Abstract
Dispersal can limit the ranges of species and the diversity of communities. Despite its importance, little is known about its role in freshwater habitats and its relation to habitat type (lentic vs. lotic), especially for organisms with cryptic dispersal methods such as plankton. Poor dispersers are expected to show more clumped distributions or greater spatial autocorrelation (SA) in community composition than good dispersers. We examined patterns of SA across freshwater taxa with different dispersal modes (active vs. passive) and their association with habitat type (lake vs. stream) using 18 spatially explicit community composition data sets. We found significant relationships between SA and body size among taxa in lake habitats, but not in streams. However, the increase in SA with body size in lakes was driven entirely by fishes—organisms ranging in size from diatoms to macro-invertebrates showed equivalent levels of SA. These results support the idea that large organisms are less effective dispersers in aquatic environments, resulting in greater SA in community structure over broad scales. Streams may be effectively more connected than lakes as patterns of SA and body size were weaker in lotic habitats. Our data suggest that the critical threshold where greater body size increases dispersal limitation seems to come at the juncture between invertebrates and vertebrates rather than that between unicellular and multicellular organisms as has been previously suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen MR (2007) Measuring and modeling dispersal of adult zooplankton. Oecologia 153:135–143
Amarasekare P (1998) Allee effects in metapopulation dynamics. Am Nat 152:298–302
Bilton DT, Freeland JR, Okamura B (2001) Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:159–181
Bohonak AJ, Jenkins DG (2003) Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecol Lett 6:783–796
Bolker BM, Pacala SW (1999) Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am Nat 153:575–602
Cáceres CE, Soluk DA (2002) Blowing in the wind: a field test of overland dispersal and colonization by aquatic invertebrates. Oecologia 131:402–408
Cohen GM, Shurin JB (2003) Scale-dependence and mechanisms of dispersal in freshwater zooplankton. Oikos 103:603–617
Cohen JE, Jonsson T, Carpenter SR (2003) Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1781–1786
Condit R et al (2002) Beta diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–669
Cottenie K (2005) Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett 8:1175–1182
Cottenie K, De Meester L (2004) Metacommunity structure: synergy of biotic interactions as selective agents and dispersal as fuel. Ecology 85:114–119
Cottenie K, Michels E, Nuytten N, De Meester L (2003) Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional versus local processes in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84:991–1000
De Meester L, Gomez A, Okamura B, Schwenk K (2002) The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Int J Ecol 23:121–135
Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355
Fenchel T, Finlay BJ (2004) The ubiquity of small species: patterns of local and global diversity. Bioscience 54:777–784
Finlay BJ (2002) Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science 296:1061–1063
Finlay BJ, Clarke KJ (1999) Ubiquitous dispersal of microbial species. Nature 400:828
Finlay BJ, Monaghan EB, Maberly SC (2002) Hypothesis: The rate and scale of dispersal of freshwater diatom species is a function of their global abundance. Protist 153:261–273
Forbes AE, Chase JN (2002) The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities. Oikos 96:433–440
Gilbert B, Lechowicz MJ (2004) Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7651–7656
Green JL et al (2004) Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature 432:747–750
Grosberg RK, Cunningham CW (2001) Genetic structure in the sea: from populations to communities. In: Bertness MD, Hay ME, Gaines SD (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland
Hanski I, Gilpin ME (1997) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego
Havel JE, Shurin JB (2004) Mechanisms, effects and scales of dispersal in freshwater zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1229–1238
Havel JE, Shurin JB, Jones JR (2002) Estimating dispersal from patterns of spread: spatial and local control of lake invasions. Ecology 83:3306–3318
Hillebrand H (2004) On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am Nat 163:192–211
Hillebrand H, Blenckner T (2002) Regional and local impact on species diversity—from pattern to processes. Oecologia 132:479–491
Hillebrand H, Watermann F, Karez R, Berninger UG (2001) Differences in species richness patterns between unicellular and multicellular organisms. Oecologia 126:114–124
Horner-Devine MC, Lage M, Hughes JB, Bohannan BJM (2004) A taxa-area relationship for bacteria. Nature 432:750–753
Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Jackson DA, Peres-Neto PR, Olden JD (2001) What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities—the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:157–170
Jenkins DG, Buikema ALJ (1998) Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A test with zooplankton structure and function. Ecol Monogr 68:421–443
Knapp RA, Matthews KR, Sarnelle O (2001) Resistance and resilience of alpine lake fauna to fish introductions. Ecol Monogr 71:401–421
Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation—trouble or new paradigm. Ecology 74:1659–1673
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Leibold MA (1999) Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities. Evol Ecol Res 1:73–95
Leibold MA et al (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613
MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Magnuson JJ, Tonn WM, Banerjee A, Toivonen J, Sanchez O, Rask M (1998) Isolation versus extinction in the assembly of fishes in small northern lakes. Ecology 79:2941–2956
Michels E, Cottenie K, Neys L, De Gelas K, Coppin P, De Meester L (2001) Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton populations in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modelling of the effective geographical distance. Mol Ecol 10:1929–1938
Mouquet N, Loreau M (2002) Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am Nat 159:420–426
Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:867–878
Olden JD, Jackson DA, Peres-Neto PR (2001) Spatial isolation and fish communities in drainage lakes. Oecologia 127:572–585
Palmer MA, Allan JD, Butman CA (1996) Dispersal as a regional process affecting the local dynamics of marine and stream benthic invertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:322–326
Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic-divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:547–572
Pinel-Alloul B, Niyonsenga T, Legendre P (1995) Spatial and environmental components of freshwater zooplankton structure. Ecoscience 2:1–19
Ricklefs RE (2004) A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:1–15
Sarnelle O, Knapp RA (2004) Zooplankton recovery after fish removal: Limitations of the egg bank. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1382–1392
Shurin JB (2000) Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81:3074–3086
Shurin JB et al (2007) Diversity–stability relationship varies with latitude in zooplankton. Ecol Lett 10:127–134
Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279
Soininen J, Lennon JJ, Hillebrand H (2007a) A multivariate analysis of beta diversity across organisms and environments. Ecology 88:2830–2838
Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007b) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3–12
Taylor CM, Warren ML (2001) Dynamics in species composition of stream fish assemblages: Environmental variability and nested subsets. Ecology 82:2320–2330
Tilman D, Lehman CL, Kareiva P (1997) Population dynamics in spatial habitats. In: Tilman D, Kareiva P (eds) Spatial ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Tonn WM, Magnuson JJ, Rask M, Toivonen J (1990) Intercontinental comparison of small-lake fish assemblages––the balance between local and regional processes. Am Nat 136:345–375
Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Yli-Halla M (2003) Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299:241–244
Acknowledgements
Although some of the data described in this article have been funded wholly or in part by the US Environmental Protection Agency through its EMAP Surface Waters Program, they have not been subjected to Agency review, and therefore do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement of the conclusions should be inferred. Some of the data were obtained from the Swedish National Monitoring Programme funded by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. We also thank Peter Eklöv, Jordan Rosenfeld and Henrik Ragnarsson for providing access to their data. Jeff Nekola and an anonymous reviewer provided valuable comments. J. B. S. and K. C. were supported in part by postdoctoral fellowships from the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a center funded by the NSF (grant no. DEB-0072909), the University of California, and the Santa Barbara campus. J. B. S. and K. C. were supported by grants from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Carla Caceres.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shurin, J.B., Cottenie, K. & Hillebrand, H. Spatial autocorrelation and dispersal limitation in freshwater organisms. Oecologia 159, 151–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1174-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1174-z