Causes and consequences of fine-scale breeding dispersal in a female-philopatric species

Abstract

The potentially confounded effects of factors affecting breeding dispersal have rarely been simultaneously examined. The consequences of breeding dispersal are even less studied, presenting a paradox: breeding dispersal seldom seems to improve breeding success, despite its presumed adaptiveness. We studied the causes and consequences of breeding dispersal in female-philopatric eiders (Somateria mollissima) in relation to the spatiotemporal predictability of nest success. Previous nest fate, breeding experience, and breeding density simultaneously affected breeding dispersal. Dispersal distances were longer among inexperienced breeders and after failed breeding. Individual dispersal distances decreased with increasing nest-site-specific breeding density, whereas island-specific nesting success peaked at intermediate densities. The fate of neighbouring nests (‘public information’) did not influence dispersal. Breeding dispersal was unrelated to subsequent hatching success, controlling for individual quality (body condition, breeding experience, previous nest fate), while it delayed hatch date, which is likely to impair reproductive success. This delay may result from the loss of acquired information of local breeding conditions, prolonging nest prospecting and establishment, also helping explain why breeding dispersal did not increase at high breeding densities, despite a potential reduction in nesting success. In long-lived species, however, dispersal-induced reductions in reproductive output in one season could be offset by improved parental survival prospects. Careful nest prospecting may be profitable, because overall nest success had a strong island-specific component but showed weak temporal variation, and successive individual nest fates were predictable between years. Once a safe nest site is found, females may breed at the same place successfully for many years.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Aars J, Ims RA (2000) Population dynamic and genetic consequences of spatial density-dependent dispersal in patchy populations. Am Nat 155:252–265. doi:10.1086/303317

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson MG, Rhymer JM, Rohwer EC (1992) Philopatry, dispersal, and the genetic structure of waterfowl populations. In: Batt BDJ et al (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 365–395

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aparicio JM, Bonal R, Muñoz A (2007) Experimental test on public information use in the colonial lesser kestrel. Evol Ecol 21:783–800. doi:10.1007/s10682-006-9151-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beletsky LD, Orians GH (1991) Effects of breeding experience and familiarity on site fidelity in female red-winged blackbirds. Ecology 72:787–796. doi:10.2307/1940581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blums P, Mednis A, Clark RG (1997) Effect of incubation body mass on reproductive success and survival of two European diving ducks: a test of the nutrient limitation hypothesis. Condor 99:916–925. doi:10.2307/1370142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blums P, Nichols JD, Lindberg MS, Hines JE, Mednis A (2003) Factors affecting breeding dispersal of European ducks on Engure marsh, Latvia. J Anim Ecol 72:292–307. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00698.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolduc F, Guillemette M (2003) Incubation constancy and mass loss in the common eider Somateria mollissima. Ibis 145:329–332. doi:10.1046/j.1474-919X.2003.00143.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boulinier T, Mccoy KD, Yoccoz NG, Gasparini J, Tveraa T (2008) Public information affects breeding dispersal in a colonial bird: kittiwakes cue on neighbours. Biol Lett 4:538–540. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0291

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brinkhof MWG, Cavé AJ, Hage FJ, Verhulst S (1993) Timing of reproduction and fledging success in the coot Fulica atra: evidence for a causal relationship. J Anim Ecol 62:577–587. doi:10.2307/5206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown CR, Brown MB, Brazeal KR (2008) Familiarity with breeding habitat improves daily survival in colonial cliff swallows. Anim Behav 76:1201–1210. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.028

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bustnes JO, Erikstad KE (1993) Site fidelity in breeding common eider Somateria mollissima females. Ornis Fenn 70:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Calabuig G, Ortego J, Cordero PJ, Aparicio JM (2008) Causes, consequences and mechanisms of breeding dispersal in the colonial lesser kestrel, Falco naumanni. Anim Behav 76:1989–1996. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark RG, Shutler D (1999) Avian habitat selection: pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks? Ecology 80:272–287. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0272:AHSPFP]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (2001) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Daan S, Tinbergen J (1997) Adaptation of life histories. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 311–333

    Google Scholar 

  17. Danchin E, Cam E (2002) Can non-breeding be a cost of breeding dispersal? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:153–163. doi:10.1007/s00265-001-0423-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Danchin E, Boulinier T, Massot M (1998) Conspecific reproductive success and breeding habitat selection: implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology 79:2415–2428. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2415:CRSABH]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Devries JH, Brook RW, Howerter DW, Anderson MG (2008) Effects of spring body condition and age on reproduction in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). Auk 125:618–628. doi:10.1525/auk.2008.07055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, van Noordwijk AJ, Rutten AL, Drent PJ (2003) Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:741–747. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fast PLF, Gilchrist HG, Clark RG (2010) Nest-site materials affect nest-bowl use by common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Can J Zool 88:214–218. doi:10.1139/Z09-131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forero MG, Donázar JA, Blas J, Hiraldo F (1999) Causes and consequences of territory change and breeding dispersal distance in the black kite. Ecology 80:1298–1310. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1298:CACOTC]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenwood PJ (1982) The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:1–21. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hario M, Mazerolle MJ, Saurola P (2009) Survival of female common eiders Somateria m mollissima in a declining population of the northern Baltic Sea. Oecologia 159:747–756. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1265-x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hazlitt SL, Sigg DP, Eldridge MDB, Goldizen AW (2006) Restricted mating dispersal and strong breeding group structure in a mid-sized marsupial mammal (Petrogale penicillata). Mol Ecol 15:2997–3007. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02985.x

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hepp GR, Kennamer RA (1992) Characteristics and consequences of nest-site fidelity in wood ducks. Auk 109:812–818

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoover JP (2003) Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the prothonotary warbler. Ecology 84:416–430. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0416:DRFSFI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kilpi M, Lindström K (1997) Habitat-specific clutch size and cost of incubation in common eiders, Somateria mollissima. Oecologia 111:297–301. doi:10.1007/s004420050238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim SY, Torres R, Drummond H (2009) Simultaneous positive and negative density-dependent dispersal in a colonial bird species. Ecology 90:230–239. doi:10.1890/08-0133.1

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lehikoinen A, Christensen TK, Öst M, Kilpi M, Saurola P, Vattulainen A (2008) Large-scale change in the sex ratio of a declining eider Somateria mollissima population. Wildl Biol 14:288–301. doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[288:LCITSR]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin TE, Scott J, Menge C (2000) Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2287–2293. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McKinnon L, Gilchrist HG, Scribner KT (2006) Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Behav Ecol 17:614–621. doi:10.1093/beheco/ark002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Newton I (2001) Causes and consequences of breeding dispersal in the sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus. Ardea 89:143–154

    Google Scholar 

  34. Öst M, Steele BB (2010) Age-specific nest-site preference and success in eiders. Oecologia 162:59–69. doi:10.1007/s00442-009-1444-4

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Öst M, Vitikainen E, Waldeck P, Sundström L, Lindström K, Hollmén T, Franson JC, Kilpi M (2005) Eider females form non-kin brood-rearing coalitions. Mol Ecol 14:3903–3908. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02694.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Öst M, Wickman M, Matulionis E, Steele B (2008a) Habitat-specific clutch size and cost of incubation in eiders reconsidered. Oecologia 158:205–216. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1139-2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Öst M, Smith BD, Kilpi M (2008b) Social and maternal factors affecting duckling survival in eiders Somateria mollissima. J Anim Ecol 77:315–325. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01348.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pöysä H (1999) Conspecific nest parasitism is associated with inequality in nest predation risk in the common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula). Behav Ecol 10:533–540. doi:10.1093/beheco/10.5.533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pöysä H (2006) Public information and conspecific nest parasitism in goldeneyes: targeting safe nests by parasites. Behav Ecol 17:459–465. doi:10.1093/beheco/arj049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Robbins AM, Stoinski TS, Fawcett KA, Robbins MM (2009) Does dispersal cause reproductive delays in female mountain gorillas? Behaviour 146:525–549. doi:10.1163/156853909X426354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schaub M, von Hirschheydt J (2009) Effect of current reproduction on apparent survival, breeding dispersal, and future reproduction in barn swallows assessed by multistate capture-recapture models. J Anim Ecol 78:625–635. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01508.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Serrano D, Tella JL, Forero MG, Donázar JA (2001) Factors affecting breeding dispersal in the facultatively colonial lesser kestrel: individual experience vs conspecific cues. J Anim Ecol 70:568–578. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00512.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shields WM (1984) Factors affecting nest and site fidelity in Adirondack barn swallows (Hirundo rustica). Auk 101:780–789

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shutler D, Clark RG (2003) Causes and consequences of tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) dispersal in Saskatchewan. Auk 120:619–631. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0619:CACOTS]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sinnott RW (1984) Virtues of the haversine. Sky Telesc 68:159

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sonsthagen SA, Talbot SL, Lanctot RB, Scribner KT, McCracken KG (2009) Hierarchical spatial genetic structure of common eiders (Somateria mollissima) breeding along a migratory corridor. Auk 126:744–754. doi:10.1525/auk.2009.08224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sonsthagen SA, Talbot SL, Lanctot RB, McCracken KG (2010) Do common eiders nest in kin groups? Microgeographic genetic structure in a philopatric sea duck. Mol Ecol 19:647–657. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04495.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Steiner UK, Gaston AJ (2005) Reproductive consequences of natal dispersal in a highly philopatric seabird. Behav Ecol 16:634–639. doi:10.1093/beheco/ari035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Swennen C (1990) Dispersal and migratory movements of eiders Somateria mollissima breeding in the Netherlands. Ornis Scand 21:17–27. doi:10.2307/3676374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Switzer PV (1993) Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evol Ecol 7:533–555. doi:10.1007/BF01237820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tiedemann R, von Kistowski KG, Noer H (1999) On sex-specific dispersal and mating tactics in the common eider Somateria mollissima as inferred from the genetic structure of breeding colonies. Behaviour 136:1145–1155. doi:10.1163/156853999501801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Travis JMJ, Dytham C (1998) The evolution of dispersal in a metapopulation: a spatially explicit, individual-based model. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:17–23. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Valone TJ (1989) Group foraging, public Information, and patch estimation. Oikos 56:357–363. doi:10.2307/3565621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ward MP, Weatherhead P (2005) Sex-specific differences in site fidelity and the cost of dispersal in yellow-headed blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:108–114. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0015-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wiggett DR, Boag DA (1993) Annual reproductive success in three cohorts of columbian ground-squirrels: founding immigrants, subsequent immigrants, and natal residents. Can J Zool 71:1577–1584. doi:10.1139/z93-223

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tvärminne Zoological Station provided facilities. We thank several ornithologists for field assistance, and the Academy of Finland (grant no. 128039 to K.J. and M.Ö.) and Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation (A.L.) for funding. All experiments comply with the current laws of Finland.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Öst.

Additional information

Communicated by Ola Olsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Öst, M., Lehikoinen, A., Jaatinen, K. et al. Causes and consequences of fine-scale breeding dispersal in a female-philopatric species. Oecologia 166, 327–336 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1855-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Breeding time
  • Habitat selection
  • Predation risk
  • Site fidelity
  • Somateria mollissima