Skip to main content
Log in

Population and behavioural responses of native prey to alien predation

  • Behavioral ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction of invasive alien predators often has catastrophic effects on populations of naïve native prey, but in situations where prey survive the initial impact a predator may act as a strong selective agent for prey that can discriminate and avoid it. Using two common species of Australian small mammals that have persisted in the presence of an alien predator, the European red fox Vulpes vulpes, for over a century, we hypothesised that populations of both would perform better where the activity of the predator was low than where it was high and that prey individuals would avoid signs of the predator’s presence. We found no difference in prey abundance in sites with high and low fox activity, but survival of one species—the bush rat Rattus fuscipes—was almost twofold higher where fox activity was low. Juvenile, but not adult rats, avoided fox odour on traps, as did individuals of the second prey species, the brown antechinus, Antechinus stuartii. Both species also showed reduced activity at foraging trays bearing fox odour in giving-up density (GUD) experiments, although GUDs and avoidance of fox odour declined over time. Young rats avoided fox odour more strongly where fox activity was high than where it was low, but neither adult R. fuscipes nor A. stuartii responded differently to different levels of fox activity. Conservation managers often attempt to eliminate alien predators or to protect predator-naïve prey in protected reserves. Our results suggest that, if predator pressure can be reduced, otherwise susceptible prey may survive the initial impact of an alien predator, and experience selection to discriminate cues to its presence and avoid it over the longer term. Although predator reduction is often feasible, identifying the level of reduction that will conserve prey and allow selection for avoidance remains an important challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA (1993) Why predation rate should not be proportional to predator density. Ecology 74:726–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML, Subach A (2002) Measuring the benefit of habitat selection. Behav Ecol 13:497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apfelbach R, Blanchard CD, Blanchard RJ, Hayes RA, McGregor IS (2005) The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1123–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Augee ML, Smith B, Rose S (1996) Survival of wild and hand-reared ringtail possums (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) in bushland near Sydney. Wildl Res 23:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks PB (1998) Responses of Australian bush rats, Rattus fuscipes, to the odor of introduced Vulpes vulpes. J Mammal 79:1260–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks PB (1999) Predation by introduced foxes on native bush rats in Australia: do foxes take the doomed surplus? J Appl Ecol 36:1063–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks PB, Dickman CR (2000) Effects of winter food supplementation on reproduction, body mass, and numbers of small mammals in montane Australia. Can J Zool/Rev Can Zool 78:1775–1783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks PB, Dickman CR (2007) Alien predation and the effects of multiple levels of prey naiveté. Trends Ecol Evol 22:229–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banks PB, Hughes NK, Rose TA (2003) Do Australian native small mammals avoid faeces of domestic dogs? Aust Zool 32:406–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrio IC, Bueno CG, Banks PB, Tortosa FS (2010) Prey naiveté in an introduced prey species: the wild rabbit in Australia. Behav Ecol 21:986–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT (2006) The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology 112:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Mari M, Daniel JC, Ardron JG, Griffin AS, Evans CS (2002) Olfactory predator recognition: wallabies may have to learn to be wary. Anim Conserv 5:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Sims RA (2003) Group size but not distance to cover influences agile wallaby (Macropus agilis) time allocation. J Mammal 84:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Craine I (1985) Natal nest location and small mammal tracking with a spool and line technique. Can J Zool/Rev Can Zool 64:1034–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley GN, Waas JR, Henderson HV (2000) Responses of wild Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) to predator odors. J Chem Ecol 26:705–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS (1999) Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evol Ecol Res 1:49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder CJ, Gorman ML (1991) The effects of red fox Vulpes vulpes faecal odours on the feeding behaviour of Orkney voles Microtus arvalis. J Zool 224:599–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Mirza RS (2001) Predator diet cues and the assessment of predation risk by aquatic vertebrates: a review and prospectus. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooch E, White G (2006) Program MARK: “a gentle Introduction”, 4th edn. Available at www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/

  • Cormack RM (1989) Loglinear models for capture-recapture. Biometrics 45:395–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté IM, Sutherland WJ (1997) The effectiveness of removing predators to protect bird populations. Conserv Biol 11:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JG, Lima SL (2006) Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol Evol 21:674–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther MS, Braithwaite RW (2008) Brown Antechinus Antechinus stuartii. In: Van Dyck SM, Strahan R (eds) The mammals of Australia, 3rd edn. Angus and Robertson, Sydney, pp 94–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Dexter N, Murray A (2009) The impact of fox control on the relative abundance of forest mammals in East Gippsland, Victoria. Wildl Res 36:252–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1989) Demographic responses of Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia) to supplementary food. Aust J Ecol 14:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1992) Predation and habitat shift in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Ecology 73:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1996a) Impact of exotic generalist predators on the native fauna of Australia. Wildl Biol 2:185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1996b) Overview of the impacts of feral cats on Australian native fauna. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canberra, pp 1–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (2009) House cats as predators in the Australian environment: impacts and management. Human Wildl Conflicts 3:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR, Doncaster CP (1984) Responses of small mammals to red fox (Vulpes vulpes) odour. J Zool 204:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR, Predavec M, Lynam AJ (1991) Differential predation of size and sex classes of mice by the barn owl, Tyto alba. Oikos 62:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR, Greenville AC, Beh CL, Tamayo B, Wardle GM (2010) Social organization and movements of desert rodents during population “booms” and “busts” in central Australia. J Mammal 91:798–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doody JS, Green B, Rhind D, Castellano CM, Sims R, Robinson T (2009) Population-level declines in Australian predators caused by an invasive species. Anim Conserv 12:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendt M, Endres T, Lowry CA, Apfelbach R, McGregor IS (2005) TMT-induced autonomic and behavioral changes and the neural basis of its processing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1145–1156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritts TH, Rodda GH (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case study of Guam. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:113–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glen AS, Pennay M, Dickman CR, Wintle BA, Firestone KB (2011) Diets of sympatric native and introduced carnivores in the Barrington Tops, eastern Australia. Austral Ecol 36:290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresser S (1996) Anti-predator behaviour in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Honours thesis. University of Sydney, Sydney

  • Griffin AS, Evans CS, Blumstein DT (2001) Learning specificity in acquired predator recognition. Anim Behav 62:577–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Morrison JA, Hedges LV (2000) The interaction between competition and predation: a meta-analysis of field experiments. Am Nat 155:435–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RA, Nahrung HF, Wilson JC (2006) The response of native Australian rodents to predator odours varies seasonally: a by-product of life history variation? Anim Behav 71:1307–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedrzejewski W, Rychlik L, Jedrzejewska B (1993) Responses of bank voles to odors of 7 species of predators—experimental data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships. Oikos 68:251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones M, Dayan T (2000) Foraging behavior and microhabitat use by spiny mice, Acomys cahirinus and A. russatus, in the presence of Blanford’s Fox (Vulpes cana) odor. J Chem Ecol 26:455–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kats LB, Dill LM (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall WL, Nichols JD, Hines JE (1997) Estimating temporary emigration using capture-recapture data with Pollock’s robust sesign. Ecology 78:563–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear JE, Sumner NR, Onus ML (2002) The red fox in Australia—an exotic predator turned biocontrol agent. Biol Conserv 108:335–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpimäki E, Krebs CJ (1996) Predation and population cycles of small mammals. Bioscience 46:754–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpimäki E, Brown PR, Jacob J, Pech RP (2004) The puzzles of population cycles and outbreaks of small mammals solved? Bioscience 54:1071–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima S, Bednekoff P (1999) Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am Nat 153:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima S, Dill L (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool/Rev Can Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunney D (2008) Bush Rat Rattus fuscipes. In: Van Dyck SM, Strahan R (eds) The mammals of Australia, 3rd edn. Angus and Robertson, Sydney, pp 685–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW (1980) Patterns of scent marking with urine and faeces amongst carnivore communities. Symp Zool Soc Lond 45:107–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW (1987) Running with the fox. Unwin Hyman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon PS (2009) Targeted control of widespread exotic species for biodiversity conservation: the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in New South Wales, Australia. Ecol Manag Restor 10:s59–s69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mella VSA, Cooper CE, Davies SJJF (2010) Ventilatory frequency as a measure of the response of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) to the odour of potential predators. Aust J Zool 58:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DA, Grand JB, Fondell TF, Anthony M (2006) Predator functional response and prey survival: direct and indirect interactions affecting a marked prey population. J Anim Ecol 75:101–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moenting AE, Morris DW (2006) Disturbance and habitat use: is edge more important than area? Oikos 115:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow BA, Redmond AJ, Roth RH, Elsworth JD (2000) The predator odor, TMT, displays a unique, stress-like pattern of dopaminergic and endocrinological activation in the rat. Brain Res 864:146–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NPWS (2001) Threat abatement plan for predation by the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hurstville

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay N, Alexander GT, Lazenby S (2003) Responses of striped mice, Rhabdomys pumilio, to faeces of a predatory snake. Behaviour 140:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risbey DA, Calver MC, Short J (1997) Control of feral cats for nature conservation. I. field tests of four baiting methods. Wildl Res 24:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risbey DA, Calver MC, Short J, Bradley JS, Wright IW (2000) The impact of cats and foxes on the small vertebrate fauna of Heirisson Prong, Western Australia. II. a field experiment. Wildl Res 27:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell BG, Banks PB (2007) Do Australian small mammals respond to native and introduced predator odours? Austral Ecol 32:277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salo P, Korpimäki E, Banks PB, Nordstrom M, Dickman CR (2007) Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1237–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salo P, Banks PB, Dickman CR, Korpimäki E (2010) Predator manipulation experiments: impacts on populations of terrestrial vertebrate prey. Ecol Monogr 80:531–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders G, Coman B, Kinnear J, Braysher M (1995) Managing vertebrate pests: foxes. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders GR, Gentle MN, Dickman CR (2010) The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia. Mamm Rev 40:181–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Pech RP, Dickman CR, Hik D, Mahon P, Newsome AE (1998) Predicting effects of predation on conservation of endangered prey. Conserv Biol 12:564–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes VL, Pech RP, Banks PB, Arthur AD (2004) Foraging behaviour and habitat use by Antechinus flavipes and Sminthopsis murina (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae) in response to predation risk in eucalypt woodland. Biol Conserv 117:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland EF (1998) Fire, resource limitation and small mammal populations in coastal eucalypt forest. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney

  • Symonds M, Moussalli A (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toftegaard CL, Bradley AJ (1999) Structure of specialized osmetrichia in the brown antechinus Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). J Zool 248:27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck SM, Strahan R (2008) The mammals of Australia. New Holland, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdolin J (2006) Meta-analysis of foraging and predation risk trade-offs in terrestrial systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement):120–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen H, Eccard JA, Jokinen I, Sundell J (2006) Is the antipredatory response in behaviour reflected in stress measured in faecal corticosteroids in a small rodent? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:350–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted under permission from the University of Sydney Animal Care and Ethics Committee (Licence L04/10-2006/1/4487) and National Parks and Wildlife Licence S 12 123. We are grateful to the Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW for access to fox baiting and tracking data, and particularly Mel Hall from the Pest Control Division, National Parks and Wildlife Service. We thank Alex Diment for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and the numerous field volunteers who made this work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathew S. Crowther.

Additional information

Communicated by Chris Whelan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kovacs, E.K., Crowther, M.S., Webb, J.K. et al. Population and behavioural responses of native prey to alien predation. Oecologia 168, 947–957 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2168-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2168-9

Keywords

Navigation