves become hawks. Horm Behav 54:534–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sih A, Kats LB, Maurer EF (2003) Behavioural correlations across situations and the evolution of antipredator behaviour in a sunfish–salamander system. Anim Behav 65:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioural syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sih A, Cote J, Evans M, Fogarty S, Pruitt J (2012) Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. Ecol Lett 15:278–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith BR, Blumstein DT (2008) Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 19:448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stamps JA (2007) Growth-mortality tradeoffs and ‘personality traits’ in animals. Ecol Lett 10:355–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Stamps JA, Groothuis TG (2010) Developmental perspectives on personality: implications for ecological and evolutionary studies of individual differences. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 365:4029–4041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stamps JA, Briffa M, Biro PA (2012) Unpredictable animals: individual differences in intraindividual variability (IIV). Anim Behav 83:1325–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sweeney K, Gadd RD, Hess ZL, McDermott DR, MacDonald L, Cotter P, Armagost F, Chen JZ, Berning AW, DiRienzo N, Pruitt JN (2013) Assessing the effects of rearing environment, natural selection, and developmental stage on the emergence of a behavioral syndrome. Ethology 119:436–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teplitsky C, Mills JA, Alho JS, Yarrall JW, Merilä J (2008) Bergmann’s rule and climate change revisited: disentangling environmental and genetic responses in a wild bird population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13492–13496CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Trillmich F, Hudson R (2011) The emergence of personality in animals: the need for a developmental approach. Dev Psychobiol 53:505–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. van der Waaij EH, Wilsson E, Strandberg E (2008) Genetic analysis of results of a Swedish behaviour test on German shepherd dogs and labrador retrievers. J Anim Sci 86:2853–2861CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Verhoeven KJ, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM (2005) Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108:643–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson AD, Krause MJ (2012) Personality and metamorphosis: is behavioral variation consistent across ontogenetic niche shifts? Behav Ecol 23:1316–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2010) An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:3959–3968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2012) Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 27(8):452–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wolf M, van Doorn GS, Leimar O, Weissing FJ (2007) Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature 447:581–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamás János Urszán
    • 1
    Email author
  • János Török
    • 1
  • Attila Hettyey
    • 2
  • László Zsolt Garamszegi
    • 3
  • Gábor Herczeg
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and EcologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Lendület Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Plant Protection Institute (NÖVI) Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Agrártudományi Kutatóközpont (MTA ATK)BudapestHungary
  3. 3.Department of Evolutionary Ecology Estacion Biologica de Donana del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)SevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations