, Volume 171, Issue 2, pp 329–334 | Cite as

Vulnerability to cavitation of central California Arctostaphylos (Ericaceae): a new analysis

Views and Comments


A recent study, ‘Influence of summer marine fog and low cloud stratus on water relations of evergreen woody shrubs (Arctostaphylos: Ericaceae) in the chaparral of central California’ by M. Vasey, M.E. Loik, and V.T. Parker (2012, Oecologia, in press), presented data on the vulnerability to cavitation of eight Arctostaphylos species. We reanalyzed the vulnerability data presented in this manuscript using a different statistical model and have arrived at different conclusions than those reported previously. We suggest that regional differences have not lead to differentiation in cavitation resistance among populations of an Arctostaphylos species and, contrary to the conclusions of Vasey et al., the xylem of maritime species appears to be “overbuilt” for their current environment and do not appear to be especially vulnerable to water stress. Importantly, data on vulnerability to cavitation are limited for Arctostaphylos species from these sites. More specifically, treatment factors of site and region were not replicated and therefore conclusions drawn from these data are necessarily limited.


Cavitation resistance Embolism Mediterranean-type climate Vulnerability curve Vulnerability to xylem cavitation Water relations 

Supplementary material

442_2012_2414_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)


  1. Fichot R, Barigah TS, Chamaillard S, Le Thiec D, Laurans F, Cochard H, Brignolas F (2010) Common trade-offs between xylem resistance to cavitation and other physiological traits do not hold among unrelated Populus deltoids × Populus nigra hybrids. Plant Cell Environ 33:1553–1568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Frazer JM, Davis SD (1988) Differential survival of chaparral seedlings during the first summer drought after wildfire. Oecologia 76:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hacke UG, Stiller V, Sperry JS, Pittermann J, McCulloh KA (2001) Cavitation fatigue. Embolism and refilling cycles can weaken the cavitation resistance of xylem. Plant Physiol 125:779–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hao G-Y, Hoffman WA, Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Cao K-F, Goldstein C (2008) Stem and leaf hydraulics of congeneric tree species from adjacent tropical savanna and forest ecosystems. Oecologia 155:405–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jacobsen AL, Ewers FW, Pratt RB, Paddock WA III, Davis SD (2005) Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiol 139:546–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD (2007a) Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California. Ecol Monogr 77:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW (2007b) Cavitation resistance and seasonal hydraulics differ among three arid Californian plant communities. Plant Cell Environ 30:1599–1609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997) Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolb KJ, Sperry JS (1999a) Transport constraints on water use by the Great Basin shrub, Artemisia tridentata. Plant Cell Environ 22:925–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kolb KJ, Sperry JS (1999b) Differences in drought adaptation between subspecies of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Ecology 80:2373–2384Google Scholar
  12. Lamy J-B, Bouffier L, Burlett R, Plomion C, Cochard H, Delzon S (2011) Uniform selection as a primary force reducing population genetic differentiation of cavitation resistance across a species range. PLoS One 6:e23476. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023476 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maherali H, Pockman WT, Jackson RB (2004) Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology 85:2184–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mencuccini M, Comstock J (1997) Vulnerability to cavitation in populations of two desert species, Hymenoclea salsola and Ambrosia dumosa, from different climatic regions. J Exp Bot 48:1323–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pockman WT, Sperry JS (2000) Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran Desert vegetation. Am J Bot 87:1287–1299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Golgotiu KA, Sperry JS, Ewers FW, Davis SD (2007) Life history type coupled to water stress tolerance in nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral. Ecol Monogr 77:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Mohla R, Ewers FW, Davis SD (2008) Linkage between water stress tolerance and life history type in seedlings of nine chaparral species (Rhamnaceae). J Ecol 96:1252–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Jacobs SM, Esler KJ (2012) Xylem transport safety and efficiency differ among fynbos shrub life history types and between two sites differing in mean annual rainfall. Int J Plant Sci 173:474–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sparks JP, Black RA (1999) Regulation of water loss in populations of Populus trichocarpa: the role of stomatal control in preventing xylem cavitation. Tree Physiol 19:453–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas CM, Davis SD (1989) Recovery patterns of three chaparral species after wildfire. Oecologia 80:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vasey MC, Loik ME, Parker VT (2012) Influence of summer marine fog and low cloud stratus on water relations of evergreen woody shrubs (Arctostaphylos: Ericaceae) in the chaparral of central California. Oecologia. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2321-0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams JE, Davis SD, Portwood K (1997) Xylem embolism in seedlings and resprouts of Adenostoma fasciculatum after fire. Aust J Bot 45:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson CJ, Manos PS, Jackson RB (2008) Hydraulic traits are influenced by phylogenetic history in the drought-resistant, invasive genus Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Am J Bot 95:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyCalifornia State UniversityBakersfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations