Skip to main content
Log in

Age variation in a fluctuating population of the common vole

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analysed variation in age in a fluctuating population of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in southern Moravia, Czech Republic, to test the assumption of the senescence hypothesis that the age of voles increases with increasing population density. Between 1996 and 1998, we monitored the demographic changes by snap-trapping and live-trapping in a field population passing through the increase, peak and decline phase of the population cycle. We used the eye lens mass method to determine the age of snap-trapped animals and those that died in live-traps. The average age of winter males was clearly higher after the peak phase breeding season than before it. No such phase-dependent shift in age, however, was observed in the female component. Male age continued to increase from autumn to spring over the pre-peak winter, and the highest age was in spring of the peak phase year. However, after the peak phase breeding season the highest age was achieved in winter, with the decline phase males during the next spring tending to be younger. The average age of females in spring populations was always lower than in winter populations. The average age of voles from live-traps was always higher than voles from snap-traps, particularly in winter and spring populations, suggesting the presence of senescent animals. Although the density-dependent changes in age are consistent with those observed for other voles, they provide only weak evidence that population cycles in the common vole are accompanied by pronounced shifts in individual age, particularly in female voles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamczewska-Andrzejewska KA (1981) Population structure of Microtus arvalis (Pall.) against the background of a community of rodents in crop fields. Pol Ecol Stud 7:193–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstedt B (1965) Distribution, reproduction, growth and dynamics of the rodent species Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber), Apodemus flavicollis (Melchior) and Apodemus sylvaticus (Linne) in southern Sweden. Oikos 16:132–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman AA (1999) Principles of population dynamics and their application. Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham

  • Boonstra R (1989) Life history variation in maturation in fluctuating meadow vole populations (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Oikos 54:265–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R (1994) Population cycles in microtinae: the senescence hypothesis. Evol Ecol 8:196–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryja J, Tkadlec E, Nesvadbová J, Geisler J, Zejda J (2001) Comparison of enumeration and Jolly-Seber estimation of population size in the common vole Microtus arvalis. Acta Theriol 46:279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

  • Butet A, Spitz F (2001) Cyclic fluctuations of microtine populations: half a century of research. Rev Ecol-Terre Vie 56:353–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley, London

  • Chitty D, Phipps E (1966) Seasonal changes in survival in mixed populations of two species of vole. J Anim Ecol 35:313–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergon T, Lambin X, Stenseth NC (2001) Life-history traits of voles in a fluctuating population respond to the immediate environment. Nature 411:1043–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank F (1957) The causality of microtine cycles in Germany. J Wildl Manage 21:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz J (1994) Why do some young voles stop growing? Pol Ecol Stud 20:335–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L (1983) Differences in age indicators between field and laboratory small rodent populations. Mammalia 47:371–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemola T, Korpimäki E, Koivula M (2002) Rate of population change in voles from different phases of the population cycle. Oikos 96:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshkina TV (1965) The population density and its importance in the number regulation of red vole (in Russian). Byull M O-va Isp Prirody, Otd Biol 70:5–19

  • Krebs CHJ (1996) Population cycles revisited. J Mammal 77:8–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CHJ, Boonstra R (1978) Demography of the spring decline in populations of the vole, Microtus townsendii. J Anim Ecol 47:1007–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin X, Yoccoz NG (2001) Adaptive precocial reproduction in voles: reproductive costs and multivoltine life-history strategies in seasonal environments. J Anim Ecol 70:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallory FF, Elliot JR, Brooks RJ (1981) Changes in body size of the collared lemming: age and photoperiod influences. Can J Zool 59:174–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet L (1966) Determination de l’age chez le campagnol des champs (M. arvalis, Pallas) par la pesse du cristallin. Mammalia 30:425–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (2002) Changes in population structure and reproduction during a 3-yr population cycle of voles. Oikos 96:331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oli MK, Dobson FS (2001) Population cycles in small mammals: the alpha-hypothesis. J Mammal 82:573–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama (1992) Analytical population dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Stenseth NCH (1999) Population cycles in voles and lemmings: density dependence and phase dependence in a stochastic world. Oikos 87:427–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Tkadlec E, Krejčová P (2001) Age-specific effect of parity on litter size in the common vole (Microtus arvalis). J Mammal 82:545–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Tkadlec E, Stenseth NC (2001) A new geographical gradient in vole population dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 268:1547–1552

    Google Scholar 

  • Tkadlec E, Zejda J (1998a) Small rodent population fluctuations: the effects of age structure and seasonality. Evol Ecol 12:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tkadlec E, Zejda J (1998b) Density-dependent life histories in female bank voles from fluctuating populations. J Anim Ecol 67:863–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1999) Population regulation: a synthetic view. Oikos 84:153–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Zejda J (1961) Age structure in populations of the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus Schreber 1780. Zool Listy 10:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Zejda J (1967) Mortality of a population of Clethrionomys glareolus Schreb. in a bottomland forest in 1964. Zool Listy 16:221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Zejda J (1992) The weight growth of the water vole (Arvicola terrestris) under natural condition. Zool Listy 41:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann K (1955) Körpergrösse und Bestandsdichte bei Feldmäusen (Microtus arvalis). Z Säugetierkunde 20:114–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jan Zejda for his perpetual and enthusiastic support and Dana Havelková for laboratory assistance. This research was financially supported by the grant GACR 524/96/1095.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emil Tkadlec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jánová, E., Heroldová, M., Nesvadbová, J. et al. Age variation in a fluctuating population of the common vole. Oecologia 137, 527–532 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1379-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1379-0

Keywords

Navigation