Oecologia

, Volume 156, Issue 1, pp 237–247 | Cite as

Heterogeneity in individual quality overrides costs of reproduction in female reindeer

  • Robert B. Weladji
  • Anne Loison
  • Jean-Michel Gaillard
  • Øystein Holand
  • Atle Mysterud
  • Nigel G. Yoccoz
  • Mauri Nieminen
  • Nils C. Stenseth
Behavioral Ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Reproductive allocation at one age is predicted to reduce the probability of surviving to the next year or to lead to a decrease in future reproduction. This prediction assumes that reproduction involves fitness costs. However, few empirical studies have assessed whether such costs may vary with the age at primiparity or might be overridden by heterogeneities in individual quality. We used data from 35 years’ monitoring of individually marked semi-domestic reindeer females to investigate fitness costs of reproduction. Using multi-state statistical models, we compared age-specific survival and reproduction among four reproductive states (never reproduced, experienced non-breeders, reproduced but did not wean offspring, and reproduced and weaned offspring) and among contrasted age at primiparity. We assessed whether reproductive costs occurred, resulting in a trade-off between current reproduction and future reproduction or survival, and whether early maturation was costly or rather reflected differences in individual quality of survival and reproduction capabilities. We did not find any evidence for fitness costs of reproduction in female reindeer. We found no cost of gestation and lactation in terms of future reproduction and survival. Conversely, successful breeders had higher survival and subsequent reproductive success than experienced non-breeders and unsuccessful breeders, independently of the age at primiparity. Moreover, it was beneficial to mature earlier, especially for females that successfully weaned their first offspring. Successful females at early primiparity remained successful throughout their life, clearly supporting the existence of marked among-female differences in quality. The weaning success peaked for multiparous females and was lower for first-time breeders, indicating a positive effect of experience on reproductive performance. Our findings emphasize an overwhelming importance of individual quality and experience to account for observed variation in survival and reproductive patterns of female reindeer that override trade-offs between current reproduction and future performance, at least in the absence of harsh winters.

Keywords

Fitness Life history tactics Rangifer tarandus Reproductive cost Reproduction 

References

  1. Albon SD, Mitchell B, Staines BW (1983) Fertility and body weight in female red deer: a density-dependent relationship. J Anim Ecol 52:969–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albon SD, Mitchell B, Huby BJ, Brown V (1986) Fertility in female red deer (Cervus elaphus): the effects of body composition, age and reproductive status. J Zool 209:447–460Google Scholar
  3. Bailey RC (1992) Why we should stop trying to measure the cost of reproduction correctly. Oikos 65:349–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2005) Environmental conditions and breeding experience affect costs of reproduction in blue petrels. Ecology 86:682–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauplet G, Barbraud C, Dabin W, Kussener C, Guinet C (2006) Age-specific survival and reproductive performances in fur seals: evidence of senescence and individual quality. Oikos 112:430–441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bérubé CH, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT (1996) Reproductive cost of sons and daughters in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Behav Ecol 7:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bize P, Roulin A, Richner H (2002) Covariation between egg size and rearing condition determine offspring quality: an experiment with the Alpine swift. Oecologia 132:231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Shine R, Lourdais O (1999) What is the appropriate time scale for measuring costs of reproduction in a capital breeder such as the aspic viper? Evol Ecol 13:485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Cam E, Link WA, Cooch EG, Monnat JY, Danchin E (2002) Individual covariation between life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest. Am Nat 159:96–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron MR (1994) Reproductive pause by female caribou. J Mamm 75:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choquet R, Reboulet AM, Pradel R, Gimenez O, Lebreton JD (2005a) M-SURGE 1.7 user’s manual. CEFE, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  13. Choquet R, Reboulet AM, Lebreton JD, Gimenez O, Pradel R (2005b) U-CARE 2.2 user’s manual. CEFE, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock TH (1984) Reproductive effort and terminal investment in iteroparous animals. Am Nat 123:212–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer. Behavior and ecology of two sexes. Wildlife behavior and ecology series. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1983) The costs of reproduction to red deer hinds. J Anim Ecol 52:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1989) Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature 337:260–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clutton-Brock TH, Stevenson IR, Marrow P, MacColl AD, Houston AI, McNamara JM (1996) Population fluctuations, reproductive costs and life-history tactics in female Soay sheep. J Anim Ecol 65:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clutton-Brock TH, Illius A, Wilson K, Grenfell BT, MacColl A, Albon SD (1997) Stability and instability in ungulate populations: an empirical analysis. Am Nat 149:195–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cobley ND, Croxall JP, Prince PA (1998) Individual quality and reproductive performance in the grey-headed albatross Diomedea chrysostoma. Ibis 140:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cody ML (1966) A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crocker DE, Williams JD, Costa DP, Le Boeuf BJ (2001) Maternal traits and reproductive effort in northern elephant seals. Ecology 82:3541–3555Google Scholar
  24. Descamps S, Boutin S, Berteaux D, Gaillard JM (2006) Best squirrels trade a long life for an early reproduction. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 273:2369–2374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doughty PD, Shine R (1997) Detecting life-history tradeoffs: measuring energy stores in “capital” breeders reveals costs of reproduction. Oecologia 110:508–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eloranta E, Nieminen M (1986) Calving of the experimental reindeer herd in Kaamanen during 1970–85. Rangifer Spec Issue 1:115–121Google Scholar
  27. Festa-Bianchet M (1989) Individual differences, parasites, and the costs of reproduction for bighorn ewes (Ovis canadensis). J Anim Ecol 58:755–795Google Scholar
  28. Festa-Bianchet M (1998) Condition-dependent reproductive success in bighorn ewes. Ecol Lett 1:91–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT (1998) Selfish mothers: reproductive expenditure and resource availability in bighorn ewes. Behav Ecol 9:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Lucherini M, Wishart WD (1995) Life-history consequences of variation in age of primiparity in bighorn ewes. Ecology 76:871–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT (1998) Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder. Am Nat 152:367–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fleming IA, Lamberg A, Jonsson B (1997) Effects of early experience on the reproductive performance of Atlantic salmon. Behav Ecol 8:470–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Forslund P, Pärt T (1995) Age and reproduction in birds—hypotheses and test. Trends Ecol Evol 10:374–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gaillard JM, Sempere AJ, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1992) Effects of age and body weight on the proportion of females breeding in a population of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Can J Zool 70:1541–1545Google Scholar
  35. Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (1998) Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol Evol 13:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gaillard JM, Loison A, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Solberg E (2003) Ecological correlates of life span in populations of large herbivores mammals. Pop Dev Rev (Suppl) 29:39–56Google Scholar
  38. Gerhart KL, Russell DE, van de Wetering D, White RG, Cameron RG (1997) Pregnancy of adult caribou (Rangifer tarandus): evidence for lactational infertility. J Zool 242:17–30Google Scholar
  39. Holand Ø, Røed KH, Mysterud A, Kumpula JM, Nieminen M, Smith ME (2003) The effect of sex ratio and male age structure on reindeer calving. J Wildl Manage 67:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holand Ø, Weladji RB, Gjøstein H, Kumpula J, Smith ME, Nieminen M, Røed KH (2004) Reproductive effort in relation to maternal social rank in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holand Ø, Weladji RB, Røed KH, Gjøstein H, Kumpula J, Gaillard J-M, Smith ME, Nieminen M (2006) Male age structure influences females’ mass change during rut in a polygynous ungulate: the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:682–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huber HR (1987) Natality and weaning success in relation to age of first reproduction in northern elephant seals. Can J Zool 65:1311–1316Google Scholar
  43. Jonsson KI (1997) Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 78:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kumpula J (2001) Winter grazing of reindeer in woodland lichen pasture: effect of lichen availability on the condition of reindeer. Small Rumin Res 39:121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H (2002) Interactive effects of parental age and environmental variation on the breeding performance of Tengmalms owls. J Anim Ecol 71:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Langvatn R, Albon SD, Burkey T, Clutton-Brock TH (1996) Climate, plant phenology and variation in age at first reproduction in a temperate herbivore. J Anim Ecol 65:653–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Langvatn R, Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Yoccoz NG (2004) Timing and synchrony of ovulation in red deer constrained by short northern summers. Am Nat 163:763–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loison A, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT, Jullien JM (1999a) Age-specific survival in five populations of ungulates: evidence of senescence. Ecology 80:2539–2554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1996) State-dependent life histories. Nature 380:215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Millar JS (1994) Senescence in a population of small mammals? Ecoscience 1:317–321Google Scholar
  51. Millar JS, Derrickson EM, Sharpe STP (1992) Effects of reproduction on maternal survival and subsequent reproduction in northern Peromyscus-maniculatus. Can J Zool 70:1129–1134Google Scholar
  52. Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC, Langvatn R (2001a) Effects of age, sex, and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density-dependent senescence. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 268:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Yoccoz NG, Langvatn R, Steinheim G (2001b) Nonlinear effects of large-scale climatic variability on wild and domestic herbivores. Nature 410:1096–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Neuhaus P, Broussard DR, Murie JO, Dobson FS (2004) Age of primiparity and implications of early reproduction on life history in female Columbian ground squirrels. J Anim Ecol 73:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nichols JD, Kendall WL (1995) The use of multistate capture–recapture models to address questions of evolutionary ecology. J Appl Stat 22:835–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oftedal OT (1985) Pregnancy and lactation. In: Hudson R, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 215–238Google Scholar
  57. Orell M, Belda EJ (2002) Delayed cost of reproduction and senescence in the willow tit Parus montanus. J Anim Ecol 71:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Orell M, Koivula K, Rytkonen S, Lahti K (1994) To breed or not to breed: causes and implications of non-breeding habit in the willow tit Parus montanus. Oecologia 77:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Orell M, Rytkonen S, Koivula K, Ronkainen M, Rahlala M (1996) Brood size manipulations within the natural range did not reveal intragenerational cost of reproduction in the Willow Tit Parus montanus. Ibis 138:630–637Google Scholar
  60. Partridge L, Harvey PH (1985) Costs of reproduction. Nature 316:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Partridge L, Harvey PH (1988) The ecological context of life-history evolution. Science 241:1449–1455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pease CM, Bull JJ (1988) A critique of methods for measuring life history trade-offs. J Evol Biol 1:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pomeroy PP, Fedak MA, Rothery P, Anderson S (1999) Consequences of maternal size for reproductive expenditure and pupping success of grey seals at North Rona, Scotland. J Anim Ecol 68:235–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pradel R, Gimenez O, Lebreton JD (2005) Principles and interest of GOF tests for multistate capture-recapture models. Anim Biodivers Conserv 28:189–204Google Scholar
  65. Pyle P, Nur V, Sydeman WJ, Emslie SD (1997) Cost of reproduction and the evolution of deferred breeding in the western gull. Behav Ecol 8:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reimers E (1983) Reproduction in wild reindeer in Norway. Can J Zool 61:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reimers E, Holmengen N, Mysterud A (2005) Life history variation of wild reindeer in the highly productive North Ottadalen region, Norway. J Zool 265:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reiter J, Le Boeuf BJ (1991) Life history consequences of variation in age at primiparity in northern elephant seals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reznick D (1985) Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Robbins CT, Robbins BL (1979) Fetal and neonatal growth-patterns and maternal reproductive effort in ungulates and sub-ungulates. Am Nat 114:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robinson MR, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB (2006) Live fast, die young: trade-offs between fitness components and sexually antagonistic selection on weaponry in Soay sheep. Evolution 60:2168–2181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  73. Rönnegård L, Forslund P, Danell Ö (2002) Lifetime patterns in adult female mass, reproduction and offspring mass in semidomesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Can J Zool 80:2047–2055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sadleir RMFS (1987) Reproduction of female cervids. In: Wemmer CM (ed) Biology and management of the cervidae. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 123–144Google Scholar
  75. Sinervo B, DeNardo DF (1996) Costs of reproduction in the wild: path analysis of natural selection and experimental tests of causation. Evolution 50:1299–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Skogland T (1983) The effects of density dependent resource limitation on size of wild reindeer. Oecologia 60:156–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Skogland T (1989) Comparative social organisation of wild reindeer in relation to food, mates and predator avoidance. Adv Ethol 29:1–74Google Scholar
  78. Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  80. Suttie JM, Webster JR (1995) Extreme seasonal growth in Arctic deer: comparisons and control mechansims. Am Zool 135:215–222Google Scholar
  81. Sydeman WJ, Nur N (1994) Life history strategies of female northern elephant seals. In: Le Boeuf BJ, Laws RM (eds) Elephant seals: population ecology, behavior, and physiology. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 121–136Google Scholar
  82. Tavecchia G, Coulson T, Morgan BJT, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JC, Gulland FMD, Clutton-Brock TH (2005) Predictors of reproductive cost in female Soay sheep. J Anim Ecol 74:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Testa JW (1987) Long-term reproductive patterns and sighting bias in Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddelli). Can J Zool 65:1091–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weladji RB, Gaillard JM, Yoccoz NG, Holand Ø, Mysterud A, Loison A, Nieminen M, Stenseth NC (2006) Good reindeer mothers live longer and become better at raising offspring. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 273:1239–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wesolowski T, Rowinski P (2006) Is there a cost of reproduction for Marsh Tits Parus palustris in a primeval forest? Ibis 148:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert B. Weladji
    • 1
  • Anne Loison
    • 2
  • Jean-Michel Gaillard
    • 2
  • Øystein Holand
    • 3
  • Atle Mysterud
    • 4
  • Nigel G. Yoccoz
    • 5
  • Mauri Nieminen
    • 6
  • Nils C. Stenseth
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.UMR-CNRS 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et de Biologie EvolutiveUniversité Lyon 1Villeurbanne CedexFrance
  3. 3.Department of Animal and Aquacultural SciencesNorwegian University of Life SciencesÅsNorway
  4. 4.Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  6. 6.Finnish Game and Fisheries Research InstituteReindeer Research StationKaamanenFinland

Personalised recommendations