Oecologia

, Volume 142, Issue 1, pp 28–37 | Cite as

Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant–pollinator interactions in Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana

Plant Animal Interactions

Abstract

The structure of diverse floral visitor assemblages and the nature of spatial variation in plant–pollinator interactions have important consequences for floral evolution and reproductive interactions among pollinator-sharing plant species. In this study, I use surveys of floral visitor communities across the geographic range of Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana (hereafter C. x. xantiana) (Onagraceae) to examine the structure of visitor communities, the specificity of the pollination system, and the role of variation in the abiotic vs. biotic environment in contributing to spatial variation in pollinator abundance and community composition. Although the assemblage of bee visitors to C. x. xantiana is very diverse (49 species), few were regular visitors and likely to act as pollinators. Seventy-four percent of visitor species accounted for only 11% of total visitor abundance and 69% were collected in three or fewer plant populations (of ten). Of the few reliable visitors, Clarkia pollen specialist bees were the most frequent visitors, carried more Clarkia pollen compared to generalist foragers, and were less likely to harbor foreign pollen. Overall, the core group of pollinators was obscured by high numbers of incidental visitors that are unlikely to contribute to pollination. In a geographic context, the composition of specialist pollinator assemblages varied considerably along the abiotic gradient spanning the subspecies’ range. However, the overall abundance of specialist pollinators in plant populations was not influenced by the broad-scale abiotic gradient but strongly affected by local plant community associations. C. x. xantiana populations sympatric with pollinator-sharing congeners were visited twice as often by specialists compared to populations occurring alone. These positive indirect interactions among plant species may promote population persistence and species coexistence by enhancing individual reproductive success.

Keywords

Pollination Facilitation Positive interactions Geographic variation Specialization 

Supplementary material

442_2004_1693_ESM.pdf (145 kb)
(PDF 146 KB)

References

  1. Barthell JF, Knops JMH (1997) Visitation of evening primrose by carpenter bees: evidence of a “mixed” pollination syndrome. Southwest Nat 42:86–93Google Scholar
  2. Barrett SC, Morgan MT, Husband BC (1989) The dissolution of a complex genetic polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 43:1398–1416Google Scholar
  3. Bell G (2000) The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. Am Nat 155:606–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burdick DJ, Torchio PF (1959) Notes on the biology of Hesperapis regularis (Cresson). J Kans Entomol Soc 32:83–87Google Scholar
  5. Callaway RM, et al. (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cane JH, Payne JA (1993) Regional, annual, and seasonal variation in pollinator guilds: intrinsic traits of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) underlie their patterns of abundance at Vaccinium ashei (Ericaceae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 86:577–588Google Scholar
  7. Colwell RK (1997) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5. In. User’s guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates
  8. Crepet WL (1984) Advanced (constant) insect pollination mechanisms: pattern of evolution and implications vis-à-vis angiosperm diversity. Ann Mo Bot Gard 71:607–630Google Scholar
  9. Eckhart VM (1992) Spatio-temporal variation in abundance and variation in foraging behavior of the pollinators of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Oikos 64:573–586Google Scholar
  10. Eckhart VM, Geber MA (1999) Character variation and geographic distribution of Clarkia xantiana A. Gray (Onagraceae): flowers and phenology distinguish two subspecies. Madroño 46:117–125Google Scholar
  11. Eriksson O, Bremer B (1992) Pollination systems, dispersal modes, life forms and diversification rates in angiosperm families. Evolution 46:258–266Google Scholar
  12. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Fausto JA, Eckhart VM, Geber MA (2001) Reproductive assurance and the evolutionary ecology of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 88:1794–1800Google Scholar
  14. Fenster CB, Dudash MR (2001) Spatiotemporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica. Ecology 82:844–851Google Scholar
  15. Fishbein M, Venable DL (1996) Diversity and temporal change in the effective pollinators of Asclepias tuberosa. Ecology 77:1061–1073Google Scholar
  16. Galen C (1996) The evolution of floral form: insights from an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 65–87Google Scholar
  17. Gathmann A, Tscharntke T (2002) Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 71:757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert LE (1975) Coevolution of animals and plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex.Google Scholar
  19. Gómez JM, Zamora R (1999) Generalization vs. specialization in the pollination system of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Ecology 80:796–805Google Scholar
  20. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant V (1949) Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms. Evolution 3:82–97Google Scholar
  22. Hamback PA, Ågren J, Ericson L (2000) Associational resistance: insect damage to purple loostrife reduced in thickets of sweet gale. Ecology 81:1784–1794Google Scholar
  23. Hay ME (1986) Associational plant defenses and the maintenance of species diversity: turning competitors into accomplices. Am Nat 128:617–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herrera CM (1987) Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79–90Google Scholar
  25. Herrera CM (1988) Variation in mutualisms: the spatiotemporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol J Linn Soc 35:95–125Google Scholar
  26. Herrera CM (1996) Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil’s advocate approach. In: Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG (eds) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 65–87Google Scholar
  27. Horvitz CC, Schemske DW (1990) Spatiotemporal variation in insect mutualists of a neotropical herb. Ecology 71:1085–1097Google Scholar
  28. Johnson SD (1997) Pollination ecotypes of Satyrium hallackii. Bot J Linn Soc 123:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson SD, Peter CI, Nilsson LA, Agren J (2003) Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology 84:2919–2927Google Scholar
  30. Jordano P (1987) Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence, and coevolution. Am Nat 129:657–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kato M, Takimura A, Kawakita A (2003) An obligate pollination mutualism and reciprocal diversification in the tree genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:5264–5267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kay KM, Schemske DW (2003) Pollinator assemblages and visitation rates for 11 species of neotropical Costus (Costaceae). Biotropica 35:198–207Google Scholar
  33. Lewis H, Lewis ME (1955) The Genus Clarkia. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
  34. MacSwain JW, Raven PH, Thorp RW (1973) Comparative behavior of bees and Onagraceae. IV. Clarkia bees of the western United States. U Calif Publ Entomol 70:1–80Google Scholar
  35. Magurran AE, Henderson PA (2003) Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature 422:714–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Manning JC, Goldblatt P (1997) The Moegistorhynchus longirostris (Diptera: Nemestrinidae) pollination guild: long-tubed flowers and a specialized long-proboscid fly pollination system in southern Africa. Plant Syst Evol 206:51–69Google Scholar
  37. Mayfield MM, Waser NM, Price MV (2001) Exploring the ‘“most effective pollinator principle” with complex flowers: bumblebees and Ipomopsis aggregata. Ann Bot 88:591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Memmott J (1999) The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. Ecol Lett 2:276–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller RB (1981) Hawkmoths and the geographic pattern of floral variation in Aquilegia caerulea. Evolution 35:763–774Google Scholar
  40. Minckley RL, Cane JH, Kervin L, Roulston TH (1999) Spatial predictability and resource specialization of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) at a superabundant, widespread resource. Biol J Linn Soc 67:119–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moeller DA (2003) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of spatial variation in plant-pollinator interactions. PhD dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  42. Moeller DA (in press) Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology Google Scholar
  43. Momose K, et al. (1998) Pollination biology in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Sarawak, Malaysia. I. Characteristics of the plant-pollinator community in a lowland dipterocarp forest. Am J Bot 85:1477–1501Google Scholar
  44. Moog U, Fiala B, Federle W, Maschwitz U (2002) Thrips pollination of the dioecious ant plant Macaranga hullettii (Euphorbiaceae) in Southeast Asia. Am J Bot 89:50–59Google Scholar
  45. Moore DM, Lewis H (1965) The evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana. Evolution 19:104–114Google Scholar
  46. Norton RB (1966) Testing of plum pollen viability with tetrazolium salts. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 89:132–134Google Scholar
  47. Olesen JM, Jordano P (2002) Geographic patterns in plant-pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology 83:2416–2424Google Scholar
  48. Olsen KM (1997) Pollination effectiveness and pollinator importance in a population of Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). Oecologia 109:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Primack RB, Silander JA (1975) Measuring relative importance of different pollinators to plants. Nature 255:143–144Google Scholar
  50. Robertson JL, Wyatt R (1990) Evidence for pollination ecotypes in the yellow-fringed orchid, Platanthera ciliaris. Evolution 44:121–133Google Scholar
  51. Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleraceae). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124Google Scholar
  52. Schemske DW, Bradshaw HD (1999) Pollinator preference and evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:11910–11915CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Shmida A, Ellner S (1984) Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58:29–55Google Scholar
  54. Stage GI (1966) Biology and systematics of the American species of the genus Hesperapis Cockerell. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
  55. Stebbins GL (1970) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. 1. Pollination mechanisms. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:307–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steffan-Dewenter I, Munzenberg U, Burger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432Google Scholar
  57. Steiner KE, Whitehead VB (1996) The consequences of specialization for pollination in a rare South African shrub, Ixianthes retzioides (Scrophulariaceae). Plant Syst Evol 201:131–138Google Scholar
  58. Tepedino VJ, Sipes SD, Griswold TL (1999) The reproductive biology and effective pollinators of the endangered beardtongue Penstemon penlandii (Scrophulariaceae). Plant Syst Evol 219:39–54Google Scholar
  59. Thorp RW, Leong JM (1996) Specialist bee pollinators of showy vernal pool flowers. In: Witham CW, Bauder ET, Belk WR, Ferren WR Jr, Ornduff R (eds) Ecology, conservation, and management of vernal pool ecosystems. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, Calif., pp 169–179Google Scholar
  60. Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations