Abstract
Reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD), which occurs when the female of a species is larger than the male, is the rule for most birds of prey but the exception among other bird and mammal species. The selective pressures that favour RSD are an intriguing issue in animal ecology. Despite the large number of hypotheses proposed to explain the evolution of RSD, there is still no consensus about the mechanisms involved and whether they act on one or both sexes, mainly because few intrapopulation studies have been undertaken and few raptor species have been investigated. Using the strongly size-dimorphic northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis L.) as a model, we studied a population with one of the highest densities of breeding pairs reported in the literature in order to understand selective pressures that may favour RSD. We evaluated life-history processes, including recruitment of adult breeders and reproductive success, and we explored the mechanisms thought to act on each sex, including hunting efficiency, diet, body condition and mate choice. We found that smaller males produced more fledglings than larger ones, but there was no relationship between size and reproductive success for females. The mean body size of female breeders was larger than that of female fledglings, but male fledglings and breeders did not differ in size. Male body size was related to the type but not to the amount of prey captured during the nestling stage. We conclude that RSD may be favoured in this goshawk population because small males tend to enjoy higher reproductive success and large females greater recruitment. Our results do not support the hypotheses that evolutionary reduction in male size is driven by hunting efficiency, at least during the nestling stage, or the hypotheses that it is driven by greater recruitment. Our findings also suggest that increase in female size is driven by recruitment, rather than by reproductive success as previously postulated.


Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Alerstam T, Rosén M, Bäckman J, Ericson PGP, Hellgren O (2007) Flight speeds among bird species: allometric and phylogenetic effects. PLoS Biol 5:1656–1662. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050197
Andersson M, Norberg RA (1981) Evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism and role partitioning among predatory birds, with a size scaling of flight performance. Biol J Linn Soc 15:105–130
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
Bortolotti GR, Iko WM (1992) Non-random pairing in American kestrels: mate choice versus intra-sexual competition. Anim Behav 44:811–821
Byholm P (2005) Site-specific variation in partial brood loss in northern goshawks. Ann Zool Fenn 42:81–90
Byholm P, Rousi H, Sole I (2011) Parental care in nesting hawks: breeding experience and food availability influence the outcome. Behav Ecol 22:609–615
Carballeira A, Devesa C, Retuerto R, Santillán E, Ucieda F (1983) Bioclimatología de Galicia. Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza Conde de Fenosa, La Coruña
Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1980) The birds of the western Palearctic, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Figuerola J (1999) A comparative study on the evolution of reversed size dimorphism in monogamous waders. Biol J Linn Soc 67:1–18
Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E (1991) Reversed sexual size dimorphism in Tengmalm’s owl: is small male size adaptive? Oikos 61:337–346
Hakkarainen H, Huhta E, Lahti K, Lundvall P, Mappes T, Tolonen P, Wiehn J (1996) A test of male mating and hunting success in the kestrel: the advantages of smallness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:375–380
Johnston RF, Janiga R (1995) The feral pigeon. Oxford University Press, New York
Kenward RE (2006) The northern goshawk. T & AD Poyser/A & C Black, London
Kostrzewa A, Kostrzewa R (1990) The relationship of spring and summer weather with density and breeding performance of the buzzard Buteo buteo, goshawk Accipiter gentilis and kestrel Falco tinnunculus. Ibis 132:550–559
Krüger O (2005) The evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism in hawks, falcons and owls: a comparative study. Evol Ecol 19:467–486
Krüger O, Chakarov N, Nielsen JT, Looft V, Grunkorn T, Struwe-Juhl B, Moller AP (2012) Population regulation by habitat heterogeneity or individual adjustment? J Anim Ecol 81:330–340
Mañosa S (1991) Biologia tròfica, ús de l'hàbitat i biologia de la reproducció de l'astor Accipiter gentilis (Linneaus, 1758) a La Segarra. Ph.D. dissertaion. Department of Animal Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/35908
Mañosa S (1994) Sex and age determination in nestling goshawks Accipiter gentilis. Butlleti del Grup Catala d'Anellament 11:1–6
Massemin S, Korpimaki E, Wiehn J (2000) Reversed sexual dimorphism in raptors: evaluation of the hypotheses in kestrels breeding in a temporally changing environment. Oecologia 124:26–32
McDonald PG, Olsen PD, Cockburn A (2005) Selection on body size in a raptor with pronounced reversed sexual size dimorphism: are bigger females better? Behav Ecol 16:48–56
Mueller HC, Meyer K (1985) The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in size: a comparative analysis of the Falconiformes in the western Palearctic. Curr Ornithol 2:65–101
Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. T & AD Poyser, Berkhamsted
Newton I (1989) Individual performance in sparrowhawks: the ecology of two sexes. Proc Int Ornithol Congr 19:125–154
Newton I, Marquiss M (1984) Seasonal trend in the breeding performance of sparrowhawks. J Anim Ecol 53:809–829
Olsen PD, Olsen J (1987) Sexual size dimorphism in raptors: intrasexual competition in the larger sex for a scarce breeding resource, the smaller sex. Emu 87:59–62
Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2004) Predator hunting behaviour and prey vulnerability. J Anim Ecol 73:143–154
Rebollo S, Fernández-Pereira JM, Rebollo M, Rebollo P, Pérez-Camacho L, García-Salgado G, De la Montaña E (2010) Relaciones espaciales en rapaces forestales durante la nidificación: Azor Común (Accipiter gentilis), Busardo Ratonero (Buteo buteo) y Abejero Europeo (Pernis apivorus). In: Hernández VJ, Muñiz R, Cabot J, de Vries T (eds) Aves rapaces y conservación: una perspectiva Iberoamericana. Tundra, Valencia, pp 201–208
Rebollo S, Pérez-Camacho L, García-Salgado G, Martínez-Hesterkamp S, Fernández-Pereira JM, Rebollo M, Rebollo P, De la Montaña E (2011) Spatial relationship among northern goshawk, Eurasian sparrowhawk and common buzzard: rivals or partners? In: Zuberogoitia I, Martínez JE (eds) Ecology and conservation of European forest-dwelling raptors. Diputación Foral de Bizkaia, Vitoria, pp 159–167
Reynolds RT (1972) Sexual dimorphism in accipiter hawks: a new hypothesis. Condor 74:191–197
Schoener TW (1968) Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49:123–141
Selander RK (1966) Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113–151
Sergio F, Blas J, Forero MG, Donázar JA, Hiraldo F (2007) Size-related advantages for reproduction in a slightly dimorphic raptor: opposite trends between the sexes. Ethology 113:1141–1150
Squires JR, Reynolds RT (1997) Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, no. 298. The Academy of Natural Sciences/The American Ornithologists' Union, Philadelphia/Washington, DC
Storer RW (1966) Sexual dimorphism and food habits in three North American accipiters. Auk 83:423–436
Tornberg R, Mönkkönen M, Pahkala M (1999) Changes in diet and morphology of Finnish goshawks from 1960s to 1990s. Oecologia 121:369–376
Walter H (1979) Eleonora’s falcon, adaptations to prey and habitat in a social raptor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Widén P (1984) Reversed sexual size dimorphism in birds of prey: revival of an old hypothesis. Oikos 43:259–263
Ydenberg RC, Forbes LS (1991) The survival-reproduction selection equilibrium and reversed size dimorphism in raptors. Oikos 60:115–120
Yom-Tov Y, Yom-Tov S (2006) Decrease in body size of Danish goshawks during the twentieth century. J Ornithol 147:644–647
Zuberogoitia I, Martínez JE, Martínez JA, Zabala J, Calvo JF, Azkona A, Pagán I (2008) The dho-gaza and mist nets with a Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) lure: effectiveness in capturing thirteen species of European raptors. J. Raptor Res 42:48–51
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Enrique de la Montaña, Miguel Rebollo, Pablo Rebollo, Jorge Meltzer, Mar Zurita and Sofía Morcelle for their great help with field work; to Victor García-Matarranz from the Dirección General para la Biodiversidad of the Spanish Ministerio de Medio Ambiente for assistance in goshawk trapping; and to the Grupo de Anillamiento Aeghitalos for their help in goshawk ringing. We are grateful to Pedro Villar, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, Ignacio Morales, Patrik Byholm, Risto Tornberg, Armando Chapin Rodríguez, Mónica Díaz-Otero and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments on the manuscript, and to Santiago Mañosa for allowing us to use his figures in the Electronic supplementary material. We acknowledge the Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza of the Xunta de Galicia for granting permission to carry out the study. This research was supported by funds from CICYT projects of the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (CGL2007-60533/BOS and CGL2010-18312/BOS), and the REMEDINAL network (S-0505/AMB/0335 and S2009 AMB-1783). GGS and SMH were supported by FPU and FPI fellowships from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (AP2006-00891 and BES-2008-006630, respectively).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Markku Orell.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez-Camacho, L., García-Salgado, G., Rebollo, S. et al. Higher reproductive success of small males and greater recruitment of large females may explain strong reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) in the northern goshawk. Oecologia 177, 379–387 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3146-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3146-9


