Oecologia

, Volume 143, Issue 1, pp 85–93 | Cite as

Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test

  • Kelley M. Stewart
  • R. Terry. Bowyer
  • Brian L. Dick
  • Bruce K. Johnson
  • John G. Kie
Population Ecology

Abstract

Density dependence plays a key role in life-history characteristics and population ecology of large, herbivorous mammals. We designed a manipulative experiment to test hypotheses relating effects of density-dependent mechanisms on physical condition and fecundity of North American elk (Cervus elaphus) by creating populations at low and high density. We hypothesized that if density-dependent effects were manifested principally through intraspecific competition, body condition and fecundity of females would be lower in an area of high population density than in a low-density area. Thus, we collected data on physical condition and rates of pregnancy in each experimental population. Our manipulative experiment indicated that density-dependent feedbacks affected physical condition and reproduction of adult female elk. Age-specific pregnancy rates were lower in the high-density area, although there were no differences in pregnancy of yearlings or in age at peak reproduction between areas. Age-specific rates of pregnancy began to diverge at 2 years of age between the two populations and peaked at 6 years old. Pregnancy rates were most affected by body condition and mass, although successful reproduction the previous year also reduced pregnancy rates during the current year. Our results indicated that while holding effects of winter constant, density-dependent mechanisms had a much greater effect on physical condition and fecundity than density-independent factors (e.g., precipitation and temperature). Moreover, our results demonstrated effects of differing nutrition resulting from population density during summer on body condition and reproduction. Thus, summer is a critical period for accumulation of body stores to buffer animals against winter; more emphasis should be placed on the role of spring and summer nutrition on population regulation in large, northern herbivores.

Keywords

Body mass Body condition Cervus elaphus Lactation Pregnancy 

References

  1. Aanes R, Sæther BE, Oritsland NA (2000) Fluctuations of an introduced population of Svalbard reindeer: the effects of density dependence and climatic variation. Ecography 23:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aars J, Ims RA (2002) Intrinsic and climatic determinants of population demography: the winter dynamics of tundra voles. Ecology 83:3449–3456Google Scholar
  3. Adamczwski JZ, Flood PF, Gunn A (1997) Seasonal patterns in body composition and reproduction of female muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). J Zool (London) 241:245–269Google Scholar
  4. Animal Care and Use Committee (1998) Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. J Mammal 79:1416–1431Google Scholar
  5. Banasiak CF (1961) Deer in Maine. Maine Game Div Bull 6:1–159Google Scholar
  6. Barten NL, Bowyer RT, Jenkins KJ (2001) Habitat use by female caribou: tradeoffs associated with parturition. J Wildl Manage 65:77–92Google Scholar
  7. Bartmann RM, White GC, Carpenter LH (1992) Compensatory mortality in a Colorado mule deer population. Wildl Monogr 121:1–39 Google Scholar
  8. Boer AH (1992) Fecundity of North American moose (Alces alces): a review. Alces Suppl 1:1–10Google Scholar
  9. Both C, Visser ME (2003) Density dependence, territoriality, and divisibility of resources: from optimality models to population processes. Am Nat 161:326–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V, Kie JG (1998) Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan moose: long-term versus proximal effects of climate. J Mammal 79:1332–1344Google Scholar
  11. Bowyer RT, Nicholson MC, Molvar EM, Faro JB (1999) Moose on Kalgin island: are density-dependent processes related to harvest? Alces 35:73–89Google Scholar
  12. Bowyer RT, McCullough DR, Belovsky GE (2001) Causes and consequences of sociality in mule deer. Alces 37:371–402Google Scholar
  13. Boyce MS (1989) The Jackson elk herd: intensive wildlife management in North America. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar
  14. Bubenik AB (1982) Physiology. In: Thomas J W, Toweill DE (eds) Elk of North America: ecology and management. Stackpole, Harrisburg, pp 125–179Google Scholar
  15. Cameron RD, Ver Hoef JM (1994) Predicting parturition rate of caribou from autumn body mass. J Wildl Manage 58:674–679Google Scholar
  16. Cameron RD, Smith WT, Fancy SG, Gerhart KL, White RG (1993) Calving success of female caribou in relation to body weight. Can J Zool 71:480–486Google Scholar
  17. Caughley G (1970) Eruption of ungulate populations, with emphasis on Himalayan thar in New Zealand. Ecology 51:54–72Google Scholar
  18. Chapin FS III (1983) Direct and indirect effects of temperature on arctic plants. Polar Biol 2:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clutton-Brock TH (1984) Reproductive effort and terminal investment in iteroparous animals. Am Nat 123:212–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guiness FE (1987) Interactions between population density and maternal characteristics affecting fecundity and juvenile survival in red deer. J Anim Ecol 56:857–871Google Scholar
  21. Cook RC, Cook JG, Murray DL, Zager P, Johnson BK, Gratson MW (2001) Development of predictive models of nutritional condition for Rocky Mountain elk. J Wildl Manage 65:973–987Google Scholar
  22. Cook JG, Johnson BK, Cook RC, Riggs RA, Delcurto T, Bryant LD, Irwin LL (2004) Effects of summer-autumn nutrition and parturition date on reproduction and survival of elk. Wildl Monogr 155:1–61Google Scholar
  23. Elmberg J, Nummi P, Poysa H, Sjoberg K (2003) Breeding success of sympatric dabbling ducks in relation to population density and food resources. Oikos 100:333–341Google Scholar
  24. Ericsson G, Wallin K, Ball JP, Broberg M (2001) Age-related reproductive effort and senescence in free-ranging moose, Alces alces. Ecology 82:1613–1620Google Scholar
  25. Fowler CW (1981) Density dependence as related to life history strategy. Ecology 62:602–610Google Scholar
  26. Fryxell JM, Falls JB, Falls EA, Brooks RJ, Dix L, Strickland MA (1999) Density dependence, prey dependence, and population dynamics of martens in Ontario. Ecology 80:1311–1321Google Scholar
  27. Gaillard JM, Boutin JM, Delorme D, VanLaere G, Duncan P, Lebreton JD (1997) Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations. Oecologia 112:502–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toigo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gasaway WC, Stephenson RO, Davis JL, Shepherd PEK, Burris OE (1983) Interrelationships of wolves, prey, and man in interior Alaska. Wildl Monogr 84:1–50Google Scholar
  30. Gerhart KL, Russel DE, VanDewetering D, White RG, Cameron RD (1997) Pregnancy of adult caribou (Rangifer tarandus): evidence for lactational infertility. J Zool 242:17–30Google Scholar
  31. Hobbs NT, Baker DL, Bear GD, Bowden DC (1996) Ungulate grazing in sagebrush grassland: mechanisms of resource competition. Ecol Appl 6:200–217Google Scholar
  32. Houston DB (1982) The Northern Yellowstone elk. Macmillian, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Houston DB, Stevens V (1988) Resource limitation in mountain goats: a test by experimental cropping. Can J Zool 66:228–238Google Scholar
  34. Keech MA, Stephenson TR, Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V, Ver Hoef JM (1998) Relationships between blood-serum variables and depth of rump fat in Alaskan moose. Alces 34:51–57Google Scholar
  35. Keech MA, Boertje RD, Bowyer RT, Dale BW (1999) Effects of birth weight on growth of young moose: do low-weight neonates compensate? Alces 35:51–57Google Scholar
  36. Keech MA, Bowyer RT, VerHoef JM, Boertje RD, Dale BW, Stephenson TR (2000) Life-history consequences of maternal condition in Alaskan moose. J Wildl Manage 64:450–462Google Scholar
  37. Kie JG, Bowyer RT (1999) Sexual segregation in white-tailed deer: density-dependent changes in use of space, habitat selection, and dietary niche. J Mammal 80:1004–1020Google Scholar
  38. Kie JG, White M (1985) Population dynamics of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on the Welder Wildlife Refuge, Texas. Southwestern Nat 30:105–118Google Scholar
  39. Kie JG, Drawe DL, Scott G (1980) Changes in diet and nutrition with increased herd size in Texas white-tailed deer. J Range Manage 33:28–34Google Scholar
  40. Kie JG, White M, Drawe DL (1983) Condition parameters of white-tailed deer in Texas. J Wildl Manage 47:583–594Google Scholar
  41. Kie JG, Bowyer RT, Stewart KM (2003) Ungulates in western forests: habitat relationships, population dynamics, and ecosystem processes. In: Zabel C, Anthony R (eds) Mammal community dynamics in western coniferous forests: management and conservation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 296–340Google Scholar
  42. Kirkpatrick JF, Turner JW (1991) Compensatory reproduction in feral horses. J Wildl Manage 55:649–652Google Scholar
  43. Klein DR (1968) The introduction, increase, and crash of reindeer on St. Matthew Island. J Wildl Manage 32:350–367Google Scholar
  44. Lenart EA, Bowyer RT, Ver Hoef J, Ruess RW (2002) Climate change and caribou: effects of summer weather on forage. Can J Zool 80:664–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loison A, Toigo C, Appolinarie J, Michallet J (2002) Demographic processes in colonizing populations of isard (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and ibex (Capra ibex). J Zool (London) 256:199–205Google Scholar
  46. Lubow BC, Singer FJ, Johnson TL, Bowden DC (2002) Dynamics of interacting elk populations within and adjacent to Rocky Mountain National Park. J Wildl Manage 66:757–775Google Scholar
  47. Macdonald DW, Newman C, Stewart PD, Domingo-Roura X, Johnson PJ (2002) Density-dependent regulation of body mass and condition in badgers (Meles meles) from Wytham Woods. Ecology 83:2056–2061Google Scholar
  48. Mackie RJ, Hamlin KL, Pac DF, Dusek GL, Wood AK (1990) Compensation in free-ranging deer populations. Trans No Am Wildl Nat Res Conf 55:518–526Google Scholar
  49. Mautz WW (1978) Sledding on a bushy hillside: the fat cycle in deer. Wildl Soc Bull 6:88–90Google Scholar
  50. McCullough DR (1979) The George Reserve deer herd: population ecology of a K-selected species. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  51. McCullough DR (1990) Detecting density dependence: filtering the baby from the bathwater. Trans No Am Wildl Nat Res Conf 55:534–543Google Scholar
  52. McCullough DR (1999) Density dependence and life-history strategies of ungulates. J Mammal 80:1130–1146 Google Scholar
  53. McCullough DR, Ullrey DE (1983) Proximate mineral and gross energy composition of white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 47:430–441Google Scholar
  54. Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC, Langvatn R (2000) Relationships between sex ratio, climate, and density in red deer: the importance of spatial scale. J Anim Ecol 69:959–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC, Langvatn R (2001) Efffects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density dependent senescence. Proc R Soc London B 268:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1990) Applied linear statistical models, 3rd edn. Richard D. Irwin, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  57. Noyes JH, Sasser RG, Johnson BK, Bryant LD, Alexander B (1997) Accuracy of pregnancy detection by serum protein (PSPB) in elk. Wildl Soc Bull 25:695–698Google Scholar
  58. Parker KL, Gillingham MP, Hanley TA, Robbins CT (1999) Energy and protein balance of free-ranging black-tailed deer in a natural forest environment. Wildl Monogr 143:1–48Google Scholar
  59. Pederson JC, Harper KT (1978) Factors influencing productivity of two mule deer herds in Utah. J Range Manage 31:105–110Google Scholar
  60. Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Van Laere G, Duncan P, Kjellander P, Liberg O, Delorme D, Maillard D (2001) Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality. Proc R Soc London B 269:747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rachlow JL, Bowyer RT (1994) Variability in maternal behavior by Dall’s sheep: environmental tracking or adaptive strategy? J Mammal 75:328–337Google Scholar
  62. Raedeke KJ, Millspaugh JJ, Clark PE (2002) Population characteristics. In: Toweill DE, Thomas JW (eds) North American elk: ecology and management. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington D.C., pp 449–513Google Scholar
  63. Ricker WE (1979) Growth rates and models. Fish Physiol 8:679–743Google Scholar
  64. Rowland MM, Bryant LD, Johnson BK, Noyes JH, Wisdom MJ, Thomas JW (1997) The Starkey project: history, facilities, and data collection methods for ungulate research. USDA For Serv Tech Rep PNW-GTR 396:1–62Google Scholar
  65. Russell DE, Gerhart KL, White RG, Van De Wetering D (1998) Detection of early pregnancy in caribou: evidence for embryonic mortality. J Wildl Manage 62:1066–1075 Google Scholar
  66. Sæther BE, Haagenrud H (1983) Life history of the moose (Alces alces): fecundity rates in relation to age and carcass weight. J Mammal 64:226–232Google Scholar
  67. Sæther BE, Engen S, Filli F, Aanes R, Schroeder W, Andersen R (2002) Stochastic population dynamics of an introduced Swiss population of ibex. Ecology 83:3457–3465Google Scholar
  68. SAS (2001) SAS system for windows. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwartz CC, Hundertmark KJ (1993) Reproductive characteristics of Alaskan moose. J Wildl Manage 57:454–468Google Scholar
  70. Schwartz CC, Hubbert ME, Franzman AW (1988a) Energy requirements of adult moose for winter maintenance. J Wildl Manage 52:26–33Google Scholar
  71. Schwartz CC, Regelin WL, Franzmann AW (1988b) Estimates of digestibility of birch, willow, and aspen mixtures in moose. J Wildl Manage 52:33–37Google Scholar
  72. Sedinger JS, Lindberg MS, Chelgran ND (2001) Age-specific breeding probability in black brant: effects of population density. J Anim Ecol 70:798–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singer FJ, Harting A, Symonds KK, Coughenour MB (1997) Density dependence, compensation, and environmental effects on elk calf mortality in Yellowstone National Park. J Wildl Manage 61:12–25Google Scholar
  74. Skogland T (1984) Toothwear by food limitation and its life history consequences in wild reindeer. Oikos 51:238–242Google Scholar
  75. Spaeth DF, Hundertmark KJ, Bowyer RT, Barboza PS, Stephenson TR, Peterson RO (2001) Incisor arcades of Alaskan moose: is dimorphism related to sexual segregation? Alces 37:217–226Google Scholar
  76. Stephenson TR, Hundertmark KJ, Schwartz CC, Van Ballenberghe V (1998) Predicting body fat and body mass in moose with ultrasonography. Can J Zool 76:712–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Cimon NJ, Johnson BK (2002) Temporospatial distributions of elk, mule deer, and cattle: resource partitioning and competitive displacement. J Mammal 83:229–244Google Scholar
  78. Teer JG, Thomas JW, Walker EA (1965) Ecology and management of the white-tailed deer in the Llano Basin of Texas. Wildl Monogr 15:1–62Google Scholar
  79. Toigo C, Gaillard JM, Gauthier D, Girard I, Martinot JP, Michallet J (2002) Female reproductive success and costs in an alpine capital breeder under contrasting environments. Ecoscience 9:427–433Google Scholar
  80. Van Vuren D, Bray MP (1986) Population dynamics of bison in the Henry Mountains, Utah. J Mammal 67:503–511Google Scholar
  81. Verts BJ, Carraway LN (1998) Land mammals of Oregon. University of California Press, Berkeley Google Scholar
  82. White GC, Bartmann RM (1997) Density dependence in deer populations. In: McShea WJ, Underwood HB, Rappole JH (eds) The science of overabundance: deer ecology and population management. Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC, pp 120–135Google Scholar
  83. White RG, Rowell JE, Hauer WE (1997) The role of nutrition, body condition, and lactation on calving success in muskoxen. J Zool 243:13–20Google Scholar
  84. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  85. Zullinger EM, Ricklefs RE, Redford KH, Mace GM (1984) Fitting sigmoidal equations to mammalian growth curves. J Mammal 65:607–636Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelley M. Stewart
    • 1
  • R. Terry. Bowyer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brian L. Dick
    • 3
  • Bruce K. Johnson
    • 4
  • John G. Kie
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Arctic Biology, and Department of Biology and WildlifeUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA
  3. 3.United States Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationLa GrandeUSA
  4. 4.Oregon Department of Fish and WildlifeLa GrandeUSA

Personalised recommendations