Skip to main content
Log in

Genotypic variation in growth and resistance to insect herbivory in silver birch (Betula pendula) seedlings

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If herbivory is unevenly distributed among different types of plants, or if individual plants differ in their response to herbivory, herbivores may affect seedling growth and survival, and consequently plant population structure. In this study we examined variation in resistance to insect herbivory and in growth responses to feeding among 20 silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) genotypes representing variation within a natural population. Birch seedlings were grown in dense stands in random arrangement so that seedlings of different genotypes competed with each other. On insect exposure plots natural colonization of insects was allowed, and insect removal plots were sprayed with insecticide. Resistance to insect herbivory was measured as the inverse of leaf damage, and growth responses of seedlings to feeding were determined as the change in seedling height relative to the amount of damage. Resistance varied significantly among genotypes, but growth responses to feeding did not. In fertilized seedlings, resistance correlated negatively with height, indicating a trade-off between resistance and growth. The absence of such a correlation in non-fertilized seedlings is a sign of environmental effects on the cost of resistance. Growth responses to feeding did not correlate with either resistance or growth. Nevertheless, different effects of the actual damage on height increase changed the positions of the genotypes in the size hierarchy of the experimental populations. Thus, even moderate levels of insect herbivory can change the outcome of competitive interactions between birch genotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augner M, Tuomi J, Rousi M (1997) Effects of defoliation on competitive interactions in European white birch. Ecology 78:2369–2377

    Google Scholar 

  • Danell K, Huss-Danell K (1985) Feeding by insects and hares on birches earlier affected by moose browsing. Oikos 44:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineblum WL, Rausher MD (1995) Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377:517–520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz RS, Roche BM, Brunsfeld SJ (1998) Genetic variation in resistance of hybrid willows to herbivores. Oikos 83:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (1996) Herbivory, plant regeneration, and species coexistence. J Ecol 84:609–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong TJ de, van der Meijden E (2000) On the correlation between allocation to defence and regrowth in plants. Oikos 88:503–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnaird JW (1974) Effect of site conditions on the regeneration of birch (Betula pendula Roth and B. pubescens Ehrh.). J Ecol 62:467–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen J, Rousi M, Tahvanainen J (2002) Growth and hare, Lepus timidus, resistance of white birch, Betula pendula, clones grown in different soil types. Oikos 99:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen M-L, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Rousi M (2000) Variation in phenolic compounds within a birch (Betula pendula) population. J Chem Ecol 26:1609–1622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijden E van der, Wijn M, Verkaar HJ (1988) Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51:355–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutikainen P, Walls M (1995) Growth, reproduction and defence in nettles: responses to herbivory modified by competition and fertilization. Oecologia 104:487–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutikainen P, Walls M, Ovaska J, Keinänen M, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Vapaavuori E (2000) Herbivore resistance in Betula pendula: effect of fertilization, defoliation, and plant genotype. Ecology 81:49–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutikainen P, Walls M, Ovaska J, Keinänen M, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Vapaavuori E (2002) Costs of herbivore resistance in clonal saplings of Betula pendula. Oecologia 133:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilson D (2000) The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evol Ecol 14:457–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin C, Lechowicz MJ, Tardif S (1990) The statistical analysis of ecophysiological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measures. Ecology 71:1389–1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Price PW (1991) The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Purrington CB (2000) Costs of resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie ME, Olff H (1999) Herbivore diversity and plant dynamics: compensatory and additive effects. In: Olff H, Brown VK, Drent RH (eds) Herbivores: between plants and predators. Blackwell, Oxford, pp175–204

  • Rousi M, Tahvanainen J, Uotila I (1991) A mechanism of resistance to hare browsing in winter-dormant European white birch (Betula pendula). Am Nat 137:64–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousi M, Tahvanainen J, Henttonen H, Uotila I (1993) Effects of shading and fertilization on resistance of winter-dormant birch (Betula pendula) to voles and hares. Ecology 74:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousi M, Tahvanainen J, Henttonen H, Herms DA, Uotila I (1997) Clonal variation in susceptibility of white birches (Betula spp.) to mammalian and insect herbivores. For Sci 43:396–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J, Charlesworth D (2001) Introduction to plant population biology, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford

  • Stowe KA (1998) Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52:703–712

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe KA, Marquis RJ, Hochwender CG, Simms EL (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:565–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 17:278–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis AE, Hochberg ME (2000) The diverse effects of intraspecific competition on the selective advantage to resistance: a model and its predictions. Am Nat 156:276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Punkaharju Research Station of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, in particular to Matti Rousi and Hanni Sikanen, for facilities, advice and help. We thank Helena Hakkarainen, Risto-Matti Heinilä, Jussi Toivomäki, Merja Tiainen and Johanna Heimonen for assistance in the field, Jorma Tahvanainen for helpful comments on the manuscript and Joann von Weissenberg for checking the English language. This work was funded by the Academy of Finland (grant 68726).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaarina Prittinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prittinen, K., Pusenius, J., Koivunoro, K. et al. Genotypic variation in growth and resistance to insect herbivory in silver birch (Betula pendula) seedlings. Oecologia 137, 572–577 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1384-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1384-3

Keywords

Navigation