Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does flower color variation matter in deception pollinated Psychilis monensis (Orchidaceae)?

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Negative frequency dependent selection (FDS) had been proposed as a mechanism for the maintenance of the high levels of variability in floral traits of rewardless plants. Thus far the evidence has been equivocal for discontinuous traits. We experimentally tested the FDS hypothesis for continuous variation in flower color of Psychilis monensis, a rewardless, epiphytic orchid of Mona Island, Puerto Rico. P. monensis flowers all year long with a peak in June and July. Plants are self-incompatible. Individual flowers last 9–15 days if unpollinated. Over a 9-month observation of an unmanipulated population, a high percentage of plants showed pollinarium removals (79%) and fruit initiation (63%), but the actual percentage of flowers visited was very low (12%) and final fruit set was as low as the lowest recorded for orchids (2.4%). In a FDS experiment using a Latin Square design, we manipulated flower color in three populations. Over 50% of the variation in either male or female reproductive success was explained by time and site with no significant effect of treatment except as part of a three-way interaction of time × site × treatment. Paired comparisons with the controls gave equivocal results for both male and female measures of reproductive success. Major community changes had occurred during the FDS experiment with flower activity falling dramatically and by the third run of the experiment, only P. monensis was in flower. Coincidentally, the numbers of effective visits increased with time, presumably as pollinators became less discriminating in search of new food resources. Thus, negative frequency dependent selection is either sporadic or non-existent. Reproductive success was statistically related to locality and date, which was reflected in the flowering phenology of the local communities. High natural levels of color variation may be more influenced by drift than selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman JD (1981) Pollination of Calypso bulbosa var. occidentalis (Orchidaceae): a food deception system. Madroño 28:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman JD (1986) Mechanisms and evolution of food-deceptive pollination systems in orchids. Lindleyana 1:108–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman JD (1989) Limitations to sexual reproduction and the evolution of deception pollination in Encyclia krugii (Orchidaceae). Syst Bot 14:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman JD, Galarza-Pérez M (1991) Patterns and maintenance of extraordinary variation in the Caribbean orchid, Tolumnia (Oncidium) variegata. Syst Bot 16:182–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman JD, Rodríguez-Robles JA, Meléndez EJ (1994) A meager nectar offering by an epiphytic orchid is better than nothing. Biotropica 26:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman JD, Meléndez-Ackerman EJ, Salguero-Faria J (1997) Variation in pollinator abundance and selection on fragrance phenotypes in an epiphytic orchid. Am J Bot 84:1383–1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragón S (2002) Variation and frequency dependent selection on flower color in Psychilis monensis (Orchidaceae). Master’s Thesis. University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, Puerto Rico

  • Brower JE, Zar JH, von Ende CN (1997) Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. 4th edn. WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts, pp 180–182

  • Chittka L, Menzel R (1992) The evolutionary adaptation of flower colours and the insect pollinators’ colour vision. J Comp Physiol 171:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Spaethe J, Schmidt A, Hickelsberger A (2001) Adaptation, constraint, and chance in the evolution of flower color and pollinator color vision. In: Chittka L Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 106–126

  • Cole FR, Firmage DH (1984) The floral ecology of Platanthera blephariglottis. Am J Bot 71:700–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Collias NE, Collias EC (1968) Anna’s hummingbird trained to select different colors in feeding. Condor 70:273–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper SC, Calder DM (1990) The floral biology of Thelymitra epipactoides (Orchidaceae), and the implications of pollination by deceit on the survival of this rare orchid. Plant Syst Evol 170:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A (1987) Pollination in Orchis and related genera: evolution from reward to deception. In: Arditti J (ed) Orchid biology: Rev Perspect 4:79–104

  • Dukas R, Real LA (1993) Learning constrains and floral choice behavior in bumble bees. Anim Behav 19:566–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1990) On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns. Biol J Linn Soc 41:315–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson BK, Clegg MT (1987) Frequency-dependent variation for outcrossing rate among flower-color morphs of Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 41:1302–1311

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel JJ, Whitmore JL (1973) The ecological life zones of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. U.S. Forest Service Research Paper ITF-18. Institute of Tropical Forestry, Puerto Rico

  • Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd edn. Pergamon, Oxford, England

  • Galen C (1989) Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43:882–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (2001) The effect of variation among floral traits on the flower constancy of pollinators. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 83–105

  • Gigord LDB, Macnair M, Smithson A (2001) Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhyza sambucina (L.) Soó. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6253–6255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1975) Bee flowers: a hypothesis on flower variety and blooming times. Evolution 29:325–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees. Oecologia 40:235–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG (1978) Floral coloration, its colorimetric analysis and significance in anthecology. In: Richards AJ (ed) The pollination of flowers by insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 51–78

  • Kunze J, Gumbert A (2001) The combined effect of color and odor on flower choice behavior of bumble bees in flower mimicry systems. Behav Ecol 12:447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meléndez-Ackerman EJ, Campbell DR (1998) Adaptive significance of flower color and inter-trait correlations in an Ipomopsi s hybrid zone. Evolution 52:1293–1303

    Google Scholar 

  • Meléndez-Ackerman EJ, Campbell DR, Waser NM (1997) Hummingbird behavior and mechanisms of selection on flower color in Ipomopsis. Ecology 78:2532–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1985) Learning in honey bees in an ecological and behavioral context. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology. Gustav Fisher, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 55–74

  • Mogford DJ (1978) Pollination and flower colour polymorphism, with special reference to Cirsium palustre. In: Richards AJ (ed) The pollination of flowers by insects. Academic Press, London, England, pp 191–199

  • Montalvo AM, Ackerman JD (1987) Limitations to fruit production in Ionopsis utriculariodes (Orchidaceae). Biotropica 19:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya S, Ackerman JD (1993) Variation in the floral fragrance of Epidendrum ciliare (Orchidaceae). Nord J Bot 13:41–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson LA (1980) The pollination ecology of Dactylorhiza sambucina (Orchidaceae). Bot Not 133:367–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson LA, Johnson L, Rason L, Randrianjohany E (1986) The pollination of Cymbidiella flabellata (Orchidaceae) in Madagascar: a system operated by sphecid wasps. Nord J Bot 6:411–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson LA, Rabakonandrianina E, Razananaivo R, Randriamanindry JJ (1992) Long pollinia on eyes: hawk-moth pollination of Cynorkis uniflora Lindley (Orchidaceae) in Madagascar. Bot J Linn Soc 109:145–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowright RC, Laverty TM (1984) The ecology and sociobiology of bumblebees. Annu Rev Entomol 29:175–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real LA (1990) Predator switching and the interpretation of animal choice behavior: the case for constrained optimisation. In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioral mechanisms of food selection. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–21

  • Sabat A, Ackerman JD (1996) Fruit set in a deceptive orchid: the effect of flowering phenology, display size, and local floral abundance. Am J Bot 83:1181–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Salguero-Faria JA, Ackerman JD (1999) A nectar reward: is more better? Biotropica 31:303–311

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS / JMP (2000) User’s Guide Version 4. SAS, Cary, N.C.

  • SAS / STAT (1990) User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th edn. SAS, Cary, N.C.

  • Smithson A (2001) Pollinator preference, frequency dependence, and floral evolution. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp 237–258

  • Smithson A, Macnair MR (1996) Frequency-dependent selection by pollinators: mechanisms and consequences with regard to behavior of bumblebees Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Evol Biol 9:715–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithson A, Macnair MR (1997a) Negative frequency-dependent selection by pollinators on artificial flowers without rewards. Evolution 51:715–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithson A, Macnair MR (1997b) Density-dependent and frequency-dependent selection by bumblebees Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biol J Linn Soc 60:401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Snow AA, Handel SN (1986) Floral evolution : attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232:1625–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1988) Bioestadística: principios y procedimientos. McGraw Hill Interamericana, Mexico, pp 219–220

  • Trejo-Torres JC, JD Ackerman (2002) Composition patterns of Caribbean limestone forests: are parsimony, classification and ordination analyses congruent? Biotropica 34:502–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay RL, JK Zimmerman, Lebrón L, Bayman P, Sastre I, Axelrod F, Alers-García J (1998) Host specificity and low reproductive success in the rare endemic Puerto Rican orchid Lepanthes caritensis. Biol Conserv 85:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Schaik CP, Terborgh JW, Wright SJ (1993) The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequences for primary consumers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1983) The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. In: Real L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 241–285

  • Waser NM, Chittka L (1998) Bedazzled by flowers. Nature 394:835–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1985) The effect of nectar guides on pollinator preference: experimental studies with montane herb. Oecologia 67:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiewandt TA (1979) La gran Iguana de Mona. Nat Hist 88:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ (1991) Seasonal drought and the phenology of understory shrubs in a tropical moist forest. Ecology 72:1643–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman JK, Aide TM (1989) Patterns of fruit production in a neotropical orchid: pollinators vs. resource limitation. Am J Bot 76:67–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Puerto Rico Department of Natural Resources and Environment for the transportation to and logistical support in Mona Island Reserve; C. Trejo, T. Otero, E. Lasso, A. Manrique and M. Morales for field assistance; and E. Meléndez-Ackerman, M. Aide, J. Zimmerman, C. Trejo and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Susan Aragón

    Present address: Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931–3360, USA

    Susan Aragón & James D. Ackerman

Authors
  1. Susan Aragón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James D. Ackerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Aragón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aragón, S., Ackerman, J.D. Does flower color variation matter in deception pollinated Psychilis monensis (Orchidaceae)?. Oecologia 138, 405–413 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1443-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1443-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation