Oecologia

, Volume 154, Issue 2, pp 411–421 | Cite as

Contact networks and transmission of an intestinal pathogen in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies

Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

In socially living animals, individuals interact through complex networks of contact that may influence the spread of disease. Whereas traditional epidemiological models typically assume no social structure, network theory suggests that an individual’s location in the network determines its risk of infection. Empirical, especially experimental, studies of disease spread on networks are lacking, however, largely due to a shortage of amenable study systems. We used automated video-tracking to quantify networks of physical contact among individuals within colonies of the social bumble bee Bombus impatiens. We explored the effects of network structure on pathogen transmission in naturally and artificially infected hives. We show for the first time that contact network structure determines the spread of a contagious pathogen (Crithidia bombi) in social insect colonies. Differences in rates of infection among colonies resulted largely from differences in network density among hives. Within colonies, a bee’s rate of contact with infected nestmates emerged as the only significant predictor of infection risk. The activity of bees, in terms of their movement rates and division of labour (e.g., brood care, nest care, foraging), did not influence risk of infection. Our results suggest that contact networks may have an important influence on the transmission of pathogens in social insects and, possibly, other social animals.

Keywords

Epidemiology Social insects Disease ecology Infection 

References

  1. Alford DV (1975) Bumblebees. Davis-Poynter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson RM (1991) Discussion: The Kermack–McKendrick epidemic threshold theorem. Bull Math Biol 53:3–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson RM, May RM (1991) Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson C, McShea DW (2001) Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biol Rev 76:211–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkhead G, Vogt RL (1989) Epidemiologic surveillance for endemic Giardia lamblia infection in Vermont—the roles of waterborne and person-to-person transmission. Am J Epidemiol 129:762–768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourke AFG (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J Evol Biol 12:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown MJF, Loosli R, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) Condition-dependent expression of virulence in a trypanosome infecting bumblebees. Oikos 91:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown MJF, Schmid-Hempel R, Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Strong context-dependent virulence in a host-parasite system: reconciling genetic evidence with theory. J Anim Ecol 72:994–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corner LAL, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS (2003) Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev Vet Med 59:147–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cross PC, Lloyd-Smith JO, Bowers JA, Hay CT, Hofmeyr M, Getz WM (2004) Integrating association data and disease dynamics in a social ungulate: bovine tuberculosis in African buffalo in the Kruger National Park. Ann Zool Fenn 41:879–892Google Scholar
  12. Dornhaus A, Chittka L (2001) Food alert in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): possible mechanisms and evolutionary implications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:570–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durrer S, Schmid-Hempel P (1994) Shared use of flowers leads to horizontal pathogen transmission. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 258:299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenberg JNS, Lei XD, Hubbard AH, Brookhart MA, Colford JM (2005) The role of disease transmission and conferred immunity in outbreaks: analysis of the 1993 Cryptosporidium outbreak in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Am J Epidemiol 161:62–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El Bushra HE, Bin Saeed AA (1999) Intrafamilial person-to-person spread of bacillary dysentery due to Shigella dysenteriae in southwestern Saudi Arabia. East Afr Med J 76:255–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Feldman A, Balch T (2004) Representing honey bee behavior for recognition using human trainable models. Adapt Behav 12:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Free JB (1955) The division of labour within bumblebee colonies. Insectes Soc 2:195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman SR et al (1997) Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. Am J Public Health 87:1289–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gegear RJ, Otterstatter MC, Thomson JD (2005) Does infection by an intestinal parasite impair the ability of bumble bees to learn flower handling skills? Anim Behav 70:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gegear RJ, Otterstatter MC, Thomson JD (2006) Bumblebee foragers infected by a gut parasite have an impaired ability to utilize floral information. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 273:1073–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon DM, Paul RE, Thorpe K (1993) What is the function of encounter patterns in ant colonies. Anim Behav 45:1083–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greene MJ, Gordon DM (2003) Social insects—cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions. Nature 423:32–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Imhoof B, Schmid-Hempel P (1999) Colony success of the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris, in relation to infections by two protozoan parasites, Crithidia bombi and Nosema bombi. Insectes Soc 46:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keeling MJ, Eames KTD (2005) Networks and epidemic models. J R Soc Interface 2:295–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keystone JS, Krajden S, Warren MR (1978) Person-to-person transmission of Giardia lamblia in day care nurseries. Can Med Assoc J 119:241–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Klovdahl AS (1985) Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases—the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med 21:1203–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liljeros F, Edling CR, Amaral LAN (2003) Sexual networks: implications for the transmission of sexually transmitted infections. Microbes Infect 5:189–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Logan A, Ruiz-González MX, Brown MJF (2005) The impact of host starvation on parasite development and population dynamics in an intestinal trypanosome parasite of bumble bees. Parasitology 130:637–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mallon EB, Schmid-Hempel P (2004) Behavioural interactions, kin and disease susceptibility in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. J Evol Biol 17:829–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. May RM (2006) Network structure and the biology of populations. Trends Ecol Evol 21:394–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyers LA (2007) Contact network epidemiology: bond percolation applied to infectious disease prediction and control. Bull Am Math Soc 44:63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Montoya JM, Pimm SL, Sole RV (2006) Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442:259–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Müller CB, Schmid-Hempel P (1992) Variation in life-history pattern in relation to worker mortality in the bumblebee, Bombus lucorum. Funct Ecol 6:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Naug D, Camazine S (2002) The role of colony organization on pathogen transmission in social insects. J Theor Biol 215:427–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naug D, Smith B (2006) Experimentally induced change in infectious period affects transmission dynamics in a social group. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naumann K, Winston ML, Slessor KN, Prestwich GD, Webster FX (1991) Production and transmission of honey bee queen (Apis mellifera L.) mandibular gland pheromone. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Kottiri BJ, Jarlais DCD (2001) HIV risk networks and HIV transmission among injecting drug users. Eval Program Plann 24:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newman MEJ, Barabasi AL, Watts DJ (eds) (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  41. Nicolis SC, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL (2005) The effects of aggregates on interaction rate in ant colonies. Anim Behav 69:535–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Donnell S, Reichardt M, Foster R (2000) Individual and colony factors in bumble bee division of labor (Bombus bifarius nearcticus Handl; Hymenoptera, Apidae). Insectes Soc 47:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Otterstatter MC, Thomson JD (2006) Within-host dynamics of an intestinal pathogen of bumble bees. Parasitology 133:749–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Otterstatter MC, Gegear RJ, Colla S, Thomson JD (2005) Effects of parasitic mites and protozoa on the flower constancy and foraging rate of bumble bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pacala SW, Gordon DM, Godfray HCJ (1996) Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation. Evol Ecol 10:127–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Padhye NV, Doyle MP (1992) Escherichia coli O157-H7—epidemiology, pathogenesis, and methods for detection in food. J Food Prot 55:555–565Google Scholar
  47. Proulx SR, Promislow DEL, Phillips PC (2005) Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 20:345–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodd FH, Plowright RC, Owen RE (1980) Mortality rates of adult bumble bee workers (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Can J Zool 58:1718–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ryan MJ, Wall PG, Adak GK, Evans HS, Cowden JM (1997) Outbreaks of infectious intestinal disease in residential institutions in England and Wales 1992–1994. J Infect 34:49–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. SAS Institute (2006) SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmid-Hempel P (2001) On the evolutionary ecology of host-parasite interactions: addressing the question with regard to bumblebees and their parasites. Naturwissenschaften 88:147–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmid-Hempel P, Schmid-Hempel R (1993) Transmission of a pathogen in Bombus terrestris, with a note on division of labor in social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shykoff JA, Schmid-Hempel P (1991) Genetic relatedness and eusociality—parasite-mediated selection on the genetic composition of groups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Honk C, Hogeweg P (1981) The ontogeny of the social structure in a captive Bombus terrestris colony. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Veeraraghavan A, Chellappa R (2005) Tracking bees in a hive. In: Snowbird Learning Workshop, Snowbird, UtahGoogle Scholar
  57. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson EO, Holldobler B (1988) Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 3:65–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu W (1994) Microevolutionary studies on a host–parasite interaction. PhD dissertation. University of Basel, BaselGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations