Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Temporally stable abundance–occupancy relationships and occupancy frequency patterns in stream insects

  • Community Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interspecific relationship between local abundance and regional distribution, as well as the occupancy frequency distribution, are widely studied topics in macroecology. A positive abundance–occupancy relationship has been found in a majority of studies, and satellite species modes are typically dominant in occupancy frequency distributions. However, there are a number of exceptions to these “general” findings, and only a few studies have examined these patterns and their temporal variability in stream organisms. I examined both abundance–occupancy relationships and occupancy frequency distributions in stream insects in a boreal drainage system over six consecutive years. I found that the positive interspecific abundance–occupancy relationship was highly stable temporally, with coefficients of determination ranging from 0.25 to 0.47 over the years. There were no strong differences in the strength and slope of the abundance–occupancy relationship between non-predatory and predatory insect species in each year. Temporally stable abundance–occupancy relationships were paralleled by among-year patterns in both abundance and occupancy, with locally abundant and widely distributed species remaining locally abundant and widely distributed over the years, while locally uncommon and regionally rare species showed the opposite. Occupancy frequency distributions were strongly right-skewed, mirroring the dominance of the left-most satellite mode of regionally rare species. That the abundance–occupancy relationship, species’ abundances and distributions, as well as the dominance of satellite species in occupancy frequency distribution were temporally stable suggest that niche-based models are strong candidates for explaining these patterns in stream insects. By contrast, metapopulation-based models that predict clear temporal variability in species’ abundance and occupancy, as well as bimodal occupancy frequency distributions, are less plausible candidates for explaining the observed patterns. The present findings are the opposite to those in some terrestrial studies, but they are in agreement with other terrestrial studies and with a few previous studies on stream organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan JD (1995) Stream ecology. The structure and function of running waters. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Quinn RM, Arnold H, Gregory RD (1997) Of mice and wrens: the relation between abundance and geographic range size in British mammals and birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 352:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Greenwood JJD, Gregory RD (1998) The anatomy of the interspecific abundance-range size relationship for the British avifauna: II. Temporal dynamics. Ecol Lett 1:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Gaston KJ (2006) Variations on a theme: sources of heterogeneity in the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and distribution. J Anim Ecol 75:1426–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt B, Honnay O, Hermy M (2004) Scale-dependent frequency distributions of plant species in dune slacks: dispersal and niche limitation. J Veg Sci 15:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124:255–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins SL, Glenn SM (1997) Effects of organismal and distance scaling on analysis of species distribution and abundance. Ecol Appl 7:543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley MJR, Thomas CD, Wilson RJ, León-Cortés JL, Gutiérrez D, Bulman CR (2001) Density-distribution relationships in British butterflies: II. An assessment of mechanisms. J Anim Ecol 70:426–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (2000) Pattern and process in macroecology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Kunin WE (1997) Rare-common differences: an overview. In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (eds) The biology of rarity: causes and consequences of rare and common difference. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 12–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Lawton JH (1990) Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance. Oikos 58:329–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Lawton JH (1997) Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. J Anim Ecol 66:579–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Greenwood JJD, Gregory RD, Quinn RM, Lawton JH (2000) Abundance-occupancy relationships. J Appl Ecol 37:39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ (1991) Metapopulation models: the rescue effect, the propagule rain and the core-satellite hypothesis. Am Nat 138:768–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Simberloff D (1987) The distribution and abundance of tallgrass prairie plants: a test of the core-satellite hypothesis. Am Nat 130:18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q, Brown JH, Valone TJ (2000) Abundance and distribution of desert annuals: are spatial and temporal patterns related? J Ecol 88:551–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1982) Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38:210–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Kouki J, Halkka A (1993) Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH (1996) Phylogenies for ecologists. J Anim Ecol 65:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heatherly T, Whiles MR, Gibson DJ, Collins SL, Huryn AD, Jackson JK, Palmer MA (2007) Stream insect occupancy frequency patterns and metapopulation structure. Oecologia 151:313–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J (2005a) Positive relationship between regional distribution and local abundance in stream insects: a consequence of niche breadth or habitat niche position? Ecography 28:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J (2005b) Metacommunity patterns of highly diverse stream midges: gradients, checkerboards and nestedness, or is there only randomness? Ecol Entomol 30:590–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J (2008) Influence of taxonomic resolution and data transformation on biotic matrix concordance and assemblage-environment relationships in stream macroinvertebrates. Boreal Environ Res (in press)

  • Heino J, Soininen J (2006) Regional occupancy in unicellular eukaryotes: a reflection of niche breadth, habitat availability or size-related dispersal capacity? Freshw Biol 51:672–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld R, Haeck J (1982) The distribution of abundance. I. Measurements. J Biogeogr 9:303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffsten P-O (2004) Site-occupancy in relation to flight morphology in caddisflies. Freshw Biol 49:810–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt AR, Gaston KJ (2003) Interspecific abundance-occupancy relationships pf British mammals and birds: is it possible to explain the residual variation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD, Gaston KJ, Lawton JH (1997) On the relationship between range size and local abundance: back to basics. Oikos 78:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist B (2000) How does wing length relate to distribution patterns of stoneflies (Plecoptera) and mayflies (Ephemeroptera)? Biol Conserv 93:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist B (2002) Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes. Freshw Biol 47:679–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist B, Zhang Y, Adler PH (1999) Diversity, distribution and larval habitats of North Swedish blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Freshw Biol 42:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer BA (1999) Untangling ecological complexity. The macroscopic perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch MA, Gaston KJ (2002) Occupancy frequency distributions: patterns, artefacts, and mechanisms. Biol Rev 77:311–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mykrä H, Ruokonen T, Muotka T (2006) The effect of sample duration on the efficiency of kick-sampling in two streams with contrasting substratum heterogeneity. Verh Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol 29:1351–1355

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog O (ed) (2002) Fauna Aquatica Austriaca. Katalog zur autoökologischen Einstufung aquatischer Organismen Österreichs. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Wien

  • Nee S, Gregory RD, May RM (1991) Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts. Oikos 62:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Allan JD, Butman CA (1996) Dispersal as a regional process affecting marine and stream benthic invertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:322–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (2002) SPSS version 11.5 for Windows. SPSS, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Tales E, Keith P, Oberdorff T (2004) Density-range size relationship in French riverine fishes. Oecologia 138:360–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CM, Warren ML (2001) Dynamics of species composition of stream fish assemblages: environmental variability and nested subsets. Ecology 82:2320–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi M (1992) Dynamics of distribution in animal communities: theory and analysis. Res Popul Ecol 34:249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright DH (1991) Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. J Biogeogr 18:463–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank S. Koljonen, T. Muotka, H. Mykrä, and A. Astorga for their help in the field, and Oulanka Research Station for logistical support. B. Bossuyt and R. Virtanen provided the Excel formulas for testing the occupancy frequency distributions. I also thank T.O. Crist and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on this paper and excellent ideas for further studies. Financial support was provided by the Academy of Finland (grants to J. Heino and T. Muotka) and Nessling foundation (grants to J. Heino and T. Muotka).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Finnish Environment Institute, Research Programme for Biodiversity, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 413, 90014, Oulu, Finland

    Jani Heino

Authors
  1. Jani Heino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jani Heino.

Additional information

Communicated by Volkmar Wolters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heino, J. Temporally stable abundance–occupancy relationships and occupancy frequency patterns in stream insects. Oecologia 157, 337–347 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1078-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1078-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation