Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating predation pressure on green treefrog larvae across a habitat gradient

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of a predator on the abundance of a prey species depends upon the predator’s abundance and its ability to capture that prey. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the community structure of predators of green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) tadpoles across habitat types and evaluate the effectiveness of individual predators on H. cinerea tadpoles. Correspondence and cluster analyses of predator frequencies across 23 aquatic habitats indicated that the majority of variance in predator communities was due to a division between permanent and temporary habitats. Experimental work demonstrated that survival of the smallest H. cinerea tadpoles was significantly lower than survival of medium and large tadpoles with the most effective predators, indicating that H. cinerea tadpoles attain a refuge from predation at larger body sizes. We combined the effectiveness of predators in experiments with the abundance of each predator species from the predator community survey to demonstrate that predation pressure on H. cinerea tadpoles is higher in temporary ponds. This pattern may explain in part why this species generally breeds successfully only in permanent habitats. It also confirms that discussions about an increasing gradient of predation pressure from temporary to permanent aquatic habitats should be restricted to individual prey species for which such a gradient has been demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a–f
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bleckmann H, Lotz T (1987) The vertebrate-catching behaviour of the fishing spider Dolomedestriton (Aranae, Pisauridae). Anim Behav 35:641–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Blouin MS (1990) Evolution of palatability differences between closely-related treefrogs. J Herpetol 24:309–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED Jr, Formanowicz DR (1987) Antipredator mechanisms of larval anurans: protection of palatable individuals. Herpetologica 43:369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Chick JH, Jordan F, Smith JP, McIvor CC (1992) A comparison of four enclosure traps and methods used to sample fishes in aquatic macrophytes. J Freshwater Ecol 7:353–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin JT, Travis J (1986) Size-limited predation on larval Rana aerolata (Anura: Ranidae) by two species of backswimmers (Insecta: Heteroptera: Notonectidae). Herpetologica 42:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Formanowicz DR, Brodie ED Jr (1982) Relative palatabilities of members of a larval amphibian community. Copeia 1982:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton JS, Brandon RA (1975) Reproductive ecology of the green treefrog Hyla cinerea in Southern Illinois (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetologica 31:150–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidinger RC (1975) Life history and biology of the largemouth bass. In: Clepper H (ed) Black bass biology and management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, pp 11–20

  • Jordan F, Coyne S, Trexler JC (1997) Sampling fishes in vegetated habitats: effects of habitat structure and sampling characteristics of the 1-m2 throw trap. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:1012–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats LB, Petranka JW, Sih A (1988) Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska MS, Wootton JT (1994) Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength. Ecology 79:461–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre P (1998) Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modeling, 20. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  • Leips J, Travis J (1999) The comparative expression of life-history traits and its relationship to the numerical dynamics of four populations of least killifish. J Anim Ecol 68:595–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leips J, McManus MG, Travis J (2000) Response of treefrog larvae to drying ponds: comparing temporary and permanent pond breeders. Ecology 81:2997–3008

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1990) Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71:83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1997) Measuring phenotypic selection on an adaptation: lamellae of damselflies experiencing dragonfly predation. Evolution 51:459–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ (1983) Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol Monogr 53:119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ (1995) Functional redundancy, non-additive interactions, and supply-side dynamics in experimental pond communities. Ecology 76:133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount RH (1975) The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn, Auburn

  • Paine RT (1974) Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15:93–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2002) Local population differences in phenotypic plasticity: predator-induced changes in wood frog tadpoles. Ecol Monogr 72:77–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Resetarits WJ Jr, Wilbur HM (1991) Calling site choice by Hyla chrysoscelis: effect of predators, competitors, and oviposition sites. Ecology 72:778–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1984) Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225:519–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis J, Keen WH, Juilianna J (1985) The role of relative body size in a predator–prey relationship between dragonfly naiads and larval anurans. Oikos 45:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AM, Trexler JC (1997) Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: evaluating the options. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:694–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (1999) Plasticity and selection explain variation in tadpole phenotype between ponds with different predator composition. Oikos 85:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, McPeek MA (1994) Direct and indirect effects of predators on two anuran species across an environmental gradient. Ecology 75:1368–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1997) Experimental ecology of food webs: complex systems in temporary ponds. Ecology 78:2279–2302

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward BD (1983) Predator–prey interactions and breeding-pond use of temporary pond species in a desert anuran community. Ecology 64:1549–1555

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright AH (1932) Life-histories of the frogs of Okefinokee Swamp, Georgia. Comstock, Cornell University Press, Ithaca

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Aresco, R. Fuller, B. Hale, B. Storz, and members of the 2001 FSU Advanced Field Biology class for assistance during the field censuses. J. Gunzburger, E. Gunzburger, and M. Aresco assisted with experiments at the greenhouse. We thank E. Walters, P. Richards, T. Miller, and F. James for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Experiments and field sampling were conducted under FSU ACUC Protocol # 0115. We acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation through grant DEB 99–03925 to J.T.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret S. Gunzburger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gunzburger, M.S., Travis, J. Evaluating predation pressure on green treefrog larvae across a habitat gradient. Oecologia 140, 422–429 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1610-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1610-7

Keywords

Navigation