Oecologia

, Volume 158, Issue 4, pp 633–640 | Cite as

Whole-tree sap flow is substantially diminished by leaf herbivory

  • Saul A. Cunningham
  • Kimberi R. Pullen
  • Matthew J. Colloff
Plant-Animal Interactions - Original Paper

Abstract

Ecohydrological models consider the relationship between tree size and structure (especially leaf area index) and water use but generally treat herbivory as a source of unwanted noise in the data. Little is known of how insect damage to leaves influences whole-plant water use in trees. Water use is driven by environmental demand and the total leaf area through which transpiration can occur, but the effects of insects are expected to be complex. Different kinds of insects could have different effects; for example, chewing insects reduce leaf area, whereas sucking and tissue mining insects reduce leaf function without reducing area. Further, plants respond to herbivory in a range of ways, such as by altering leaf production or abscising leaves. We examined the effect of insects on Eucalyptus blakelyi in a woodland near Canberra, Australia, using sap flow velocity as a measure of whole-plant water use. We applied insecticide to 16 trees matched to an untreated control group. After 6 months, we examined the effects on sap flow velocity and crown condition. There was a general increase in sap flow velocity as trees produced leaves over the growing season, but the increase in sap flow for trees without insecticide protection was half that of the protected trees (increase: 4.4 vs. 9.0 cm/h, respectively). This dramatic effect on sap flow was consistent with effects on crown condition. Unprotected trees had 20% less leaf mass per unit stem in the crown. In addition, unprotected trees had a 20% greater loss of leaf functional area from necrosis. It should be noted that these effects were detected in a year in which there was not an outbreak of the psyllids (Homoptera) that commonly cause severe leaf damage to this tree species. It is predicted that the effect in a psyllid outbreak year would be even more substantial. This result underscores the significant impact that insect herbivores can have on an ecological process of significance to the ecosystem, namely, the movement of water from the soil to the atmosphere.

Keywords

Eucalyptus Insects Psyllidae Transpiration Water 

References

  1. Aldea M, Hamilton JG, Resti JP, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR, DeLucia EH (2005) Indirect effects of insect herbivory on leaf gas exchange in soybean. Plant Cell Environ 28:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldea M, Hamilton JG, Resti JP, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR, Frank TD, DeLucia EH (2006) Comparison of photosynthetic damage from arthropod herbivory and pathogen infection in understory hardwood saplings. Oecologia 149:221–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres E, Heath J, Possell M, Black HIJ, Kerstiens G, Bardgett RD (2004) Tree physiological responses to above-ground herbivory directly modify below-ground processes of soil carbon and nitrogen cycling. Ecol Lett 7:469–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa P, Schultz JC (1987) Insect outbreaks. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  5. Cermák J, Kuèera J, Nadezhdina N (2004) Sap flow measurements with some thermodynamic methods, flow integration within trees and scaling up from sample trees to entire forest stands. Trees 18:529–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark LR (1962) The general biology of Cardiaspina albitextura (Psyllidae) and its abundance in relation to weather and parasitism. Aust J Zool 10:537–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark LR, Dallwitz MJ (1974) On the relative abundance of some Australian Psyllidae that coexist on Eucalyptus blakelyi. Aust J Zool 22:387–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornish PM, Vertessy RA (2001) Forest age induced changes in evapotranspiration and water yield in a eucalypt forest. J Hydrol 242:43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eamus D, Macinnis-Ng CMO, Hose GC, Zeppel MJB, Taylor DT, Murray BR (2005) Ecosystem services: an ecophysiological examination. Aust J Bot 53:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eamus D, Hatton T, Cook P, Colvin C (2006) Ecohydrology: vegetation function, water and resource management. CSIRO, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  11. Hatton TJ, Vertessy RA (1990) Transpiration of plantation Pinus radiata estimated by the heat pulse method and the Bowen ratio. Hydrol Processes 4:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatton T, Reece P, Taylor P, McEwan K (1998) Does leaf water efficiency vary among eucalypts in water-limited environments? Tree Physiol 18:529–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Langford KJ (1976) Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans. J Hydrol 29:87–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawes Agricultural Trust (2006) GenStat, 9th edn. VSN Int, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Lowman MD, Heatwole H (1992) Spatial and temporal variability in defoliation of Australian eucalypts. Ecology 73:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer S, Saccardy-Adji K, Rizza F, Genty B (2001) Inhibition of photosynthesis by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in bean leaves determined by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Cell Environ 24:947–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morrow PA, LaMarche VC (1978) Tree ring evidence for chronic insect suppression of productivity in subalpine Eucalyptus. Science 201:1244–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pataki DE, Oren R, Phillips N (1998) Responses of sap flux and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda L. trees to stepwise reductions in leaf area. J Exp Biol 49:871–878Google Scholar
  20. Pincebourde S, Frak E, Sinoquet H, Regnard JL, Casas J (2006) Herbivory mitigation through increased water-use efficiency in a leaf-mining moth–apple tree relationship. Plant Cell Environ 29:2238–2247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reich PB, Walters MB, Krause SC, Vanderklein DW, Raffa KF, Tabone T (1993) Growth, nutrition and gas exchange of Pinus resinosa following artificial defoliation. Trees 7:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salleo S, Nardini A, Raimondo F, Lo Gullo MA, Pace F, Giacomich P (2003) Effects of defoliation caused by the leaf miner Cameraria ohridella on wood production and efficiency in Aesculus hippocastanum growing in north-eastern Italy. Trees 17:367–375Google Scholar
  23. Swanson RH, Whitfield DWA (1981) A numerical analysis of heat-pulse velocity theory and practice. J Exp Bot 32:221–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watson F, Vertessy RA, McMahon T, Rhodes B, Watson I (2001) Improved methods to assess water yield changes from paired-catchment studies: application to the Maroondah catchments. For Ecol Manage 143:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wotherspoon KP (1998) Patterns of phytophagous insect herbivory and abundance on juvenile regrowth of Eucalyptus subgenera coexisting in southeastern Tasmania. Aust J Ecol 23:430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wullschleger SD, Meinzer FC, Vertessy RA (1998) A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiol 18:499–512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeppel MJB, Murray BR, Barton C, Eamus D (2004) Seasonal responses of xylem sap velocity to VPD and solar radiation during drought in a stand of native trees in temperate Australia. Funct Plant Biol 31:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeppel MJB, Yunusa IAM, Eamus D (2006) Daily, seasonal and annual patterns of transpiration from a stand of remnant vegetation dominated by a coniferous Callitris species and a broad-leaved Eucalyptus species. Physiol Plant 127:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou GY, Yin GC, Morris J, Bai JY, Chen SX, Chu GW, Zhang NN (2004) Measured sap flow and estimated evapotranspiration of tropical Eucalyptus urophylla plantations in south China. Acta Bot Sin 46:202–210Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saul A. Cunningham
    • 1
  • Kimberi R. Pullen
    • 1
  • Matthew J. Colloff
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO EntomologyCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations