, Volume 176, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

Competing neighbors: light perception and root function

  • Pedro E. Gundel
  • Ronald Pierik
  • Liesje Mommer
  • Carlos L. Ballaré
Concepts, Reviews and Syntheses


Plant responses to competition have often been described as passive consequences of reduced resource availability. However, plants have mechanisms to forage for favorable conditions and anticipate competition scenarios. Despite the progresses made in understanding the role of light signaling in modulating plant–plant interactions, little is known about how plants use and integrate information gathered by their photoreceptors aboveground to regulate performance belowground. Given that the phytochrome family of photoreceptors plays a key role in the acquisition of information about the proximity of neighbors and canopy cover, it is tempting to speculate that changes in the red:far-red (R:FR) ratio perceived by aboveground plant parts have important implications shaping plant behavior belowground. Exploring data from published experiments, we assess the neglected role of light signaling in the control of root function. The available evidence indicates that plant exposure to low R:FR ratios affects root growth and morphology, root exudate profiles, and interactions with beneficial soil microorganisms. Although dependent on species identity, signals perceived aboveground are likely to affect root-to-root interactions. Root systems could also be guided to deploy new growth predominantly in open areas by light signals perceived by the shoots. Studying interactions between above- and belowground plant–plant signaling is expected to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of plant competition.


Plant competition Root growth Signal transduction Phytochrome Neighbor perception 



This article is dedicated to the memory of Hernán E. Boccalandro with whom P. E. G. started to explore some of the ideas discussed here. P. E. G. thanks Prof. Kari Saikkonen for the opportunity to carry out this project during his post-doctoral stay at MTT Agrifood Research Finland. The stay of P. E. G. at Wageningen University was supported by a visiting scientist grant of the graduate school of Production Ecology and Resource Conservation of Wageningen University and an Academy of Finland grant 137909 (MTT: 21030085).


  1. Abdel-Lateif K, Bogusz D, Hocher V (2012) The role of flavonoids in the establishment of plant root endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia and Frankia bacteria. Plant Signal Behav 7:636–641PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA, Kearney EE, Hastings AP, Ramsey TE (2012) Attenuation of the jasmonate burst, plant defensive traits, and resistance to specialist monarch caterpillars on shaded common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). J Chem Ecol 38:893–901PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akiyama K, Matsuzaki KI, Hayashi H (2005) Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435:824–827PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aphalo PJ, Ballaré CL (1995) On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant–plant interactions. Funct Ecol 9:5–14Google Scholar
  5. Aphalo PJ, Lehto T (2001) Effect of lateral far-red light supplementation on the growth and morphology of birch seedlings and its interaction with mineral nutrition. Trees 15:297–303Google Scholar
  6. Araya T, Miyamoto M, Wibowo J, Suzuki A, Kojima S, Tsuchiya Y, Sawa S, Fukuda H, von Wirén N, Takahashi H (2014) CLE-CLAVATA1 peptide-receptor signaling module regulates the expansion of plant root systems in a nitrogen-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:2029–2034PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkinson D, Naylor D, Coldrick GA (1976) The effect of tree spacing on the apple root system. Hortic Res 16:89–105Google Scholar
  8. Bae G, Choi G (2008) Decoding of light signals by plant phytochromes and their interacting proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:281–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM (2006) The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:233–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ballare CL (2014) Light and plant defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:335–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ballaré CL (2009) Illuminated behaviour: phytochrome as a key regulator of light foraging and plant anti-herbivore defence. Plant Cell Environ 32:713–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ballaré CL (2011) Jasmonate-induced defenses: a tale of intelligence, collaborators and rascals. Trends Plant Sci 16:249–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Sánchez RA (1990) Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science 247:329–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Sánchez RA (1991) On the opportunity cost of the photosynthate invested in stem elongation reactions mediated by phytochrome. Oecologia 86:561–567Google Scholar
