, Volume 154, Issue 4, pp 785–794 | Cite as

Latitudinal variation in spongivorous fishes and the effectiveness of sponge chemical defenses

Community Ecology - Original Paper


It has been proposed that predation pressure declines with increasing latitude and a positive correlation exists between predation intensity and the investment into chemical defenses. However, little direct evidence supports the idea that tropical species are better defended chemically than their temperate counterparts. Temperate reefs of the South Atlantic Bight (SAB) off Georgia, USA, provide a unique opportunity to study tropical sponges in a temperate environment. We documented sponge species richness and abundance, sponge predator density, and examined the ability of eight sponge species to chemically deter predation by fishes on two reefs in the SAB. We used rarefaction analysis and ANOVA to compare our results for sponge species richness and density, respectively, with similar published studies conducted on reefs of the sub-tropical Atlantic (i.e., Florida Keys). These analyses were combined with similar statistical comparisons for spongivorous fish species richness and density. Results showed that sponge species richness was lower, but sponge density was higher, on the temperate SAB reefs than on the subtropical reefs. Both spongivorous fish diversity and density were lower on the SAB reefs. The greater abundance of sponges and lower density of predators on SAB reefs suggest a lower frequency of predation on sponges on SAB reefs. Of the eight sponge species assayed from the SAB reefs, five possessed chemical extracts that were significantly less deterrent to fish predators than their tropical/subtropical conspecifics. When the results were combined across all sponge species, the chemical deterrence of fish predators was significantly lower for extracts obtained from the temperate sponge community as compared to the tropical/subtropical assemblage. These results support the more general hypothesis that a lower density and diversity of sponge predators occurs at high as compared to low latitudes in the western Atlantic and may contribute to decreased investment in chemical defenses.


Sponge Chemical defenses Predation Atlantic reefs Secondary metabolites 


  1. Alvarez B, Diaz MC, Laughlin RA (1990) The sponge fauna on a fringing coral reef in Venezuela. I. Composition, distribution, and abundance. Smithsonian Institution Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez B, Soest RWM van, Rutzler K (1998) A revision of Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae) of the Central West Atlantic region. In: Smithson Contrib Zool 598:1–47Google Scholar
  3. Assmann M, Lichte E, Pawlik JR, Kock M (2000) Chemical defenses of the Caribbean sponges Agelas wiedenmayeri and Agelas conifera. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 207:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakus GJ, Green G (1974) Toxicity in sponges and holothurians: a geographic pattern. Science 185:951–953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becerro MA, Turon X, Uriz MJ (1995) Natural variation of toxicity in the encrusting sponge Crambe crambe (Schmidt) in relation to size and environment. J Chem Ecol 21:1931–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becerro MA, Turon X, Uriz MJ (1997) Multiple functions for secondary metabolites in encrusting marine-invertebrates. J Chem Ecol 23:1527–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becerro MA, Thacker RW, Turon X, Uriz MJ, Paul VJ (2003) Biogeography of sponge chemical ecology: comparisons of tropical and temperate defenses. Oecologia 135:91–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell JJ, Barnes DK (2000) A sponge diversity centre within a marine “island”. Hydrobiologia 440:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergquist PR, Wells RJ (1983) Chemotaxonomy of the Porifera: the development and current status of the field. In: Scheuer PJ (ed) Marine natural products, vol V. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–50Google Scholar
  10. Bertness MD, Garrity SD, Levings SC (1981) Predation pressure and gastropod foraging: a tropical-temperate comparison. Evolution 35:995–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolser RC, Hay ME (1996) Are tropical plants better defended? Palatability and defenses of temperate vs. tropical seaweeds. Ecology 77:2269–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns E, Ilan M (2003) Comparison of anti-predatory defenses of Red Sea and Caribbean sponges. II. Physical defense. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 252:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burns E, Ifrach I, Carmeli S, Pawlik JR, Ilan M (2003) Comparison of anti-predatory defenses of Red Sea and Caribbean sponges. I. Chemical defense. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 252:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coley PD, Aide TM (1991) Comparison of herbivory and plant defenses in temperate and tropical broad-leaved forests. In: Price PW (ed) Plant–animal interactions: evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions. Wiley, New York pp 25–49Google Scholar
  15. Cronin G, Paul VJ, Hay ME, Fenical W (1997) Are tropical herbivores more resistant than temperate herbivores to seaweed chemical defenses? Diterpenoid metabolites from Dictyota acutiloba as feeding deterrents for tropical versus temperate fishes and urchins. J Chem Ecol 23:289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dayton PK, Robilliard GA, Paine RT, Dayton LB (1974) Biological accommodation in the benthic community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctic. Ecol Monogr 44:105–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2001) EcoSim: null models software for ecology, version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence, Kesey-Bear, Jericho. http://homepages.together.net/∼gentsmin/ecosim.htm
  18. Harvell CD (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Q Rev Biol 65:323–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heck KL Jr, Wilson KA (1987) Predation rates on decapod crustaceans in latitudinally separated seagrass communities: a study of spatial and temporal variation using tethering techniques. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 107:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill MS (1998) Spongivory on Caribbean reefs releases corals from competition with sponges. Oecologia 117:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill MS, Lopez NA, Young KA (2005) Anti-predator defenses in western North Atlantic sponges with evidence of enhanced defense through interactions between spicules and chemicals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 291:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt JL (1974) The geology and origin of Gray’s Reef, Georgia continental shelf. MS thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.Google Scholar
  23. Jeanne RL (1979) A latitudinal gradient in rates of ant predation. Ecology 60:1211–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones AC, Blum JE, Pawlik JR (2005) Testing for defensive synergy in Caribbean sponges: bad taste or glass spicules? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 322:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelly SR, Garo E, Jensen PR, Fenical W, Pawlik JR (2005) Effects of Caribbean sponge secondary metabolites on bacterial surface colonization. Aquat Microb Ecol 40:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klautau M, Russo CAM, Lazoski C, Boury-Esnault N, Thorpe JP, Sole-Cava M (1999) Does cosmopolitanism result from overconservative systematics? A case study using the marine sponge Chondrilla nucula? Evolution 53:1414–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kubanek J, et al (2002) Multiple defensive roles for triterpene glycosides from two Caribbean sponges. Oecologia 131:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lopez-Legentil S, Henkel TP, Pawlik JR (2007) Troubling taxonomy: the genus Callyspongia in the Caribbean. In: Benthic Ecology Meetings, Atlanta, Ga.Google Scholar
  29. McClintock JB (1987) Investigation of the relationship between invertebrate predation and biochemical composition, energy content, spicule armament and toxicity of benthic sponges at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Mar Biol 94:479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meekan MG, Choat JH (1997) Latitudinal variation in abundance of herbivorous fishes: a comparison of temperate and tropical reefs. Mar Biol 128:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Menge BA, Lubchencho J (1981) Community organization in temperate and tropical rocky intertidal habitats: prey refuges in relation to consumer pressure gradients. Ecol Monogr 51:429–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meylan A (1998) Spongivory in hawksbill turtles: a diet of glass. Science 239:393–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paul VJ (1992) Chemical defenses of benthic marine invertebrates. In: Paul VJ (ed) Ecological roles of marine natural products. Comstock, Ithaca, N.Y., pp 164–188Google Scholar
  34. Pawlik JR (1997) Fish predation on Caribbean reef sponges: an emerging perspective of chemical defenses. Proc Int Coral Reef Symp 2:1255–1258Google Scholar
  35. Pawlik JR (1998) Coral reef sponges: do predatory fishes affect their distribution? Limnol Oceanogr 43:1396–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pawlik JR, Chanas B, Toonen RJ, Fenical W (1995) Defenses of Caribbean sponges against predatory reef fish. I. Chemical deterrency. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 127:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pennings SC, Paul VJ (1992) Effect of plant toughness, calcification, and chemistry on herbivory by Dolabella auricularia. Ecology 73:1606–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pennings SC, Siska EL, Bertness MD (2001) Latitudinal differences in plant palatability in Atlantic coast salt marshes. Ecology 82:1344–1359Google Scholar
  39. Pianka ER (1966) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am Nat 100:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Randall JE, Hartman WD (1968) Sponge-feeding fishes of the West Indies. Mar Biol 1:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruzicka R (2005) Sponge community structure and anti-predator defenses on temperate reefs of the South Atlantic Bight. MS thesis, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Ga.Google Scholar
  42. Salgado SC, Pennings SC (2005) Latitudinal variaton in the palatability of salt-marsh plants: are differences constitutive?. Ecology 86:1571–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmahl GP (1990) Community structure and ecology of sponges associated with four southern Florida coral reefs. In: Rutzler K (eds) New perspectives in sponge biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, London, pp 376–383Google Scholar
  44. Schulte BA, Bakus GJ (1992) Predation deterrence in marine sponges: laboratory versus field studies. Bull Mar Sci 50:205–211Google Scholar
  45. Schupp PJ, Paul VJ (1994) Calcium carbonate and secondary metabolites in tropical seaweeds: variable effects on herbivorous fishes. Ecology 75:1172–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Swearingen DC III, Pawlik JR (1998) Variability in the chemical defense of the sponge Chondrilla nucula against predatory reef fishes. Mar Biol 131:619–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swihart RK, Bryant JP, Newton L (1994) Latitudinal patterns in consumption of woody plants by snowshoe hare in the eastern United States. Oikos 103:170–179Google Scholar
  49. Targett NM, Arnold TM (1998) Predicting the effects of brown algal phlorotannins on marine herbivores in tropical and temperate oceans. J Phycol 34:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Targett NM, Coen LD, Boettcher AA, Tanner CE (1992) Biogeographic comparisons of marine algal polyphenolics: evidence against a latitudinal trend. Oecologia 89:464–470Google Scholar
  51. Teeyapant R, Proksch P (1993) Biotransformation of brominated compounds in the marine sponge Verongia aerophoba—evidence for an induced chemical defense? Naturwissenschaften 80:369–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thacker RW, Becerro MA, Lumbang WA, Paul VJ (1998) Allelopathic interactions between sponges on a tropical reef. Ecology 79:1740–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thoms C, Ebel R, Proksch P (2006) Activated chemical defenses in Aplysina sponges revisited. J Chem Ecol 32:97–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Turon X, Becerro MA, Uriz MJ (1996) Seasonal patterns of toxicity in benthic invertebrates—the encrusting sponge Crambe crambe (Poecilosclerida). Oikos 75:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Alstyne KL, Paul VJ (1990) The biogeography of polyphenolic compounds in marine macroalgae: temperate brown algal defenses deter feeding by tropical herbivorous fishes. Oecologia 84:158–163Google Scholar
  56. van Soest RWM (1984) Marine sponges from Curacao and other Caribbean localities. Part III. Poecilosclerida. Stud Fauna Curacao Caribb Isl 66(199):1–167Google Scholar
  57. Vermeij T (1978) Biogeography and adaptation: patterns of marine life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  58. Walker RP, Thompson JE, Faulkner DJ (1985) Exudation of biologically active metabolites in a sponge Aplysina fistularis. II. Chemical evidence. Mar Biol 88:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wells HW, Wells MJ, Gray IE (1960) Marine sponges of North Carolina. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 76:200–238Google Scholar
  60. Wiedenmayer F (1977) Shallow-water sponges of the Western Bahamas. Experientia [Suppl] 28:1–287Google Scholar
  61. Wulff JL (1994) Sponge feeding by Caribbean angelfishes, trunkfishes, and filefishes. In: van Soest RWM, van Kempen MG, Braekman JC (eds) Sponges in time and space: biology, chemistry, paleontology. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 265–271Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coral Reef Conservation ProgramMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations