, Volume 172, Issue 3, pp 679–688 | Cite as

Does maternal oviposition site influence offspring dispersal to suitable habitat?

  • Daniel A. WarnerEmail author
  • Timothy S. Mitchell
Behavioral ecology - Original research


Orientation and dispersal to suitable habitat affects fitness in many animals, but the factors that govern these behaviors are poorly understood. In many turtle species, hatchlings must orient and disperse to suitable aquatic habitat immediately after emergence from subterranean nests. Thus, the location of nest sites relative to aquatic habitats ideally should be associated with the direction of hatchling dispersal. At our study site, painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) nest to the west (on an island) and east (on the mainland) of a wetland, which determines the direction that hatchlings must travel to reach suitable aquatic habitat. To determine if hatchling orientation is intrinsically influenced by the location where their mothers nest, we employed a two-part cross-fostering experiment in the field, whereby half the eggs laid in mainland nests were swapped with half the eggs laid in island nests. Moreover, because C. picta hatchlings overwinter inside their nests, we performed a second cross-fostering experiment to fully decouple the effects of (1) the maternally chosen nest location, (2) the embryonic developmental location, and (3) the overwinter location. We released hatchlings into a circular arena in the field and found that turtles generally dispersed in a westerly direction, regardless of the maternally chosen nest location and independent of the locations of embryonic development and overwintering. Although this westerly direction was towards suitable aquatic habitat, we could not distinguish whether naïve hatchling turtles (i) use environmental cues/stimuli to orient their movement, or (ii) have an intrinsic bias to orient west in the absence of stimuli. Nevertheless, these findings suggest that the orientation behavior of naïve hatchling turtles during terrestrial dispersal is not dependent upon the location of maternally-chosen nest sites.


Cross-fostering experiment Maternal effects Nest-site selection Orientation Turtle 



We thank R. Alverio, A. Durso, J. Maciel, A. Sethuraman, J. Strickland, and J. Ward for assistance in the field and laboratory. We are grateful to E. Britton and the staff with the Army Corps of Engineers for making this research possible. Thanks to G. Cordero, F. Janzen, J. Refsnider, A. Sethuraman, and R. Telemeco for insightful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. This research was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Iowa State University (protocol # 12-03-5570-J), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (permit # 0A022), and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (permit # NH10.0073). This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (LTREB DEB-0640932 to F.J. Janzen).


  1. Able K (1991) Common themes and variations in animal orientation systems. Am Zool 31:157–167Google Scholar
  2. Adler K (1970) The role of extraoptic photoreceptors in amphibian rhythms and orientation: a review. J Herpetol 4:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akessen S, Ottosson U, Sandberg R (1995) Bird orientation: displacement experiments with young autumn migrating wheatears, Oenanthe oenanthe, along the Arctic coast of Russia. Proc R Soc Lond B 262:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson PK (1958) The photic responses and water-approach behavior of hatchling turtles. Copeia 1958:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avens L, Lohmann KJ (2003) Use of multiple orientation cues by juvenile loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta. J Exp Biol 206:4317–4325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen BW, Karl SA (1996) Population structure, phylogeography, and molecular evolution. In: Lutz PL, Musick JA (eds) The biology of sea turtles. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 29–50Google Scholar
  7. Bowen BW, Bass AL, Chow SM, Bostrom M, Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB, Okuyama T, Bolker BM, Epperly S, Lacasella E, Shaver D, Dodd M, Hopkins-Murphy SR, Musick JA, Swingle M, Rankin-Baransky K, Teas W, Witzell WN, Dutton PH (2004) Natal homing in juvenile loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta). Mol Ecol 13:3697–3808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burger J (1976) Behavior of hatchling diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) in the field. Copeia 1976:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cain SD, Boles LC, Wang JH, Lohmann KJ (2005) Magnetic orientation and navigation in marine turtles, lobsters, and mollusks: concepts and conundrums. Integr Comp Biol 45:539–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clobert J, Danchi E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (2001) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Congdon JD, Pappas M, Brecke B, Capps J (2011) Conservation implications of initial orientation of naïve hatchling snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) and painted turtles (Chrysemys picta belli) dispersing from experimental nests. Chel Conserv Biol 10:42–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeRosa CT, Taylor DH (1978) Sun-compass orientation in the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta (Reptilia, Testudines, Testudinidae). J Herpetol 12:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeRosa CT, Taylor DH (1980) Homeward orientation in three species of turtles (Trionyx spinifer, Chrysemys picta, and Terrapene carolina). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emlen ST (1969) Homing ability and orientation in the painted turtle Chrysemys picta marginata. Behaviour 33:58–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ernst CH (1970) Homing ability in the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta (Schneider). Herpetologica 26:339–403Google Scholar
  16. Fox CW, Waddell KJ, Mousseau TA (1995) Parental host plan affects offspring life histories in a seed beetle. Ecology 76:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freake MJ, Muheim R, Phillips JB (2006) Magnetic maps in animals: a theory comes of age? Quart Rev Biol 81:327–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freedberg S, Ewert MA, Ridenhour BJ, Neiman M, Nelson CE (2005) Nesting fidelity and molecular evidence for natal homing in the freshwater turtle, Graptemys kohnii. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1345–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham T, Georges A, McElhinney N (1996) Terrestrial orientation by the eastern long-necked turtle, Chelodina longicollis, from Australia. J Herpetol 30:467–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hager R, Cheverud JM, Wolf JB (2009) Change in maternal investment induced by cross-fostering alters genetic and epigenetic effects on complex traits in mice. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2949–2954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harms HK, Paitz RT, Bowden RM, Janzen FJ (2005) Age and season impact resource allocation to eggs and nesting behavior in the painted turtle. Physiol Biochem Zool 78:996–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Iverson JB, Prosser RL, Dalton EN (2009) Orientation in juveniles of a semiaquatic turtle, Kinosternon flavescens. Herpetologica 65:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janzen FJ (1993) An experimental analysis of natural selection on body size of hatchling turtles. Ecology 74:332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janzen FJ, Morjan CL (2001) Repeatability of microenvironment-specific nesting behaviour in a turtle with environmental sex determination. Anim Behav 62:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Janzen FJ, Tucker JK, Paukstis GL (2000) Experimental analysis of an early life-history stage: selection on size of hatchling turtles. Ecology 81:2290–2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Janzen FJ, Tucker JK, Paukstis GL (2007) Experimental analysis of an early life-history stage: direct or indirect selection on body size of hatchling turtles? Funct Ecol 21:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lohmann KJ, Witherington BE, Lohmann CMF, Salmon M (1997) Orientation, navigation and natal beach homing in sea turtles. In: Lutz PL, Musick JA (eds) The biology of sea turtles. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 107–135Google Scholar
  28. Lohmann KJ, Lohmann CMF, Ehrhart LM, Bagley DA, Swing T (2004) Geomagnetic map used in sea-turtle navigation. Nature 428:909–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McNeil JA, Herman TB, Standing KL (2000) Movement of hatchling Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) in Nova Scotia in response to proximity to open water: a manipulative experiment. Chel Conserv Biol 3:611–617Google Scholar
  30. Mrosovsky N, Carr A (1967) Preference for light of short wavelengths in hatchling green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas, tested on their natural nesting beaches. Behaviour 28:217–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noble GK, Breslau AM (1938) The senses involved in the migration of young fresh-water turtles after hatching. J Comp Psychol 25:175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ortleb RP, Sexton OJ (1964) Orientation in the painted turtle Chrysemys picta. Am Mid Nat 71:320–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pappas MJ, Congdon JD, Brecke BJ, Capps JD (2009) Orientation and dispersal of hatchling Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) from experimental nests. Can J Zool 87:755–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips JB, Jorge PE, Muheim R (2010) Light-dependent magnetic compass orientation in amphibians and insects: candidate receptors and candidate molecular mechanisms. J R Soc Interface 7:S241–S256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Putman NF, Shay TJ, Lohmann KJ (2010) Is the geographic distribution of nesting in the Kemp’s Ridley turtle shaped by the migratory needs of offspring? Integr Comp Biol 50:305–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reed W, Clark ME, Vleck CM (2009) Maternal effects increase within-family variation in offspring survival. Am Nat 174:685–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Refsnider JM, Janzen FJ (2010) Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Resetarits WJ (1996) Oviposition site choice and life history evolution. Am Zool 36:205–215Google Scholar
  39. Rieger JF, Binckley CA, Resetarits WJ (2004) Larval performance and oviposition site preference along a predation gradient. Ecology 85:2094–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salmon M, Wyneken J, Fritz E, Lucas M (1992) Seafinding by hatchling sea turtles: role of brightness, silhouette and beach slope as orientation cues. Behaviour 122:56–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Salmon M, Tolbert MG, Painter DP, Goff M, Reiners R (1995) Behavior of loggerhead sea turtles on an urban beach. II. Hatchling orientation. J Herpetol 29:568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SAS Institute Inc. (1997) SAS/STAT user’s guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwanz LE, Bowden RM, Spencer RJ, Janzen FJ (2009) Nesting ecology and offspring recruitment in a long-lived turtle. Ecology 90:1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scribner KT, Congdon JD, Chesser RK, Smith MH (1993) Annual differences in female reproductive success affect spatial and cohort-specific genotypic heterogeneity in painted turtles. Evolution 47:1360–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheridan CM, Spotila JR, Bien WF, Avery HW (2010) Sex-biased dispersal and natal philopatry in the diamondback terrapin, Malaclemys terrapin. Mol Ecol 19:5497–5510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Standing KL, Herman TB, Hurlburt DD, Morrison IP (1997) Postemergence behaviour of neonates in a northern peripheral population of Blanding’s turtle, Emydoidea blandingii, in Nova Scotia. Can J Zool 75:1387–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steen DA, Gibbs JP, Buhlman KA, Carr JL, Compton BW, Congdon JD, Doody JS, Godwin JC, Holcomb KL, Jackson DR, Janzen FJ, Johnson G, Jones MT, Lamer JT, Langen TA, Plummer MV, Rowe JW, Saumure RA, Tucker JK, Wilson DS (2012) Terrestrial habitat requirements of nesting freshwater turtles. Biol Conserv 151:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tuttle SE, Carroll DM (2005) Movement and behavior of hatchling wood turtles (Glyptemys insculpta). Northeastern Nat 12:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Valenzuela N (2001) Genetic differentiation among nesting beaching in the highly migratory giant river turtle (Podocnemis expansa) from Colombia. Herpetologica 57:48–57Google Scholar
  50. Valenzuela N, Janzen FJ (2001) Nest-site philopatry and the evolution of temperature-dependent sex determination. Evol Ecol Res 3:779–794Google Scholar
  51. Van De Pol M, Bakker T, Saaltink DJ, Verhulst S (2006) Rearing conditions determine offspring survival independent of egg quality: a cross-foster experiment with oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus. Ibis 148:203–210Google Scholar
  52. Warrant EJ, Kelber A, Giseln A, Greiner B, Ribi W, Wcislo WT (2004) Nocturnal vision and landmark orientation in a tropical halictid bee. Curr Biol 14:1309–1318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weisrock DW, Janzen FJ (1999) Thermal and fitness-related consequences of nest location in painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Funct Ecol 13:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wiggins DA (1989) Heritability of body size on cross-fostered tree swallow broods. Evolution 43:1808–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilbur HM, Morin PJ (1988) Life history evolution in turtles. In: Gans C, Huey RB (eds) Biology of the Reptilia, vol 16. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 387–439Google Scholar
  56. Wiltschko W, Wiltschko R (2005) Magnetic orientation and magnetoreception in birds and other animals. J Comp Physiol A 191:675–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yeomans SR (1995) Water-finding in adult turtles: random search or oriented behaviour? Anim Behav 49:977–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal BiologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations