Skip to main content

Context dependence in foraging behaviour of Achillea millefolium

Abstract

Context-dependent foraging behaviour is acknowledged and well documented for a diversity of animals and conditions. The contextual determinants of plant foraging behaviour, however, are poorly understood. Plant roots encounter patchy distributions of nutrients and soil fungi. Both of these features affect root form and function, but how they interact to affect foraging behaviour is unknown. We extend the use of the marginal value theorem to make predictions about the foraging behaviour of roots, and test our predictions by manipulating soil resource distribution and inoculation by soil fungi. We measured plant movement as both distance roots travelled and time taken to grow through nutrient patches of varied quality. To do this, we grew Achillea millefolium in the centers of modified pots with a high-nutrient patch and a low-nutrient patch on either side of the plant (heterogeneous) or patch-free conditions (homogeneous). Fungal inoculation, but not resource distribution, altered the time it took roots to reach nutrient patches. When in nutrient patches, root growth decreased relative to homogeneous soils. However, this change in foraging behaviour was not contingent upon patch quality or fungal inoculation. Root system breadth was larger in homogeneous than in heterogeneous soils, until measures were influenced by pot edges. Overall, we find that root foraging behaviour is modified by resource heterogeneity but not fungal inoculation. We find support for predictions of the marginal value theorem that organisms travel faster through low-quality than through high-quality environments, with the caveat that roots respond to nutrient patches per se rather than the quality of those patches.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Allison VJ (2002) Nutrients, arbuscular mycorrhizas and competition interact to influence seed production and germination success in Achillea millefolium. Funct Ecol 16:742–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augspurger CK (1983) Seed dispersal of the tropical tree, Platypodium-elegans, and the escape of its seedlings from fungal pathogens. J Ecol 71:759–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber I, Huntingford FA (1996) Parasite infection alters schooling behaviour: deviant positioning of helminth-infected minnows in conspecific groups. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:1095–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber I, Hoare D, Krause J (2000) Effects of parasites on fish behaviour: a review and evolutionary perspective. Rev Fish Biol Fish 10:131–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bever JD, Dickie IA, Facelli E, Facelli JM, Klironomos J, Moora M, Rillig MC, Stock WD, Tibbett M, Zobel M (2010) Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 25:468–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Kotler BP (2004) Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Lett 7:999–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett MC (2009) Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil 320:37–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill JF, McNickle GG (2011) The behavioural ecology of nutrient foraging by plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Systemat 42:289–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill JF, McNickle GG, Haag JJ, Lamb EG, Nyanumba SM, Clair CCS (2010) Plants integrate information about nutrients and neighbours. Science 328:1657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cain ML (1994) Consequences of foraging in clonal plant-species. Ecology 75:933–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho LM, Correia PM, Ryel RJ, Martins-Loucao MA (2003) Spatial variability of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores in two natural plant communities. Plant Soil 251:227–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas-Reyes P, Fernandes GW, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Pimenta M (2011) Effects of generalist and specialist parasitic plants (Loranthaceae) on the fluctuating asymmetry patterns of ruprestrian host plants. Basic Appl Ecol 12:449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui M, Caldwell MM (1996) Facilitation of plant phosphate acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizas from enriched soil patches. 1. Roots and hyphae exploiting the same soil volume. New Phytol 133:453–460

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon H, Mommer L (2006) Root foraging theory put to the test. Trends Ecol Evol 21:113–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farley RA, Fitter AH (1999) Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in a deciduous woodland. J Ecol 87:688–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forde BG (2009) Is it good noise? The role of developmental instability in the shaping of a root system. J Exp Bot 60:3989–4002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson SK, Fry JE (1997) Root proliferation and marginal patch value. Oikos 79:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (2011) The fusion of behavioural ecology and ecology. Behav Ecol 22:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimoldi AA, Kavanova M, Lattanzi FA, Schaufele R, Schnyder H (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on carbon economy in perennial ryegrass: quantification by (CO2)-C-13/(CO2)-C-12 steady-state labelling and gas exchange. New Phytol 172:544–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A (2004) The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 162:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Robinson D, Fitter AH (2000) An arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculum enhances root proliferation in, but not nitrogen capture from, nutrient-rich patches in soil. New Phytol 145:575–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Helgason T, Fitter AH (2010) Nutritional ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Fungal Ecol 3:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema JD, Chaudhary VB, Gehring CA, Johnson NC, Karst J, Koide RT, Pringle A, Zabinski C, Bever JD, Moore JC, Wilson GWT, Klironomos JN, Umbanhowar J (2010) A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol Lett 13:394–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1993) The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74:612–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins W (1964) A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Disease Report 73:288–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen EL, Dill LM, Cahill JE (2011) Applying behavioural-ecological theory to plant defence: light-dependent movement in Mimosa pudica suggests a trade-off between predation risk and energetic reward. Am Nat 177:377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HA, Biondini ME (2001) Root morphological plasticity and nitrogen uptake of 59 plant species from the Great Plains grasslands, USA. Basic Appl Ecol 2:127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA (1997) Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol 135:575–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MD, Smith SE (2004) Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas: are mycorrhizas always mutualisms? Can J Bot 82:1089–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R (2008) Plant behaviour and communication. Ecol Lett 11:727–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CK (1990) Plant foraging—a marginal value model and coiling response in Cuscuta-subinclusa. Ecology 71:1916–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN (2003) Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84:2292–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN, Rillig MC, Allen MF (1999) Designing belowground field experiments with the help of semi-variance and power analyses. Appl Soil Ecol 12:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb EG, Haag JJ, Cahill JF (2004) Patch-background contrast and patch density have limited effects on root proliferation and plant performance in Abutilon theophrasti. Funct Ecol 18:836–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefevre T, Lebarbenchon C, Gauthier-Clerc M, Misse D, Poulin R, Thomas F (2009) The ecological significance of manipulative parasites. Trends Ecol Evol 24:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lempa K, Martel J, Koricheva J, Haukioja E, Ossipov V, Ossipova S, Pihlaja K (2000) Covariation of fluctuating asymmetry, herbivory and chemistry during birch leaf expansion. Oecologia 122:354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levri EP, Lively CM (1996) The effects of size, reproductive condition, and parasitism on foraging behaviour in a freshwater snail, Potamopyrgus antipodarum. Anim Behav 51:891–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNickle GG, Cahill JF (2009) Plant root growth and the marginal value theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4747–4751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNickle GG, St Clair CC, Cahill JF (2009) Focusing the metaphor: plant root foraging behaviour. Trends Ecol Evol 24:419–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (1995) The behaviour of parasitized animals. Bioscience 45:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (2002) Parasites and the behaviour of animals. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummey DL, Rillig MC (2008) Spatial characterization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal molecular diversity at the submetre scale in a temperate grassland. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:260–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Packer A, Clay K (2000) Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature 404:278–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer AR (1996) Waltzing with asymmetry. Bioscience 46:518–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaniemi TK (2007) Root foraging traits and competitive ability in heterogeneous soils. Oecologia 153:145–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raveh A, Kotler BP, Abramsky Z, Krasnov BR (2011) Driven to distraction: detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils. Ecol Lett 14:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smilauer P, Smilauerova M (2000) Effect of AM symbiosis exclusion on grassland community composition. Folia Geobot 35:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic, London

  • Stevens GN, Jones RH (2006) Patterns in soil fertility and root herbivory interact to influence fine-root dynamics. Ecology 87:616–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll P, Schmid B (1998) Plant foraging and dynamic competition between branches of Pinus sylvestris in contrasting light environments. J Ecol 86:934–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbett M (2000) Roots, foraging and the exploitation of soil nutrient patches: the role of mycorrhizal symbiosis. Funct Ecol 14:397–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijesinghe DK, John EA, Beurskens S, Hutchings MJ (2001) Root system size and precision in nutrient foraging: responses to spatial pattern of nutrient supply in six herbaceous species. J Ecol 89:972–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Tan Bao, Gordon McNickle, Samson Nyanumba, and Shannon White for critical discussions and readings of the manuscript. Justine D. Karst was supported by an Izaak Walton Killam postdoctoral fellowship, Jonathan A. Bennett by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada postgraduate scholarship, and James F. Cahill by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada discovery grant and an accelerator supplemental grant. This experiment was conducted in AB, Canada, and complied with all current provincial and federal laws.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justine D. Karst.

Additional information

Communicated by Bernhard Schmid.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 247 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karst, J.D., Belter, P.R., Bennett, J.A. et al. Context dependence in foraging behaviour of Achillea millefolium . Oecologia 170, 925–933 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2358-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2358-0

Keywords