Skip to main content

Leafhopper-induced plant resistance enhances predation risk in a phytophagous beetle

Oecologia volume 152, pages 665–675 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Many herbivores elicit biochemical, physiological, or morphological changes in their host plants that render them more resistant to co-occurring herbivores. Yet, despite the large number of studies that investigate how induced resistance affects herbivore preference and performance, very few have simultaneously explored the cascading effects of induction on higher trophic levels and consequences for prey suppression. In our study system, early-season herbivory by leafhoppers elevated plant resistance to subsequent attack by chrysomelid beetles sharing the same host plant. Notably, beetles feeding on leafhopper-damaged plants incurred developmental penalties (e.g., prolonged time in early larval instars) that rendered them more susceptible to predation by natural enemies. As a result, the combined bottom-up effect of leafhopper-induced resistance and the top-down effect of enhanced predation resulted in the synergistic suppression of beetle populations. These results emphasize that higher trophic level dynamics should be considered in conjunction with induced resistance to better understand how plants mediate interspecific interactions in phytophagous insect communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4a–e
Fig. 5

References

  • Agrawal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E (1999) Inducible plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores: biochemistry, ecology, and agriculture. American Phytopathological Society Press, St Paul, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus EA, Serrano MS, Ranger CM (2005) Mechanisms of hopperburn: an overview of insect taxonomy, behavior, and physiology. Annu Rev Entomol 50:125–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benrey B, Denno RF (1997) The slow-growth-high-mortality hypothesis: a test using the cabbage butterfly. Ecology 78:987–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergelson JM, Lawton JH (1988) Does foliage damage influence predation on the insect herbivores of birch? Ecology 69:434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biever KD, Chauvin RL (1992) Suppression of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with augmentative releases of predaceous stinkbugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J Econ Entomol 85:720–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Boege K (2004) Induced responses in three tropical dry forest plant species—direct and indirect effects on herbivory. Oikos 107:541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañas LA, O’Neil RJ, Gibb TJ (2002) Population ecology of Leptinotarsa decemlineata Stål (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): population dynamics, mortality factors, and potential natural enemies for biological control of the Colorado potato beetle. Biol Control 24:50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappaert DL, Drummond FA, Logan PA (1991) Population dynamics of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on a native host in Mexico. Environ Entomol 20:1549–1555

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier C, Bauduin F (1995) Biological control of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Quebec by augmentative releases of the two-spotted stinkbug Perillus bioculatus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Can Entomol 127:195–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, Kaplan I (2007) Plant-mediated interactions in herbivorous insects: mechanisms, symmetry, and challenging the paradigms of competition past. In: Ohgushi T, Craig TP, Price PW (eds) Ecological communities: plant mediation in indirect interaction webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 19–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, McClure MS, Ott JR (1995) Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition revisited and resurrected. Annu Rev Entomol 40:297–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, Gratton C, Peterson MA, Langellotto GA, Finke DL, Huberty AF (2002) Bottom-up forces mediate natural-enemy impact in a phytophagous insect community. Ecology 83:1443–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards PJ, Wratten SD, Gibberd RM (1991) The impact of inducible phytochemicals on food selection by insect herbivores and its consequences for the distribution of grazing damage. In: Tallamy DW, Raupp MJ (eds) Phytochemical induction by herbivores. Wiley, New York, pp 205–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelberth J, Alborn HT, Schmelz EA, Tumlinson JH (2004) Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:1781–1785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson KS, Morse DH (1997) Predator size and the suitability of a common prey. Oecologia 109:608–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faeth SH (1994) Induced plant responses: effects on parasitoids and other natural enemies of phytophagous insects. In: Hawkins BA, Sheehan W (eds) Parasitoid community ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Forkner RE, Hunter MD (2000) What goes up must come down? Nutrient addition and predation pressure on oak herbivores. Ecology 81:1588–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Häggström H, Larsson S (1995) Slow larval growth on a suboptimal willow results in high predation mortality in the leaf beetle Galerucella lineola. Oecologia 104:308–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare JD (1990) Ecology and management of the Colorado potato beetle. Annu Rev Entomol 35:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare JD (1992) Effects of plant variation on herbivore–natural enemy interactions. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., pp 278–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare JD (2002) Plant genetic variation in tritrophic interactions. In: Tscharntke T, Hawkins BA (eds) Multitrophic level interactions. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 8–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Havill NP, Raffa KF (2000) Compound effects of induced plant responses on insect herbivores and parasitoids: implications for tritrophic interactions. Ecol Entomol 25:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidel AJ, Baldwin IT (2004) Microarray analysis of salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid-signaling in responses of Nicotiana attenuata to attack by insects from multiple feeding guilds. Plant Cell Environ 27:1362–1373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Kost C (2006) Priming of indirect defences. Ecol Lett 9:813–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hough-Goldstein JA (1998) Use of predatory pentatomids in integrated management of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). In: Coll M, Ruberson JR (eds) Predatory Heteroptera: their ecology and use in biological control. Say, Lanham, pp 209–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter MD (1992) Interactions within herbivore communities mediated by the host plant: the keystone herbivore concept. In: Hunter MD, Ohgushi T, Price PW (eds) Effect of resource distribution on plant–animal interactions. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 287–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter MD, Price PW (1992) Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter MD, Schultz JC (1993) Induced plant defenses breached? Phytochemical induction protects an herbivore from disease. Oecologia 94:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter MD, Varley GC, Gradwell GR (1997) Estimating the relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces on insect herbivore populations: a classic study revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9176–9181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitaniemi P, Vehviläinen H, Ruohomäki K (2004) Movement and disappearance of mountain birch defoliators are influenced by the interactive effects of plant architecture and induced resistance. Ecol Entomol 29:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay AD, Scott SE, Schade JD, Hobbie SE (2004) Stoichiometric relations in an ant–treehopper mutualism. Ecol Lett 7:1024–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2004) Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part I. The orchestration of plant defenses in nature and their fitness consequences in the wild tobacco Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J 38:639–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lill JT, Marquis RJ (2001) The effects of leaf quality on herbivore performance and attack from natural enemies. Oecologia 126:418–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lill JT, Marquis RJ, Ricklefs RE (2002) Host plants influence parasitism of forest caterpillars. Nature 417:170–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loader C, Damman H (1991) Nitrogen content of food plants and vulnerability of Pieris rapae to natural enemies. Ecology 72:1586–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch ME, Kaplan I, Dively GP, Denno RF (2006) Host-plant-mediated competition via induced resistance: interactions between pest herbivores on potatoes. Ecol Appl 16:855–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis RJ, Whelan CJ (1996) Plant morphology and recruitment of the third trophic level: subtle and little-recognized defenses? Oikos 75:330–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran N, Hamilton WD (1980) Low nutritive quality as defense against herbivores. J Theor Biol 86:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ode PJ (2006) Plant chemistry and natural enemy fitness: effects on herbivore and natural enemy interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 51:163–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohgushi T (2005) Indirect interaction webs: herbivore-induced effects through trait change in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:81–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead KL, Denno RF, Morton TC, Romeo JT (1997) Influence of Prokelisia planthoppers on the amino acid composition and growth of Spartina alterniflora. J Chem Ecol 23:303–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paré PW, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH (1999) Induced plant volatiles: biochemistry and effects on parasitoids. In: Agrawal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E (eds) Inducible plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores: biochemistry, ecology, and agriculture. American Phytopathological Society Press, St Paul, Minn., pp 167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven JA (1983) Phytophages of xylem and phloem: a comparison of animal and plant sap-feeders. Adv Ecol Res 13:135–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Saona C, Thaler JS (2005) The jasmonate pathway alters herbivore feeding behaviour: consequences for plant defences. Entomol Exp Appl 115:125–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JC (1983) Habitat selection and foraging tactics of caterpillars in heterogeneous trees. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 61–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiling P, Rossi AM (1997) Experimental manipulations of top-down and bottom-up factors in a tri-trophic system. Ecology 78:1602–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Takabayashi J, Dicke M (1996) Plant-carnivore mutualism through herbivore-induced carnivore attractants. Trends Plant Sci 1:109–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler JS (2002) Effect of jasmonate-induced plant responses on the natural enemies of herbivores. J Anim Ecol 71:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin ES, Sears MK (1992) Indirect competition between the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and the potato leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on potato: laboratory study. Environ Entomol 21:787–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Turlings TCJ, Benrey B (1998) Effects of plant metabolites on the behavior and development of parasitic wasps. Ecoscience 5:321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meijden E, Klinkhamer GL (2000) Conflicting interests of plants and the natural enemies of herbivores. Oikos 89:202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon JJA, de Vos EW, Dicke M (2000) Orientation behaviour of the predatory hemipteran Perillus bioculatus to plant and prey odours. Entomol Exp Appl 96:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zandt PA, Agrawal AA (2004) Community-wide impacts of herbivore-induced plant responses in milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Ecology 85:2616–2629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan DV, Narwani AJT, Thaler JS (2005) Specificity in induced plant responses shapes patterns of herbivore occurrence on Solanum dulcamara. Ecology 86:886–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voelckel C, Weisser WW, Baldwin IT (2004) An analysis of plant-aphid interactions by different microarray hybridization strategies. Mol Ecol 13:3187–3195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walgenbach JF, Wyman JA (1985) Potato leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) feeding damage at various potato growth stages. J Econ Entomol 78:671–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling LL (2000) The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul 19:195–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weissbecker B, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M (1999) Electroantennogram responses of a predator, Perillus bioculatus, and its prey, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, to plant volatiles. J Chem Ecol 25:2313–2325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weissbecker B, Van Loon JJA, Posthumus MA, Bouwmeester HJ, Dicke M (2000) Identification of volatile potato sesquiterpenoids and their olfactory detection by the two-spotted stinkbug Perillus bioculatus. J Chem Ecol 26:1433–1445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams IS (1999) Slow-growth, high-mortality—a general hypothesis, or is it? Ecol Entomol 24:490–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Heather Harmon, Amy Miller, and Terry Patton for their assistance with field experiments. Later drafts of the manuscript were greatly improved by comments from Andre Kessler, Shannon Murphy, and Gina Wimp. Funding for this research was provided by a USDA Competitive Research Grant (NRICGP, Entomology and Nematology, 00-35302-9334) to R. F. Denno and G. P. Dively. These experiments comply with the current laws of the USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, 4112 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Ian Kaplan, Margaret E. Lynch, Galen P. Dively & Robert F. Denno

Authors
  1. Ian Kaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margaret E. Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Galen P. Dively
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert F. Denno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Kaplan.

Additional information

Communicated by Richard Karban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, I., Lynch, M.E., Dively, G.P. et al. Leafhopper-induced plant resistance enhances predation risk in a phytophagous beetle. Oecologia 152, 665–675 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0692-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0692-4

Keywords

  • Plant-mediated interactions
  • Induced plant resistance
  • Interspecific competition
  • Slow-growth-high-mortality hypothesis
  • Tri-trophic interactions