Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 137, Issue 1, pp 148–152 | Cite as

Carotenoid-based colour expression is determined early in nestling life

  • Patrick S. FitzeEmail author
  • Barbara Tschirren
  • Heinz Richner
Behavioural Ecology

Abstract

Carotenoid-based colours are widespread in animals and are used as signals in intra- and interspecific communication. In nestling birds, the carotenoids used for feather pigmentation may derive via three pathways: (1) via maternal transfer to egg yolk; (2) via paternal feeds early after hatching when females are mainly brooding; or (3) via feeds from both parents later in nestling life. We analysed the relative importance of the proposed carotenoid sources in a field experiment on great tit nestlings (Parus major). In a within-brood design we supplemented nestlings with carotenoids shortly after hatching, later on in the nestling life, or with a placebo. We show that the carotenoid-based colour expression of nestlings is modified maximally during the first 6 days after hatching. It reveals that the observed variation in carotenoid-based coloration is based only on mechanisms acting during a short period of time in early nestling life. The experiment further suggests that paternally derived carotenoids are the most important determinants of nestling plumage colour.

Keywords

Carotenoids Honest signalling Maternal effects Paternal effects Plumage coloration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel and Alfred Giger for kindly providing carotenoid and placebo beadlets, Kurt Bernhard for helpful advice, and Jean-Daniel Charrière and Peter Fluri for providing the bee larvae. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 31-53956.98 to H. Richner) and the Swiss Bundesamt für Bildung und Wissenschaft (grant BBW Nr. 01.0254 to P.S. Fitze). The experiment was conducted under a licence provided by the Ethical Committee of the Office of Agriculture of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland.

References

  1. Bakker TCM, Mundwiler B (1994) Female mate choice and male red coloration in a natural three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) population. Behav Ecol 5:74–80Google Scholar
  2. Beath K (2000) GLM Stat version 5.2.1. Available from http://members.ozemail.com.au/~kjbeath/glmstat.htmlGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendich A (1989) Carotenoids and the immune response. J Nutr 119:112–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendich A (1991) β-carotene and the immune response. Proc Nutr Soc 50:263–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Norris KJ (1994) Sexual selection and the mismeasure of color. Am Nat 144:848–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Betts MM (1955) The behaviour of a pair of great tits at the nest. Br Birds 48:77–82Google Scholar
  7. Blount JD, Houston DC, Møller AP (2000) Why egg yolk is yellow. Trends Ecol Evol 15:47–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brawner WR, Hill GE, Sundermann CA (2000) Effects of coccidial and mycoplasmal infections on carotenoid-based plumage pigmentation in male house finches. Auk 117:952–963Google Scholar
  9. Brush AH (1990) Metabolism of carotenoid pigments in birds. FASEB J 4:2969–2977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton GW (1989) Antioxidant action of carotenoids. J Nutr 119:109–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD, Church SC, Hart NS, Hunt S (2000) Ultraviolet vision in birds. Adv Stud Behav 29:159–214Google Scholar
  12. Dufva R, Allander K (1995) Intraspecific variation in plumage coloration reflects immune response in great tits (Parus major) males. Funct Ecol 9:785–789Google Scholar
  13. Fitze PS, Richner H (2002) Differential effects of a parasite on ornamental structures based on melanins and carotenoids. Behav Ecol 13:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitze PS, Koelliker M, Richner H (2003) Effects of common origin and common environment on nestling plumage coloration in the great tit (Parus major). Evolution 57:144–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Frischknecht M (1993) The breeding colouration of male three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) as an indicator of energy investment in vigour. Evol Ecol 7:439–450Google Scholar
  16. Gosler S (1993) The great tit. Hamlyn, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Götmark F, Hohlfalt A (1995) Bright male plumage and predation risk in passerine birds: are males easier to detect than females? Oikos 74:475–484Google Scholar
  18. Grether GF, Hudon J, Millie DF (1999) Carotenoid limitation of sexual coloration along an environmental gradient in guppies. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1317–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387Google Scholar
  20. Hill GE (1990) Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Anim Behav 40:563–572Google Scholar
  21. Hill GE (1991) Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350:337–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill GE (1992) Proximate basis of variation in carotenoid pigmentation in male house finches. Auk 109:1–12Google Scholar
  23. Hill GE (1994) Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch: a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav Ecol 5:64–73Google Scholar
  24. Hill GE, Brawner III WR (1998) Melanin-based plumage coloration in the house finch is unaffected by coccidial infection. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1105–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hōrak P, Vellau H, Ots 1, Moller AP (2000) Growth conditions affect carotenoid-based plumage coloration of great tit nestlings. Naturwissenschaften 87:460–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hōrak P, Ots I, Vellau H, Spottiswoode C, Møller AP (2001) Carotenoid-based plumage coloration reflects hemoparasite infection and local survival in breeding great tits. Oecologia 126:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kluijver HN (1950) Daily routines of the great tit, Parus m. major L. Ardea 38:99–135Google Scholar
  28. Kodric-Brown A (1989) Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an environmental component to female choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:393–401Google Scholar
  29. Linville SU, Breitwisch R, Schilling AJ (1998) Plumage brightness as an indicator of parental care in northern cardinals. Anim Behav 55:119–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mertens JAL (1977) Thermal conditions for successful breeding in great tits (Parus major L.). Oecologia 28:1-29Google Scholar
  31. Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice—and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344:330–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nys Y (2000) Dietary carotenoids and egg yolk coloration: a review. Arch Gefluegelkd 64:45–54Google Scholar
  33. Olson VA, Owens IPF (1998) Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol Evol 13:510–514Google Scholar
  34. Partali V, Liaaen-Jensen S, Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1987) Carotenoids in food chain studies II. The food chain of Parus spp. monitored by carotenoid analysis. Comp Biochem Physiol B 82B:767–772Google Scholar
  35. Royama T (1966) Factors governing feeding rate, food requirement and brood size of nestling great tits Parus major. Ibis 108:313–347Google Scholar
  36. Sall J, Lehman A (1996) JMP start statistics. Duxbury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Schantz T von, Bensch S, Grahn M, Hasselquist D, Wittzell H (1999) Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1-12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Senar JC, Figuerola J, Pascual J (2002) Brighter yellow blue tits make better parents. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:257–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Surai PF, Speake BK, Noble RC, Sparks NHC (1999) Tissue-specific antioxidant profiles and susceptibility to lipid peroxidation of the newly hatched chick. Biol Trace Elem Res 68:63–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines. Heraclio Fournier, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson CW, Hillgarth N, Leu M, McClure HE (1997) High parasite load in house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) is correlated with reduced expression of a sexually selected trait. Am Nat 149:270–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tschirren B, Fitze PS, Richner H (2003) Proximate mechanisms of variation in the carotenoid-based plumage coloration of nestling great tits (Parus major L.). J Evol Biol 16:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winkel W (1970) Hinweise zur Art- und Altersbestimmung von Nestlingen höhlenbrütender Vogelarten anhand ihrer Körperentwicklung. Vogelwelt 91:52–59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick S. Fitze
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Barbara Tschirren
    • 1
  • Heinz Richner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Zoology, Evolutionary Ecology DivisionUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Ecology LaboratoryUniversity Pierre & Marie Curie – CNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations