Oecologia

, Volume 138, Issue 2, pp 175–183 | Cite as

Feeding level and individual metabolic rate affect δ13C and δ15N values in carp: implications for food web studies

  • Julia Gaye-Siessegger
  • Ulfert Focken
  • Stefan Muetzel
  • Hansjörg Abel
  • Klaus Becker
Stable Isotope Ecology

Abstract

Stable isotope analyses are often used to calculate relative contributions of multiple food sources in an animal’s diet. One prerequisite for a precise calculation is the determination of the diet-tissue fractionation factor. Isotopic ratios in animals are not only affected by the composition of the diet, but also by the amount of food consumed. Previous findings regarding the latter point are controversial. As stable isotope analyses have often been used to investigate aquatic food webs, an experiment with carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) was carried out to test the influence of the feeding level and individual metabolic rate on δ13C and δ15N values of the whole body. After an initial phase, 49 carp were assigned randomly to four groups and fed the same diet at different levels for 8 weeks. For 15 fish, the energy budget was determined by indirect calorimetry. Feed and individual fish were analysed for their proximate composition, gross energy content and δ13C and δ15N values. δ13C and δ15N values differed significantly at different feeding levels. While δ13C values of the lipids and δ15N values decreased with increasing feeding rate, δ13C values of the lipid-free matter showed a non-linear pattern. Data obtained from fish held in the respirometric system revealed a relationship between δ13C values and the percentage retention of metabolizable energy. Our results show that reconstructing the diets of fish from the isotopic ratios when the feeding level and individual metabolic rates are unknown would introduce an error into the data used for back-calculation of up to 1‰ for both δ13C and δ15N values and may have substantial effects on the results of calculated diets. As other workers have pointed out, the development and application of stable isotopes to nutritional ecology studies is a field in its infancy and gives rise to erroneous, misleading results without nutritional, physiological and ecological knowledge.

Keywords

Cyprinus carpio Feeding ecology Respirometry Stable isotopes Trophic shift 

References

  1. Anderson RK, Parker PL, Lawrence A (1987) A 13C/12C tracer study of the utilization of presented feed by a commercially important shrimp Penaeus vannamei in a pond growout system. J World Aquacult Soc 18(3):148–155Google Scholar
  2. Becker K, Eckhardt O, Struck J (1983) Untersuchungen zum Erhaltungsbedarf an UE von Spiegelkarpfen (Cyprinus carpio L.) bei unterschiedlichen Körpermassen. Z Tierphysiol Tierernaehr Futtermittelkd 50:11–12Google Scholar
  3. DeNiro MJ (1987) Stable isotopes and archaeology. Am Sci 75:182–191Google Scholar
  4. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1977) Mechanism of carbon isotope fractionation associated with lipid synthesis. Science 197:261–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1978) Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:495–506Google Scholar
  6. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1981) Influence of diet on the distribution of nitrogen isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 45:341–351Google Scholar
  7. Focken U (2001) Stable isotopes in animal ecology: the effect of ration size on the trophic shift of C and N isotopes between feed and carcass. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 37:199–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Focken U, Becker K (1993) Body composition of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). In: Braunbeck T, Hanke W, Segner H (eds) Fish: ecotoxicology and ecophysiology. VCH, Weinheim, pp 269–288Google Scholar
  9. Focken U, Becker K (1998) Metabolic fractionation of stable carbon isotopes: implications of different proximate compositions for studies of the aquatic food webs using δ13C data. Oecologia 115:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Focken U, Schiller M, Becker K (1994) A computer-controlled system for the continuous determination of metabolic rates of fish. In: Kestemont P, Muir J, Sevilla F, Willot P (eds) Measures of success: contributions presented at the International Conference Bordeaux Aquaculture 1994. CEMAGREF, Antony, pp 167–171Google Scholar
  11. Fry B, Sherr EB (1984) δ13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Contrib Mar Sci 27:13–47Google Scholar
  12. Gaye-Siessegger J, Focken U, Abel Hj, Becker K (2003) Feeding level and diet quality influence trophic shift of C and N isotopes in Nile tilapia [Oreochromis niloticus (L.)]. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 39:125–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorokhova E, Hansson S (1999) An experimental study on the variations in stable carbon and nitrogen isotope fractionation during growth of Mysis mixta and Neomysis integer. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2203–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrera LG, Gutierrez E, Hobson KA, Altube B, Díaz WG, Sánchez-Cordero V (2002) Sources of assimilated protein in five species of New World frugivorous bats. Oecologia 133:280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobson KA, Clark RG (1992) Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes. I.: factors influencing diet-tissue fractionation. Condor 94:189–197Google Scholar
  16. Hobson KA, Alisauskas RT, Clark RG (1993) Stable-nitrogen isotope enrichment in avian tissues due to fasting and nutritional stress: implications for isotopic analysis of diet. Condor 95:388–394Google Scholar
  17. Huisman EA (1976) Food conversion efficiencies at maintenance and production levels for carp, Cyprinus carpio L., and rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. Aquaculture 9:259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kang CK, Sauriau PG, Richard P, Blanchard GF (1999) Food sources of the infaunal suspension-feeding bivalve Cerastoderma edule in a muddy sandflat of Marennes-Oléron Bay, as determined by analyses of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 187:147–158Google Scholar
  19. Lochmann R, Phillips H (1996) Stable isotopic evaluation of the relative assimilation of natural and artificial foods by golden shiners Notemigonus crysoleucas in ponds. J World Aquacult Soc 27(2):168–177Google Scholar
  20. Magnusson WE, Carmozina de Araújo M, Cintra R, Lima AP, Martinelli LA, Sanaiotti TM, Vasconcelos HL, Victoria RL (1999) Contributions of C3 and C4 plants to higher trophic levels in an Amazonian savanna. Oecologia 119:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer-Burgdorff K, Müller C, Becker K, Günther KD (1989) Determination of energy metabolism in mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) at maintenance and different production levels. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 62:75–84Google Scholar
  22. National Research Council (1993) Nutrient requirements of fish. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  23. Naumann K, Bassler R (1983) Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Untersuchungsmethodik. III. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Neumann-Neudamm, MelsungenGoogle Scholar
  24. Oelbermann K, Scheu S (2002) Stable isotope enrichment (δ15N and δ13C) in a generalist predator (Pardosa lugubris, Araneae: Lycosidae): effects of prey quality. Oecologia130(3):337–344Google Scholar
  25. Phillips DL (2001) Mixing models in analyses of diet using multiple stable isotopes: a critique. Oecologia 127:166–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips DL, Koch PL (2002) Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models. Oecologia 130:114–125Google Scholar
  27. Robbins CT, Hilderbrand GV, Farley SD (2002) Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models: a response to Phillips and Koch (2002). Oecologia 133:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schroeder GL (1983) Stable isotope ratios as naturally occurring tracers in the aquaculture food web. Aquaculture 30:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vanderklift MA, Ponsard S (in press) Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis. OecologiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Webb SC, Hedges REM, Simpson SJ (1998) Diet quality influences the δ13C and δ15N of locusts and their biochemical components. J Exp Biol 201:2903–2911PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Gaye-Siessegger
    • 1
  • Ulfert Focken
    • 1
  • Stefan Muetzel
    • 1
  • Hansjörg Abel
    • 2
  • Klaus Becker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aquaculture Systems and Animal Nutrition in the Tropics and SubtropicsUniversity of Hohenheim (480b)StuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Animal Physiology and Animal NutritionGeorg August University GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations