Oecologia

, Volume 159, Issue 1, pp 139–150 | Cite as

Exotic herbivores directly facilitate the exotic grasses they graze: mechanisms for an unexpected positive feedback between invaders

Community Ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

The ability of an exotic species to establish in a system may depend not only on the invasibility of the native community, but also on its interactions with other exotic species. Though examples of mutually beneficial interactions between exotic species are known, few studies have quantified these effects or identified specific mechanisms. We used the co-invasion of an endangered island ecosystem by exotic Canada geese (Branta canadensis) and nine exotic annual grasses to study the effects of an invading herbivore on the success of invading grasses. On our study islands in southwestern Canada, we found that geese fed selectively on the exotic grasses and avoided native forbs. Counter to current theory suggesting that the grasses should be limited by a selective enemy, however, the grasses increased in proportional abundance under grazing whereas forbs showed declining abundance. Testing potential mechanisms for the effects of grazing on grasses, we found that the grasses produced more stems per area when grazing reduced vegetation height and prevented litter accumulation. Forming dense mats of short stems appeared to be an efficient reproductive and competitive strategy that the Eurasian grasses have evolved in the presence of grazers, conferring a competitive advantage in a system where the native species pool has very few annual grasses and no grazers. Germination trials further demonstrated that selective herbivory by geese enables their dispersal of exotic grass seed between heavily invaded feeding areas and the small islands used for nesting. In summary, the exotic geese facilitated both the local increase and the spatial spread of exotic grasses, which in turn provided the majority of their diet. This unexpected case of positive feedback between exotic species suggests that invasion success may depend on the overall differences between the evolutionary histories of the invaders and the evolutionary history of the native community they enter.

Keywords

Annual grass Branta canadensis Poa annua Seed dispersal Selective herbivory 

Supplementary material

442_2008_1172_MOESM1_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Online supplement S1 (DOC 60 kb)

References

  1. Banks RC, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JV, Rising JD, Stotz DF (2004) Forty-fifth supplement to the American ornithologists’ union check-list of North American birds. Auk 121:985–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellrose FC (1980) Ducks, geese and swans of North America. Stackpole Books, HarrisburgGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergelson J (1990) Life after death—site preemption by the remains of Poa annua. Ecology 71:2157–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best RJ (2008) Exotic grasses and feces deposition by an exotic herbivore combine to reduce the relative abundance of native forbs. Oecologia. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1137-4
  5. Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley YM, Briese DT, Rees M (2003) Demography and management of the invasive plant species Hypericum perforatum. I. Using multi-level mixed-effects models for characterizing growth, survival and fecundity in a long-term data set. J Appl Ecol 40:481–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290:521–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cargill SM, Jefferies RL (1984) The effects of grazing by lesser snow geese on the vegetation of a sub-arctic salt-marsh. J Appl Ecol 21:669–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clausen P, Nolet BA, Fox AD, Klaassen M (2002) Long-distance endozoochorous dispersal of submerged macrophyte seeds by migratory waterbirds in northern Europe: a critical review of possibilities and limitations. Acta Oecol 23:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crosby AW (1986) Ecological imperialism: the biological expansion of Europe. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Daehler CC (2001) Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis revisited. Am Nat 158:324–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delacour J (1954) Waterfowl of the world. Country Life, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. di Castri F (1973) Climatographical comparisons between Chile and the western coast of North America. In: di Castri F, Mooney HA (eds) Mediterranean type ecosystems, vol 7. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 21–36Google Scholar
  15. DiTomaso JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falster DS, Westoby M (2003) Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends Ecol Evol 18:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falster DS, Westoby M (2005) Tradeoffs between height growth rate, stem persistence and maximum height among plant species in a post-fire succession. Oikos 111:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox BJ (1987) Species assembly and the evolution of community structure. Evol Ecol 1:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuchs MA (2001) Towards a recovery strategy for Garry Oak and associated ecosystems in Canada: ecological assessment and literature review. Technical report GBEI/EC-00-030. Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, LadnerGoogle Scholar
  20. Gonzales EK (2008) The effects of herbivory, competition, and disturbance on island meadows. PhD thesis. Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffin JR (1977) Oak woodland. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. John Wiley, New York, pp 383–416Google Scholar
  22. Gutman M, Noy-Meir I, Pluda D, Seligman N, Rothman S, Sternberg M (2002) Biomass partitioning following defoliation of annual and perennial Mediterranean grasses. Conserv Ecol 5(2):1 (online)Google Scholar
  23. Hanson HC (1997) The giant Canada goose. Southern Illinois University Press, CarbondaleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hierro JL, Maron JL, Callaway RM (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol 93:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hobbs RJ (2001) Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in southwestern Australia. Conserv Biol 15:1522–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6:324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutchinson CS, Seymour GB (1982) Poa annua L. J Ecol 70:887–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson PG, White DB (1998) Inheritance of flowering pattern among four annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) genotypes. Crop Sci 38:163–168Google Scholar
  29. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Levine JM, D’Antonio CM (2003) Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv Biol 17:322–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Littell R, Milliken G, Stroup W, Wolfinger R, Schabenberger O (1996) SAS system for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Press, CaryGoogle Scholar
  33. Lush WM (1988) Biology of Poa annua in a temperate zone golf putting green (Agrostis stolonifera Poa annua). 1. The above-ground population. J Appl Ecol 25:977–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacDougall AS, Boucher J, Turkington R, Bradfield GE (2006) Patterns of plant invasion along an environmental stress gradient. J Veg Sci 17:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mack RN, Thompson JN (1982) Evolution in steppe with few large, hoofed mammals. Am Nat 119:757–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malo JE, Suarez F (1997) Dispersal mechanism and transcontinental naturalization proneness among Mediterranean herbaceous species. J Biogeogr 24:391–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals, 2nd edn. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitchell CE, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Gilbert GS, Hufbauer RA, Klironomos JN, Maron JL, Morris WF, Parker IM, Power AG, Seabloom EW, Torchin ME, Vazquez DP (2006) Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9:726–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Myers JA, Vellend M, Gardescu S, Marks PL (2004) Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia 139:35–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. NoyMeir I, Briske DD (1996) Fitness components of grazing-induced population reduction in a dominant annual, Triticum dicoccoides (wild wheat). J Ecol 84:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pakeman RJ (2004) Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi-site analysis. J Ecol 92:893–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Hay ME (2006) Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311:1459–1461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quigley PE, Ford JZ (2002) Sheep production-system effects on botanical composition and growth of perennial pasture. Wool Tech Sheep Breed 50:477–484Google Scholar
  44. Roemer HL (1972) Forest vegetation and environments on the Saanich peninsula. PhD thesis. University of Victoria, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  45. Romermann C, Tackenberg O, Poschlod P (2005) How to predict attachment potential of seeds to sheep and cattle coat from simple morphological seed traits. Oikos 110:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. SAS Institute (2003) SAS for Windows 9.1.3 service pack 4. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  47. Schabenberger O, Pierce FJ (2002) Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  48. Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith DW (2000) Management of Canada geese in the lower Fraser valley, southwestern British Columbia. In: Dickson KM (ed) Towards conservation of the diversity of Canada geese. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp 151–158Google Scholar
  51. Smith B, Wilson JB (1996) A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76:70–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sorensen AE (1986) Seed dispersal by adhesion. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van der Graaf AJ, Stahl J, Bakker JP (2005) Compensatory growth of Festuca rubra after grazing: can migratory herbivores increase their own harvest during staging? Funct Ecol 19:961–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Vliet LJP, Kenney EA, Green AJ (1991) Soils of the Gulf Islands of British Columbia: soils of Sidney, James, Moresby, Portland, and Lesser islands. Report No. 43, vol 5. British Columbia Soil Survey, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  55. Vellend M, Knight TM, Drake JM (2006) Antagonistic effects of seed dispersal and herbivory on plant migration. Ecol Lett 9:319–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward P, Radcliffe G, Kirkby J, Illingworth J, Cadrin C (1998) Sensitive ecosystems inventory: east Vancouver Island and Gulf Islands, 1993–1997: methodology, ecological descriptions and results, vol 1. Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific and Yukon Region, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  57. Whitson TD, Koch DW (1998) Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) with herbicides and perennial grass competition. Weed Technol 12:391–396Google Scholar
  58. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Evolution and EcologyUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Centre for Applied Conservation ResearchUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations