, Volume 157, Issue 2, pp 327–335 | Cite as

Detached kelps from distant sources are a food subsidy for sea urchins

  • Mathew A. VanderkliftEmail author
  • Thomas Wernberg
Community Ecology - Original Paper


Trophic subsidies link habitats and can determine community structure in the subsidised habitats. Knowledge of the spatial extents of trophic interactions is important for understanding food webs, and for making spatial management practices more efficient. We demonstrate trophic linkages between detached (drift) fragments of the kelp Ecklonia radiata and the purple sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma among discrete rocky reefs separated by kilometres. Sea urchins were abundant at one inshore reef, where the biomass of drift was usually high. There, sea urchins trapped detached kelp at high rates, although local kelp abundance was low. Most detached kelp present on the reef was retained by sea urchins. Detached seagrass, which was abundant on the reef, was not retained by sea urchins in large quantities. Experiments with tethered pieces of kelp showed that sea urchins only consumed detached fragments, and did not consume attached kelps. Comparisons of the morphology of detached fragments of kelp collected from the inshore reef to attached kelps from reefs further offshore showed that a large proportion (30–95%, varying among dates) of the fragments originated at distant reefs (≥2 km away). At the inshore reef, the sea urchin H. erythrogramma is subsidised by detached kelps, and detached kelp fragments have been transported across landscapes. Cross-habitat resource subsidies therefore link discrete reef habitats separated by kilometres of non-reef habitat.

Key words

Food webs Trophic linkages Spatial subsidy Rocky reefs Drift algae 



We thank Jari Oksanen, Bill Venables and Mark Bravington for invaluable advice on the use of R for statistical analyses. The research was supported by the Strategic Research Fund for the Marine Environment (SRFME), the Australian Research Council (DP 344023) and the Faculty of Computing, Health and Science, at Edith Cowan University. Comments by TS Elsdon, MH Graham, GA Kendrick and RC Babcock improved the manuscript. The research described in this paper complies with the laws of Australia.


  1. Bustamante RH, Branch GM, Eekhout S (1995) Maintenance of an exceptional intertidal grazer biomass in South Africa: subsidy by subtidal kelps. Ecology 76:2314–2329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cebrian J (1999) Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities. Am Nat 154:449–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colombini I, Chelazzi L (2003) Influence of marine allochthonous input on sandy beach communities. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 41:115–159Google Scholar
  4. Day E, Branch GM (2002a) Effects of sea urchins (Parechinus angulosus) on recruits and juveniles of abalone (Haliotis midae). Ecol Monogr 72:133–149Google Scholar
  5. Day E, Branch GM (2002b) Influences of the sea urchin Parechinus angulosus (Leske) on the feeding behaviour and activity rhythms of juveniles of the South African abalone Haliotis midae Linn. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 276:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dayton PK (1985) Ecology of kelp communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:215–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duggins DO, Simenstad CA, Estes JA (1989) Magnification of secondary production by kelp detritus in coastal marine ecosystems. Science 245:170–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fowler-Walker MJ, Connell SD (2002) Opposing states of subtidal habitat across temperate Australia: consistency and predictability in kelp canopy-benthic associations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 240:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fowler-Walker MJ, Wernberg T, Connell SD (2006) Differences in kelp morphology between wave sheltered and exposed localities: morphologically plastic or fixed traits? Mar Biol 148:755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerber LR, Botsford LW, Hastings A, Possingham HP, Gaines SD, Palumbi SR, Andelman S (2003) Population models for marine reserve design: a retropective and prospective synthesis. Ecol Appl 13:S47–S64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris LG, Ebeling AW, Laur DR, Rowley RJ (1984) Community recovery after storm damage: a case of facilitation in primary succession. Science 224:1336–1338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrold C, Reed DC (1985) Food availability, sea urchin grazing, and kelp forest community structure. Ecology 66:1160–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrold C, Lisin S (1989) Radio-tracking rafts of giant kelp: local production and regional transport. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 130:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson CR, Valentine JP, Pederson HG (2004) A most unusual barrens: complex interactions between lobsters, sea urchins and algae facilitates spread of an exotic kelp in eastern Tasmania. In: Heinzeller T, Nebelsick JH (eds) Proceedings of the 11th International Echinoderm Conference. Balkema, Munich, pp 213–220Google Scholar
  15. Kim SL (1992) The role of drift kelp in the population ecology of a Diopatra ornata Moore (Polychaeta: Onuphidae) ecotone. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 156:253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirkman H, Kendrick GA (1997) Ecological significance and commercial harvesting of drifting and beach-cast macro-algae and seagrasses in Australia: a review. J Appl Phycol 9:311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawrence JM (1975) On the relationship between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 13:213–286Google Scholar
  18. Lenanton RCJ, Robertson AI, Hansen JA (1982) Nearshore accumulations of detached macrophytes as nursery areas for fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lundberg J, Moberg F (2003) Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 6:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marczak LB, Thompson RM, Richardson JS (2007) Meta-analysis: trophic level, habitat, and productivity shape the food web effects of resource subsidies. Ecology 88:140–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Menge BA, Daley BA, Wheeler PA, Dahlhoff E, Sanford E, Strub PT (1997) Benthic-pelagic links and rocky intertidal communities: bottom-up effects on top-down control? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:14530–14535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menge BA, Lubchenco J, Bracken MES, Chan F, Foley MM, Freidenburg TL, Gaines SD, Hudson G, Krenz C, Leslie H, Menge DNL, Russell R, Webster MS (2003) Coastal oceanography sets the pace of rocky intertidal community dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:12229–12234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakano S, Miyasaka H, Kuhara N (1999) Terrestrial–aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80:2435–2441Google Scholar
  24. Nakano S, Murakami M (2001) Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:166–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Okey TA (2003) Macrobenthic colonist guilds and renegades in Monterey Canyon (USA) drift algae: partitioning among multidimensions. Ecol Monogr 73:415–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palumbi SR (2004) Marine reserves and ocean neighbourhoods: the spatial scale of marine populations and their management. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:31–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pattiaratchi C, Hegge B, Gould J, Eliot I (1997) Impact of sea-breeze activity on nearshore and foreshore processes in southwestern Australia. Cont Shelf Res 17:1539–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Polis GA, Hurd SD (1996) Linking marine and terrestrial food webs; allochthonous input from the ocean supports high secondary productivity on small islands and coastal land communities. Am Nat 147:396–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD (1997) Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scheibling RE (1994) Molluscan grazing and macroalgal zonation on a rocky intertidal platform at Perth, Western Australia. Aust J Ecol 19:141–149Google Scholar
  31. Schiel DR, Foster MS (1986) The structure of subtidal algal stands in temperate waters. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 24:265–307Google Scholar
  32. Searle DJ, Semeniuk V (1985) The natural sectors of the inner Rottnest Shelf coast adjoining the Swan Coastal Plain. J R Soc West Aust 67:116–136Google Scholar
  33. Stapp P, Polis GA (2003) Marine resources subsidize insular rodent populations in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Oecologia 134:496–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Steneck RS, Graham MH, Bourque BJ, Corbett D, Erlandson JM, Estes JA, Tegner MJ (2002) Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ Conserv 29:436–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valentine JF, Heck KL Jr (2005) Perspective review of the impacts of overfishing on coral reef food web linkages. Coral Reefs 24:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Valentine JP, Johnson CR (2005) Persistence of the exotic kelp Undaria pinnatifida does not depend on sea urchin grazing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 285:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vanderklift MA, Kendrick GA (2004) Variation in abundances of herbivorous invertebrates in temperate subtidal rocky reef habitats. Mar Freshw Res 55:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vanderklift MA, Kendrick GA (2005) Contrasting influence of sea urchins on attached and drift macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 299:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vanderklift MA, Kendrick GA, Smit AJ (2006) Differences in trophic position among sympatric sea urchin species. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 66:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vetter EW (1994) Hotspots of benthic production. Nature 372:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vetter EW, Dayton PK (1999) Organic enrichment by macrophyte detritus, and abundance patterns of megafaunal populations in submarine canyons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 186:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Meyer JL, Webster JR (1997) Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science 277:102–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wernberg T, Coleman M, Fairhead A, Miller S, Thomsen M (2003a) Morphology of Ecklonia radiata (Phaeophyta: Laminarales) along its geographic distribution in south-western Australia and Australasia. Mar Biol 143:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wernberg T, Kendrick GA, Phillips JC (2003b) Regional differences in kelp-associated algal assemblages on temperate limestone reefs in south-western Australia. Divers Distrib 9:427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wernberg T, Vanderklift MA, Lavery PS, How J (2006) Export of detached macroalgae from reefs to adjacent seagrass beds. Oecologia 147:692–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wright JT, Steinberg PD (2001) Effect of variable recruitment and post-recruitment herbivory on local abundance of a marine alga. Ecology 82:2200–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric ResearchWembleyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Ecosystem ManagementEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia

Personalised recommendations