, Volume 172, Issue 1, pp 155–166 | Cite as

Adding parasites to the guppy-predation story: insights from field surveys

  • Kiyoko M. GotandaEmail author
  • Lari C. Delaire
  • Joost A. M. Raeymaekers
  • Felipe Pérez-Jvostov
  • Felipe Dargent
  • Paul Bentzen
  • Marilyn E. Scott
  • Gregor F. Fussmann
  • Andrew P. Hendry
Population ecology - Original research


Studies of phenotypic variation in nature often consider only a single potential selective agent. In such cases, it remains an open question as to whether variation attributed to that single measured agent might be influenced by some other unmeasured agent. Previous research has shown that phenotypic variation in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) is strongly influenced by predation regime, and we here ask whether parasitism might represent an additional important selective agent shaping this variation. We performed a field survey of 26 natural guppy populations of known predation regime in northern Trinidad. We quantified levels of parasitism of guppies by the monogenean ecotoparasite, Gyrodactylus, and examined whether this parasite was associated with guppy body size or male colour. Spatial variation in Gyrodactylus parasitism was consistent between years, and parasite prevalence was generally, but not always, higher at high-predation sites than at low-predation sites. Consistent with previous work, predation regime was related to guppy size and some aspects of male colour, whereas parasitism showed few and only minor associations with the same traits. Moreover, a consideration of parasitism did not alter any interpretations regarding associations between guppy traits and predation regimes. These results suggest that parasitism, at least as quantified in the present study, does not play a major role in shaping variation in guppy body size or colour. Nevertheless, considerable variation in these traits, even within a predation regime, suggests the likely importance of other selective agents beyond just predation regime.


Adaptive divergence Natural selection Poecilia reticulata Selective agents Sexual selection 



Fieldwork was aided by Shahin Muttalib, Lyndsey Baillie, and Ian Paterson. Photoshop analysis was performed by Cameron Mojarrad. Special thanks to Indar Ramnarine for field support and Mauricio Torres for producing Online Resource 1. We sincerely thank three anonymous reviewers and David J. Marcogliese for their comments which greatly improved the manuscript. Funding for field work was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) in the form of a Special Research Opportunity Grant to G.F.F., M.E.S., P.B., and A.P.H.. NSERC also provided a Canada Graduate Scholarship—Masters and Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship to K.M.G. J.A.M.R. was funded by the Research Foundation—Flanders and the University of Leuven, F.D. was funded by a Richard H. Tomlinson Fellowship, and F.P.J. was funded by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (Mexico). Research at the Institute of Parasitology is supported by a regroupement stratégique from Fonds Québecois pour la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT).

Supplementary material

442_2012_2485_MOESM1_ESM.docx (399 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 399 kb)


  1. Bagge AM, Poulin R, Valtonen ET (2004) Fish population size, and not density, as the determining factor of parasite infection: a case study. Parasitology 128:305–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakke TA, Cable J, Harris PD (2007) The biology of gyrodactylid monogeneans: the “Russian-doll killers”. In: Baker JR. Muller R, Rollinson D (eds) Advances in parasitology, vol 64. Academic Press, New York, pp 161–460Google Scholar
  3. Barber I, Hoare D, Krause J (2000) Effects of parasites on fish behaviour: a review and evolutionary perspective. Rev Fish Biol Fish 10:131–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cable J, Van Oosterhout C (2007a) The impact of parasites on the life history evolution of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): the effects of host size on parasite virulence. Int J Parasitol 37:1449–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cable J, van Oosterhout C (2007b) The role of innate and acquired resistance in two natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) infected with the ectoparasite Gyrodactylus turnbulli. Biol J Linn Soc 90:647–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cain AJ, Sheppard PM (1950) Selection in the polymorphic land snail Cepaea nemoralis. Heredity 4:275–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crispo E, Bentzen P, Reznick DN, Kinnison MT, Hendry AP (2006) The relative influence of natural selection and geography on gene flow in guppies. Mol Ecol 15:49–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Decaestecker E, de Meester L, Ebert D (2002) In deep trouble: habitat selection constrained by multiple enemies in zooplankton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:5481–5485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dick JTA et al (2010) Parasitism may enhance rather than reduce the predatory impact of an invader. Biol Lett 6:636–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endler JA (1978) A predator’s view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364Google Scholar
  11. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Endler JA (1990) On the measurement and classification of color in studies of animal color patterns. Biol J Linn Soc 41:315–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Endler JA (1991) Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vis Res 31:587–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Endler JA (1995) Multiple trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol 10:22–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Endler JA, Houde AE (1995) Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser B, Neff B (2010) Parasite mediated homogenizing selection at the MHC in guppies. Genetica 138:273–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraser BA, Ramnarine IW, Neff BD (2010) Temporal variation at the MHC class IIB in wild populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 64:286–2096Google Scholar
  18. Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Caroll SP, Reznick DN (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gheorgiu C, Marcogliese DJ, Scott M (2006) Concentration-dependent effects of waterborne zinc on population dynamics of Gyrodactylus turnbulli (Monogenea) on isolated guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Parasitology 132:225–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gray SM, Robinson BW (2002) Experimental evidence that competition between stickleback species favours adaptive character divergence. Ecol Lett 5:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grether GF, Hudon J, Millie DF (1999) Carotenoid limitation of sexual coloration along an environmental gradient in guppies. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1317–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grether GF, Millie DF, Bryant MJ, Reznick DN, Mayea W (2001) Rain forest canopy cover, resource availability, and life history evolution in guppies. Ecology 82:1546–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris PD (1986) Species of Gyrodactylus von Nordmann, 1832 (Monogenea Gyrodactylidae) from poeciliid fishes, with a description of G. turnbulli sp. nov. from the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Peters. J Nat Hist 20:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris PD, Lyles AM (1992) Infections of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis and Gyrodactylus turnbulli on guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in Trinidad. J Parasitol 78:912–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hatcher MJ, Dick JTA, Dunn AM (2006) How parasites affect interactions between competitors and predators. Ecol Lett 9:1253–1271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Houde AE (1992) Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural popualtion of Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies). Heredity 69:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houde AE (1997) Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Houde AE, Torio AJ (1992) Effect of parasitic infection on male color pattern and female choice in guppies. Behav Ecol 3:346–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes KA, Rodd FH, Reznick DN (2005) Genetic and environmental effects on secondary sex traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J Evol Biol 18:35–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson PTJ et al (2010) When parasites become prey: ecological and epidemiological significance of eating parasites. Trends Ecol Evol 25:362–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson MB, Lafferty KD, van Oosterhout C, Cable J (2011) Parasite transmission in social interacting hosts: Monogenean epidemics in guppies. PLoS ONE 6:e22634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones JS, Leith BH, Rawlings P (1977) Polymorphism in Cepaea: a problem with too many solutions? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:109–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karino K, Haijima Y (2001) Heritability of male secondary sexual traits in feral guppies in Japan. J Ethol 19:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kemp DJ, Reznick DN, Grether GF (2008) Ornamental evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata): insights from sensory processing-based analyses of entire colour patterns. Biol J Linn Soc 95:734–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kennedy CR, Guégan JF (1994) Regional versus local helminth parasite richness in British freshwater fish—saturated or unsaturated parasite communities. Parasitology 109:175–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kennedy CEJ, Endler JA, Poynton SL, McMinn H (1987) Parasite load predicts mate choice in guppies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kerfoot WC, Sih A (1987) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, HanoverGoogle Scholar
  38. Kodric-Brown A (1989) Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy—an environmental component to female choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kolluru GR, Grether GF, Dunlop E, South SH (2009) Food availability and parasite infection influence mating tactics in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 20:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Langerhans RB, Layman CA, Shokrollahi AM, DeWitt TJ (2004) Predator-driven phenotypic diversification in Gambusia affinis. Evolution 58:2305–2318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lopez S (1998) Acquired resistance affects male sexual diplay and female choice in guppies in Trinindad. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lozano GA (1994) Carotenoids, parasites, and sexual selection. Oikos 70:309–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacColl ADC (2011) The ecological causes of evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 26:514–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Magurran AE (1990) The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator derence in fish. Ann Zool Fenn 27:51–66Google Scholar
  45. Magurran AE (2005) Evolutionary ecology: the Trinidadian guppy. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mandic M, Todgham AE, Richards JG (2009) Mechanisms and evolution of hypoxia tolerance in fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:735–744 Google Scholar
  47. Martin CH, Johnsen S (2007) A field test of the Hamilton-Zuk hypothesis in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1897–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Millar N, Hendry A (2012) Population divergence of private and non-private signals in wild guppies. Environ Biol Fish 513–525Google Scholar
  49. Millar NP, Reznick DN, Kinnison MT, Hendry AP (2006) Disentangling the selective factors that act on male colour in wild guppies. Oikos 113:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Otti O, Gantenbein-Ritter I, Jacot A, Brinkhof MWG (2012) Immune response increases predation risk. Evolution 66:732–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pérez-Jvostov F, Hendry AP, Fussmann GF, Scott ME (2012) Are host-parasite interactions influenced by adaptation to predators? A test with guppies and Gyrodactylus in experimental stream channels. Oecologia 170:77–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Porter JW, Muscatine L, Dubinsky Z, Falkowski PG (1984) Primary production and photoadaptation in light- and shade-adapted colonies of the symbiotic coral, Stylophora pistillata. Proc R Soc Lond B 222:161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raffel TR, Hoverman JT, Halstead NT, Michel PJ, Rohr JR (2010) Parasitism in a community context: trait-mediated interactions with competition and predation. Ecology 91:1900–1907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reardon EE, Chapman LJ (2010) Hypoxia and energetics of mouth brooding: is parental care a costly affair? Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol 156:400–406Google Scholar
  55. Reznick D, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation on life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:160–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reznick DN, Butler MJ, Rodd FH, Ross P (1996) Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). VI. Differential mortality as a mechanism for natural selection. Evolution 50:1651–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reznick D, Butler MJ IV, Rodd FH (2001) Life-history evolution in guppies. VII. The comparative ecology of high- and low-predation environments. Am Nat 157:126–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rifkin JL, Nunn CL, Garamszegi LZ (2012) Do animals living in larger groups experience greater parasitism? A meta-analysis. Am Nat 180:70–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rodd FH, Reznick DN (1997) Variation in the demography of guppy populations: the importance of predation and life histories. Ecology 78:405–418Google Scholar
  60. Rodd FH, Hughes KA, Grether GF, Baril CT (2002) A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc R Soc Lond B 269:475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Schluter D (1994) Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science 266:798–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwartz AK, Hendry AP (2007) A test for the parallel co-evolution of male colour and female preference in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evol Ecol Res 9:71–90Google Scholar
  64. Schwartz AK, Hendry AP (2010) Testing the influence of local forest canopy clearing on phenotypic variation in Trinidadian guppies. Funct Ecol 24:354–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scott ME (1985) Dynamics of challenge infections of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis Turnbull (Monogenea) on guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Peters). J Fish Dis 8:495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scott ME (1987) Temporal changes in aggregation: a laboratory study. Parasitology 94:583–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scott ME, Anderson RM (1984) The population dynamics of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis within laboratory populations of the fish host Poecilia reticulata. Parasitology 89:159–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scott ME, Nokes DJ (1984) Temperature-dependent reproduction and survival of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis (Monogenea) on guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Parasitology 89:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Strauss RE (1990) Predation and life-history variation in Poecilia reticulata (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). Environ Biol Fish 27:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thomas F, Renaud F, Meeüs TD, Cézilly F, Cézilly F (2009) Parasites, age and the Hamilton-Zuk hypothesis: inferential fallacy? Oikos 74:305–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tripathi N, Hoffmann M, Willing EM, Lanz C, Weigel D, Dreyer C (2009) Genetic linkage map of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, and quantitative trait loci analysis of male size and colour variation. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2195–2208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Oosterhout C et al (2006) Balancing selection, random genetic drift, and genetic variation at the major histocompatibility complex in two wild populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 60:2562–2574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van Oosterhout C et al (2007) Selection by parasites in spate conditions in wild Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Int J Parasitol 37:805–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. van Oosterhout C, Potter R, Wright H, Cable J (2008) Gyro-scope: an individual-based computer model to forecast gyrodactylid infections on fish hosts. Int J Parasitol 38:541–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vergara P, Martinez-Padilla J, Redpath SM, Mougeot F (2011) The ornament-condition relationship varies with parasite abundance at population level in a female bird. Naturwissenschaften 98:897–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weese DJ, Gordon SP, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (2010) Spatiotemporal variation in linear natural selection on body color in wild guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 64:1802–1815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiyoko M. Gotanda
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lari C. Delaire
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joost A. M. Raeymaekers
    • 3
  • Felipe Pérez-Jvostov
    • 1
    • 4
  • Felipe Dargent
    • 1
  • Paul Bentzen
    • 5
  • Marilyn E. Scott
    • 4
  • Gregor F. Fussmann
    • 1
  • Andrew P. Hendry
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary GenomicsKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.Institute of ParasitologyMacdonald Campus of McGill UniversitySte-Anne de BellevueCanada
  5. 5.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations