Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Net carbon flux of dead wood in forests of the Eastern US

  • Global change ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Downed dead wood (DDW) in forest ecosystems is a C pool whose net flux is governed by a complex of natural and anthropogenic processes and is critical to the management of the entire forest C pool. As empirical examination of DDW C net flux has rarely been conducted across large scales, the goal of this study was to use a remeasured inventory of DDW C and ancillary forest attributes to assess C net flux across forests of the Eastern US. Stocks associated with large fine woody debris (diameter 2.6–7.6 cm) decreased over time (−0.11 Mg ha−1 year−1), while stocks of larger-sized coarse DDW increased (0.02 Mg ha−1 year−1). Stocks of total DDW C decreased (−0.14 Mg ha−1 year−1), while standing dead and live tree stocks both increased, 0.01 and 0.44 Mg ha−1 year−1, respectively. The spatial distribution of DDW C stock change was highly heterogeneous with random forests model results indicating that management history, live tree stocking, natural disturbance, and growing degree days only partially explain stock change. Natural disturbances drove substantial C transfers from the live tree pool (≈−4 Mg ha−1 year−1) to the standing dead tree pool (≈3 Mg ha−1 year−1) with only a minimal increase in DDW C stocks (≈1 Mg ha−1 year−1) in lower decay classes, suggesting a delayed transfer of C to the DDW pool. The assessment and management of DDW C flux is complicated by the diversity of natural and anthropogenic forces that drive their dynamics with the scale and timing of flux among forest C pools remaining a large knowledge gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aakala T (2011) Temporal variability of deadwood volume and quality in boreal old-growth forests. Silva Fenn 45:969–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett TM (2014) Storage and flux of carbon in live trees, snags, and logs in the Chugach and Tongass National Forests. USDA Forest Service general technical report PNW-889. USDA, Portland, OR

  • Bechtold WA, Patterson PL (Eds) (2005) The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program—national sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA Forest Service general technical report SRS-80. USDA, Asheville, NC

  • Becker DR, Skog K, Hellman A, Halvorsen KE, Mace T (2009) An outlook for sustainable forest bioenergy production in the Lake States. Energy Policy 37:5687–5693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin JG, Lilieholm RJ, Coup CE (2010) Forest biomass harvesting in the northeast: a special-needs operation? North J Appl For 27:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger AL, Palik B, D’Amato AW, Fraver S, Bradford JB, Nislow K, King D, Brooks RT (2013) Ecological impacts of energy-wood harvests: lessons from whole-tree harvesting and natural disturbance. J For 111:139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST (2008) Decomposition and fragmentation of coarse woody debris: revisiting a boreal black spruce chronosequence. Ecosystems 11:831–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MA, Warren RJ II, Baldrian P, Crowther TW, Maynard DS, Oldfield EE, Wieder WR, Wood SA, King JR (2014) Climate fails to predict wood decomposition at regional scales. Nat Clim Change 4:625–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breimen L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell WK et al (2009) Plant traits and wood fates across the globe. Glob Change Biol 15:2431–2449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domke GM, Woodall CW, Smith JE (2011) Accounting for density reduction and structural loss in standing dead trees: implications for forest biomass and carbon stock estimates in the US. Carbon Balance Manage 6:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JA, Mladenoff DJ, Gower ST, Stoffel JL (2012) Interactions of temperature and moisture with respiration from coarse woody debris in experimental forest canopy gaps. For Ecol Manage 265:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraver S, Wagner RG, Day M (2002) Dynamics of coarse woody debris following gap harvesting in the Acadian forest of central Maine, USA. Can J For Res 32(12):2094–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend AD, Lucht W, Rademacher TT, Keribin R, Betts R, Cadule P, Ciais P, Clark DB, Dankers R, Falloon PD, Ito A, Kahana R, Kleidon A, Lomas MR, Nishina K, Ostberg S, Pavlick R, Peylin P, Schaphoff S, Vuichard N, Warszawski L, Wilshire AM, Woodward FI (2014) Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3280–3285

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gough CM, Vogel CS, Kazanski C, Nagel L, Flower CE, Curtis PS (2007) Coarse woody debris and the carbon balance of a north temperate forest. For Ecol Manage 244:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray AN, Whittier TR (2014) Carbon stocks and changes on Pacific Northwest national forests and the role of disturbance, management, and growth. For Ecol Manage 328:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K Jr, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Woodall CW, Fasth B, Sexton J (2008) Woody detritus density and density reduction factors for tree species in the US: a synthesis. General technical report 29. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station

  • Harmon ME, Bond-Lamberty B, Tang J, Vragas R (2011a) Heterotrophic respiration in disturbed forests: a review with examples from North America. J Geophys Res 116:G00K04

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Woodall CW, Fasth B, Sexton J, Yatkov M (2011b) Differences between standing and downed dead tree wood density reduction factors: a comparison across decay classes and tree species. Research paper 15. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service

  • Hurteau MD, Hungate BA, Koch GW, North MP, Smith GR (2013) Aligning ecology and markets in the forest carbon cycle. Front Ecol Environ 11:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National scale biomass estimators for US tree species. For Sci 49:12–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson MT, Fraver S, Jonsson BG (2011) Spatio-temporal variation of coarse woody debris input in woodland key habitats in central Sweden. Silva Fenn 45:957–967

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce LA, Running SW, Breshears DD, Dale VH, Malmsheimer RW, Sampson RN, Sohngen B, Woodall CW (2014) National climate assessment of US 2014. Ch 7: forests. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the US: the third national climate assessment. US Global Change Research Program, pp 175–194

  • Krankina ON, Harmon ME (1995) Dynamics of the dead wood carbon pool in northwestern Russian boreal forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 82:227–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee PC, Crites S, Nietfeld M, Nguyen HV, Stelfox JB (1997) Characteristics and origins of deadwood material in aspen-dominated boreal forests. Ecol Appl 7:691–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippke B, Oneil E, Harrison R, Skog K, Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2011) Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns. Carbon Manage 2:303–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmsheimer RW, Heffernan P, Brink S, Crandall D, Deneke F, Galik C, Gee E, Helms JA, McClure N, Mortimer M, Ruddell S, Smith M, Stewart J (2008) Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the US. J For 106:115–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmsheimer RW, Bowyer JL, Fried JS, Gee E, Izlar RL, Miner RA, Munn IA, Oneil E, Stewart WC (2011) Managing forests because carbon matters: integrating energy, products, and land management policy. J For 109:S7–S50

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley DC, Ryan MG, Birdsey RA, Giardina CP, Harmon ME, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jackson RB, Morrison JF, Murray BC, Pataki DE, Skog KE (2011) A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the US. Ecol Appl 21:1902–1924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miles PD, Smith WB (2009) Specific gravity and other properties of wood and bark for 156 tree species found in North America. Research note NRS-38. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA

  • Nepal P, Wear DN, Skog KE (2014) Net change in carbon emissions with increased wood energy use in the US. GCB Bioenergy (in press)

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics.Update edition. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt GE (2006) A spline model of climate for the western US. General technical report RMRS-165. USDA Forest Service

  • Russell MB, Woodall CW, Fraver S, D’Amato AW, Domke GM, Skog KE (2014a) Residence times and decay rates of downed woody debris biomass/carbon in Eastern US forests. Ecosystems 17:765–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell MB, Woodall CW, D’Amato AW, Fraver S, Bradford JB (2014b) Technical note: Linking climate change and downed woody debris decomposition across forests of the eastern United States. Biogeosciences (in press)

  • SAS Institute (2011) SAS/STAT(R) 9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

  • Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2011) Time-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels. Biomass Bioenery 35:2506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlamadinger B, Spitzer J, Kohlmaier GH, Ludeke M (1995) Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass Bioenergy 8:221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith WB, Miles PD, Perry CH, Pugh SA (2009) Forest resources of the US, 2007. General technical report WO-GTR-78. US Forest Service

  • Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG (2012) Biodiversity in dead wood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant BR, Bissonette JA, Long JN, Roberts DW (1997) Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecol Appl 7:702–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service (2007) Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide, vol I: field, data collection procedures for phase 2 plots, version 4.0. USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Washington, DC. URL: http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/. Accessed December 2010

  • USDA Forest Service (2007) Forest inventory and analysis phase 3 guide—downed woody materials, version 4.0. USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Washington, DC. URL: http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/. Accessed January 2011

  • USDA Forest Service (2014) Forest inventory and analysis national program—data and tools–FIA data mart, FIADB version 5.1. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. http://apps.fs.fed.us/fiadb-downloads/datamart.html . Accessed 24 June 2014

  • Wang C, Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST (2002) Environmental controls on carbon dioxide flux from black spruce coarse woody debris. Oecologia 132:374–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westfall JA, Woodall CW (2007) Measurement repeatability of a large-scale inventory of forest fuels. For Ecol Manage 253:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westfall JA, Woodall CW, Hatfield MA (2013) A statistical power analysis of woody carbon flux from forest inventory data. Clim Change 118:919–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BT, Woodall CW, Griffith D (2013) Imputing forest carbon stock estimates from inventory plots to a nationally continuous coverage. Carbon Balance Manage 8:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW (2010) Carbon flux of down woody materials in forests of the north central US. Int J For Res 2010:413703

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW, Liknes GC (2008) Climatic regions as an indicator of forest coarse and fine woody carbon stocks in the US. Carbon Balance Manage 3:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW, Monleon VJ (2008) Sampling, estimation, and analysis procedures for the down woody materials indicator. General technical report NRS-22. USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA

  • Woodall CW, Westfall JA (2009) Relationships between the stocking levels of live trees and dead tree attributes in forests of the US. For Ecol Manage 258:2602–2608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW, Miles PD, Vissage JS (2005) Determining maximum stand density index in mixed species stands for strategic-scale stocking assessments. For Ecol Manage 216:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW, Conkling BL, Amacher MC, Coulston JW, Jovan S, Perry CH, Schulz B, Smith GC, Will-Wolf S (2010) The forest inventory and analysis database version 4.0: description and users manual for phase 3. General technical report NRS-61. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA

  • Woodall CW, LS Heath, G Domke, M Nichols (2011a) Methods and equations for estimating volume, biomass, and carbon for trees in the US forest inventory, 2010. General technical report NRS-GTR-88. US Forest Service

  • Woodall CW, Amacher MC, Bechtold WA, Coulston JW, Jovan S, Perry CH, Randolph KC, Schulz BK, Smith GC, Tkacz B, Will-Wolf S (2011b) Status and future of the forest health indicators program of the US. Environ Monit Assess 177:419–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW, Domke GM, MacFarlane DW, Oswalt CM (2012) Comparing field- and model-based standing dead tree carbon stock estimates across forests of the US. Forestry 85:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW, Walters BF, Oswalt SN, Domke GM, Toney C, Gray AN (2013) Biomass and carbon attributes of downed woody materials in forests of the US. For Ecol Manage 305:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woudenberg SW, Conkling BL, O’Connell BM, LaPoint EB, Turner JA, Waddell KL (2010) The forest inventory and analysis database: database description and users manual version 4.0 for phase 2. General technical report RMRS-GTR-245. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO

  • Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N (2012) Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy 4:761–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Running SW (2010) Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net production from 2000 to 2009. Science 329:940–943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Andrew Gray, Mark Harmon, and John Stanovick for valuable reviews and insights into DDW dynamics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, US Department of Agriculture, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St Paul, MN, 55108, US

    C. W. Woodall, B. F. Walters & G. M. Domke

  2. Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, US

    M. B. Russell & A. W. D’Amato

  3. School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, US

    S. Fraver

Authors
  1. C. W. Woodall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. B. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. F. Walters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. W. D’Amato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Fraver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. M. Domke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. W. Woodall.

Additional information

Communicated by Ram Oren.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woodall, C.W., Russell, M.B., Walters, B.F. et al. Net carbon flux of dead wood in forests of the Eastern US. Oecologia 177, 861–874 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3171-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3171-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation