Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 167, Issue 4, pp 1027–1039 | Cite as

What are the consequences of ant–seed interactions on the abundance of two dry-fruited shrubs in a Mediterranean scrub?

  • Xavier ArnanEmail author
  • A. Rodrigo
  • J. Retana
Plant-Animal Interactions - Original Paper

Abstract

Strong interactions between dry-fruited shrubs and seed-harvesting ants are expected in early successional scrubs, where both groups have a major presence. We have analysed the implications of the seed characteristics of two dry-fruited shrub species (Coronilla minima and Dorycnium pentaphyllum) on seed predation and dispersal mediated by harvester ants and the consequences of these processes on spatio-temporal patterns of plant abundance in a heterogeneous environment. We found that large C. minima seeds were collected much more (39%) than small D. pentaphyllum seeds (2%). However, not all of the removed seeds of these plant species were consumed, and 12.8% of the seeds were lost along the trails, which increased dispersal distances compared with abiotic dispersal alone. Seed dropping occurred among all microhabitats of the two plant species, but especially in open microhabitats, which are the most suitable ones for plant establishment. The two plant species increased their presence in the study area during the study period: C. minima in open microhabitats and D. pentaphyllum in high vegetation. The large size of C. minima seeds probably limited the primary seed dispersal of this species, but may have allowed strong interaction with ants. Thus, seed dispersal by ants resulted in C. minima seeds reaching more suitable microhabitats by means of increasing dispersal distance and redistribution among microhabitats. In contrast, the smaller size of D. pentaphyllum seeds arguably allows abiotic seed dispersal over longer distances and colonization of all types of microhabitats, although it probably also limits their interaction with ants and, consequently, their redistribution in suitable microhabitats. We suggest that dyszoochory could contribute to the success of plant species with different seed characteristics in scrub habitats where seeds are abundantly collected by seed-harvesting ants.

Keywords

Microhabitat suitability Plant recruitment Seed dispersal Seed predation Seed-harvesting ants 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Helena Barril for field assistance and Jacqueline Minett for the correction of the English. This research was partly funded by CICYT project REN2001-2500/GLO, by the CONSOLIDER INGENIO project CSD 2008-0040 and by the Departament d’Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Generalitat de Catalunya grant 2002 FI 00095 to X. Arnan. All experiments comply with the Spanish current laws.

References

  1. Andersen AN (1987) Effects of seed predation by ants on seedling densities at a woodland site in SE Australia. Oikos 48:171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen AN (1988) Immediate and longer-term effects of fire on seed predation by ants in sclerophyllous vegetation in south-eastern Australia. Aust J Ecol 13:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen AN (1989) How important is seed predation to recruitment in stable populations of long-lived perennials? Oecologia 81:310–315Google Scholar
  4. Andersen AN, Azcárate FM, Cowie ID (2000) Seed selection by an exceptionally rich community of harvester ants in the Australian seasonal tropics. J Anim Ecol 69:975–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnan X, Rodrigo A, Molowny-Horas R, Retana J (2010) Ant-mediated expansion of an obligate seeder species during the first years after fire. Plant Biol 12:842–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aronne G, Wilcock CC (1994) Reproductive characteristics and breeding system of shrubs of the Mediterranean region. Funct Ecol 8:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azcárate FM, Arqueros L, Sánchez AM, Peco B (2005) Seed and fruit selection by harvester ants, Messor barbarus, in Mediterranean grassland and scrubland. Funct Ecol 19:273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1989) Physiology of dormancy and germination. In: Leck MA, Palmer VT, Simpson RL (eds) Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 53–66Google Scholar
  9. Battaglia LL, Foré SA, Sharitz RR (2000) Seedling emergence, survival and size in relation to light and water availability in two bottomland hardwood species. J Ecol 88:1041–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beattie AJ (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blate GM, Peart DR, Leighton M (1998) Post-dispersal predation on isolated seeds: a comparative study of 40 tree species in a southeast Asian rainforest. Oikos 82:522–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boulay R, Carro F, Soriguer RC, Cerdá X (2009) Small-scale indirect effects determine the outcome of a tripartite plant–disperser–granivore interaction. Oecologia 161:529–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyd RS (1996) Ant-mediated seed dispersal of the rare chaparral shrub Fremontodendron decumbens (Sterculiaceae). Madroño 43:299–315Google Scholar
  14. Brown MJF, Human KG (1997) Effects of harvester ants on plant species distribution and abundance in a serpentine grassland. Oecologia 112:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown JH, Reichman OJ, Davidson DW (1979) Granivory in desert ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:201–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cerdan P (1989) Etude de la Biologie, de l’Ecologie et du Comportament des Fourmis Moissonneuses du Genre Messor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) en Crau. PhD thesis. Université de Provence, MarseilleGoogle Scholar
  17. Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2003) Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups. Trends Ecol Evol 18:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crist TO, MacMahon JA (1992) Harvester ant foraging and shrub-steppe seeds: interactions of seed resources and seed use. Ecology 73:1768–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crist TO, Wiens JA (1994) Scale effects of vegetation on forager movement and seed harvesting by ants. Oikos 69:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davison EA (1982) Seed utilization by harvester ants. In: Buckley RC (ed) Ant–plant interactions. Dr W Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  21. de Bolós O, Vigo J, Masalles RM, Ninot JM (1993) Flora manual dels Països Catalans, 2nd edn. Editorial Pòrtic, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  22. Detrain C, Pasteels JM (2000) Seed preferences of the harvester ant Messor barbarus in a Mediterranean mosaic grassland (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 35:35–48Google Scholar
  23. Detrain C, Tasse O (2000) Seed drops and caches by the harvester ant Messor barbarus: do they contribute to seed dispersal in Mediterranean grasslands? Naturwissenschaften 87:373–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Detrain C, Tasse O, Versaen M, Pasteels JM (2000) Seed preferences of the harvester ant Messor barbarus in a Mediterranean mosaic grassland. Sociobiology 35:35–48Google Scholar
  25. Eriksson O (2005) Game theory provides no explanation for seed size variation in grasslands. Oecologia 144:98–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (1992) Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecologia 91:360–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gorb SN, Gorb EV (1999) Dropping rates of elaiosome-bearing seeds during transport by ants (Formica polyctena Foerst.): implications for distance dispersal. Acta Oecol 20:509–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2000) Effects of seed aggregation on the removal rates of elaiosome-bearing Chelidonium majus and Viola adourata seeds carried by Formica polyctena ants. Ecol Res 15:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guarino R, Ferrario B, Mossa L (2005) A stochastic model of seed dispersal pattern to assess seed predation by ants in annual dry grasslands. Plant Ecol 178:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants, 1st edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Herrera CM (1984) Tipos morfológicos y funcionales en plantas del matorral mediterráneo del sur de España. Stud Oecol 5:7–34Google Scholar
  32. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoppes WG (1988) Seedfall pattern of several species of bird-dispersed plants in an Illinois woodland. Ecology 69:320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Howe HF, Brown JS (2001) The ghost of granivory past. Ecol Lett 4:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes L, Westoby M (1990) Removal rates of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants. Ecology 71:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hulme PE (1997) Post-dispersal seed predation and the establishment of vertebrate dispersed plants in Mediterranean scrublands. Oecologia 111:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hulme PE (1998) Post-dispersal seed predation: consequences for plant demography and evolution. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 1:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Janzen DH (1971) Seed predation by animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:465–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jordano P, Herrera CM (1995) Shuffling the offspring: uncoupling and spatial discordance of multiple stages in vertebrate seed dispersal. Ecoscience 2:230–237Google Scholar
  40. Kunin WE (1994) Density-dependent foraging in the harvester ant Messor ebeninus: two experiments. Oecologia 98:328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levey DJ, Byrne MM (1993) Complex ant–plant interactions: rain forest ants as secondary dispersers and post-dispersal seed predators. Ecology 74:1802–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Louda SM (1982) Distribution ecology: variation in plant recruitment over a gradient in relation to insect seed predation. Ecol Monogr 52:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacMahon JA, Mull JF, Crist TO (2000) Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): their community and ecosystem influences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:265–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moles AT, Westoby M (2004) Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. J Ecol 92:372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore KA, Elmendorf SC (2006) Propagule vs. niche limitation: untangling the mechanisms behind plant species’ distributions. Ecol Lett 9:797–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morehead SA, Feener DH (1998) Foraging behavior and morphology: seed selection in the harvester ant genus, Pogonomyrmex. Oecologia 114:548–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Münzergová Z, Herben T (2005) Seed, dispersal, microsite, habitat and recruitment limitation: identification of terms and concepts in studies of limitations. Oecologia 145:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Dowd DJ, Hay ME (1980) Mutualism between harvester ants and a desert ephemeral: seed escape from rodents. Ecology 61:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ohkawara K, Higashi S, Ohara M (1996) Effects of ants, ground beetles and the seed-fall patterns on myrmecochory of Erythronium japonicum Decne. (Liliaceae). Oecologia 106:500–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ordoñez JL, Retana J (2004) Early reduction of post-fire recruitment of Pinus nigra by post-dispersal seed predation in different time-since-fire habitats. Ecography 27:449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ordoñez JL, Retana J, Espelta JM (2004) Limitation of the recruitment of Pinus nigra in a gradient of post-fire environmental conditions. Ecoscience 11:296–304Google Scholar
  52. Ostfeld RS, Mason RH, Canham CD (1997) Effects of rodents on tree invasion of old fields. Ecology 78:1531–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Passos L, Oliveira PS (2002) Ants affect the distribution and performance of seedlings of Clusia criuva, a primarily bird-dispersed rain forest tree. J Ecol 90:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reader RJ (1993) Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species. J Ecol 81:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reichman OJ (1979) Desert granivore foraging and its impact on seed densities and distributions. Ecology 60:1085–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Retana J, Picó FX, Rodrigo A (2004) Dual role of harvesting ants as seed predators and dispersers of a non-myrmecochorous Mediterranean perennial herb. Oikos 105:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rey PJ, Garrido JL, Alcántara JM, Ramírez JM, Aguilera A, García L, Manzaneda AJ, Fernández R (2002) Spatial variation in ant and rodent post-dispersal predation of vertebrate-dispersed seeds. Funct Ecol 16:773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reyes-López JL, Fernández-Haeger J (2001) Some factors determining size-matching in the harvester ant Messor barbarus: food type, transfer activity, recruitment rate and size-range. Insectes Soc 48:118–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sallabanks RS (1992) Fruit fate, frugivory, and fruit characteristics: a study of the hawthorn, Crataegus monogyna (Rosaceae). Oecologia 91:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schöning C, Espadaler X, Hensen I, Roces F (2004) Seed predation of the tussock-grass Stipa tenacissima L. by ants (Messor spp.) in south-eastern Spain: the adaptive value of trypanocarpy. J Arid Environ 56:43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schupp EW (1995) Seed-seedling conflicts, habitat choice, and patterns of plant recruitment. Am J Bot 82:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thompson K, Band SR, Hodgson JG (1993) Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil. Funct Ecol 7:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vander Wall SB, Kuhn KM, Beck MJ (2005) Seed removal, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology 86:801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang BC, Smith TB (2002) Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends Ecol Evol 17:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilby A, Shachak M (2000) Harvester ant response to spatial and temporal heterogeneity in seed availability: pattern in the process of granivory. Oecologia 125:495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Willott SJ, Compton SG, Incoll LD (2000) Foraging, food selection and worker size in the seed harvesting ant Messor bouvieri. Oecologia 125:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Willson MF (1992) The ecology of seed dispersal. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 61–85Google Scholar
  69. Zavala MA, Espelta JM, Retana J (2000) Constraints and trade-offs in Mediterranean plant communities: the case of holm oak-aleppo pine forests. Bot Rev 66:119–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unitat d’Ecologia i CREAF, Facultat de BiociènciesUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterra, BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations