Oecologia

, Volume 162, Issue 4, pp 815–823 | Cite as

Enemy release and plant invasion: patterns of defensive traits and leaf damage in Hawaii

Physiological ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Invasive species may be released from consumption by their native herbivores in novel habitats and thereby experience higher fitness relative to native species. However, few studies have examined release from herbivory as a mechanism of invasion in oceanic island systems, which have experienced particularly high loss of native species due to the invasion of non-native animal and plant species. We surveyed putative defensive traits and leaf damage rates in 19 pairs of taxonomically related invasive and native species in Hawaii, representing a broad taxonomic diversity. Leaf damage by insects and pathogens was monitored in both wet and dry seasons. We found that native species had higher leaf damage rates than invasive species, but only during the dry season. However, damage rates across native and invasive species averaged only 2% of leaf area. Native species generally displayed high levels of structural defense (leaf toughness and leaf thickness, but not leaf trichome density) while native and invasive species displayed similar levels of chemical defenses (total phenolics). A defense index, which integrated all putative defense traits, was significantly higher for native species, suggesting that native species may allocate fewer resources to growth and reproduction than do invasive species. Thus, our data support the idea that invasive species allocate fewer resources to defense traits, allowing them to outperform native species through increased growth and reproduction. While strong impacts of herbivores on invasion are not supported by the low damage rates we observed on mature plants, population-level studies that monitor how herbivores influence recruitment, mortality, and competitive outcomes are needed to accurately address how herbivores influence invasion in Hawaii.

Keywords

Herbivory Pathogen Phenolics Defense allocation Invasive species 

Supplementary material

442_2009_1497_MOESM1_ESM.doc (151 kb)
Online Appendix (DOC 151 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal AA, Fishbein M (2006) Plant defense syndromes. Ecology 87:S132–S149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM, Mitchell CE, Power AG, Godsoe W, Klironomos J (2005) Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and below-ground enemies. Ecology 86:2979–2989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AOAC (1950) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 7th edn. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Appel HM, Govenor HL, D’Ascenzo M, Siska E, Schultz JC (2001) Limitations of folin assays of foliar phenolics in ecological studies. J Chem Ecol 27:761–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson IAE, Greenwood RM (1989) Relationships between moas and plants. N Z J Ecol 12:67–96Google Scholar
  6. Baruch Z, Goldstein G (1999) Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii. Oecologia 121:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumenthal D (2005) Interrelated causes of plant invasion. Science 310:243–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumenthal D, Mitchell CE, Pysek P, Jarosik V (2009) Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:7899–7904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowen L, Van Vuren D (1997) Insular endemic plants lack defenses against herbivores. Conserv Biol 11:1249–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlquist S (1974) Island biology. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coley P, Bryant J, Chapin FI (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Darwin C (1859) The Origin of Species. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson W, Burslem DFRP, Hulme PE (2009) Herbivory is related to taxonomic isolation, but not to invasiveness of tropical alien plants. Divers Distrib 15:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denslow JS (2003) Weeds in paradise: thoughts on the invasibility of tropical islands. Ann Mo Bot Gard 90:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denslow JS, Uowolo AL, Hughes RF (2006) Limitations to seedling establishment in a mesic Hawaiian forest. Oecologia 148:118–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS, Ickes K (2004) Natural-enemy release facilitates habitat expansion of the invasive tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Ecology 85:471–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dietz H, Wirth LR, Buschmann H (2004) Variation in herbivore damage to invasive and native woody plant species in open forest vegetation on Mahe, Seychelles. Biol Invasions 6:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dirzo R (1984) Herbivory: a phytocentric overview. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhan J (eds) Perspectives in Plant Population Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 141–165Google Scholar
  21. Dirzo R, Boege K (2008) Patterns of herbivory and defense in tropical dry and rain forests. In: Carson W, Schnitzer S (eds) Tropical forest community ecology. Blackwell, West Sussex, pp 63–78Google Scholar
  22. Dominguez-Bello MG, Michelangeli F, Ruiz MC, Garcia A, Rodriguez E (1994) Ecology of the folivorous Hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) on the Venezuelan plains. Auk 111:643–651Google Scholar
  23. Engelkes T et al (2008) Successful range-expanding plants experience less above-ground and below-ground enemy impact. Nature 456:946–948CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fine PVA et al (2006) The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. Ecology 87:S150–S162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Funk JL (2008) Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. J Ecol 96:1162–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446:1079–1081CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Garcia-Guzman G, Dirzo R (2001) Patterns of leaf-pathogen infection in the understory of a Mexican rain forest: incidence, spatiotemporal variation, and mechanisms of infection. Am J Bot 88:634–645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, Smith JF, Hahn WJ (1994) Thorn-like prickles and heterophylly in Cyanea: adaptations to extinct avian browsers on Hawaii? Proc Natl Acad Sci 91:2810–2814CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen I, Brimer L, Molgaard P (2003) Herbivore-deterring secondary compounds in heterophyllous woody species of the Mascarene Islands. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes RF, Denslow JS (2005) Invasion by a N2-fixing tree alters function and structure in wet lowland forests of Hawaii. Ecol Appl 15:1615–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. James HF, Burney DA (1997) The diet and ecology of Hawaii’s extinct flightless waterfowl: evidence from coprolites. Biol J Linn Soc 62:279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joe SM, Daehler CC (2008) Invasive slugs as under-appreciated obstacles to rare plant restoration: evidence from the Hawaiian Islands. Biol Invasions 10:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu H, Stiling P (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Invasions 8:1535–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu H, Stiling P, Pemberton RW (2007) Does enemy release matter for invasive plants? Evidence from a comparison of insect herbivore damage among invasive, non-invasive and native congeners. Biol Invasions 9:773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lockwood JL (2006) Life in a double-hotspot: the transformation of Hawaiian passerine bird diversity following invasion and extinction. Biol Invasions 8:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loope LL (1998) Hawaii and the Pacific islands. In: Mac MJ, Opler CE, Haecker CEP, Doran PD (eds) Status and trends in the nation’s biology resources. U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, pp 747–774Google Scholar
  38. Maron JL, Vila M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marquis RJ (1984) Leaf herbivores decrease fitness of a tropical plant. Science 226:537–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mascaro J, Becklund KK, Hughes RF, Schnitzer SA (2008) Limited native plant regeneration in novel, exotic-dominated forests on Hawaii. For Ecol Manage 256:593–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mitchell CE et al (2006) Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9:726–740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Muller-Scharer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19:417–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Parker IM, Gilbert GS (2007) When there is no escape: the effects of natural enemies on native, invasive, and noninvasive plants. Ecology 88:1210–1224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Parker JD, Hay ME (2005) Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecol Lett 8:959–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pattison RR, Goldstein G, Ares A (1998) Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rainforest species. Oecologia 117:449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–54Google Scholar
  47. Ridenour WM, Vivanco JM, Feng Y, Horiuchi J-I, Callaway RM (2008) No evidence for trade-offs: Centaurea plants from America are better competitors and defenders. Ecol Monogr 78:369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rinker HB, Lowman MD (2004) Insect herbivory in tropical forests. In: Lowman MD, Rinker HB (eds) Forest Canopies, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 359–386Google Scholar
  49. Rogers WE, Siemann E (2002) Effects of simulated herbivory and resource availability on native and invasive exotic tree seedlings. Basic Appl Ecol 3:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rogers WE, Siemann E (2004) Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of the Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum. J Appl Ecol 41:561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Martin BA, Orrock JL (2009) Effects of long-term consumer manipulations on invasion in oak savanna communities. Ecology 90:1356–1365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2003) Herbivory, disease, recruitment limitation, and success of alien and native tree species. Ecology 84:1489–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Siemens DH, Garner SH, Mitchell-Olds T, Callaway RM (2002) Cost of defense in the context of plant competition: Brassica rapa may grow and defend. Ecology 83:505–517Google Scholar
  54. Strauss SY et al (2009) Cryptic seedling herbivory by nocturnal introduced generalists impacts survival, performance of native and exotic plants. Ecology 90:419–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Struempf HM, Schondube JE, Martinez del Rio C (1999) The cyanogenic glycoside amygdalin does not deter consumption of ripe fruit by cedar waxwings. Auk 116:749–775Google Scholar
  56. van Kleunen M, Fischer M (2009) Release from foliar and floral fungal pathogen species does not explain the geographic spread of naturalized North American plants in Europe. J Ecol 97:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Verhoeven KJF, Biere A, Harvey JA, van der Putten WH (2009) Plant invaders and their novel natural enemies: who is naive? Ecol Lett 12:107–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Vitousek PM (1988) Diversity and biological invasions of oceanic islands. In: Wilson EO (ed) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 181–189Google Scholar
  59. Vourc’h G, Martin J-L, Duncan P, Escarre J, Clausen TP (2001) Defensive adaptations of Thuja plicata to ungulate browsing: a comparative study between mainland and island populations. Oecologia 126:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang D-Y, Jiang X-H (2006) Interactive effects of habitat productivity and herbivore pressure on the evolution of anti-herbivore defense in invasive plant populations. J Theor Biol 242:935–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesChapman UniversityOrangeUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA

Personalised recommendations