  15. Ballaré CL, Mazza CA, Austin AT, Pierik R (2012) Canopy light and plant health. Plant Physiol 160:145–155PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Benech-Arnold RL, Sánchez RA, Forcella F, Kruk BC, Ghersa CM (2000) Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil. Field Crops Res 67:105–122Google Scholar
  17. Biedrzycki ML, Jilany TA, Dudley SA, Bais HP (2010) Root exudates mediate kin recognition in plants. Commun Integr Biol 3:28–35PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Blilou I, Xu J, Wildwater M, Willemsen V, Paponov I, Friml J, Heidstra R, Aida M, Palme K, Scheres B (2005) The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots. Nature 433:39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Boccalandro HE, De Simone SN, Bergmann-Honsberger A, Schepens I, Fankhauser C, Casal JJ (2008) PHYTOCHROME KINASE SUBSTRATE1 regulates root phototropism and gravitropism. Plant Physiol 146:108–115PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Brewer PB, Koltai H, Beveridge CA (2013) Diverse roles of strigolactones in plant development. Mol Plant 6:18–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Briggs WR, Christi JM (2002) Phototropins 1 and 2: versatile plant blue-light receptors. Trends Plant Sci 7:204–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Brisson J, Reynolds JF (1994) The effect of neighbors on root distribution in a creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) population. Ecology 75:1693–1702Google Scholar
  23. Caffaro MM, Vivanco JM, Gutierrez Boem FH, Rubio G (2011) The effect of root exudates on root architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Growth Regul 64:241–249Google Scholar
  24. Caffaro MM, Vivanco JM, Botto J, Rubio G (2013) Root architecture of Arabidopsis is affected by competition with neighbouring plants. Plant Growth Regul 70:141–147Google Scholar
  25. Cahill JF Jr, McNickle GG (2011) The behavioral ecology of nutrient foraging by plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:289–311Google Scholar
  26. Cahill JF Jr, McNickle GG, Haag JJ, Lamb EG, Nyanumba SM, Clair St CC (2010) Plants integrate information about nutrients and neighbors. Science 328:1657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Carabelli M, Possenti M, Sessa G, Ciolfi A, Sassi M, Morelli G, Ruberti I (2007) Canopy shade causes a rapid and transient arrest in leaf development through auxin-induced cytokinin oxidase activity. Genes Dev 21:1863–1868PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Casal JJ (2013) Photoreceptor signaling networks in plant responses to shade. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:403–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cerdán PD, Chory J (2003) Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature 423(6942):881–885PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cerrudo I, Keller MM, Cargnel MD, Demkura PV, de Wit M, Patitucci MS, Pierik R, Pieterse CM, Ballaré CL (2012) Low red/far-red ratios reduce Arabidopsis resistance to Botrytis cinerea and jasmonate responses via a COI1-JAZ10-dependent, salicylic acid-independent mechanism. Plant Physiol 158:2042–2052PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen M, Chory J, Fankhauser C (2004) Light signal transduction in higher plants. Annu Rev Genet 38:87–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Corré WJ (1983) Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants. II. The influence of light quality. Acta Bot Neerl 32:185–202Google Scholar
  33. Cowan JE, Reekie EG (2008) Effects of elevated CO2 on intra-specific competition in Sinapis alba: an examination of the role of growth responses to red:far-red ratio. Plant Biol 10:202–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dale MP, Causton DR (1992) The ecophysiology of Veronica chamaedrys, V. montana and V. officinalis. I. Light quality and light quantity. J Ecol 80:483–492Google Scholar
  35. de Kroon H, Mommer L, Nishiwaki A (2003) Root competition: towards a mechanistic understanding. In: de Kroon H, Visser EJW (eds) Root ecology. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–234Google Scholar
  36. de la Rosa TM, Aphalo PJ, Lehto T (1998) Effects of far-red light on the growth, mycorrhizas and mineral nutrition of Scots pine seedlings. Plant Soil 201:17–25Google Scholar
  37. de la Rosa TM, Lehto T, Aphalo PJ (1999) Does far-red light affect growth and mycorrhizas of Scots pine seedlings grown in forest soil? Plant Soil 211:259–268Google Scholar
  38. de Wit M, Kegge W, Evers JB, Vergeer-van Eijk MH, Gankema P, Voesenek LACJ, Pierik R (2012) Plant neighbor detectionn through touching leaf tips precedes phytochrome signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:14705–14710PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. de Wit M, Spoel SH, Sánchez-Pérez GF, Gommers CM, Pieterse CM, Voesenek LACJ, Pierik R (2013) Perception of low red:far-red ratio compromises both salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid-dependent pathogen defences in Arabidopsis. Plant J 75:90–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ding ZJ, Galvan-Ampudia CS, Demarsy E, Langowski L, Kleine-Vehn J, Fan YW, Morita MT, Tasaka M, Fankhauser C, Offringa R, Friml J (2011) Light-mediated polarization of the PIN3 auxin transporter for the phototropic response in Arabidopsis. Nat Cell Biol 13:447–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dorn LA, Hammond Pyle E, Schmitt J (2000) Plasticity to light cues and resources in Arabidopsis thaliana: testing for adaptive value and costs. Evolution 54:1982–1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dudley SA, File AL (2007) Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biol Lett 3:435–438PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Engelen-Eigles G, Holden G, Cohen JD, Gardner G (2006) The effect of temperature, photoperiod and light quality on gluconasturti in concentration in watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.). J Agric Food Chem 54:328–334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Falik O, Reides P, Gersani M, Novoplansky A (2003) Self/non-self discrimination in roots. J Ecol 91:525–531Google Scholar
  45. Fang S, Clark RT, Zheng Y, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Weitz JS, Kochian LV, Edelsbrunner H, Liao H, Benfey PN (2013) Genotypic recognition and spatial responses by rice roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:2670–2675PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Farley RA, Fitter AH (1999) The responses of seven co-occurring woodland herbaceous perennials to localized nutrient rich patches. J Ecol 87:849–859Google Scholar
  47. Feldman LJ, Briggs WR (1987) Light-regulated gravitropism in seedling roots of maize. Plant Physiol 83:241–243PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Finlayson SA, Lee I-J, Morgan PW (1998) Phytochrome B and the regulation of circadian ethylene production in Sorghum. Plant Physiol 116:17–25PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Forde BG, Walch-Liu P (2009) Nitrate and glutamate as environmental cues for behavioural responses in plant roots. Plant Cell Environ 32:682–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Frank DA, Pontes AW, Maine EM, Caruana J, Raina R, Raina S, Fridley JD (2010) Grassland root communities: species distributions and how they are linked to aboveground abundance. Ecology 91:3201–3209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Franklin KA (2008) Shade avoidance. New Phytol 179:930–944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Franklin KA, Quail PH (2010) Phytochrome functions in Arabidopsis development. J Exp Bot 61:11–24PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Franklin KA, Whitelam GC (2004) Light signals, phytochromes and cross-talk with other environmental cues. J Exp Bot 55:271–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Galen C, Rabenold J, Liscum E (2006) Functional ecology of a blue light photoreceptor: effects of phototropin-1 on root growth enhance drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 173:91–99Google Scholar
  55. Gersani M, Abramsky Z, Falik O (1998) Density-dependent habitat selection in plants. Evol Ecol 12:223–234Google Scholar
  56. Gersani M, Brown JS, O’Brien EE, Maina GM, Abramsky Z (2001) Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition. J Ecol 89:660–669Google Scholar
  57. Gommers CMM, Visser EJW, Onge St KR, Voesenek LACJ, Pierik R (2013) Shade tolerance: when growing tall is not an option. Trends Plant Sci 18:65–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Green-Tracewicz E, Page ER, Swanton CJ (2012) Light quality and the critical period for weed control in soybean. Weed Sci 60:86–91Google Scholar
  59. Grimes DW, Miller RJ, Wiley PL (1975) Cotton and corn root development in two field soils of different strength characteristics. Agron J 67:519–523Google Scholar
  60. Gruntman M, Novoplansky A (2004) Physiologically mediated self non-self discrimination in roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:3863–3867PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Hendriks M, Mommer L, de Caluwe H, Smit-Tiekstra AE, van der Putten WH, de Kroon H (2013) Independent variations of plant and soil mixtures reveal soil feedback effects on plant community overyielding. J Ecol 101:287–297Google Scholar
  62. Hennig L, Stoddart WM, Dieterle M, Whitelam GC, Schäfer E (2002) Phytochrome E controls light-induced germination of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 128:194–200PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hess L, de Kroon H (2007) Effects of rooting volume and nutrient availability as an alternative explanation for root self/non-self discrimination. J Ecol 95:241–251Google Scholar
  64. Ho C, Tsay Y (2010) Nitrate, ammonium and potassium sensing and signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:604–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Ho C, Lin S, Hu H, Tsay Y (2009) CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell 138:1184–1194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Hoddinott J, Hall LM (1982) The responses of photosynthesis and translocation rates to changes in the ζ ratio of light. Can J Bot 60:1285–1291Google Scholar
  67. Hoddinott J, Rickey S (1996) The influence of light quality and carbon dioxide enrichment on the growth and physiology of seedlings of three conifer species. I. Growth responses. Can J Bot 74:383–390Google Scholar
  68. Hodge A (2009) Root decisions. Plant Cell Environ 32:628–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Holmes MG, Smith H (1977) The function of phytochrome in the natural environment. I. Characterization of daylight for studies in photomorphogesis and photoperiodism. Photochem Photobiol 25:533–538Google Scholar
  70. Hornitschek P, Kohnen MV, Lorrain S, Rougemont J, Ljung K, López-Vidriero I, Franco-Zorrilla JM, Solano R, Trevisan M, Pradervand S, Xenarios I, Fankhauser C (2012) Phytochrome interacting factors 4 and 5 control seedling growth in changing light conditions by directly controlling auxin signaling. Plant J 71:699–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, Biondini M, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL (2006) Remote sensing of future competitors: impacts on plant defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:7170–7174PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, Astigueta MS, Ciarla AM, Ballaré CL (2013) No time for candy: passionfruit (Passiflora edulis) plants down-regulate damage-induced extra floral nectar production in response to light signals of competition. Oecologia 173:213–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Jones FA, Erickson DL, Bernal MA, Bermingham E, Kress WJ, Herre EA, Muller-Landau HC, Turner BL (2011) The roots of diversity: below ground species richness and rooting distributions in a tropical forest revealed by DNA barcodes and inverse modeling. PLoS One 6(9):e24506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024506 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Kasperbauer MJ, Hunt PG (1992) Cotton seedling morphogenic responses to FR/R ratio reflected from different colored soils and soil covers. Photochem Photobiol 56:579–584Google Scholar
  75. Kasperbauer MJ, Hunt PG (1994) Shoot/root assimilate allocation and nodulation of Vigna unguiculata seedlings as influenced by shoot light environment. Plant Soil 161:97–101Google Scholar
  76. Kasperbauer MJ, Karlen DL (1994) Plant spacing and reflected far-red light effects on phytochrome-regulated photosynthate allocation in corn seedlings. Crop Sci 34:1564–1569Google Scholar
  77. Kasperbauer MJ, Hunt PG, Sojka RE (1984) Photosynthate partitioning and nodule formation in soybean plants that received red or far-red light at the end of the photosynthetic period. Physiol Plant 61:549–554Google Scholar
  78. Kegge W, Pierik R (2010) Biogenic volatile organic compounds and plant competition. Trends Plant Sci 15:126–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kegge W, Weldegergis B, Soler R, Vegeer-van Eijck M, Dicke M, Voesenek LACJ, Pierik R (2013) Canopy light cues affect emission of constitutive and methyl jasmonate-induced volatile organic compounds in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 200:861–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Keiller D, Smith H (1989) Control of carbon partitioning by light-quality mediated by phytochrome. Plant Sci 63:25–29Google Scholar
  81. Keller MM, Jaillais Y, Pedmale UV, Moreno JE, Chory J, Ballaré CL (2011) Cryptochrome 1 and phytochrome B control shade-avoidance responses in Arabidopsis via partially-independent hormonal cascades. Plant J 67:195–207PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Kembel SW, Cahill JF Jr (2005) Plant phenotypic plasticity belowground: a phylogenetic perspective on root foraging trade-offs. Am Nat 166:216–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Kesanakurti PR, Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Percy DM, Newmaster SG, Graham SW, Barrett SC, Hajibabaei M, Husband BC (2011) Spatial patterns of plant diversity below-ground as revealed by DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol 20:1289–1302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Keuskamp DH, Pollmann S, Voesenek LACJ, Peeters AJM, Pierik R (2010) Auxin transport through PIN-FORMED 3 (PIN3) controls shade avoidance and fitness during competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:22740–22744PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Keuskamp DH, Sasidharan R, Vos I, Peeters AJM, Voesenek LACJ, Pierik R (2011) Blue-light-mediated shade avoidance requires combined auxin and brassinosteroid action in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J 67:208–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Klemens JA (2008) Kin recognition in plants? Biol Lett 4:67–68PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Krouk G, Lacombe B, Bielach A, Perrine-Walker F, Malinska K, Mounier E, Hoyerova K, Tillard P, Leon S, Ljung K, Zazimalova E, Benkova E, Nacry P, Gojon A (2010) Nitrate-regulated auxin transport by NRT1.1 defines a mechanism for nutrient sensing in plants. Dev Cell 18:927–937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv Ecol Res 23:187–261Google Scholar
  89. Lee DW, Baskaran K, Mansor M, Mohamad H, Yap SK (1996) Irradiance and spectral quality affect Asian tropical rain forest tree seedling development. Ecology 77:568–580Google Scholar
  90. Li L, Ljung K, Breton G, Schmitz RJ, Pruneda-Paz J, Cowing-Zitron C, Cole BJ, Ivans LJ, Pedmale UV, Jung H-S, Ecker JR, Kay SA, Chory J (2012) Linking photoreceptor excitation to changes in plant architecture. Genes Dev 26:785–790PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Liu JG, Mahoney KJ, Sikkema PH, Swanton CJ (2009) The importance of light quality in crop–weed competition. Weed Res 49:217–224Google Scholar
  92. Lobet G, Pagès L, Draye X (2011) A novel image-analysis toolbox enabling quantitative analysis of root system architecture. Plant Physiol 157:29–39PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Lötscher M, Nösberger J (1997) Branch and root formation in Trifolium repens is influenced by the light environment of unfolded leaves. Oecologia 111:499–504Google Scholar
  94. Lu YT, Hidaka H, Feldman LJ (1996) Characterization of a calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase homolog from maize roots showing light-regulated gravitropism. Planta 199:18–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Mahall BE, Callaway RM (1991) Root communication among desert shrubs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:874–876PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Mahall BE, Callaway RM (1992) Root communication mechanisms and intracommunity distributions of 2 Mojave desert shrubs. Ecology 73:2145–2151Google Scholar
  97. Maina GG, Brown JS, Gersani M (2002) Intra-plant versus inter-plant root competition in beans: avoidance, resource matching or tragedy of the commons. Plant Ecol 160:235–247Google Scholar
  98. Martínez-García JF, Galstyan A, Salla-Martret M, Cifuentes-Esquivel N, Gallemí M, Bou-Torrent J (2010) Regulatory components of shade avoidance syndrome. Adv Bot Res 53:65–116Google Scholar
  99. Mason WK, Rowse HR, Bennie ATP, Kaspar TC, Taylor HM (1982) Responses of soybeans to two row spacings and two soil water levels. II. Water use, root growth and plant water status. Field Crops Res 5:15–29Google Scholar
  100. McKendrick SL (1996) The effects of shade on seedlings of Orchis morio and Dactylorhiza fuchsii in chalk and clay soil. New Phytol 134:343–352Google Scholar
  101. McLaren JS, Smith H (1978) Phytochrome control of the growth and development of Rumex obtusifolius under simulated canopy light environments. Plant Cell Environ 1:61–67Google Scholar
  102. Mitchell PL, Woodward FI (1988) Responses of three woodland herbs to reduced photosynthetically active radiation and low red to far-red ratio in shade. J Ecol 76:807–825Google Scholar
  103. Mommer L, Wagemaker CAM, de Kroon H, Ouborg NJ (2008) Unravelling below-ground plant distributions: a real-time polymerase chain reaction method for quantifying species proportions in mixed root samples. Mol Ecol Resour 8:947–953PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Mommer L, van Ruijven J, de Caluwe H, Smit-Tiekstra AE, Wagemaker CAM, Joop Ouborg N, Bögemann GM, van der Weerden GM, Berendse F, de Kroon H (2010) Unveiling below-ground species abundance in a biodiversity experiment: a test of vertical niche differentiation among grassland species. J Ecol 98:1117–1127Google Scholar
  105. Mommer L, Dumbrell AJ, Wagemaker CAM, Ouborg NJ (2011) Belowground DNA based techniques: untangling the network of plant root interactions. Plant Soil 348:115–121Google Scholar
  106. Mommer L, van Ruijven J, Jansen C, van de Steeg HM, de Kroon H (2012) Interactive effects of nutrient heterogeneity and competition: implications for root foraging theory? Funct Ecol 26:66–73Google Scholar
  107. Moreno JE, Tao Y, Chory J, Ballaré CL (2009) Ecological modulation of plant defense via phytochrome control of jasmonate sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4935–4940PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Morgan DC, Smith H (1979) A systematic relationship between phytochrome-controlled development and species habitat, for plants grown in simulated natural radiation. Planta 145:253–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Murphy GP, Dudley SA (2007) Above- and below-ground competition cues elicit independent responses. J Ecol 95:261–272Google Scholar
  110. Murphy GP, Dudley SA (2009) Kin recognition: competition and cooperation in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). Am J Bot 96:1990–1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Newton AC, Dick JM, McBeath C, Leakey RRB (1996) The influence of R:FR ratio on the growth, photosynthesis and rooting ability of Terminalia spinosa Engl and Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum Ann Appl Biol 128:541–556Google Scholar
  112. Novoplansky A (2009) Picking battles wisely: plant behaviour under competition. Plant Cell Environ 32:726–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. O’Brien EE, Gersani M, Brown JS (2005) Root proliferation and seed yield in response to spatial heterogeneity of below-ground competition. New Phytol 168:401–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Page ER, Tollenaar M, Lee EA, Lukens L, Swanton CJ (2009) Does the shade avoidance response contribute to the critical period for weed control in maize (Zea mays)? Weed Res 49:563–571Google Scholar
  115. Pattison RR, Goldstein G, Ares A (1998) Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rainforest species. Oecologia 117:449–459Google Scholar
  116. Pearson CJ, Jacobs BC (1985) Root distribution in space and time in Trifolium subterranean. Aust J Agric Res 36:601–614Google Scholar
  117. Pechácková S (1999) Root response to above-ground light quality. Differences between rhizomatous and non-rhizomatous clones of Festuca rubra. Plant Ecol 141:67–77Google Scholar
  118. Peret B, De Rybel B, Casimiro I, Benkova E, Swarup R, Laplaze L, Beeckman T, Bennett MJ (2009) Arabidopsis lateral root development: an emerging story. Trends Plant Sci 14:399–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Pierik R, Whitelam GC, Voesenek LACJ, de Kroon H, Visser EJW (2004a) Canopy studies on ethylene-insensitive tobacco identify ethylene as a novel element in blue light and plant–plant signaling. Plant J 35:310–319Google Scholar
  120. Pierik R, Cuppens MLC, Voesenek LACJ, Visser EJW (2004b) Interactions between ethylene and gibberellins in phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses in Tobacco. Plant Physiol 136:2928–2936PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Pierik R, Mommer L, Voesenek LACJ (2013) Molecular mechanisms of plant competition: neighbor detection and response strategies. Funct Ecol 27:841–853Google Scholar
  122. Pierik R, Ballaré CL, Dicke M (2014) Ecology of plant volatiles: taking a plant community perspective. Plant Cell Environ (in press)Google Scholar
  123. Pomilio AD, Leicach SR, Yaber Grass M, Ghersa CM, Santoro M, Vitale A (2000) Root exudate constituents of Avena fatua grown under far infrared enriched light. Phytochem Anal 11:304–308Google Scholar
  124. Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012) Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol 193:30–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Rajcan I, Chandler KJ, Swanton CJ (2004) Red-far-red ratio of reflected light: a hypothesis of why early season weed control is important in corn. Weed Sci 52:774–778Google Scholar
  126. Ruberti I, Sessa G, Ciolfi A, Possenti M, Carabelli M, Morelli G (2012) Plant adaptation to dynamically changing environment: the shade avoidance response. Biotechnol Adv 30:1047–1108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Ruyter-Spira C, Al-Babili S, van der Krol S, Bouwmeester H (2013) The biology of strigolactones. Trends Plant Sci 18:72–83Google Scholar
  128. Sadras VO, Hall AJ, Trapani N, Vilella F (1989) Dynamics of rooting and root-length: leaf-area relationships as affected by plant population in sunflower crops. Field Crops Res 22:45–57Google Scholar
  129. Salisbury FJ, Hall A, Grierson CS, Halliday KJ (2007) Phytochrome coordinates Arabidopsis shoot and root development. Plant J 50:429–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Schenk HJ (2006) Root competition: beyond resource depletion. J Ecol 94(4):725–739Google Scholar
  131. Schmitt J, McCormac AC, Smith H (1995) A test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis using transgenic and mutant plants disabled in phytochrome-mediated elongation responses to neighbors. Am Nat 146:937–953Google Scholar
  132. Semchenko M, John EA, Hutchings MJ (2007) Effects of physical connection and genetic identity of neighbouring ramets on root-placement patterns in two clonal species. New Phytol 176:644–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Skálová H, Vosátka M (1998) Growth response of three Festuca rubra clones to light quality and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Folia Geobot 33:159–169Google Scholar
  134. Smith H (2000) Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants–an emerging synthesis. Nature 407:585–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Smith H, Whitelam GC (1997) The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes. Plant Cell Environ 20:840–844Google Scholar
  136. Stuefer JF, Huber H (1998) Differential effects of light quantity and spectral light quality on growth, morphology and development in two stoloniferous Potentilla species. Oecologia 117:1–8Google Scholar
  137. Suzuki A, Suriyagoda L, Shigeyama T, Tominaga A, Sasaki M, Hiratsuka Y, Yoshinaga A, Arima S, Agarie S, Sakai T, Inada S, Jikumaru Y, Kamiya Y, Uchiumi T, Abe M, Hashiguchi M, Akashi R, Sato S, Kaneko T, Tabata S, Hirsch AM (2011) Lotus japonicus nodulation is photomorphogenetically controlled by sensing the red/far red (R/FR) ratio through jasmonic acid (JA) signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:16837–16842PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Tao Y, Ferrer J-L, Ljung K, Pojer F, Hong F, Long JA, Li L, Moreno JE, Bowman ME, Ivans LJ, Cheng Y, Lim J, Zhao Y, Ballaré CL, Sandberg G, Noel JP, Chory J (2008) Rapid synthesis of auxin via a new tryptophan-dependent pathway is required for shade avoidance in plants. Cell 133:164–176PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Tegelberg R, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Aphalo PJ (2004) Red:far-red light ratio and UV-B radiation: their effects on leaf phenolics and growth of silver birch seedlings. Plant Cell Environ 27:1005–1013Google Scholar
  140. Tinoco-Ojanguren C, Pearcy RW (1995) A comparison of light quality and quantity effects on the growth and steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic characteristics of three tropical tree species. Funct Ecol 9:222–230Google Scholar
  141. Tsuchiya Y, Vidaurre D, Toh S, Hanada A, Nambara E, Kamiya Y, Yamaguchi S, McCourt P (2010) A small–molecule screen identifies new functions for the plant hormone strigolactone. Nat Chem Biol 6:741–749Google Scholar
  142. van Hinsberg A (1997) Morphological variation in Plantago lanceolata L.: effects of light quality and growth regulators on sun and shade populations. J Evol Biol 10:687–701Google Scholar
  143. van Hinsberg A, van Tienderen P (1997) Variation in growth form in relation to spectral light quality (red/far-red ratio) in Plantago lanceolata L. in sun and shade populations. Oecologia 111:452–459Google Scholar
  144. Zavala JA, Mazza CA, Dillon FM, Chludil HD, Ballaré CL (2014) Soybean resistance to stink bugs (Nezara viridula and Piezodorus guildinii) increases with exposure to solar UV-B radiation and correlates with isoflavonoid content in pods under field conditions. Plant Cell Environ (in press)Google Scholar
  145. Zhang J, Subramanian S, Stacey G, Yu O (2009) Flavones and flavonols play distinct critical roles during nodulation of Medicago truncatula by Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant J 57:171–183PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro E. Gundel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ronald Pierik
    • 3
  • Liesje Mommer
    • 4
  • Carlos L. Ballaré
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Plant Production ResearchMTT Agrifood Research FinlandJokioinenFinland
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Plant Ecophysiology, Institute of Environmental BiologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.IIB-INTECH, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasUniversidad Nacional de San MartínBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations