, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 523–532 | Cite as

What limits the Serengeti zebra population?

  • Sophie Grange
  • Patrick Duncan
  • Jean-Michel Gaillard
  • Anthony R. E. Sinclair
  • Peter J. P. Gogan
  • Craig Packer
  • Heribert Hofer
  • Marion East
Population Ecology


The populations of the ecologically dominant ungulates in the Serengeti ecosystem (zebra, wildebeest and buffalo) have shown markedly different trends since the 1960s: the two ruminants both irrupted after the elimination of rinderpest in 1960, while the zebras have remained stable. The ruminants are resource limited (though parts of the buffalo population have been limited by poaching since the 1980s). The zebras’ resource acquisition tactics should allow them to outcompete the ruminants, but their greater spatial dispersion makes them more available to predators, and it has been suggested that this population is limited by predation. To investigate the mechanisms involved in the population dynamics of Serengeti zebra, we compared population dynamics among the three species using demographic models based on age-class-specific survival and fecundity. The only major difference between zebra and the two ruminants occurred in the first-year survival. We show that wildebeest have a higher reproductive potential than zebra (younger age at first breeding and shorter generation time). Nevertheless, these differences in reproduction cannot account for the observed differences in the population trends between the zebra and the ruminants. On the other hand, among-species differences in first-year survival are great enough to account for the constancy of zebra population size. We conclude that the very low first-year survival of zebra limits this population. We provide new data on predation in the Serengeti and show that, as in other ecosystems, predation rates on zebras are high, so predation could hold the population in a “predator pit”. However, lion and hyena feed principally on adult zebras, and further work is required to discover the process involved in the high mortality of foals.


Coexistence African ungulates Equids Bovids Population dynamics 


  1. Bauer H (2003) Lion conservation in West and Central Africa: integrating social and natural science for wildlife conflict resolution around Waza National Park, Cameroon. PhD thesis, Leiden University, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell RHV (1970) The use of the herd layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. Animal populations in relation to their food resources. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger J (1986) Wild horses of the Great Basin. Social competition and population size. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  4. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models. Construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper SM (1990) The hunting behaviour of spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta) in a region containing both sedentary and migratory populations of herbivores. Afr J Ecol 28:131–141Google Scholar
  6. Cumming DHM (1982) The influence of large herbivores on savanna structure in Africa. In: Huntley BJ, Walker BH (eds) Ecology of tropical savannas. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 217–244Google Scholar
  7. De Boer W, Prins H (1990) Large herbivores that strive mightily but eat and drink as friends. Oecologia 82:264–274Google Scholar
  8. Dublin HT, Sinclair ARE, Boutin S, Anderson E, Jago M, Arcese P (1990) Does competition regulate ungulate populations? Further evidence from Serengeti, Tanzania. Oecologia 82:283–288Google Scholar
  9. Duncan P, Foose TJ, Gordon I, Gakahu CG, Lloyd M (1990) Comparative nutrient extraction from forages by grazing bovids and equids: a test of the nutritional model of equid/bovid competition and coexistence. Oecologia 84:411–418Google Scholar
  10. Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Coté SD (2003) Variable age structure and apparent density-dependence in survival of adult ungulates. J Anim Ecol 72:640–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fryxell J, Greever J, Sinclair A (1988) Why are migratory ungulates so abundant? Am Nat 131:781–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (1998) Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol Evol 13:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gasaway WC, Gasaway KT, Berry HH (1996) Persistent low densities of plains ungulates in Etosha National Park, Namibia: testing the food-regulating hypothesis. Can J Zool 74:1556–1572Google Scholar
  15. Georgiadis N, Hack M, Turpin K (2003) The influence of rainfall on zebra population dynamics: implications for management. J Appl Ecol 40:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimsdell JJR (1973) Age determination of the African buffalo, Syncerus caffer Sparrman. East Afr Wildl J 11:31–54Google Scholar
  17. Gwynne MD, Bell RHV (1968) Selection of vegetation components by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti National Park. Nature 220:390–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobotkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 44:421–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen RM, Mugambi MM, Bauni SM (1985) Diets and trophic ranking of ungulates of the northern Serengeti. J Wildl Manage 49:823–829Google Scholar
  20. Hofer H, East M (1995) Population dynamics, population size, and the commuting system of Serengeti spotted hyenas. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese P (eds) Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., pp 332–363Google Scholar
  21. Hofer H, Campbell KLI, East ML, Huish SA (1996) The impact of game meat hunting on target and non-target species in the Serengeti. In: Taylor V, Dunstone N (eds) The exploitation of mammal populations. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 117–146Google Scholar
  22. Jolly GM (1969) The treatment of errors in aerial counts of wildlife populations. East Afr Agric For J 34:50–55Google Scholar
  23. Klingel H (1969a) The social organisation and population ecology of the plains zebra (Equus quagga). Zool Afr 4:249–263Google Scholar
  24. Klingel H (1969b) Reproduction in the plains zebra, Equus burchelli boehmi: behaviour and ecological factors. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 6:339–345Google Scholar
  25. Kruuk H (1972) The spotted hyena: a study of predation and social behaviour. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  26. Lebreton JD, Millier C (1982) Modèles dynamiques déterministes en biologie. Masson, Paris, p 208Google Scholar
  27. Legendre S, Clobert J (1995) ULM, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists. J Appl Stat 22:817–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leslie PH (1966) The intrinsic rate of increase and the overlap of successive generations in a population of guillemots (Uria Aalge Pont.). J Anim Ecol 35:291–301Google Scholar
  29. Loison A, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT, Jullien JM (1999) Age-specific survival in five populations of ungulates: evidence of senescence. Ecology 80:2539–2554Google Scholar
  30. Maddock L (1979) The “migration” and grazing succession. In: Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (eds) Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., pp 104–129Google Scholar
  31. Mduma SAR, Sinclair ARE, Hilborn R (1999) Food regulates the Serengeti wildebeest: a 40-year record. J Anim Ecol 68:1101–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ménard C, Duncan P, Fleurance G, Georges J-Y, Lila M (2002) Comparative foraging and nutrition of horses and cattle in European wetlands. J Appl Ecol 39:120–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mills MGL, Shenk TM (1992) Predator-prey relationships: the impact of lion predation on wildebeest and zebra populations. J Anim Ecol 61:693–702Google Scholar
  34. Mills MGL, Biggs HC, Whyte IJ (1995) The relationship between rainfall, lion predation and population trends in African herbivores. Wildl Res 22:75–88Google Scholar
  35. Moehlman PD (ed) (2002) Equids: zebras, asses and horses. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Equid Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, p 190Google Scholar
  36. Ogutu JO, Owen-Smith N (2003) ENSO, rainfall and temperature influences on extreme population declines among African savanna ungulates. Ecol Lett 6:412–419Google Scholar
  37. Pluhacek J, Bartos L (2000) Male infanticide in captive plains zebra, Equus burchelli. Anim Behav 59:689–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Prins HHT (1996) Behaviour and ecology of the African buffalo: social inequality and decision making. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Redfern JV, Grant R, Biggs H, Getz WM (2003) Surface-water constraints on herbivore foraging in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Ecology 84:2092–2107Google Scholar
  40. Schaller GB (1972) The Serengeti lion. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  41. Sinclair ARE (1974) The natural regulation of buffalo populations in East Africa. IV. The food supply as a regulating factor, and competition. East Afr Wildl J 12:291–311Google Scholar
  42. Sinclair ARE (1977) The African buffalo. A study of resource limitation of populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  43. Sinclair ARE (1985) Does interspecific competition or predation shape the African ungulate communities? J Anim Ecol 54:899–918Google Scholar
  44. Sinclair ARE (1997) Fertility control of mammal pests and the conservation of endangered marsupials. Reprod Fertil Dev 9:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sinclair ARE, Arcese P (1995) Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  46. Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (1979) Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  47. Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (1982) Does competition or facilitation regulate migrant ungulate populations in the Serengeti? A test of hypotheses. Oecologia 53:364–369Google Scholar
  48. Sinclair ARE, Dublin HT, Borner M (1985) Population regulation of Serengeti wildebeest: a test of the food hypothesis. Oecologia 65:266–268Google Scholar
  49. Sinclair ARE, Mduma SAR, Arcese P (2000) What determines phenology and synchrony of ungulate breeding in Serengeti? Ecology 81:2100–2111Google Scholar
  50. Smuts GL (1976) Reproduction in the zebra mare Equus burchelli antiquorum from the Kruger National Park. Kodoe 19:89–132Google Scholar
  51. Smuts GL (1978) Interrelations between predators, prey, and their environment. BioScience 28:316–320Google Scholar
  52. Spinage CA (1972) African ungulate life tables. Ecology 53:645–652Google Scholar
  53. Treisman M (1975) Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion. Anim Behav 23:779–800Google Scholar
  54. Van Wieren SE (1996) Digestive strategies in ruminants and non-ruminants. PhD thesis. Agricultural University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  55. Watson RM (1967) The population ecology of the Serengeti wildebeest. PhD thesis. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Watson RM (1969) Reproduction of wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus albojubatus Thomas, in the Serengeti region, and its significance to conservation. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 6:287–310Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Grange
    • 1
  • Patrick Duncan
    • 1
  • Jean-Michel Gaillard
    • 2
  • Anthony R. E. Sinclair
    • 3
  • Peter J. P. Gogan
    • 4
  • Craig Packer
    • 5
  • Heribert Hofer
    • 6
  • Marion East
    • 6
  1. 1.Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de ChizéCNRS UPR 1934Beauvoir-sur-NiortFrance
  2. 2.UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”Université Claude Bernard LYON1Villeurbanne CedexFrance
  3. 3.Centre for Biodiversity ResearchUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.USGS, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Forestry Sciences LaboratoryMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA
  5. 5.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  6. 6.Institute of Zoo & Wildlife ResearchBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations