, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 422–429 | Cite as

Evaluating predation pressure on green treefrog larvae across a habitat gradient

Community Ecology


The effect of a predator on the abundance of a prey species depends upon the predator’s abundance and its ability to capture that prey. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the community structure of predators of green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) tadpoles across habitat types and evaluate the effectiveness of individual predators on H. cinerea tadpoles. Correspondence and cluster analyses of predator frequencies across 23 aquatic habitats indicated that the majority of variance in predator communities was due to a division between permanent and temporary habitats. Experimental work demonstrated that survival of the smallest H. cinerea tadpoles was significantly lower than survival of medium and large tadpoles with the most effective predators, indicating that H. cinerea tadpoles attain a refuge from predation at larger body sizes. We combined the effectiveness of predators in experiments with the abundance of each predator species from the predator community survey to demonstrate that predation pressure on H. cinerea tadpoles is higher in temporary ponds. This pattern may explain in part why this species generally breeds successfully only in permanent habitats. It also confirms that discussions about an increasing gradient of predation pressure from temporary to permanent aquatic habitats should be restricted to individual prey species for which such a gradient has been demonstrated.


Community structure Habitat gradient Hyla cinerea Predation Predator–prey interactions 


  1. Bleckmann H, Lotz T (1987) The vertebrate-catching behaviour of the fishing spider Dolomedestriton (Aranae, Pisauridae). Anim Behav 35:641–651Google Scholar
  2. Blouin MS (1990) Evolution of palatability differences between closely-related treefrogs. J Herpetol 24:309–311Google Scholar
  3. Brodie ED Jr, Formanowicz DR (1987) Antipredator mechanisms of larval anurans: protection of palatable individuals. Herpetologica 43:369–373Google Scholar
  4. Chick JH, Jordan F, Smith JP, McIvor CC (1992) A comparison of four enclosure traps and methods used to sample fishes in aquatic macrophytes. J Freshwater Ecol 7:353–361Google Scholar
  5. Cronin JT, Travis J (1986) Size-limited predation on larval Rana aerolata (Anura: Ranidae) by two species of backswimmers (Insecta: Heteroptera: Notonectidae). Herpetologica 42:171–174Google Scholar
  6. Formanowicz DR, Brodie ED Jr (1982) Relative palatabilities of members of a larval amphibian community. Copeia 1982:91–97Google Scholar
  7. Garton JS, Brandon RA (1975) Reproductive ecology of the green treefrog Hyla cinerea in Southern Illinois (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetologica 31:150–161Google Scholar
  8. Heidinger RC (1975) Life history and biology of the largemouth bass. In: Clepper H (ed) Black bass biology and management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, pp 11–20Google Scholar
  9. Jordan F, Coyne S, Trexler JC (1997) Sampling fishes in vegetated habitats: effects of habitat structure and sampling characteristics of the 1-m2 throw trap. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:1012–1020Google Scholar
  10. Kats LB, Petranka JW, Sih A (1988) Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870Google Scholar
  11. Laska MS, Wootton JT (1994) Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength. Ecology 79:461–476Google Scholar
  12. Legendre P, Legendre P (1998) Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modeling, 20. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  13. Leips J, Travis J (1999) The comparative expression of life-history traits and its relationship to the numerical dynamics of four populations of least killifish. J Anim Ecol 68:595–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leips J, McManus MG, Travis J (2000) Response of treefrog larvae to drying ponds: comparing temporary and permanent pond breeders. Ecology 81:2997–3008Google Scholar
  15. McPeek MA (1990) Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71:83–98Google Scholar
  16. McPeek MA (1997) Measuring phenotypic selection on an adaptation: lamellae of damselflies experiencing dragonfly predation. Evolution 51:459–466Google Scholar
  17. Morin PJ (1983) Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol Monogr 53:119–138Google Scholar
  18. Morin PJ (1995) Functional redundancy, non-additive interactions, and supply-side dynamics in experimental pond communities. Ecology 76:133–149Google Scholar
  19. Mount RH (1975) The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn, AuburnGoogle Scholar
  20. Paine RT (1974) Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15:93–120Google Scholar
  21. Relyea RA (2002) Local population differences in phenotypic plasticity: predator-induced changes in wood frog tadpoles. Ecol Monogr 72:77–93Google Scholar
  22. Resetarits WJ Jr, Wilbur HM (1991) Calling site choice by Hyla chrysoscelis: effect of predators, competitors, and oviposition sites. Ecology 72:778–786Google Scholar
  23. Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1984) Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225:519–521Google Scholar
  24. Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Travis J, Keen WH, Juilianna J (1985) The role of relative body size in a predator–prey relationship between dragonfly naiads and larval anurans. Oikos 45:59–65Google Scholar
  26. Turner AM, Trexler JC (1997) Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: evaluating the options. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:694–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (1999) Plasticity and selection explain variation in tadpole phenotype between ponds with different predator composition. Oikos 85:31–39Google Scholar
  28. Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Werner EE, McPeek MA (1994) Direct and indirect effects of predators on two anuran species across an environmental gradient. Ecology 75:1368–1382Google Scholar
  30. Wilbur HM (1997) Experimental ecology of food webs: complex systems in temporary ponds. Ecology 78:2279–2302Google Scholar
  31. Woodward BD (1983) Predator–prey interactions and breeding-pond use of temporary pond species in a desert anuran community. Ecology 64:1549–1555Google Scholar
  32. Wright AH (1932) Life-histories of the frogs of Okefinokee Swamp, Georgia. Comstock, Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations