Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal and sexual variation of leaf-produced pollinator-attracting odours in the dwarf palm

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 June 2004

Abstract

Information on intra-specific variation in pollinator-attracting floral traits provides clues to selective pressures imposed by pollinators. However, these traits also reflect constraints related to floral phenology or morphology. The specific weevil pollinator Derelomus chamaeropsis of the dioecious Mediterranean dwarf palm Chamaerops humilis is attracted by volatile compounds that leaves, and not flowers, release during anthesis. Production of these olfactory cues is thus probably not constrained by any other floral function. This provides the opportunity to study variation of a “floral” trait that is not produced by a floral organ. We studied volatile compounds emitted by leaves of 12 individual C. humilis over the whole flowering season. The quantity of volatile compounds emitted by leaves reached a maximum when plants required pollinator visits. The relationship between odour emission and floral phenology was slightly different between male and female plants, probably reflecting differences in the exact time at which females and males benefit from pollinator visitation. Male plants produced higher quantities of volatile compounds than females. Odour composition was highly variable among individuals but did not differ between male and female plants. In this system, female C. humilis are pollinated by deceit and pollinators should be selected to avoid visiting them. The absence of sexual difference in blend composition may thus prevent pollinators from discriminating between male and female plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams RP (1995) Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Allured, Carol Stream, Ill.

  • Ågren J, Elmqvist T, Tunlid A (1986) Pollination by deceit, floral sex ratios and seed set in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. Oecologia 70:332–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstett M-C (1999) An experimental study of the interaction between the dwarf palm (Chamaerops humilis) and its floral visitor Derelomus chamaeropsis throughout the life cycle of the weevil. Acta Oecol 20:551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JE (1997) Pollination by deceit in nutmeg (Myristica insipida); floral displays and beetle activity at male and female trees. Am J Bot 84:1266–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayasse M, Schiestl FP, Paulus HF, Lofstedt C, Hansson B, Ibarra F, Francke W (2000) Evolution of reproductive strategies in the sexually deceptive orchid Ophrys sphegodes: how does flower-specific variation of odor signals influence reproductive success? Evolution 54:1998–2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS (1980) Mimicry of male by female flowers and intrasexual competition for pollinators in Jacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith) Woodson (Caricaceae). Evolution 34:467–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström J, Bergström G (1989) Floral scents of Bartsia alpina (Scrophulariaceae): chemical composition and variation between individual plants. Nord J Bot 9:363–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlman J, Meyer-Gauen G, Croteau R (1998) Plant terpenoid synthases: molecular biology and phylogenetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4126–4133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:2480–2484

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delph LF, Galloway LF, Stanton ML (1996) Sexual dimorphism in flower size. Am Nat 148:299–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson HEM (1994) Floral volatiles in insect biology. In: Bernays EA (ed) Insect-plant interactions. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 47–81

  • Dobson HEM, Groth I, Bergström G (1996) Pollen advertisement: chemical contrasts between whole-flower and pollen odors. Am J Bot 83:877–885

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dufaÿ M, Anstett M-C, Hossaert-McKey M (2003) When leaves act like flowers: how dwarf palms attract their pollinators. Ecol Lett 6:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufaÿ M, Anstett M-C (2004) Cheating is not always punished: killer female plants and pollination by deceit in the dwarf palm Chamaerops humilis. J Evol Biol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukas R (1987) Foraging behavior of three bee species in a natural mimicry system: female flowers which mimic male flowers in Ecballium elaterium (Cucurbitaceae). Oecologia 74:256–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckart VM (1999) Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 123–148

  • Eckert CG, Manicacci D, Barrett SCH (1996) Frequency-dependent selection on morph ratios in tristylous Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). Heredity 77:581–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, Van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon, Oxford

  • Fry JD, Rausher MD (1997) Selection on a floral color polymorphism in the tall morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea): transmission success of the alleles through pollen. Evolution 51:66–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C (1999) Why do flowers vary ? Bioscience 49:631–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Kevan PG (1980) Scent and color, floral polymorphisms and pollination biology in Polemonium viscosum Nutt. Am Midl Nat 104:281–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigord LDB, Macnair MR, Smithson A (2001) Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soò. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6253–6255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouinguené S, Degen T, Turlings TCJ (2001) Variability in herbivore-induced odour emissions among maize cultivars and their wild ancestors (teosinte). Chemoecology 11:9-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Grison-Pigé L, Bessière JM, Turlings TCJ, Kjellberg F, Roy J, Hossaert-McKey M (2001) Limited intersex mimicry of floral odour in Ficus carica. Funct Ecol 15:551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groth I, Bergström G, Pellmyr O (1987) Floral fragances in Cimicifuga: chemical polymorphism and incipient speciation in Cimicifuga simplex. Biochem Syst Ecol 15:441–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heath RR, Manukian A (1994) An automated system for use in collecting volatile chemicals released from plants. J Chem Ecol 20:593–607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Steiner KE (2000) Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:140–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SG, Delph LF, Elderkin CL (1995) The effect of petal-size manipulation on pollen removal, seed set, and insect-visitor in Campanula americana. Oecologia 102:174–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen JT (2002) Variation in floral scent composition within and between populations of Geonoma macrostachys (Arecaceae) in the western Amazon. Am J Bot 89:1772–1778

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen JT, Tollsten L (1995) Floral scent in bat-pollinated plants: a case of convergent evolution. Bot J Linn Soc 119:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin RA, McDade LA, Raguso RA (2003) The systematic utility of vegetative fragrances in two genera of Nyctaginaceae. Syst Biol 52:334–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R, Shmida A (1993) The ecology of flower coulours and the natural colour vision of insect pollinators: the Israeli flora as a study case. Biol Rev 68:81–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Sorci G (1998) Insect preference for symmetrical artificial flowers. Oecologia 114:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Handel SN (1993) Pollinators discriminate among floral heights of a sexually deceptive orchid: implications for selection. Evolution 47:1681–1687

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr O, Thien LB (1986) Insect reproduction and floral fragrances: keys to the evolution of the angiosperms? Taxon 35:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JL, Wyatt R (1990) Evidence for pollination ecotypes in the yellow-fringed orchid, Platanthera ciliaris. Evolution 44:121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1999) Release 8.02. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

  • Schemske DW, Bradshaw HD (1999) Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11910–11915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiestl FP, Ayasse M (2001) Post-pollination emission of a repellent compound in a sexually deceptive orchid: a new mechanism for maximising reproductive success? Oecologia 126:531–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiestl FP, Ayasse M, Paulus HF, Erdmann D, Francke W (1997) Variation of floral scent emission and postpollination changes in individual flowers of Ophrys sphegodes subsp. sphegodes. J Chem Ecol 23:2881–2895

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver TN, Lingren PD, Marshall HF (1997) Nighttime variation in volatile content of flowers of the night blooming plant Gaura drummondii. J Chem Ecol 23:2673–2682

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam B, Rausher MD (2000) Balancing selection on a floral polymorphism. Evolution 54:691–695

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CF, Kuchenreuther MA, Drew A (2000) Floral dimorphism, pollination, and self-fertilization in gynodioecious Geranium richardsonii (Geraniaceae). Am J Bot 87:661–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF (1979) Sexual selection in plants. Am Nat 113:777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HJ, Stanton ML (1990) Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology 71:536–547

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Jean-Marie Bessière, who identified the chemical compounds. We thank Eric Crantor and Nasser Rouibi for their invaluable assistance in odour collections, and Michelle Beltran for help in the gas chromatography analysis. We thank Nadir Alvarez, Doyle McKey, Finn Kjellberg, John Thompson, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful reading of various versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathilde Dufaÿ.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1606-3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dufaÿ, M., Hossaert-McKey, M. & Anstett, MC. Temporal and sexual variation of leaf-produced pollinator-attracting odours in the dwarf palm. Oecologia 139, 392–398 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1538-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1538-y

Keywords

Navigation