Oecologia

, Volume 176, Issue 3, pp 637–651 | Cite as

Diagnosing predation risk effects on demography: can measuring physiology provide the means?

  • Liana Y. Zanette
  • Michael Clinchy
  • Justin P. Suraci
Special Topic: Ecophysiological Effects of Predation Risk

Abstract

Predators kill prey thereby affecting prey survival and, in the traditional top-down view of predator limitation, that is their sole effect. Bottom-up food limitation alters the physiological condition of individuals affecting both fecundity and survival. Predators of course also scare prey inducing anti-predator defences that may carry physiological costs powerful enough to reduce prey fecundity and survival. Here, we consider whether measuring physiology can be used as a tool to unambiguously diagnose predation risk effects. We begin by providing a review of recent papers reporting physiological effects of predation risk. We then present a conceptual framework describing the pathways by which predators and food can affect prey populations and give an overview of predation risk effects on demography in various taxa. Because scared prey typically eat less the principal challenge we see will be to identify measures that permit us to avoid mistaking predator-induced reductions in food intake for absolute food shortage. To construct an effective diagnostic toolkit we advocate collecting multiple physiological measures and utilizing multivariate statistical procedures. We recommend conducting two-factor predation risk × food manipulations to identify those physiological effects least likely to be mistaken for responses to bottom-up food limitation. We suggest there is a critical need to develop a diagnostic tool that can be used when it is infeasible to experimentally test for predation risk effects on demography, as may often be the case in wildlife conservation, since failing to consider predation risk effects may cause the total impact of predators to be dramatically underestimated.

Keyword

Ecology of fear Food supply Non-consumptive effects Non-lethal predator effects Predator–prey interaction 

References

  1. Adamo SA, Baker JL (2011) Conserved features of chronic stress across phyla: the effects of long-term stress on behavior and the concentration of the neurohormone octopamine in the cricket, Gryllus texensis. Horm Behav 60:478–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alton LA, White CR, Wilson RS, Franklin CE (2012) The energetic cost of exposure to UV radiation for tadpoles is greater when they live with predators. Funct Ecol 26:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archard GA, Earley RL, Hanninen AF, Braithwaite VA (2012) Correlated behaviour and stress physiology in fish exposed to different levels of predation pressure. Funct Ecol 26:637–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry MJ, Syal S (2013) Metabolic responses of tadpoles to chemical predation cues. Hydrobiologia 700:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell AM, Henderson L, Huntingford FA (2010) Behavioral and respiratory responses to stressors in multiple populations of three-spined sticklebacks that differ in predation pressure. J Comp Physiol B 180:211–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2013) Are wolves saving Yellowstone’s aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade: comment. Ecology 94:1420–1425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaustein L (1997) Non-consumptive effects of larval Salamandra on crustacean prey: can eggs detect predators? Oecologia 110:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolnick D, Preisser E (2005) Resource competition modifies the strength of trait-mediated predator-prey interactions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 86:2771–2779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boonstra R, Hik D, Singleton G, Tinnikov A (1998) The impact of predator-induced stress on the snowshoe hare cycle. Ecol Monogr 68:371–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breuner CW, Delehanty B, Boonstra R (2013) Evaluating stress in natural populations of vertebrates: total CORT is not good enough. Funct Ecol 27:24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown J, Kotler B (2004) Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Lett 7:999–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown J, Laundre J, Gurung M (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mammal 80:385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Christianson D, Creel S (2010) A nutritionally mediated risk effect of wolves on elk. Ecology 91:1184–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clinchy M, Zanette L, Boonstra R, Wingfield JC, Smith JNM (2004) Balancing food and predator pressure induces chronic stress in songbirds. Proc R Soc B 271:2473–2479PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Clinchy M, Schulkin J, Zanette LY, Sheriff MJ, McGowan PO, Boonstra R (2011a) The neurological ecology of fear: insights neuroscientists and ecologists have to offer one another. Front Behav Neurosci 5:21PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Clinchy M, Zanette L, Charlier TD, Newman AEM, Schmidt KL, Boonstra R, Soma KK (2011b) Multiple measures elucidate glucocorticoid responses to environmental variation in predation threat. Oecologia 166:607–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clinchy M, Sheriff MJ, Zanette LY (2013) Predator-induced stress and the ecology of fear. Funct Ecol 27:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coslovsky M, Groothuis T, de Vries B, Richner H (2012) Maternal steroids in egg yolk as a pathway to translate predation risk to offspring: experiments with great tits. Gen Comp Endocrinol 176:211–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Costello DM, Michel MJ (2013) Predator-induced defenses in tadpoles confound body stoichiometry predictions of the general stress paradigm. Ecology 94:2229–2236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Creel S, Christianson D (2008) Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol Evol 23:194–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Creel S, Christianson D, Liley S, Winnie JA Jr (2007) Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk. Science 315:960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Creel S, Winnie JA Jr, Christianson D (2009) Glucocorticoid stress hormones and the effect of predation risk on elk reproduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12388–12393PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Creel S, Christianson DA, Winnie JA Jr (2011) A survey of the effects of wolf predation risk on pregnancy rates and calf recruitment in elk. Ecol Appl 21:2847–2853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Creel S, Winnie JA Jr, Christianson D (2013) Underestimating the frequency, strength and cost of antipredator responses with data from GPS collars: an example with wolves and elk. Ecol Evol 3:5189–5200PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Cross DJ, Marzluff JM, Palmquist I, Minoshima S, Shimizu T, Miyaoka R (2013) Distinct neural circuits underlie assessment of a diversity of natural dangers by American crows. Proc R Soc B 280:20131046PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Dahl E, Orizaola G, Winberg S, Laurila A (2012) Geographic variation in corticosterone response to chronic predator stress in tadpoles. J Evol Biol 25:1066–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dickens MJ, Romero LM (2013) A consensus endocrine profile for chronically stressed wild animals does not exist. Gen Comp Endocrinol 191:177–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eggers S, Griesser M, Nystrand M, Ekman J (2006) Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the siberian jay. Proc R Soc B 273:701–706PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. El-Sabaawi RW, Zandonà E, Kohler TJ, Marshall MC, Moslemi JM, Travis J, Lopez-Sepulcre A, Ferriere R, Pringle CM, Thomas SA, Reznick DN, Flecker AS (2012) Widespread intraspecific organismal stoichiometry among populations of the Trinidadian guppy. Funct Ecol 26:666–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fontaine JJ, Arriero E, Schwabl H, Martin TE (2011) Nest predation and circulating corticosterone levels within and among species. Condor 113:825–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giesing ER, Suski CD, Warner RE, Bell AM (2011) Female sticklebacks transfer information via eggs: effects of maternal experience with predators on offspring. Proc R Soc B 278:1753–1759PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Glazier DS, Butler EM, Lombardi SA, Deptola TJ, Reese AJ, Satterthwaite EV (2011) Ecological effects on metabolic scaling: amphipod responses to fish predators in freshwater springs. Ecol Monogr 81:599–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gosler A, Greenwood J, Perrins C (1995) Predation risk and the cost of being fat. Nature 377:621–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gravel M-A, Suski CD, Cooke SJ (2011) Behavioral and physiological consequences of nest predation pressure for larval fish. Behav Ecol 22:510–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Groner ML, Buck JC, Gervasi S, Blaustein AR, Reinert LK, Rollins-Smith LA, Bier ME, Hempel J, Relyea RA (2013) Larval exposure to predator cues alters immune function and response to a fungal pathogen in post-metamorphic wood frogs. Ecol Appl 23:1443–1454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gross CT, Canteras NS (2012) The many paths to fear. Nat Rev Neurosci 13:651–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haislip NA, Hoverman JT, Miller DL, Gray MJ (2012) Natural stressors and disease risk: does the threat of predation increase amphibian susceptibility to ranavirus? Can J Zool 90:893–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hamlin KL, Garrott RA, White PJ, Cunningham JA (2009) Contrasting wolf-ungulate interactions in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. In: Garrott RA, White PJ, Watson FGR (eds) The ecology of large mammals in central Yellowstone: sixteen years of integrated field studies. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 541–577Google Scholar
  40. Harshman LG, Zera AJ (2007) The cost of reproduction: the devil in the details. Trends Ecol Evol 22:80–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hawlena D, Schmitz OJ (2010a) Herbivore physiological response to fear of predation alters ecosystem nutrient dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:15503–15507PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Hawlena D, Schmitz OJ (2010b) Physiological stress as a fundamental mechanism linking predation to ecosystem functioning. Am Nat 176:537–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hawlena D, Strickland MS, Bradford MA, Schmitz OJ (2012) Fear of predation slows plant-litter decomposition. Science 336:1434–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Houston A, Mcnamara J, Hutchinson J (1993) General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philos Trans R Soc B 341:375–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Chastel O, Soler M (2011) Hormonal response of nestlings to predator calls. Gen Comp Endocrinol 171:232–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Janssens L, Stoks R (2013) Predation risk causes oxidative damage in prey. Biol Lett 9:20130350PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Kats L, Dill L (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361–394Google Scholar
  48. Kauffman MJ, Brodie JF, Jules ES (2013) Are wolves saving Yellowstone’s aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade: reply. Ecology 94:1425–1431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liesenjohann M, Liesenjohann T, Palme R, Eccard JA (2013) Differential behavioural and endocrine responses of common voles (Microtus arvalis) to nest predators and resource competitors. BMC Ecol 13:33PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Lima S (1986) Predation risk and unpredictable feeding conditions—determinants of body-mass in birds. Ecology 67:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lima S (1998) Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions—what are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? Bioscience 48:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lima SL (2009) Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev 84:485–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lima S, Dill L (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation—a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MacLeod R, MacLeod CD, Learmonth JA, Jepson PD, Reid RJ, Deaville R, Pierce GJ (2007) Mass-dependent predation risk and lethal dolphin porpoise interactions. Proc R Soc B 274:2587–2593PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. MacLeod CD, MacLeod R, Learmonth JA, Cresswell W, Pierce GJ (2014) Predicting population level risk effects of predation from the responses of individuals. Ecology (in press)Google Scholar
  56. Maher JM, Werner EE, Denver RJ (2013) Stress hormones mediate predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in amphibian tadpoles. Proc R Soc B 280:20123075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marzluff JM, Miyaoka R, Minoshima S, Cross DJ (2012) Brain imaging reveals neuronal circuitry underlying the crow’s perception of human faces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:15912–15917PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Mateo JM (2010) Alarm calls elicit predator-specific physiological responses. Biol Lett 6:623–625PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Middleton AD, Kauffman MJ, McWhirter DE, Jimenez MD, Cook RC, Cook JG, Albeke SE, Sawyer H, White PJ (2013) Linking anti-predator behaviour to prey demography reveals limited risk effects of an actively hunting large carnivore. Ecol Lett 16:1023–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Monclús R, Tiulim J, Blumstein DT (2011) Older mothers follow conservative strategies under predator pressure: the adaptive role of maternal glucocorticoids in yellow-bellied marmots. Horm Behav 60:660–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morosinotto C, Ruuskanen S, Thomson RL, Siitari H, Korpimäki E, Laaksonen T (2013) Predation risk affects the levels of maternal immune factors in avian eggs. J Avian Biol 44:427–436Google Scholar
  62. Nelson EH, Matthews CE, Rosenheim JA (2004) Predators reduce prey population growth by inducing changes in prey behavior. Ecology 85:1853–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pakkala JJ, Ryan Norris D, Newman AEM (2013) An experimental test of the capture-restraint protocol for estimating the acute stress response. Physiol Biochem Zool 86:279–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paterson RA, Pritchard DW, Dick JTA, Alexander ME, Hatcher MJ, Dunn AM (2013) Predator cue studies reveal strong trait-mediated effects in communities despite variation in experimental designs. Anim Behav 86:1301–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pauwels K, Stoks R, De Meester L (2010) Enhanced anti-predator defence in the presence of food stress in the water flea daphnia magna. Funct Ecol 24:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peacor SD, Pangle KL, Schiesari L, Werner EE (2012) Scaling-up anti-predator phenotypic responses of prey: impacts over multiple generations in a complex aquatic community. Proc R Soc B 279:122–128PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Peckarsky BL, Cowan CA, Penton MA, Anderson C (1993) Sublethal consequences of stream-dwelling predatory stoneflies on mayfly growth and fecundity. Ecology 74:1836–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Peckarsky BL, Abrams PA, Bolnick DI, Dill LM, Grabowski JH, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SD, Preisser EL, Schmitz OJ, Trussell GC (2008) Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator-prey interactions. Ecology 89:2416–2425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Perez-Tris J, Diaz J, Telleria J (2004) Loss of body mass under predation risk: cost of antipredatory behaviour or adaptive fit-for-escape? Anim Behav 67:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Plautz SC, Guest T, Funkhouser MA, Salice CJ (2013) Transgenerational cross-tolerance to stress: parental exposure to predators increases offspring contaminant tolerance. Ecotoxicology 22:854–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Preisser E, Bolnick D, Benard M (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reeve BC, Crespi EJ, Whipps CM, Brunner JL (2013) Natural stressors and ranavirus susceptibility in larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). EcoHealth 10:190–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rivers JW, Martin LB, Liebl AL, Betts MG (2011) Parental alarm calls of the white-crowned sparrow fail to stimulate corticosterone production in nest-bound offspring. Ethology 117:374–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Soares MC, Bshary R, Cardoso SC, Cote IM, Oliveira RF (2012) Face your fears: cleaning gobies inspect predators despite being stressed by them. PLOS ONE 7:e39781Google Scholar
  75. Scheuerlein A, Van’t Hof TJ, Gwinner E (2001) Predators as stressors? Physiological and reproductive consequences of predation risk in tropical stonechats (Saxicola torquata axillaris). Proc R Soc B 268:1575–1582PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Schmitz O, Beckerman A, OBrien K (1997) Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78:1388–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Seeman TE, McEwen BS, Rowe JW, Singer BH (2001) Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: mac-Arthur studies of successful aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4770–4775PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Seeman TE, Crimmins E, Huang M-H, Singer B, Bucur A, Gruenewald T, Berkman LF, Reuben DB (2004) Cumulative biological risk and socio-economic differences in mortality: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Soc Sci Med 58:1985–1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Seiter SA (2011) Predator presence suppresses immune function in a larval amphibian. Evol Ecol Res 13:283–293Google Scholar
  80. Sheriff MJ, Krebs CJ, Boonstra R (2009) The sensitive hare: sublethal effects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe hares. J Anim Ecol 78:1249–1258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sheriff MJ, Krebs CJ, Boonstra R (2010) The ghosts of predators past: population cycles and the role of maternal programming under fluctuating predation risk. Ecology 91:2983–2994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sheriff MJ, Krebs CJ, Boonstra R (2011) From process to pattern: how fluctuating predation risk impacts the stress axis of snowshoe hares during the 10-year cycle. Oecologia 166:593–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Speakman JR, Garratt M (2014) Oxidative stress as a cost of reproduction: beyond the simplistic trade-off model. Bioessays 36:93–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Strobbe F, McPeek MA, De Block M, Stoks R (2010) Survival selection imposed by predation on a physiological trait underlying escape speed. Funct Ecol 24:1306–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thaker M, Vanak AT, Lima SL, Hews DK (2010) Stress and aversive learning in a wild vertebrate: the role of corticosterone in mediating escape from a novel stressor. Am Nat 175:50–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thaler JS, McArt SH, Kaplan I (2012) Compensatory mechanisms for ameliorating the fundamental trade-off between predator avoidance and foraging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:12075–12080PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Thomson RL, Tomás G, Forsman JT, Broggi J, Mönkkönen M (2010) Predator proximity as a stressor in breeding flycatchers: mass loss, stress protein induction, and elevated provisioning. Ecology 91:1832–1840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thomson RL, Tomás G, Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M (2012) Manipulating individual decisions and environmental conditions reveal individual quality in decision-making and non-lethal costs of predation risk. PLoS One 7:e52226PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Travers M, Clinchy M, Zanette L, Boonstra R, Williams TD (2010) Indirect predator effects on clutch size and the cost of egg production. Ecol Lett 13:980–988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Vucetich JA, Smith DW, Stahler DR (2005) Influence of harvest, climate and wolf predation on Yellowstone elk, 1961–2004. Oikos 111:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. White PJ, Garrott RA, Hamlin KL, Cook RC, Cook JG, Cunningham JA (2011) Body condition and pregnancy in northern yellowstone elk: evidence for predation risk effects? Ecol Appl 21:3–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wikelski M, Cooke S (2006) Conservation physiology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:38–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Williams T (2005) Mechanisms underlying the costs of egg production. Bioscience 55:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zanette L, Clinchy M, Smith J (2006) Combined food and predator effects on songbird nest survival and annual reproductive success: results from a bi-factorial experiment. Oecologia 147:632–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zanette LY, White AF, Allen MC, Clinchy M (2011) Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year. Science 334:1398–1401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zanette LY, Hobson KA, Clinchy M, Travers M, Williams TD (2013) Food use is affected by the experience of nest predation: implications for indirect predator effects on clutch size. Oecologia 172:1031–1039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liana Y. Zanette
    • 1
  • Michael Clinchy
    • 2
  • Justin P. Suraci
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations