Oecologia

, Volume 162, Issue 2, pp 343–348 | Cite as

Locomotor performance in an invasive species: cane toads from the invasion front have greater endurance, but not speed, compared to conspecifics from a long-colonised area

  • John Llewelyn
  • Benjamin L. Phillips
  • Ross A. Alford
  • Lin Schwarzkopf
  • Richard Shine
Behavioral ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Cane toads (Bufo marinus) are now moving about 5 times faster through tropical Australia than they did a half-century ago, during the early phases of toad invasion. Radio-tracking has revealed higher daily rates of displacement by toads at the invasion front compared to those from long-colonised areas: toads from frontal populations follow straighter paths, move more often, and move further per displacement than do toads from older (long-established) populations. Are these higher movement rates of invasion-front toads associated with modified locomotor performance (e.g. speed, endurance)? In an outdoor raceway, toads collected from the invasion front had similar speeds, but threefold greater endurance, compared to conspecifics collected from a long-established population. Thus, increased daily displacement in invasion-front toads does not appear to be driven by changes in locomotor speed. Instead, increased dispersal is associated with higher endurance, suggesting that invasion-front toads tend to spend more time moving than do their less dispersive conspecifics. Whether this increased endurance is a cause or consequence of behavioural shifts associated with rapid dispersal is unclear. Nonetheless, shifts in endurance between frontal and core populations of this invasive species point to the complex panoply of traits affected by selection for increased dispersal ability on expanding population fronts.

Keywords

Dispersal rate Bufo marinus Introduced species Rhinella marina Spatial selection 

References

  1. Alford RA, Brown GP, Schwarzkopf L, Phillips BL, Shine R (2009) Comparisons through time and space suggest rapid evolution of dispersal behaviour in an invasive species. Wildl Res 36:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubret F, Shine R, Bonnet X (2004) Adaptive developmental plasticity in snakes. Nature 431:261–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Battisti A, Stastny M, Netherer S, Robinet C, Schopf A, Roques A, Larsson S (2005) Expansion of geographic range in the pine processionary moth caused by increased winter temperatures. Ecol Appl 15:2084–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernays EA (1986) Diet-induced head allometry among foliage-chewing insects and its importance for graminivores. Science 231:495–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown GP, Shilton C, Phillips BL, Shine R (2007) Invasion stress and spinal arthritis in cane toads. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:17698–17700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Byers JE, Reichard S, Randall JM, Parker IM, Smith CS, Lonsdale WM, Atkinson IAE, Seastedt TR, Williamson M, Chornesky E, Hayes D (2002) Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conserv Biol 16:630–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey JR (1996) The future of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata invasion of California: a predictive framework. Biol Conserv 78:35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crozier L (2004) Warmer winters drive butterfly range expansion by increasing survivorship. Ecology 85:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummings JW (1979) Physiological and biochemical adaptations to training in Rana pipiens. J Comp Physiol B 134:345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cwynar LC, MacDonald GM (1987) Geographical variation of lodgepole pine in relation to population history. Am Nat 129:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman DB (1992) Prickly Pear menace in eastern Australia 1880–1940. Geogr Rev 82:413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman BA, Miles DB, Schwarzkopf L (2008) Life on the rocks: habitat use drives morphological and performance evolution in lizards. Ecology 89:3462–3471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Grosholz ED (1996) Contrasting rates of spread for introduced species in terrestrial and marine systems. Ecology 77:1680–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hastings A, Cuddington K, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone A, Harrison S, Holland M, Lambrinos J, Malvadkar U, Melbourne BA, Moore K, Taylor C, Thomson D (2005) The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol Lett 8:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes CL, Dytham C, Hill JK (2007) Modelling and analysing evolution of dispersal in populations at expanding range boundaries. Ecol Entomol 32:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson LE, Carlton JT (1996) Post-establishment spread in large-scale invasions: dispersal mechanisms of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Ecology 77:1686–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knowles TW, Weigl PD (1990) Thermal dependence of anuran burst locomotor performance. Copeia 1990:796–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraus F, Campbell EW (2004) Human-mediated escalation of a formerly eradicable problem: the invasion of Caribbean frogs in the Hawaiian Islands. Biol Invas 4:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lever C (2001) The cane toad: the history and ecology of a successful colonist. Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Losos JB, Creer DA, Glossip D, Goellner R, Hampton A, Roberts G, Haskell N, Taylor P, Ettling J (2000) Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in the hindlimb of the lizard Anolis sagrei. Evolution 54:301–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller K, Camilliere JJ (1981) Physical training improves swimming performance of the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis. Herpetologica 37:1–10Google Scholar
  22. Phillips BL, Brown GP, Webb JK, Shine R (2006) Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 439:803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Phillips BL, Brown GP, Greenlees M, Webb JK, Shine R (2007) Rapid expansion of the cane toad (Bufo marinus) invasion front in tropical Australia. Austral Ecol 32:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips BL, Brown GP, Travis JMJ, Shine R (2008) Reid’s paradox revisited: the evolution of dispersal in range-shifting populations. Am Nat 172:S34–S48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwarzkopf L, Alford RA (2002) Nomadic movement in tropical toads. Oikos 96:492–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998) Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecol Appl 8:833–845Google Scholar
  27. Simmons AD, Thomas CD (2004) Changes in dispersal during species’ range expansions. Am Nat 164:378–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Thebaud C, Debussche M (1991) Rapid invasion of Fraxinus ornus L. along the Herault River system in southern France: the importance of seed dispersal by water. J Biogeogr 18:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Travis JMJ, Dytham C (2002) Dispersal evolution during invasions. Evol Ecol Res 4:1119–1129Google Scholar
  30. Urban MC, Phillips BL, Skelly DK, Shine R (2008) A toad more traveled: the heterogeneous invasion dynamics of cane toads in Australia. Am Nat 171:E134–E148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. West-Eberhard MJ (1989) Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:249–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. West-Eberhard MJ (2002) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Zug GR (1972) Anuran locomotion: structure and function. I. Preliminary observations on relation between jumping and osteometrics of appendicular and postaxial skeleton. Copeia 1972:613–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Llewelyn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Benjamin L. Phillips
    • 1
  • Ross A. Alford
    • 2
  • Lin Schwarzkopf
    • 2
  • Richard Shine
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences A08University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Marine and Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations