Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 172, Issue 4, pp 1017–1029 | Cite as

Spatial structuring of an evolving life-history strategy under altered environmental conditions

  • Jens C. HeggEmail author
  • Brian P. Kennedy
  • Paul M. Chittaro
  • Richard W. Zabel
Population ecology - Original research

Abstract

Human disturbances to ecosystems have created challenges to populations worldwide, forcing them to respond phenotypically in ways that increase their fitness under current conditions. One approach to examining population responses to disturbance in species with complex life histories is to study species that exhibit spatial patterns in their phenotypic response across populations or demes. In this study, we investigate a threatened population of fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Snake River of Idaho, in which a significant fraction of the juvenile population have been shown to exhibit a yearling out-migration strategy which had not previously been thought to exist. It has been suggested that dam-related environmental changes may have altered the selective pressures experienced by out-migrating fall chinook, driving evolution of a later and more selectively advantageous migration strategy. Using isotopic analysis of otoliths from returning adult spawners, we reconstructed the locations of individual fish at three major juvenile life stages to determine if the representation of the yearling life history was geographically structured within the population. We reconstructed juvenile locations for natal, rearing and overwintering life stages in each of the major spawning areas in the basin. Our results indicate that the yearling life-history strategy is predominantly represented within one of the main spawning regions, the Clearwater River, rather than being distributed throughout the basin. Previous studies have shown the Clearwater River to have cooler temperatures, later hatch dates, and later outmigration of juveniles, indicating a link between environment and expression of the yearling life history. Our data suggest that this new yearling life history may be disproportionally represented in returning adult spawners, indicating selection for this life history within the population.

Keywords

Phenotypic plasticity Local adaptation Chinook salmon Juvenile migration Otolith microchemistry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to members of the CIFEES laboratory at University of Idaho, including E. Hamann, J. Reader and S. Bourret for help in sample collection, analysis, and method development. Thanks to A. Fremier for help with geospatial analysis and to B. Connor with U. S. Fish and Wildlife and B. Arnsberg from Nez Perce Tribal Fisheries who collected juvenile samples for this study. Thanks to D. Milks, staff at Lyons Ferry Hatchery and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, for facilitating sample collection and providing scale analysis. Thanks to the Washington State University Geoanalytical Lab, J. Vervoort, C. Knaack, and G. Hart for the use of their equipment and help in isotopic method development. This work was funded by grants to R. Zabel and B. Kennedy from the USACE and to B. Kennedy from NMFS - NWFSC. Additional funding came from an NSF GK-12 award, #0841199, and by the NSF Idaho EPSCoR program, award number EPS-0814387.

References

  1. Altwegg R (2002) Predator-induced life-history plasticity under time constraints in pool frogs. Ecology 83:2542–2551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacon C, Weber P, Larsen K, Reisenbichler R, Fitzpatrick J, Wooden J (2004) Migration and rearing histories of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) determined by ion microprobe Sr isotope and Sr/Ca transects of otoliths. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:2425–2439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bain D, Bacon J (1994) Strontium isotopes as indicators of mineral weathering in catchments. Catena 22:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett-Johnson R, Ramos F, Grimes C, MacFarlane R (2005) Validation of Sr isotopes in otoliths by laser ablation multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICPMS): opening avenues in fisheries science applications. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:2425–2430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett-Johnson R, Teel DJ, Casillas E (2010) Genetic and otolith isotopic markers identify salmon populations in the Columbia River at broad and fine geographic scales. Environ Biol Fish 89:533–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campana S (2005) Otolith science entering the 21st century. Mar Freshw Res 56:485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campana S, Thorrold S (2001) Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chevin LM, Lande R, Mace GM (2010) Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol 8:e1000357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clow D, Mast M, Bullen T, Turk J (1997) Strontium 87/strontium 86 as a tracer of mineral weathering reactions and calcium sources in an alpine/subalpine watershed, Loch Vale, Colorado. Water Resour Res 33:1335–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connor W, Burge H, Waitt R, Bjornn T (2002) Juvenile life history of wild fall Chinook salmon in the Snake and Clearwater rivers. N Am J Fish Manag 22:703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connor W, Burge H, Yearsley J, Bjornn T (2003a) Influence of flow and temperature on survival of wild subyearling fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River. N Am J Fish Manag 23:362–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connor WP, Steinhorst RK, Burge HL (2003b) Migrational behavior and seaward movement of wild subyearling fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River. N Am J Fish Manag 23:414–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connor W, Sneva J, Tiffan K, Steinhorst R, Ross D (2005) Two alternative juvenile life history types for fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crispo E et al (2010) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in response to anthropogenic disturbance. Evol Ecol Res 12:47–66Google Scholar
  15. Crozier L et al (2008) Potential responses to climate change in organisms with complex life histories: evolution and plasticity in Pacific salmon. Evol Appl 1:252–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Block M, Stoks R (2005) Fitness effects from egg to reproduction: bridging the life history transition. Ecology 86:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Decker MB, Breitburg DL, Marcus NH (2003) Geographical differences in behavioral responses to hypoxia: local adaptation to an anthropogenic stressor? Ecol Appl 13:1104–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foley JA et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster D, Fanning M (1997) Geochronology of the northern Idaho batholith and the Bitterroot metamorphic core complex: magmatism preceding and contemporaneous with extension. Geol Soc Am Bull 109:379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia AP, Bradbury S, Arnsberg BD, Groves PA (2008) Fall Chinook Salmon spawning ground surveys in the Snake River Basin Upriver of Lower Granite Dam, 2007 Annual ReportGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghalambor C, McKay J, Carroll S, Reznick D (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giménez KA, Torres G (2004) Linking life history traits in successive phases of a complex life cycle: effects of larval biomass on early juvenile development in an estuarine crab, Chasmagnathus granulata. Oikos 104:570–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gotthard K, Nylin S (1995) Adaptive plasticity and plasticity as an adaptation: a selective review of plasticity in animal morphology and life history. Oikos 74:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groot C, Margolis L (1991) Pacific salmon life histories. University of British Columbia Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  25. Grottoli AG, Rodrigues LJ, Palardy JE (2006) Heterotrophic plasticity and resilience in bleached corals. Nature 440:1186–1189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamann EJ, Kennedy BP (2012) Juvenile dispersal affects straying behaviors of adults in a migratory population. Ecology 93:733–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hendry AP, Farrugia TJ, Kinnison MT (2008) Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations. Mol Ecol 17:20–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hollander M, Wolfe D (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Hooper PR, Camp VE, Reidel SP, Ross ME (2007) The origin of the Columbia River flood basalt province: plume versus nonplume models. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 430:635Google Scholar
  30. Hughes TP et al (2003) Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science 301:929–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiguet F, Gadot AS, Julliard R, Newson SE, Couvet D (2007) Climate envelope, life history traits and the resilience of birds facing global change. Glob Chang Biol 13:1672–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johansson F, Stoks R, Rowe L, De Block M (2001) Life history plasticity in a damselfly: effects of combined time and biotic constraints. Ecology 82:1857–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keefer ML, Peery CA, Bjornn TC, Jepson MA, Stuehrenberg LC (2004) Hydrosystem, dam, and reservoir passage rates of adult Chinook salmon and steelhead in the Columbia and Snake rivers. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:1413–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kennedy B, Blum J, Folt C, Nislow K (2000) Using natural strontium isotopic signatures as fish markers: methodology and application. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:2280–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kennedy B, Klaue A, Blum J, Folt C, Nislow K (2002) Reconstructing the lives of fish using Sr isotopes in otoliths. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:925–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ludington S et al (2005) Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States—western states: California, Nevada, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah [version 1.3]. In: US Geological Survey, Open-File Report OF-2005-1305Google Scholar
  37. Marcel EV et al (2003) Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marra P, Hobson K, Holmes R (1998) Linking winter and summer events in a migratory bird by using stable-carbon isotopes. Science 282:1884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCullough D (1999) A review and synthesis of effects of alterations to the water temperature regime on freshwater life stages of salmonids, with special reference to chinook salmon. In: Water Resources, U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  40. Milks D, Varney M, Schuck M (2009) Lyons ferry hatchery evaluation fall Chinook Salmon Annual Report, 2006. Washington State Department of Fish and WildlifeGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller JA, Butler VL, Simenstad CA, Backus DH, Kent AJR, Gillanders B (2011) Life history variation in upper Columbia River Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): a comparison using modern and ~500-year-old archaeological otoliths. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:603–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Montgomery D (2000) Coevolution of the Pacific salmon and Pacific Rim topography. Geology 28:1107–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Munzel U, Hothorn LA (2001) A unified approach to simultaneous rank test procedures in the unbalanced one way layout. Biometr J 43:553–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Quinn TP, Unwin MJ, Kinnison MT (2000) Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding by introduced chinook salmon populations. Evolution 54:1372–1385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Raymond HL (1979) Effects of dams and impoundments on migrations of juvenile chinook salmon and steelhead from the Snake River, 1966 to 1975. Trans Am Fish Soc 108:505–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reed TE, Schindler DE, Waples RS (2011) Interacting effects of phenotypic plasticity and evolution on population persistence in a changing climate. Conserv Biol 25:56–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Routledge R (2005) Fisher’s exact test. In: Armitage P, Colton T (eds) Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Wiley, New York. doi: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a10020
  49. Ruckelshaus MH, Levin P, Johnson JB, Kareiva PM (2002) The Pacific salmon wars: what science brings to the challenge of recovering species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:665–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Secor D, Dean J, Laban E (1991) Manual for otolith removal and preparation for microstructural examination. Electric Power Research Institute; Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal ResearchGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith TB et al (2008) Evolutionary consequences of human disturbance in a rainforest bird species from Central Africa. Mol Ecol 17:58–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stoeser DB et al (2006) Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: central states: Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana. In: U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report OF-95-691Google Scholar
  53. Taborsky B (2006) The influence of juvenile and adult environments on life-history trajectories. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thorrold SR, Latkoczy C, Swart PK, Jones CM (2001) Natal homing in a marine fish metapopulation. Science 291:297–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walther BD, Dempster T, Letnic M, McCulloch MT (2011) Movements of diadromous fish in large unregulated tropical rivers inferred from geochemical tracers. PLoS ONE 6(4):e18351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018351 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waples R, Jones R Jr, Beckman B, Swan G (1991) Status review for Snake River fall chinook salmon. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS N/NWC-201, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  58. Waples R, Teel D, Myers J, Marshall A (2004) Life-history divergence in Chinook salmon: historic contingency and parallel evolution. Evolution 58:386–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Waples R, Pess G, Beechie T (2008) Evolutionary history of Pacific salmon in dynamic environments. Evol Appl 1:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Waples R, Beechie T, Pess G (2009) Evolutionary history, habitat disturbance regimes, and anthropogenic changes: what do these mean for resilience of Pacific salmon populations? Ecol Soc 14:3Google Scholar
  61. Wassenaar LI, Hobson KA (1998) Natal origins of migratory monarch butterflies at wintering colonies in Mexico: new isotopic evidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15436–15439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wassenaar LI, Hobson KA (2000) Stable-carbon and hydrogen isotope ratios reveal breeding origins of red-winged blackbirds. Ecol Appl 10:911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams J, Zabel R, Waples R, Hutchings J, Connor W (2008) Potential for anthropogenic disturbances to influence evolutionary change in the life history of a threatened salmonid. Evol Appl 1:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zabel R, Chittaro P (unpublished data) Unpublished otolith hatch check data for Snake River fall Chinook Salmon. In. NOAA—Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  65. Zabel R, Haught K, Chittaro P (2010) Variability in fish size/otolith radius relationships among populations of Chinook salmon. Environ Biol Fish 89:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens C. Hegg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brian P. Kennedy
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Paul M. Chittaro
    • 3
  • Richard W. Zabel
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Fish and Wildlife SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  3. 3.Fish Ecology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science CenterNOAA Fisheries ServiceSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations