Abstract
Trade-offs have a central role in evolutionary ecology and life-history theory. Here, we present evidence for the existence of a rarely studied trade-off between growth rate and starvation endurance in larvae of a pit-building antlion. We first manipulated antlions’ feeding regime and obtained a spectrum of growth rates. Next, we starved the antlions and documented their rate of mass loss. Antlions growing faster during the feeding phase also lost mass faster during the successive starvation period, implying the existence of an induced trade-off between fast growth and starvation endurance. Finally, we fed all antlions with prey items of similar mass and measured both the giving-up prey mass (i.e. the remaining body mass of the prey that was not converted into predator body mass), and growth efficiency of antlions (i.e. proportion of prey consumed, negatively correlated with giving-up prey mass). The giving-up mass was negatively correlated with the growth rate of the antlions during the feeding phase, and positively correlated with their growth rate during the starvation phase (the opposite pattern was evident when examining growth efficiency), incongruently with the common phenomenon of growth compensation (i.e. extracting more of the prey after a starvation period). We suggest that antlion larvae can adopt a physiological mode bounded by two extremes: one extreme is adapted to starvation, involving reduced metabolic rates but also reduced capability to exploit prey, while the other is adapted to fast growth, allowing an efficient exploitation of prey, but at the expense of lowered starvation endurance.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.

References
Abrams PA, Leimar O, Nylin S, Wiklund C (1996) The effect of flexible growth rates on optimal sizes and development times in a seasonal environment. Am Nat 147:381–395
Arendt JD (1997) Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Q Rev Biol 72:149–177
Arnett AE, Gotelli NJ (2003) Bergmann’s rule in larval ant lions: testing the starvation resistance hypothesis. Ecol Entomol 28:645–650
Barnett AG, van der Pols J, Dobson AJ (2005) Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol 34:215–220
Blanckenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q Rev Biol 75:385–407
Blanckenhorn WU (2005) Behavioral causes and consequences of sexual size dimorphism. Ethology 111:977–1016
Blanckenhorn WU, Fanti J, Reim C (2007) Size-dependent energy reserves, energy utilization and longevity in the yellow dung fly. Physiol Entomol 32:372–381
Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47
Cade BS, Noon B (2003) A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 1:412–420
Chapman RF (1998) The insects: structure and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
De Block M, Stoks R (2004) Life history variation in relation to time constraints in a damselfly. Oecologia 140:68–75
Engqvist L (2007) Environment-dependent genetic correlations between development time and body mass in a scorpionfly. Zoology 110:344–353
Fischer K, Zeilstra I, Hetz SK, Fiedler (2004) Physiological costs of growing fast: does accelerated growth reduce pay-off in adult fitness? Evol Ecol 18:343–353
Gotelli NJ (1993) Ant lion zones: causes of high-density predator aggregations. Ecology 74:226–237
Gotthard K (2000) Increased risk of predation as a cost of high growth rate: an experimental test in a butterfly. J Anim Ecol 69:896–902
Gotthard K (2001) Growth strategies of ectothermic animals in temperate environments. In: Atkinson D, Thorndyke M (eds) Environment and animal development. BIOS Scientific, Oxford, pp 287–304
Gotthard K, Nylin S, Wiklund C (1994) Adaptive variation in growth rate: life history costs and consequences in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oecologia 99:281–289
Gotthard K, Berger D, Walters R (2007) What keeps insects small? Time limitation during oviposition reduces the fecundity benefit of female size in a butterfly. Am Nat 169:768–779
Griffiths D (1982) Tests of alternative models of prey consumption by predators, using ant-lion larvae. J Anim Ecol 51:363–373
Griffiths D (1992) Interference competition in ant-lion (Macroleon quinquemaculatus) larvae. Ecol Entomol 17:219–226
Harshman LG, Schmid JL (1998) Evolution of starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: aspects of metabolism and counter-impact selection. Evolution 52:1679–1685
Honek A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492
Iwasa J (1991) Pessimistic plant: optimal growth schedule in stochastic environments. Theor Popul Biol 40:246–268
Kelly C, Price TD (2005) Correcting for regression to the mean in behavior and ecology. Am Nat 166:700–707
Leather SR (1988) Size, reproductive potential and fecundity in insects: things aren’t as simple as they seem. Oikos 51:386–389
Lewis DB (2001) Trade-offs between growth and survival: responses of freshwater snails to predacious crayfish. Ecology 82:758–765
Lucas JR (1985) Metabolic rates and pit-construction costs of two antlion species. J Anim Ecol 54:295–309
Mand T, Tammaru T, Mappes J (2007) Size dependent predation risk in cryptic and conspicuous insects. Evol Ecol 21:485–498
Matsura T, Murao T (1994) Comparative study on the behavioral response to starvation in three species of antlion larvae (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). J Insect Behav 7:873–884
Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254–260
Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2003) Growth versus lifespan: perspectives from evolutionary ecology. Exp Gerontol 38:935–940
Moya-Larano J, El-Sayyid MET, Fox CW (2007) Smaller beetles are better scramble competitors at cooler temperatures. Biol Lett 3:475–478
Pollard SD (1989) Constraints affecting partial prey consumption by a crab spider, Diaea sp. Indet. (Araneae: Thoisidae). Oecologia 81:392–396
Reznick D, Nunney L, Tessier A (2000) Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 15:421–425
Samu F (1993) Wolf spider feeding strategies: optimality of prey consumption in Pardosa hortensis. Oecologia 94:139–145
Scharf FS, Juanes F, Sutherland M (1998) Inferring ecological relationships from the edges of the scatter diagrams: comparison of regression techniques. Ecology 79:448–460
Scharf I, Ovadia O (2006) Factors influencing site abandonment and site selection in a sit-and-wait predator: a review of pit-building antlion larvae. J Insect Behav 19:197–218
Scharf I, Filin I, Golan M, Buchshtav M, Subach A, Ovadia O (2008) Phenotypic variation and plasticity in antlion populations: effect of population of origin and climate on morphology and life history development. J Evol Biol 21:162–172
Scharf I, Filin I, Ben-Yehoshua D, Ovadia O (2009) Phenotypic plasticity and variation in morphological and life-history traits of antlion adults across a climatic gradient. Zoology 112:139–150
Sibly RM, Calow P (1986) Physiological ecology of animals. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
Sokal R, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York
Sokolovska N, Rowe L, Johansson F (2000) Fitness and body size in mature odonates. Ecol Entomol 25:239–248
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Stockhoff BA (1991) Starvation resistance of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): tradeoffs among growth, body size and survival. Oecologia 88:422–429
Stoks R, De Block M, McPeek MA (2006) Physiological costs of compensatory growth in a damselfly. Ecology 87:1566–1574
Tessier AJ, Leibold MA, Tsao J (2000) A fundamental trade-off in resource exploitation by Daphnia and consequences to plankton communities. Ecology 81:826–841
Thompson DJ, Fincke OM (2002) Body size and fitness in Odonata, stabilising selection and a meta-analysis too far? Ecol Entomol 27:378–384
Ziv Y, Kotler BP (2003) Giving-up densities of foraging gerbils: the effect of interspecific competition on patch use. Evol Ecol 17:333–347
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Wolf Blanckenhorn, Karl Gotthard, Hanna Kokko, Ron Rotkopf, Ido Tsurim and Wouter Vahl for fruitful discussions, and Aziz Subach for helping in the laboratory. The research was supported by Israel Science Foundation Grants 1084/05 and 1399/05 (to O.O.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Sven Bacher.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scharf, I., Filin, I. & Ovadia, O. A trade-off between growth and starvation endurance in a pit-building antlion. Oecologia 160, 453–460 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1316-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1316-y