Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 137, Issue 2, pp 205–210 | Cite as

Defining core habitat of local populations of the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) based on choice of oviposition site

  • Jarrett R. JohnsonEmail author
  • Raymond D. Semlitsch
Population Ecology

Abstract

Concern over amphibian population declines and loss of terrestrial and aquatic habitat have emphasized the need to define habitat requirements for each stage in a species' life history. The realization that pond-breeding amphibians spend most of their lives in the terrestrial environment suggests the need to protect terrestrial as well as aquatic habitat. Many studies on amphibian populations have focused on emigration from breeding sites to define habitat use; however these studies do not typically elucidate terrestrial activities of adults within the breeding season. We measured colonization rates of artificial pools by gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor) at multiple distances from natural breeding ponds. We found a non-random distribution of egg deposition among distances, with 95% of eggs deposited within 15 m of the breeding pond. Additionally, we found that the time to first colonization of artificial pools increased with respect to distance. Our results indicate that adult gray treefrogs may travel up to 200 m within a breeding season, and that multiple breeding ponds may be considered part of a single population. We suggest that a minimum core terrestrial habitat of 60 m surrounding breeding sites is appropriate for protection of local populations of gray treefrogs.

Keywords

Amphibian Colonization Core Habitat Hyla Metapopulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank J. Crawford, G. Woloszyn, D. Johnson and T. Green for assistance in monitoring ponds and counting eggs. We also thank G. Woloszyn for assistance in filling wading pools, and C. Dillman for helping to transport and arrange the wading pools into transects. We thank J. Millspaugh for permission to access the field sites at the Baskett Wildlife Research Area. We also thank B. Rothermel, T. Green, J. Crawford and two anonymous reviewers for comments on early drafts of this manuscript. Funding for this research was provided by a grant from the U.S. Geological Survey (01CRAG0007) to R.D.S.

References

  1. Berven KA, Grudzien TA (1990) Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic structure. Evolution 44:2047–2056Google Scholar
  2. Breden F (1987) The effect of post-metamorphic dispersal on the population genetic structure of Fowler's toad Bufo woodhousei fowleri. Copeia 1987:386–395Google Scholar
  3. Dahl TE (1990) Wetlands: losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Fellers GM (1979) Mate selection in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Copeia 1979:286–290Google Scholar
  5. Freda J, Gonzalez RJ (1986) Daily movements of the treefrog, Hyla andersoni. J. Herpetol 20:469–471Google Scholar
  6. Gibbons JW, Bennett DH (1974) Determination of anuran terrestrial activity patterns by a drift fence method. Copeia 1974:236–243Google Scholar
  7. Gill DE (1978) The metapopulation ecology of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Ecol Monogr 48:145–166Google Scholar
  8. Godwin GJ, Roble SM (1983) Mating success in male treefrogs, Hyla chrysoscelis (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetologica 39:141–146Google Scholar
  9. Hanski I, Gilpin M (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc 42:3–16Google Scholar
  10. Harris RT (1975) Seasonal activity and microhabitat utilization in Hyla cadaverina (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetologica 31:236–239Google Scholar
  11. Houlahan JE, Findlay SC, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL (2000) Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404:752–755Google Scholar
  12. Jameson DL (1957) Population structure and homing responses in the Pacific treefrog. Copeia 1957:221–228Google Scholar
  13. Johnson TR (2000) The amphibians and reptiles of Missouri, 2nd edn. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Mo.Google Scholar
  14. Kramer DC. (1973) Movements of Western chorus frogs Pseudacris triseriata triseriata tagged with cobalt-60. J Herpetol 7:231–235Google Scholar
  15. Lee ET (1992) Statistical methods for survival data analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 104–130Google Scholar
  16. Levins R (1970) Extinction. In: Gerstenhaber M (ed) Some mathematical questions in biology. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., pp 77–107Google Scholar
  17. Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol 15:40–49Google Scholar
  18. Murphy CG (1994) Determinants of chorus tenure in barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Perrill SA (1984) Male mating behavior in Hyla regilla. Copeia 1984:727–732Google Scholar
  20. Perrill SA, Daniels RE (1983) Multiple egg clutches in Hyla regilla, H. cinerea, and H. gratiosa. Copeia 1983:513–516Google Scholar
  21. Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Resetarits MJ, Wilbur HM (1989) Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70:220–228Google Scholar
  23. Resetarits MJ, Wilbur HM (1991) Calling site choice by Hyla chrysoscelis: effect of predators, competitors, and oviposition sites. Ecology 72:778–786Google Scholar
  24. Ritke ME, Semlitsch RD (1991) Mating behavior and determinants of male mating success of the gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis). Can J Zool 69:246–250Google Scholar
  25. Ritke ME, Babb JG, Ritke MK (1990) Life history of the gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis in Western Tennessee USA. J Herpetol 24:135–141Google Scholar
  26. Ritke ME, Babb JG, Ritke MK (1991) Breeding-site specificity in the gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis). J Herpetol 25:123–125Google Scholar
  27. Semlitsch RD (1998) Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conserv Biol 12:1113–1119Google Scholar
  28. Semlitsch RD (2000) Principles for management of aquatic-breeding amphibians. J Wildl Manage 64:615–631Google Scholar
  29. Semlitsch RD (2002) Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conserv Biol 16:619–629Google Scholar
  30. Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (2003) Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv Biol, in pressGoogle Scholar
  31. Sinsch U (1992) Structure and dynamic of a natterjack toad metapopulation (Bufo calamita). Oecologia 90:489–499Google Scholar
  32. Sinsch U (1997) Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation. Oecologia 112:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sjogren P (1991) Genetic variation in relation to demography of peripheral pool frog populations Rana lessonae. Evol Ecol 5:248–271Google Scholar
  34. Sjogren-Gulve P (1994) Distribution and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog, Rana lessonae. Ecology 75:1357–1367Google Scholar
  35. Sullivan BK, Hinshaw SH (1992) Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor. Anim Behav 44:733–744Google Scholar
  36. Trenham PC (1998) Demography, migration and metapopulation structure of pond breeding salamanders. PhD dissertation, University of California, Davis, Calif.Google Scholar
  37. Trenham PC, Koenig WD, Shaffer BH (2001) Spatially autocorrelated demography and interpond dispersal in the salamander Ambystoma californiense. Ecology 82:3519–3530Google Scholar
  38. Wells KD (1976) Multiple egg clutches in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Herpetologica 32:85–87Google Scholar
  39. Wilbur HM (1980) Complex life cycles. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:67–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations