, Volume 154, Issue 3, pp 561–570 | Cite as

Overdispersion of body size in Australian desert lizard communities at local scales only: no evidence for the Narcissus effect

  • Daniel L. Rabosky
  • Julian Reid
  • Mark A. Cowan
  • Jeff Foulkes
Community Ecology


Both local and regional processes may contribute to community diversity and structure at local scales. Although many studies have investigated patterns of local or regional community structure, few have addressed the extent to which local community structure influences patterns within regional species pools. Here we investigate the role of body size in community assembly at local and regional scales in Ctenotus lizards from arid Australia. Ctenotus has long been noted for its exceptional species diversity in the Australian arid-zone, and previous studies have attempted to elucidate the processes underlying species coexistence within communities of these lizards. However, no consensus has emerged on the role of interspecific competition in the assembly and maintenance of Ctenotus communities. We studied Ctenotus communities at several hundred sites in the arid interior of Australia to test the hypothesis that body sizes within local and regional Ctenotus assemblages should be overdispersed relative to null models of community assembly, and we explored the relationship between body size dispersion at local and regional scales. Results indicate a striking pattern of community-wide overdispersion of body size at local scales, as measured by the variance in size ratios among co-occurring species. However, we find no evidence for body size overdispersion within regional species pools, suggesting a lack of correspondence between processes influencing the distribution of species phenotypes at local and regional scales. We suggest that size ratio constancy in Ctenotus communities may have resulted from contemporary ecological interactions among species or ecological character displacement, and we discuss alternative explanations for the observed patterns.


Character displacement Community assembly Competition Null model Regional diversity 

Supplementary material

442_2007_849_MOESM1_ESM.doc (34 kb)
ESM1 (DOC 34 kb)
442_2007_849_MOESM2_ESM.xls (19 kb)
ESM2 (XLS 19 kb)
442_2007_849_MOESM3_ESM.xls (26 kb)
ESM3 (XLS 27 kb)


  1. Adams DC (2004) Character displacement via aggressive interference in Appalachian salamanders. Ecology 84:2664–2670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alatalo RV, Moreno J (1987) Body size, interspecific interactions, and use of foraging sites in tits (Paridae). Ecology 68:1773–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Moshe A, Dayan T, Simberloff D (2001) Convergence in morphological patterns and community organization between Old and New World rodent guilds. Am Nat 158:484–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers MA, Brown JH (1982) Body size and coexistence in desert rodents: chance or community structure. Ecology 63:391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JH, Fox BA, Kelt DA (2000) Assembly rules: desert rodents are structured at scales from local to continental. Am Nat 156:314–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1974) Interference competition and niche theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:3073–3077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Case TJ, Sidell R (1983) Pattern and chance in the structure of model and natural communities. Evolution 37:832–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colwell RK, Winkler DW (1984) A null model for null models in biogeography. In: Strong DR Jr, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 344–359Google Scholar
  9. Dayan T, Simberloff D (1994) Morphological relationships among co-existing heteromyids: an incisive dental character. Am Nat 143:462–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dayan T, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. Ecol Lett 8:875–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dayan T, Simberloff D, Tchernov E, Yom-Tov Y (1989) Inter- and intraspecific character displacement in mustelids. Ecology 70:1526–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donadio E, Buskirk SW (2006) Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in Carnivora. Am Nat 167:524–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox BJ, Brown JH (1993) Assembly rules for functional groups in North American desert rodent communities. Oikos 67:358–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garland T, Losos JB (1994) Ecological morphology of locomotor performance in squamate reptiles. In: Wainwright PC, Reilly SM (eds) Ecological morphology: integrative organismal biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 240–302Google Scholar
  15. Giannasi N, Thorpe RS, Malhotra A (2000) A phylogenetic analysis of body size evolution in the Anolis roquet group (Sauria : Iguanidae): character displacement or size assortment? Mol Ecol 9: 193–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2002) Assembly rules for New England ant assemblages. Oikos 99:591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gotelli NJ, Graves GR (1996) Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Gurevitch J, Curtis P, Jones MH (2001) Meta-analysis in ecology. Adv Ecol Res 32:199–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmes RT, Pitelka FA (1968) Food overlap among coexisting sandpipers on northern Alaska tundra. Syst Zool 17:305–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. James CD (1991) Temporal variation in diets and trophic partitioning by coexisting lizards (Ctenotus, Scincidae) in central Australia. Oecologia 85:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James CD, Shine R (2000) Why are there so many coexisting species of lizards in Australian deserts? Oecologia 125:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jeffries MJ, Lawton JH (1984) Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol J Linn Soc 23:269–286Google Scholar
  23. Kieser JA (1995) Gnathomandibular morphology and character displacement in the bat-eared fox. J Mammal 76:542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Losos JB (1990) A phylogenetic analysis of character displacement in Caribbean Anolis Lizards. Evolution 44:558–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Losos JB (1996) Dynamics of range expansion by three introduced species of Anolis lizards on Bermuda. J Herpetol 30:204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Macarthur RH, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manly FJ (1996) Are there clumps in body-size distributions? Ecology 77:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Melville J (2002) Competition and character displacement in two species of scincid lizards. Ecol Lett 5:386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moreno CE, Arita HT, Solis L (2006) Morphological assembly mechanisms in Neotropical bat assemblages and ensembles within a landscape. Oecologia 149:133–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morton SR, James CD (1988) The diversity and abundance of lizards in arid Australia – a new hypothesis. Am Nat 132:237–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nipperess DA, Beattie AJ (2004) Morphological dispersion of Rhytidoonera assemblages: the importance of spatial scale and null model. Ecology 85:2728–2736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palomares F, Caro TM (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am Nat 153:492–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patchell FC, Shine R (1986) Feeding mechanisms in pygopodid lizards: how can Lialis swallow such large prey? J Herpetol 20:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pfennig KS, Pfennig DW (2005) Character displacement as the “best of a bad situation”: fitness trade-offs resulting from selection to minimize resource and mate competition. Evolution 59:2200–2208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pianka ER (1969a) Habitat specificity, speciation, and species density in Australian desert lizards. Ecology 50:498–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pianka ER (1969b) Sympatry of desert lizards (Ctenotus) in Western Australia. Ecology 50:1012–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pianka ER (1972) Zoogeography and speciation of Australian desert lizards an ecological perspective. Copeia 1972:127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pianka ER (1981) Diversity and adaptive radiations of Australian desert lizards. In: Keast A (eds) Ecological biogeography in Australia. D.W. Junk, The Hague, pp 1375–1392Google Scholar
  39. Pianka ER (1986) Ecology and natural history of desert lizards. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. Pianka ER (1989) Desert lizard diversity – additional comments and some data. Am Nat 134:344–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pianka ER (1994) Comparative ecology of Varanus in the Great Victoria desert. Aust J Ecol 19:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pleasants JM (1994) A comparison of statistics used to detect competitive displacement in body size. Ecology 75:847–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Development Core Team (2004) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  45. Radtkey RR, Fallon SM, Case TJ (1997) Character displacement in some Cnemidophorus lizards revisited: a phylogenetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9740–9745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Read JL (1998) The ecology of sympatric scincid lizards (Ctenotus) in arid South Australia. Aust J Zool 46:617–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reid JRW, Kerle JA, Morton SR (1993) Kowari 4: the distribution and abundance of vertebrate fauna of Uluru (Ayers Rock-Mount Olga) National Park, N.T. Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  48. Robertson D (1996) Interspecific competition controls abundance and habitat use of territorial Caribbean damselfishes. Ecology 77:885–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Schluter D, Grant PR (1984) Determinants of morphological patterns in communities of Darwin finches. Am Nat 123:175–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schoener TW (1983a) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schoener TW (1983b) Size difference among sympatric, bird-eating hawks: a worldwide survey. In: Simberloff DR, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 254–281Google Scholar
  53. Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Stone L, Dayan T, Simberloff D (2000) On desert rodents, favored states, and unresolved issues: scaling up and down regional assemblages and local communities. Am Nat 156:322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thackway R, Cresswell ID (1995) An interim biogeographic regionalisation for Australia: a framework for setting priorities in the national reserves system cooperative program. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Belconnen, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitlock MC (2005) Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher’s approach. J Evol Biol 18:1368–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yom-Tov Y (1991) Character displacement in the psammophile Gerbillidae of Israel. Oikos 60:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel L. Rabosky
    • 1
    • 2
  • Julian Reid
    • 3
    • 4
  • Mark A. Cowan
    • 5
  • Jeff Foulkes
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Cornell Lab of OrnithologyIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Fenner School of Environment and SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  4. 4.CSIRO Sustainable EcosystemsCanberraAustralia
  5. 5.Department of Environment and ConservationWannerooAustralia
  6. 6.Department for Environment and HeritageAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations