Skip to main content
Log in

Dragonfly predators influence biomass and density of pond snails

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies in lakes show that fish and crayfish predators play an important role in determining the abundance of freshwater snails. In contrast, there are few studies of snails and their predators in shallow ponds and marshes. Ponds often lack fish and crayfish but have abundant insect populations. Here we present the results of field surveys, laboratory foraging trials, and an outdoor mesocosm experiment, testing the hypothesis that insects are important predators of pulmonate snails. In laboratory foraging trials, conducted with ten species of insects, most insect taxa consumed snails, and larval dragonflies were especially effective predators. The field surveys showed that dragonflies constitute the majority of the insect biomass in fishless ponds. More focused foraging trials evaluated the ability of the dragonflies Anax junius and Pantala hymenaea to prey upon different sizes and species of pulmonate snails (Helisoma trivolvis, Physa acuta, and Stagnicola elodes). Anax junius consumed all three species up to the maximum size tested. Pantala hymenaea consumed snails with a shell height of 3 mm and smaller, but did not kill larger snails. P. acuta were more vulnerable to predators than were H. trivolvis or S. elodes. In the mesocosm experiment, conducted with predator treatments of A. junius, P. hymenaea, and the hemipteran Belostoma flumineum, insect predators had a pronounced negative effect on snail biomass and density. A. junius and B. flumineum reduced biomass and density to a similar degree, and both reduced biomass more than did P. hymenaea. Predators did not have a strong effect on species composition. A model suggested that A. junius and P. hymenaea have the largest effects on snail biomass in the field. Given that both pulmonate snails and dragonfly nymphs are widespread and abundant in marshes and ponds, snail assemblages in these water bodies are likely regulated in large part by odonate predation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benoy GA, Nudds TD, Dunlop E (2002) Patterns of habitat and invertebrate diet overlap between tiger salamanders and ducks in prairie potholes. Hydrobiologia 481:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C (1992) Leech predation on juvenile freshwater snails: effects of size, species, and substrate. Oecologia 91:526–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Malmqvist B (1986) Interactions between the leech Glossiphonia complanata and its gastropod prey. Oecologia 69:268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Klosiewski SP, Stein RA (1992) Indirect effects of predation in a freshwater benthic food chain. Ecology 73:1662–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy T (1980) Food habits of sympatric larval Ambystoma tigrinum and Notophthalmus viridescens. J Herpetol 14:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KM (1991) Mollusca: Gastropoda. In: Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 285–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, DeVries D (1985) Predation and the distribution and abundance of a pond snail. Oecologia 66:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton T (1976) An analysis of the feeding ecology of the salamanders (Amphibia: Urodela) of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. J Herpetol 10:187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM (1999) To grow or to reproduce? The role of life-history plasticity in food web dynamics. Am Nat 154:571–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM (2003) Strong and weak trophic cascades along a productivity gradient. Oikos 101:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt TJ, Robinson BW, Wilson DS (2000) Functional diversity among predators of a freshwater snail imposes an adaptive tradeoff for shell morphology. Evol Ecol Res 2:129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon RT Jr (2000) The ecology of freshwater mollusks. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkle SW (1989) Dragonflies of the Florida Peninsula, Bermuda, and the Bahamas. Scientific Publishers, Gainsville, Fla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckblad J (1976) Biomass and energy transfer by a specialized predator of aquatic snails. Freshwater Biol 6:19–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg RM (1966) The regulation of density in a natural population of the pond snail, Lymnaea elodes. Ecology 47:889–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoverman JT, Auld JR, Relyea RA (2005) Putting prey back together again: integrating predator-induced behavior, morphology, and life history. Oecologia 144:481–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen E (1987) Structure of freshwater snail communities: species–area relationships and incidence categories. Am Malacol Bull 5: 9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesler DH, Munns WR Jr (1989) Predation by Belastoma flumineum (Hemiptera): an important cause of mortality in freshwater snails. J N Am Benthol Soc 8:342–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapu GL, Reinecke KJ (1992) Foraging ecology and nutrition. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn., pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DB (2001) Trade-offs between growth and survival: responses of freshwater snails to predacious crayfish. Ecology 82:758–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Brown KM, Klosiewski SP, Stein RA, Covich AP, Leathers BK, Brönmark C (1987) Distribution of freshwater snails: spatial scale and the relative importance of physicochemical and biotic factors. Am Malacol Bull 5:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Kershner MW, Aloi JE, Covich AP (1994) Effects of an omnivorous crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) on a freshwater littoral food web. Ecology 75:1265–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud I (1968) Feeding behavior in kinosternid turtles. Herpetologica 24:300–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TH, Crowder LB, Dumas CF, Burkholder JM (1992) Indirect effects of fish on macrophytes in Bays Mountain Lake: evidence for a littoral trophic cascade. Oecologia 89:476–481

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1990) Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1998) The consequences of changing the top predator in a food web: a comparative experimental approach. Ecol Monogr 68:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (2004) The growth/predation risk tradeoff: so what is the mechanism? Am Nat 163:88–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA, Grace M, Richardson JML (2001) Physiological and behavioral responses to predators shape the growth/predation risk trade-off in damselflies. Ecology 82:1535–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mower C, Turner AM (2004) Behavior, morphology and the coexistence of two pulmonate snails with molluscivorous fish: a comparative approach. Am Malacol Bull 19:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyström P, Perez JR (1998) Crayfish predation on the common pond snail (Lymnaea stagnalis): the effect of habitat complexity and snail size on foraging efficiency. Hydrobiologia 368:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg CW (1989) Resource limitation, competition, and the influence of life history in a freshwater snail community. Oecologia 79:512–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg CW, Mittelbach GG, Wainwright PC (1992) Two-stage life histories in fish: the interaction between juvenile competition and adult performance. Ecology 73:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pip E (1986) The ecology of freshwater gastropods in the central Canada region. Nautilus 100:56–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK (1996) Pond drying, predators, and the distribution of Pseudacris tadpoles. Copeia 1996:509–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK (1997) Tadpole communitities: pond permanence and predation are powerful forces shaping the structure of tadpole communities. Am Sci 85:36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AM, Montgomery SL (2003) Spatial and temporal scales of predator avoidance: experiments with fish and snails. Ecology 84:616–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AM, Trexler JC (1997) Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: evaluating the options. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:694–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AM, Turner SL, Lappi HM (2006) Learning, memory, and predator avoidance by freshwater snails: effects of experience on predator recognition and defensive strategy. Anim Behav 72:1443–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber LM, Lodge DM (1990) Periphytic food and predatory crayfish: relative roles in determining snail distribution. Oecologia 82:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn GA (1994) Size based predation and the evolution of prey life histories: a comparative study of freshwater amphipod populations. Ecology 75:2104–2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn GA (2002) Trade-off between competitive ability and antipredator adaptation in a freshwater amphipod species complex. Ecology 83:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger SA, McGrady J (1993) Intraguild predation and competition between larval dragonflies: direct and indirect effects on shared prey. Ecology 74:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger SA, Whiteman HH, Sparks GB, Rouse GL, Brown WS (1999) Foraging trade-offs along a predator-permanence gradient in subalpine wetlands. Ecology 80:2012–2116

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodzis P, Innes S (1992) Body size and consumer–resource dynamics. Am Nat 139:1151–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM (1980) Predation and Freshwater Communities. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Scott Ray, Rebekah Turner, Amanda Harold, Hannah Turner, Mike Pettyjohn, Martin Heben, and Sharon Montgomery for assistance with field work in all weather conditions. Chuck Williams, Sharon Montgomery, Jason Hoverman, Rebekah Turner, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant No. 0444939) and is a contribution of the Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew M. Turner.

Additional information

Communicated by Jay Rosenheim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, A.M., Chislock, M.F. Dragonfly predators influence biomass and density of pond snails. Oecologia 153, 407–415 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0736-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0736-9

Keywords

Navigation