Skip to main content
Log in

Diet switching in a generalist mammalian folivore: fundamental to maximising intake

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generalist mammalian herbivores exploit a diverse diet. A generalised feeding strategy utilises a mixed diet to obtain a range of nutrients and to reduce the detoxication load of similar groups of plant secondary metabolites (PSMs). There is limited research investigating how mammalian herbivores achieve this dietary mixing in their daily foraging activities. We investigated the patterns of, and behaviours associated with, dietary mixing in a generalist mammalian folivore, the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Possums were offered foliage of two eucalypt species (Eucalyptus globulus and E. regnans) as either (a) Full choice: both species offered for 8 h; (b) Restricted choice: both species offered for 2×2 h blocks; (c) G–R no choice: E. globulus offered for the first 4 h, E. regnans offered for next 4 h; and (d) R–G no choice: E. regnans offered for first 4 h, E. globulus offered for next 4 h. We hypothesised that possums would maximise intake on the Full choice diet, where time availability was greatest in combination with a choice of foliage. We also hypothesised that diet switching, defined as the frequency of changing between food types while feeding, would play a fundamental role in maximising intake. Possums achieved maximum intake on the Full choice diet and minimum intake on the No choice diets. Although intake was similar between the Restricted choice and No choice diets, possums achieved this intake in half the amount of time when able to switch regularly between foliage on the Restricted choice diet. We conclude that a generalist herbivore’s ability to effectively switch diets when foraging is fundamental to maximising intake. Hence, the degree of plant heterogeneity in an environment, and the spatial scale at which it occurs, may affect an herbivore’s foraging decisions and, ultimately, influence its foraging efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyle RR, McLean S, Foley WJ, Davies NW (1999) Comparative metabolism of dietary terpene, p-cymene, in generalist and specialist folivorous marsupials. J Chem Ecol 25:2109–2126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Close DC, Davies NW, Beadle CL (2001) Temporal variation of tannins (galloylglucoses), flavonols and anthocyanins in leaves of Eucalyptus nitens seedlings: implications for light attenuation and antioxidant activities. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:269–278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cork SJ, Pahl L (1984) The possible influence of nutritional factors on diet and habitat selection by the ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus). In: Smith AP, Hume ID (eds) Possums and gliders. Australian Mammal Society, Sydney pp 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing DM, Cork S (1999) Role of detoxification of plant secondary compounds on diet breadth in a mammalian herbivore, Trichosurus vulpecula. J Chem Ecol 25:1205–1219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald AE (1984) Diet of the possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in three Tasmanian forest types and its relevance to the diet of possums in New Zealand forests. In: Smith AP, Hume ID (eds) Possums and gliders. Australian Mammal Society, Sydney pp 137–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland WJ (1991) Plant secondary metabolites: biochemical coevolution with herbivores. In: Palo RT, Robbins CT (eds) Plant defenses against mammalian herbivory. CRC, Boca Raton pp 61–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland WJ, Janzen DH (1974) Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. Am Nat 108:269–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland WJ, Winter JW (1975) Evolutionary consequences of eating: Trichosurus vulpecula (Marsupialia) and the genus Eucalyptus. J Chem Ecol 1:439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TH, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Davies NW (2002) Genetic resistance of Eucalyptus globulus to autumn gum moth defoliation and the role of cuticular waxes. Can J Forest Res 32:1961–1969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler IR, Foley WJ, Eschler BM (2000) Foliar concentration of a single toxin creates habitat patchiness for a marsupial folivore. Ecology 81:1327–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • le Mar K, McArthur C (2005) Habitat selection by common brushtail possums in a patchy eucalypt-forestry environment. Aust Mammal (in press)

  • Lowther JR (1980) Use of a single sulphuric acid-hydrogen peroxide digest for the analysis of Pinus radiata needles. Commun Soil Sci Plan 11:175–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur C, Goodwin A, Turner S (2000) Preferences, selection and damage to seedlings under changing availability by two marsupial herbivores. Forest Ecol Manag 139:157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly-Wapstra JM, McArthur C, Potts BM (2004) Linking plant genotype, plant defensive chemistry and mammal browsing in a Eucalyptus species. Funct Ecol 18:677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly-Wapstra JM, Potts BM, McArthur C, Davies NW, Tilyard P (2005) Inheritance of resistance to mammalian herbivores and of plant defensive chemistry in an Eucalyptus species. J Chem Ecol 31:357–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pass GJ, Foley WJ (2000) Plant secondary metabolites as mammalian feeding deterrents: separating the effects of the taste of salicin from its post-ingestive consequences in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). J Comp Physiol B 170:185–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister JA, Provenza FD, Manners GD, Gardner DR, Ralphs MH (1997) Tall larkspur ingestion: can cattle regulate intake below toxic levels? J Chem Ecol 23:759–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratkowsky DA, Evans MA, Alldredge JR (1993) Cross-over experiments: design, analysis, and application. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Spalinger DE (1995) Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer. Oecologia 104:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MS, Bernays EA, Carrière Y (2002) The interplay between nutrient balancing and toxin dilution in foraging by a generalist insect herbivore. Anim Behav 64:629–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen JS, McLister JD, Dearing DM (2005) Plant secondary metabolites compromise the energy budgets of specialist and generalist mammalian herbivores. Ecology 86:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M (1978) What are the biological bases of varied diets? Am Nat 112:627–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins NL, McArthur C, McLean S, Boyle R (2003) Effects of two plant secondary metabolites, cineole and gallic acid, on nightly feeding patterns of the common brushtail possum. J Chem Ecol 29:1447–1464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hugh Fitzgerald and Kit Williams for their help with setting up camera equipment. We also thank Jan Wiggins for experimental assistance and Ann Wilkinson for running colorimetric assays of the nitrogen digests. This research was approved by the University of Tasmania’s Animal Ethics Committee (Permit Number A6700) and Parks and Wildlife Service (Permit Number FA 03103). Research was funded by an Australian Postgraduate Award and the CRC for Sustainable Production Forestry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natasha L Wiggins.

Additional information

Communicated by Roland Brandl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiggins, N.L., McArthur, C. & Davies, N.W. Diet switching in a generalist mammalian folivore: fundamental to maximising intake. Oecologia 147, 650–657 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0305-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0305-z

Keywords

Navigation