Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumption of a nectar alkaloid reduces pathogen load in bumble bees

  • Plant-Animal Interactions - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diet has a significant effect on pathogen infections in animals and the consumption of secondary metabolites can either enhance or mitigate infection intensity. Secondary metabolites, which are commonly associated with herbivore defense, are also frequently found in floral nectar. One hypothesized function of this so-called toxic nectar is that it has antimicrobial properties, which may benefit insect pollinators by reducing the intensity of pathogen infections. We tested whether gelsemine, a nectar alkaloid of the bee-pollinated plant Gelsemium sempervirens, could reduce pathogen loads in bumble bees infected with the gut protozoan Crithidia bombi. In our first laboratory experiment, artificially infected bees consumed a daily diet of gelsemine post-infection to simulate continuous ingestion of alkaloid-rich nectar. In the second experiment, bees were inoculated with C. bombi cells that were pre-exposed to gelsemine, simulating the direct effects of nectar alkaloids on pathogen cells that are transmitted at flowers. Gelsemine significantly reduced the fecal intensity of C. bombi 7 days after infection when it was consumed continuously by infected bees, whereas direct exposure of the pathogen to gelsemine showed a non-significant trend toward reduced infection. Lighter pathogen loads may relieve bees from the behavioral impairments associated with the infection, thereby improving their foraging efficiency. If the collection of nectar secondary metabolites by pollinators is done as a means of self-medication, pollinators may selectively maintain secondary metabolites in the nectar of plants in natural populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–c

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler LS (2000) The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos 91:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler LS, Irwin RE (2005) Ecological costs and benefits of defenses in nectar. Ecology 86:2968–2978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum MR (1988) Allelochemicals in insect–microbe–plant interactions; agents provocateurs in the coevolutionary arms race. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Singer MS (2005) Taste alteration and endoparasites. Nature 436:476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blau PA, Feeny P, Contardo L, Robson DS (1978) Allylglucosinolate and herbivorous caterpillars—contrast in toxicity and tolerance. Science 200:1296–1298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaw ME, Adkisson MA, Levin D, Garriott JC, Tindall RSA (1979) Poisoning with Carolina jessamine (Gelsemium sempervirens [L.] Ait). J Pediatr 94:998–1001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boppre M, Colegate SM, Edgar JA (2005) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids of Echium vulgare honey found in pure pollen. J Agric Food Chem 53:594–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MJF, Loosli R, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) Condition-dependent expression of virulence in a trypanosome infecting bumblebees. Oikos 91:421–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MJF, Schmid-Hempel R, Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Strong context-dependent virulence in a host–parasite system: reconciling genetic evidence with theory. J Anim Ecol 72:994–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysch-Herzberg M (2004) Ecology of yeasts in plant-bumblebee mutualism in Central Europe. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 50:87–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapuisat M, Oppliger A, Magliano P, Christe P (2007) Wood ants use resin to protect themselves against pathogens. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:2013–2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christe P, Oppliger A, Bancala F, Castella G, Chapuisat M (2003) Evidence for collective medication in ants. Ecol Lett 6:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DH, Wolfe ND (1993) The adaptive significance of self-medication. Trends Ecol Evol 8:60–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colla SR, Otterstatter MC, Gegear RJ, Thomson JD (2006) Plight of the bumble bee: pathogen spillover from commercial to wild populations. Biol Conserv 129:461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cory JS, Hoover K (2006) Plant-mediated effects in insect–pathogen interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 21:278–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan MM (1999) Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:564–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Despres L, David JP, Gallet C (2007) The evolutionary ecology of insect resistance to plant chemicals. Trends Ecol Evol 22:298–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durrer S, Schmid-Hempel P (1994) Shared use of flowers leads to horizontal pathogen transmission. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 258:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers BK, Olesen JM (1997) The fruit-wasp route to toxic nectar in Epipactis orchids? Flora 192:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott SE, Irwin RE, Adler LS, Williams NM (2008) The nectar alkaloid, gelsemine, does not affect offspring performance of a native solitary bee, Osmia lignaria (Megachilidae). Ecol Entomol 33:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiburghaus F, Kaminsky R, Nkunya MHH, Brun R (1996) Evaluation of African medicinal plants for their in vitro trypanocidal activity. J Ethnopharmacol 55:1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gegear RJ, Otterstatter MC, Thomson JD (2005) Does parasitic infection impair the ability of bumblebees to learn flower-handling techniques? Anim Behav 70:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegear RJ, Otterstatter MC, Thomson JD (2006) Bumble-bee foragers infected by a gut parasite have an impaired ability to utilize floral information. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegear RJ, Manson JS, Thomson JD (2007) Ecological context influences pollinator deterrence by alkaloids in floral nectar. Ecol Lett 10:375–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golonka AM (2002) Nectar-inhabiting microorganisms and the dioecious plant species Silene latifolia. Department of Botany. Duke University, Durham, p 150

  • Imhoof B, Schmid-Hempel P (1999) Colony success of the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris, in relation to infections by two protozoan parasites, Crithidia bombi and Nosema bombi. Insect Soc 46:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85:1503–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isman MB, Duffey SS (1982) Toxicity of tomato phenolic compounds to the fruitworm, Heliothis zea. Entomol Exp Appl 31:370–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, English-Loeb G (1997) Tachinid parasitoids affect host plant choice by caterpillars to increase caterpillar survival. Ecology 78:603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konig B (1988) The honeybee as pharmacophorus insect. Entomol Gen 14:145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KP, Cory JS, Wilson K, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ (2006) Flexible diet choice offsets protein costs of pathogen resistance in a caterpillar. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:823–829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lipa JJ, Triggiani O (1988) Crithidia bombi sp n. a flagellated parasite of a bumblebee Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Acta Protozool 27:287–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan A, Ruiz-Gonzalez MX, Brown MJF (2005) The impact of host starvation on parasite development and population dynamics in an intestinal trypanosome parasite of bumble bees. Parasitology 130:637–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manson JS, Thomson JD (2009) Post-ingestive effects of nectar alkaloids depend on dominance status of bumble bees. Ecol Entomol 34:421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson JS, Lachance MA, Thomson JD (2007) Candida gelsemii sp. nov., a yeast of the Metschnikowiaceae clade isolated from nectar of the poisonous Carolina jessamine. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 92:37–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci MC (1995) Propolis—chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 26:83–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otterstatter MC, Thomson JD (2006) Within-host dynamics of an intestinal pathogen of bumble bees. Parasitology 133:749–761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otterstatter MC, Thomson JD (2007) Contact networks and transmission of an intestinal pathogen in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies. Oecologia 154:411–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otterstatter MC, Gegear RJ, Colla SR, Thomson JD (2005) Effects of parasitic mites and protozoa on the flower constancy and foraging rate of bumble bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella JB (2007) Mechanisms of prezygotic reproductive isolation between two sympatric species, Gelsemium rankinii and G. sempervirens (Gelsemiaceae), in the southeastern United States. Am J Bot 94:468–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among 3 trophic levels—influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades DF, Bergdahl JC (1981) Adaptive significance of toxic nectar. Am Nat 117:798–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2006) SAS/STAT 9.1 user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (2001) On the evolutionary ecology of host–parasite interactions: addressing the question with regard to bumblebees and their parasites. Naturwissenschaften 88:147–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel R, Schmid-Hempel P (1991) Endoparasitic flies, pollen-collection by bumblebees and a potential host–parasite conflict. Oecologia 87:227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P, Schmid-Hempel R (1993) Transmission of a pathogen in Bombus terrestris, with a note on division-of-labor in social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P, Stauffer HP (1998) Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees. Anim Behav 55:819–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MS, Carriere Y, Theuring C, Hartmann T (2004) Disentangling food quality from resistance against parasitoids: diet choice by a generalist caterpillar. Am Nat 164:423–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MS, Mace KC, Bernays EA (2009) Self-medication as adaptive plasticity: increased ingestion of plant toxins by parasitized caterpillars. PLoS One 4:e4796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slansky F (1992) Allelochemical–nutrient interactions in herbivore nutrient ecology, vol. II. Ecological and evolutionary processes. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites, vol 2, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 135–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles B, Paschke JD (1980) Midgut pH in different instars of 3 Aedes mosquito species and the relation between pH and susceptibility of larvae to a nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J Invertebr Pathol 35:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Whittall JB (2006) Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 120–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadmor-Melamed H, Markman S, Arieli A, Distl M, Wink M, Izhaki I (2004) Limited ability of Palestine sunbirds Nectarinia osea to cope with pyridine alkaloids in nectar of tree tobacco Nicotiana glauca. Funct Ecol 18:844–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanetten H, Temporini E, Wasmann C (2001) Phytoalexin (and phytoanticipin) tolerance as a virulence trait: why is it not required by all pathogens? Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 59:83–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wink M, Theile V (2002) Alkaloid tolerance in Manduca sexta and phylogenetically related sphingids (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Chemoecology 12:29–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Nathan Muchhala and Mario Vallejo-Marín, Richard Karban and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. All experiments complied with the current laws of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada

    Jessamyn S. Manson, Michael C. Otterstatter & James D. Thomson

Authors
  1. Jessamyn S. Manson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael C. Otterstatter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James D. Thomson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessamyn S. Manson.

Additional information

Communicated by Richard Karban.

J. S. Manson and M. C. Otterstatter have contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manson, J.S., Otterstatter, M.C. & Thomson, J.D. Consumption of a nectar alkaloid reduces pathogen load in bumble bees. Oecologia 162, 81–89 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1431-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1431-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation