Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental studies of diaspore attachment to animal coats: predicting epizoochorous dispersal potential

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transport of diaspores on animal hairs depends on the ability of a diaspore to attach to the hair and to be retained in it over longer periods of time. Whereas several studies of diaspore retention on animal hairs have been conducted recently, the process of diaspore attachment to the hair has not yet been studied systematically. We describe a new method to quantify the attachment potential (AtP) of plant diaspores. Attachment potential was measured as the proportion of diaspores of a given species that attached to pieces of an animal coat in a standardised experiment. The experiment was conducted for 58 plant species (herbs and grasses) and three different coat types: sheep wool, cattle and roe deer hair. Attachment potentials differed widely between the three coat types, but also between plant species. We found diaspore surface structure (a quantitative measure of diaspore morphology) and diaspore exposition (describing the morphology of the infructescence) to be the most important plant traits regulating AtP. An influence of seed mass on attachment potential could not be detected. For sheep wool, a general linear model (with diaspore exposure as a factor and diaspore surface structure as covariate) explained 77% of the variation in AtPs. To validate this model, we predicted AtPs for 27 additional species and compared these to the measured Atps; the predicted and measured AtPscorrelated significantly with r s  = 0.68. A comparison of attachment and retention potentials to sheep wool for 127 randomly selected plant species showed that attachment and retention are only very weakly correlated, indicating that both processes act rather independently of each other. Since many diaspores seem to perform well in only one of these processes, attachment can be considered to be as equally as decisive as retention in terms of epizoochorous dispersal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew ADQ, Flux JEC (1970) Plant dispersal by hares (Lepus capensis L.) in Kenya. Ecology 51:735–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohrer G, Nathan R Volis S (2005) Effects of long-distance dispersal for metapopulation survival and genetic structure at ecological time and spatial scales. J Ecol 93:1029–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock SH, Primack RB (1977) Comparative experimental study of seed dispersal on animals. Ecology 58:681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S, Pauly Q (1985) Experimental studies on epizoochorous dispersal in Californian plants. Aliso 11:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Flores AA, Calvo-Irabien LM (2003) Animal dispersal of two secondary-vegetation herbs into the evergreen rain forest of south-eastern Mexico. J Trop Ecol 19:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constible JM, Sweitzer RA, Van Vuren DH, Schuyler PT, Knapp DA (2005) Dispersal of non-native plants by introduced bison in an island ecosystem. Biol Invest 7:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couvreur M, Christiaen B, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2004a) Large herbivores as mobile links between isolated nature reserves through adhesive seed dispersal. Appl Veg Sci 7:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couvreur M, Vandenberghe B, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2004b) An experimental assessment of seed adhesivity on animal furs. Seed Sci Res 14:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couvreur M, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2005) Experimental assessment of plant seed retention times in fur of cattle and horse. Flora 200:136–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidse G (1986) Fruit dispersal in the Poaceae. In: Soderstrom TR, Hilu KW, Campbell ChS, Barkworth ME (eds) Grass systematics and evolution. Smithson Institute Press, Washington D.C., pp143–155

  • Eichberg C, Storm C, Schwabe A (2005) Epizoochorous and post-dispersal processes in a rare plant species: Jurinea cyanoides (L.) Rchb. (Asteraceae). Flora 200:477–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt W, Götz E, Bödeker N, Seybold S (2002) Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 17th edn. Ulmer, Stuttgart

  • Fischer SF, Poschlod P, Beinlich B (1996) Experimental studies on the dispersal of plants and animals on sheep in calcareous grasslands. J Appl Ecol 33:1206–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2002) Contact separation force of the fruit burrs in four plant species adapted to dispersal by mechanical interlocking. Plant Phys Biochem 40:373–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graae BJ (2002) The role of epizoochorous seed dispersal of forest plant species in a fragmented landscape. Seed Sci Res 12:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinken T, Raudnitschka D (2002) Do wild ungulates contribute to the dispersal of vascular plants in central European forests by epizoochory? A case study in NE Germany. Forstwiss Centralb 121:179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Nathan R, Cain ML (2003) Are long-distance dispersal events usually caused by non-standard means of dispersal? Ecology 84:1945–1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnay O, Coart E, Butaye J, Adriaens D, van Glabeke S, Roldán-Ruiz I (2006) Low impact of present and historical landscape configuration on the genetics of fragmented Anthyllis vulneraria populations. Biol Conserv 127:411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L, Dunlop M, French K, Leishman MR, Rice B et al. (1994) Predicting dispersal spectra: a minimal set of hypotheses based on plant attributes. J Ecol 82:933–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviniemi K (1996) A study of adhesive seed dispersal of three species under natural conditions. Acta Bot Neerl 45:73–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviniemi K, Telenius A (1998) Experiments on adhesive dispersal by wood mouse: seed shadows and dispersal distances of 13 plant species from cultivated areas in southern Sweden. Ecography 21:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin DC (2003) Geographic distribution and dispersal mechanisms of Bouteloua curtipendula in the Appalachian Mountains. Am Midl Nat 149:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales JM, Haydon DT, Frair J, Holsinger KE, Fryxell JM (2004) Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85:2436–2445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouissie AM, Lengkeek W, van Diggelen R (2005) Estimating adhesive seed-dispersal distances: field experiments and correlated random walks. Func Ecol 19:478–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrotzek R, Halder M, Schmidt W (1999) Die Bedeutung von Wildschweinen für die Diasporenausbreitung von Phanerogamen. Verh Ges Ökol 29:437–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Schneider P (1977) Verbreitungsbiologie (Diasporologie) der Blütenpflanzen. Geobot. Institut der ETH, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Pijl L (1982) Principles of dispersal in higher plants, 3rd revised and expanded edn. Springer, Berlin

  • Ridley HN (1930) The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Reeve, Ashford

    Google Scholar 

  • Römermann C, Tackenberg O, Poschlod P (2005) How to predict attachment potential of seeds to sheep and cattle hair from simple morphological seed traits. Oikos 110:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Sommer K, Kriebitzsch W-U (2004) Dispersal of vascular plants by game in northern Germany. Part I: Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa). Eur J For Res 123:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmida A, Ellner S (1983) Seed dispersal on pastoral grazers in open Mediterranean chaparral, Israel. Isr J Bot 32:147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen AE (1986) Seed dispersal by adhesion. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:443–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stender S, Poschlod P, Vauk-Henthelt E, Dernedde T (1997) Die Ausbreitung von Pflanzen durch Galloway-Rinder. Verh Ges Ökol 27:173–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Tackenberg O, Poschlod P, Bonn S (2003) Assessment of wind dispersal potential in plant species. Ecol Monogr 73:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tackenberg O, Römermann C, Thompson K, Poschlod P (2006) What does diaspore morphology tell us about external animal dispersal? Evidence from standardised experiments measuring seed retention on animal-hairs. Basic Appl Ecol 7:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trakhtenbrot A, Nathan R, Perry G, Richardson DM (2005) The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Div Dist 11:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Brown T, Boyle T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ch. Römermann for helpful discussions and two anonymous referees for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidrun Will.

Additional information

Communicated by Peter Clarke.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 170 kb doc

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Will, H., Maussner, S. & Tackenberg, O. Experimental studies of diaspore attachment to animal coats: predicting epizoochorous dispersal potential. Oecologia 153, 331–339 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0731-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0731-1

Keywords

Navigation