Pesticide alters oviposition site selection in gray treefrogs
- 167 Downloads
Understanding the impacts of pesticides on non-target organisms is an important issue for conservation biology. Research into the environmental consequences of pesticides has largely focused on pesticide toxicity. We have less understanding of the nonlethal effects of pesticides, and the consequences of nonlethal effects for species and communities. For example, we know very little about whether pesticides alter habitat selection behavior. Understanding whether pesticides alter habitat selection is important because pesticide-induced shifts in habitat selection could either magnify or reduce the toxic effects of contaminants by funneling organisms into or directing them away from contaminated sites. Here we present four field experiments that examine the effect of the commercial pesticide Sevin® and its active ingredient, carbaryl, on oviposition site selection by the gray treefrog (Hylachrysoscelis). Our results show that uncontaminated pools consistently received 2–3 times more eggs than contaminated pools; that treefrogs appeared to respond to Sevin® directly, not indirectly via its effects on the aquatic food web, and that this preference persisted across a range of temporal and spatial scales. Both Sevin® and carbaryl per se reduced oviposition, while other volatile chemicals (e.g., our solvent control, acetone) had no effect. These findings suggest that in order to understanding the consequences of contaminants in aquatic systems we will need to consider not only toxicity, but also how contaminant effects on habitat selection alter the way organisms distribute themselves in the environment.
KeywordsAmphibian decline Anuran Carbaryl Habitat selection Hyla Insecticide
Thanks to S. Gallitano, T. Giarla, S. Rosenberg, R. Shulman, M. Sobotka, and for assisting in experiments; M. Boone and R. Semlitsch for sharing original data; B. Allen, L. Blaustein, J. Chase, P. Crumrine, T. Knight, A. Randle, W. Resetarits, J. Rohr, W. Ryberg, T. Steury, and R. Shulman for discussions that helped shape this research and/or for providing comments on the manuscript; and the staff at Tyson Research Center for logistical support. This research was funded by HHMI/SURF and Crescent Hills Research Fund support to JCB and a Tyson Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis postdoctoral fellowship to JRV. Research was conducted according to Washington University IACUC/EH&S protocol # 20050173.
- Johnson JR (2005) Multi-scale investigations of gray treefrog movements: patterns or migration, dispersal, and gene flow. Dissertation, Department of Biology. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, pp i–246Google Scholar
- Kats LB, Sih A (1992) Oviposition site selection and avoidance of fish by streamside salamanders (Ambystoma barbouri). Copeia:468–473Google Scholar
- Osenberg CW, Shima JS, St Mary CM (2006) Habitat degradation and settlement behavior: effects on fish settlement, survival, and recruitment. In: Suzuki Y, Nakamori T, Hidaka M, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Coral Reef Symposium. Japanese Coral Reef Society, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Petranka JW, Fakhoury K (1991) Evidence of a chemically mediated avoidance response of ovipositing insects to blue gills and green frog tadpoles. Copeia 234–239Google Scholar
- Resetarits WJ, Binckley CA, Chalcraft DR (2005) Habitat selection, species interactions, and processes of community assembly in complex landscapes: a metacommunity perspective. In: Holyoak M, Leibold M, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 374–398Google Scholar
- Viertel B (1999) Salt tolerance of Rana temporaria: spawning site selection and survival during embyonic development. Amphib–Reptil 20:161–171Google Scholar