Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging decisions in a capital breeder: trade-offs between mass gain and lactation

  • Behavioral Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high energetic costs of lactation can lead to fundamental trade-offs in life-history traits, particularly in young females that reproduce before completing body growth. We assessed whether lactating female mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) used behavioural tactics at fine spatio-temporal scales to increase energy intake to compensate for the costs of lactation. Lactating females increased bite rate and chewing rate compared with non-lactating females, but selected similar foraging sites in terms of plant quality and abundance. At peak lactation, forage intake of lactating females was >40% greater than that of non-lactating females. For females that had reached asymptotic body mass (i.e. ≥6 years old), summer mass gain of lactating females was similar to that of non-lactating females. At 4 and 5 years of age, however, daily mass gain of lactating females was about 20% lower than that of non-lactating females. We conclude that increased foraging may allow fully-grown lactating females to compensate for the energetic costs of lactation, but that there is a major trade-off between mass gain and lactation for younger females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold GW (1985) Regulation of forage intake. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold GW, Dudzinski ML (1967) Studies on the diet of the grazing animal. II. The effect of physiological status in ewes and pasture availability on herbage intake. Aust J Agric Res 18:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984) Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker DL, Hobbs NT (1987) Strategies of digestion: digestive efficiency and retention time of forage diets in montane ungulates. Can J Zool 65:1978–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (2005) Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard P (2005) On lactation and rumination in bighorn ewes (Ovis canadensis). J Zool 265:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham CD (1989) Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell FL, Gillingham MP (1985) Foraging behavior: dynamics of dining out. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 53–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Iason GR, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1982) Effects of lactation on feeding behaviour and habitat use in wild red deer hinds. J Zool 198:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1983) The costs of reproduction to red deer hinds. J Anim Ecol 52:367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD (1998) In vitro digestibilities of summer forages utilized by the Riviere George caribou herd. Arctic 51:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD (2000) Dominance hierarchies in female mountain goats: stability, aggressiveness and determinants of rank. Behaviour 137:1541–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2001a) Reproductive success in female mountain goats: the influence of age and social rank. Anim Behav 62:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2001b) Birthdate, mass and survival in mountain goat kids: effects of maternal characteristics and forage quality. Oecologia 127:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2003) Mountain goat. In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson B, Chapman J (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management and conservation. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 1061–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M, Fournier F (1998a) Life-history effects of chemical immobilization and radiocollars on mountain goats. J Wildl Manag 62:745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M, Smith KG (1998b) Horn growth in mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus). J Mammal 79:406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries H (1995) An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim Behav 50:1375–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries H (1998) Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review. Anim Behav 55:827–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domingue BMF, Dellow DW, Barry NT (1991) The efficiency of chewing during eating and ruminating in goats and sheep. Br J Nutr 65:355–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour DL, Reina JC, Spurr GB (2002) Energy intake and expenditure of free-living, lactating Colombian women in an urban setting. Eur J Clin Nutr 56:205–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Côté SD (2008) Mountain goats: ecology, behavior and conservation of an alpine ungulate. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Lucherini M, Wishart WD (1995) Life history consequences of variation in age of primiparity in bighorn ewes. Ecology 76:871–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, King WJ, Smith KG, Wishart WD (1996) The development of sexual dimorphism: seasonal and lifetime mass changes in bighorn sheep. Can J Zool 74:330–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Jorgenson JT (1998) Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder. Am Nat 152:367–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier F, Festa-Bianchet M (1995) Social dominance in adult female mountain goats. Anim Behav 49:1449–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund R, Littell R (1992) SAS system for regression. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginnett TF, Demment MW (1997) Sex differences in giraffe foraging behavior at two spatial scales. Oecologia 110:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman JL, Thompson SD (1988) Energy allocation in mammalian reproduction. Am Zool 28:863–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Green WCH, Rothstein A (1991) Trade-offs between growth and reproduction in female bison. Oecologia 86:521–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross JE, Hobbs NT, Wunder BA (1993) Independent variables for predicting intake rate of mammalian herbivores: biomass density, plant density, or bite size? Oikos 68:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross JE, Demment MW, Alkon PU, Kotzman M (1995) Feeding and chewing behaviours of Nubian ibex: compensation for sex-related differences in body size. Funct Ecol 9:385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross JE, Alkon PU, Demment MW (1996) Nutritional ecology of dimorphic herbivores: digestion and passage rates in Nubian ibex. Oecologia 107:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel S (2008) Les compromis à court et à long terme associés à la reproduction chez les ongulés femelles: l’exemple de la chèvre de montagne. PhD thesis. Université Laval, Quebec City

  • Hamel S, Côté SD (2007) Habitat use patterns in relation to escape terrain: are alpine ungulate females trading-off better foraging sites for safety? Can J Zool 85:933–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel S, Côté SD (2008) Trade-offs in activity budget in an alpine ungulate: contrasting lactating and non-lactating females. Anim Behav 75:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel S, Côté SD, Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M (2009) Individual variation in reproductive costs of reproduction: high-quality females always do better. J Anim Ecol 78:143–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haviernick M, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (1998) Immobilization of mountain goats with xylazine and reversal with idazoxan. J Wildl Dis 34:342–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson RJ, Frank S (1987) Foraging ecology of bison in aspen boreal habitats. J Range Manag 40:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iason GR, Sim DA, Gordon IJ (2000) Do endogenous seasonal cycles of food intake influence foraging behaviour and intake by grazing sheep? Funct Ecol 14:614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komers PE, Messier F, Gates CC (1993) Group structure in wood bison: nutritional and reproductive determinants. Can J Zool 71:1367–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krockenberger A (2003) Meeting the energy demands of reproduction in female koalas, Phascolarctos cinereus: evidence for energetic compensation. J Comp Physiol B 173:531–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Künkele J, Trillmich F (1997) Are precocial young cheaper? Lactation energetics in the Guinea pig. Physiol Zool 70:589–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landete-Castillejos T, Garcia A, Garde J, Gallego L (2000) Milk intake and production curves and allosuckling in captive Iberian red deer, Cervus elaphus hispanicus. Anim Behav 60:679–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenson MK (1995) Behavioural costs and constraints of lactation in free-living cheetahs. Anim Behav 50:815–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis L, Dodd PW, Fentress JC (1985) The pooling fallacy: problems arising when individuals contribute more than one observation to the data set. Z Tierpsychol 68:201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhirter RB (1991) Effects of reproduction on activity and foraging behaviour of adult female Columbian ground squirrels. Can J Zool 69:2209–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellish JE, Iverson SJ, Bowen WD (2000) Metabolic compensation during high energy output in fasting, lactating grey seals (Halichoerus grypus): metabolic ceilings revisited. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 267:1245–1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KE, Bales KL, Ramos JH, Dietz JM (2006) Energy intake, energy expenditure, and reproductive costs of female wild golden lion tamarins. Am J Primatol 68:1037–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moyes K, Coulson T, Morgan BJT, Donald A, Morris SJ, Clutton-Brock TH (2006) Cumulative reproduction and survival costs in female red deer. Oikos 115:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG (1991) Maximizing energy retention in grazing ruminants. J Anim Ecol 60:1029–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus P, Ruckstuhl KE (2002a) The link between sexual dimorphism, activity budgets, and group cohesion: the case of the plains zebra (Equus burchelli). Can J Zool 80:1437–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus P, Ruckstuhl KE (2002b) Foraging behaviour in Alpine ibex (Capra ibex): consequences of reproductive status, body size, age and sex. Ethol Ecol Evol 14:373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Noldus Information Technology (1998) Matman, reference manual. Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Oftedal OT (1985) Pregnancy and lactation. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 215–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan J, Koike S, Suzuki T, Ueda K, Kobayashi Y, Tanaka K, Okubo M (2003) Effect of mastication on degradation of orchardgrass hay stem by rumen microbes: fibrolytic enzyme activities and microbial attachment. Anim Feed Sci Technol 106:69–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker KL, Barboza PS, Gillingham MP (2009) Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. Funct Ecol 23:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Barbería FJ, Gordon IJ (1998) Factors affecting food comminution during chewing in ruminants: a review. Biol J Linn Soc 63:233–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Racey PA, Speakman JR (1987) The energy costs of pregnancy and lactation in heterothermic bats. Symp Zool Soc Lond 57:107–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Renecker LA, Hudson RJ (1986) Seasonal foraging rates of free-ranging moose. J Wildl Manag 50:143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckstuhl KE, Festa-Bianchet M (1998) Do reproductive status and lamb gender affect the foraging behavior of bighorn ewes? Ethology 104:941–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckstuhl KE, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT (2003) Bite rates in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): effects of season, age, sex and reproductive status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:167–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadleir RMFS (1982) Energy consumption and subsequent partitioning in lactating black-tailed deer. Can J Zool 60:382–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Haagenrud H (1985) Life history of the moose Alces alces: relationship between growth and reproduction. Holarct Ecol 8:100–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Gross JE, Spalinger DE, Hobbs NT, Wunder BA (1994) The scaling of intake rate in mammalian herbivores. Am Nat 143:1055–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Illius AW, Danell K, Hobbs NT, Spalinger DE (1999) Predicting bite size selection of mammalian herbivores: a test of a general model of diet optimization. Oikos 84:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalinger DE, Hobbs NT (1992) Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response. Am Nat 140:325–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens V, Houston DB (1989) Reliability of age determination of mountain goats. Wildl Soc Bull 17:72–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavecchia G, Coulson T, Morgan BJT, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JC, Gulland FMD, Clutton-Brock TH (2005) Predictors of reproductive cost in female Soay sheep. J Anim Ecol 74:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoven W, Boomker EA (1985) Digestion. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 103–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest PJ (1994) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiberg V, Mysterud A, Bjørkvoll E, Langvatn R, Loe LE, Irvine RJ, Bonenfant C, Couweleers F, Stenseth NC (2007) Evidence for a trade-off between early growth and tooth wear in Svalbard reindeer. J Anim Ecol 76:1139–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickstrom ML, Robbins CT, Hanley TA, Spalinger DE, Parish SM (1984) Food intake and foraging energetics of elk and mule deer. J Wildl Manag 48:1285–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R (2003) Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Stat Med 22:3527–3541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our research was financed by the Alberta Conservation Association, the Alberta Fish and Wildlife Division, the Alberta Sport, Recreation, Parks and Wildlife Foundation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and Université Laval. S.H. received scholarships from NSERC and the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies. We especially thank M. Festa-Bianchet and K.G. Smith for fruitful discussions and logistical help. We are grateful to M. Bégin Pépin, C. Cameron, E. Cardinal, G. Côté, E. Drouin, M. Favre, C.A. Gagnon, Y. Gendreau, M. Houle, L. MacPherson, S. Popp, S. Rioux and V. Viera for help with field work, and to A. Brousseau, M. Gravel, L. L’Italien, and G. Picard for help with laboratory work. We thank the Centre de Conservation de la Biodiversité Boréale for allowing us to work with captive mountain goats, and C. Gagnon and R. Hamel for logistical help in this experiment. Valuable comments from P. Blanchard, J.-M. Gaillard, V. Harvey, I. Kojola, J. Taillon and two anonymous reviewers improved earlier versions of this manuscript. This research project was approved by the Canadian Council for Animal Care committee of the Université Laval.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Hamel.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-Michel Gaillard.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material (PDF 297 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamel, S., Côté, S.D. Foraging decisions in a capital breeder: trade-offs between mass gain and lactation. Oecologia 161, 421–432 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1377-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1377-y

Keywords

Navigation